This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: C++ demangler horrors
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- To: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>, Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>, Oscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo dot es>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 01 Jul 2003 12:28:40 -0300
- Subject: Re: C++ demangler horrors
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <20030627014931.GA30139@lucon.org> <y8zo3y0l.fsf@wanadoo.es><Pine.BSF.4.56.0306271411080.53800@naos.dbai.tuwien.ac.at><20030628013200.GA23878@lucon.org><m3isqqa6gi.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net><20030628145900.GA2791@lucon.org> <20030628152805.GA3496@lucon.org><or65mm4aw0.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><20030701142407.GA11967@lucon.org><orof0e2t86.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><20030701150829.GA12570@lucon.org>
On Jul 1, 2003, "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> wrote:
> The original problem is demangler depends on libstdc++ and on Cygwin
> libstdc++ may depend on libiberty.
winsup depends on libiberty and newlib, not libstdc++. libstdc++
depends on winsup. However, looking at the Makefile.tpl we have now,
I don't see this dependency; why is that? Am I getting it wrong?
> I still don't see why Cygwin library
> can't depend on both libstdc++
How can you link, or even configure, libstdc++ if you don't have a C
library yet?
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer