This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc
- From: Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>
- To: Rainer Orth <ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 17:11:15 -0400
- Subject: Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc
- References: <16133.30814.486754.373909@xayide.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 02:51:42PM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
> The current state of mainline gets increasingly annoying: it's almost
> impossible to get any work done when at any random time at least one of
> your platforms doesn't bootstrap at all, while more often than not most of
> them don't.
3.3 went out the door with some amazing problems; I'm just now discovering
them for myself. I submit that, at present, the following statement is
essentially true.
The sparc-sun-solaris2.* platform is not supported.
Proving this statement false would be wonderful. A number of people
have been tirelessly hunting down bugs (most recently, yourself and Eric
Botcazou). The expanding time required for a build-and-test cycle is
what's defeating us.
For unrelated reasons, I need to try and build an x86/linux to s-s-s cross
compiler. If it works, I might try doing that regularly, on hardware that
can finish a cycle in a reasonable amount of time.
> I spend more time tracking down the culprit patches than
Possibly the only thing that can help here are more autobuilders, running
in a tighter cycle (i.e., fewer number of patches between runs). Anybody
have spare Suns...?
Phil
--
If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater
than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace. We seek
not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you;
and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen. - Samuel Adams