gcc archive
date index for July, 2003

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

July 31, 2003
23:41 Re: std::pow implementation Segher Boessenkool
23:41 Re: std::pow implementation Segher Boessenkool
23:37 [tree-ssa] [gfortran] bootstrap failure in exp_c8.c in Darwin Andrew Pinski
23:27 Re: different code behaviour with -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage Andrew Pinski
23:26 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Conn Clark
23:23 different code behaviour with -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage Lothar Werzinger
23:11 Questions about the ATTRS field of builtins.def Kaveh R. Ghazi
21:56 Re: Does C++ std::queue really conflict with C header 'struct queue'? Phil Edwards
21:51 Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: portable cdecl 'elliptic' function calls Camm Maguire
19:45 Re: GCC tm_gccmail
19:38 Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions Alexandre Oliva
18:45 Re: GCC Gerald Pfeifer
18:15 Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions Phil Edwards
17:24 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
17:05 Re: [tree-ssa] Java byte compiler status Martin Brain
17:02 Re: [tree-ssa] Java byte compiler status Steven Bosscher
17:01 Re: [tree-ssa] Java byte compiler status Diego Novillo
16:58 Re: [tree-ssa] Java byte compiler status Andrew Haley
16:41 Re: GCC cgd
16:09 Re: std::pow implementation Scott Robert Ladd
14:57 Re: GCC Steven Bosscher
14:53 Re: std::pow implementation Steven Bosscher
14:44 Clarification in the docs for possible bugs with the Alpha port Chris Devers
14:13 Re: tree-ssa internal compiler error Diego Novillo
14:08 Problems with -pg option Vishwas H.K
14:07 Re: tree-ssa internal compiler error Andrew Pinski
14:00 Re: [tree-ssa] Using -M to create dependency list Diego Novillo
13:58 Re: tree-ssa internal compiler error Diego Novillo
13:53 Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: portable cdecl 'elliptic' function calls Fergus Henderson
13:37 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
13:12 Re: std::pow implementation Scott Robert Ladd
13:00 Re: Loop optimizer issues Diego Novillo
12:41 Re: GCC Gerald Pfeifer
12:05 Re: definition of "implicit" inline? Gabriel Dos Reis
11:59 Re: definition of "implicit" inline? Gabriel Dos Reis
11:50 Re: definition of "implicit" inline? Robert Dewar
11:31 Re: definition of "implicit" inline? Gabriel Dos Reis
11:08 Re: definition of "implicit" inline? Robert Dewar
11:04 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
11:02 Re: definition of "implicit" inline? Gabriel Dos Reis
10:57 Re: std::pow implementation Robert Dewar
10:54 Re: definition of "implicit" inline? Robert Dewar
10:50 Re: std::pow implementation Robert Dewar
10:49 RE: std::pow implementation Rob Taylor
10:38 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
10:31 Re: definition of "implicit" inline? Gabriel Dos Reis
10:19 Re: definition of "implicit" inline? Robert Dewar
10:08 Re: GCC Robert Dewar
10:02 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
09:47 Re: definition of "implicit" inline? Andreas Schwab
09:33 Re: GCC Lars Segerlund
09:30 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
09:25 new FAILs on HEAD gcc
09:11 Re: std::pow implementation Martin Reinecke
08:37 Re: definition of "implicit" inline? Gabriel Dos Reis
08:14 definition of "implicit" inline? Martin Reinecke
07:58 Re: GCC Randy.Dunlap
07:20 new FAILs on HEAD gcc
06:49 Re: GCC Aaron Lehmann
06:42 GCC Steven Bosscher
04:42 Re: Understanding Multilibs ;-) Alexandre Oliva
04:04 Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions Alexandre Oliva
02:46 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
02:40 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
02:10 Re: Bay Area GCC hackers luncheon Zack Weinberg
00:30 Re: std::pow implementation Alexandre Oliva

July 30, 2003
23:31 RE: [Gcl-devel] Re: portable cdecl 'elliptic' function calls Mike Thomas
23:21 Re: Using multiple compilers Mike Stump
22:49 Using multiple compilers J.B. Brown
22:28 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
21:55 Re: portable cdecl 'elliptic' function calls Camm Maguire
21:51 Re: std::pow implementation Alexandre Oliva
21:49 Re: std::pow implementation Richard B. Kreckel
21:32 Re: Does C++ std::queue really conflict with C header 'struct queue'? Nathanael Nerode
20:36 Mainline bootstrap failure on IRIX 6 O32 with GNU as Rainer Orth
20:14 Re: std::pow implementation Robert Dewar
20:08 Re: std::pow implementation Robert Dewar
20:07 Re: #import, #pragma once yadda yadda mumble grumble Neil Booth
20:06 Re: [GCC] Status of Chill-frontend and Pascal Trevor Jenkins
20:05 Re: std::pow implementation Robert Dewar
19:58 Re: [tree-ssa]: Constant propagation into PHI's screws up IVR and PRE Pop Sébastian
19:57 Re: Status of Chill-frontend and Pascal Nathanael Nerode
19:54 Re: Does C++ std::queue really conflict with C header 'struct queue'? Phil Edwards
19:31 Status of GCC 3 on IRIX 5.3 Rainer Orth
19:24 Re: Status of Chill-frontend and Pascal Andreas Jaeger
19:21 Re: Status of Chill-frontend and Pascal Zack Weinberg
19:17 Status of Chill-frontend and Pascal Andreas Meier
19:12 Re: incorrect __vxworks__ usage in longlong.h (3.3) was ok in 3.2.3 Zack Weinberg
19:08 Re: upcast-downcast Martin Brain
18:56 RE: incorrect __vxworks__ usage in longlong.h (3.3) was ok in 3.2.3 Ken Faiczak
18:42 Re: std::pow implementation tm_gccmail
18:34 Re: [tree-ssa]: Constant propagation into PHI's screws up IVR and PRE Daniel Berlin
18:22 Re: std::pow implementation Felix Lee
18:20 Re: [tree-ssa]: Constant propagation into PHI's screws up IVR and PRE Pop Sébastian
18:06 Re: std::pow implementation Daniel Berlin
17:46 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
17:42 Re: incorrect __vxworks__ usage in longlong.h (3.3) was ok in 3.2.3 David Edelsohn
17:41 upcast-downcast Fabio Salvucci
17:38 Re: GCC testsuite differences with and without gas on IRIX 6 Eric Christopher
17:35 Re: std::pow implementation Daniel Berlin
17:32 Re: gcc do not consider the head file change when compiling??? Zack Weinberg
17:32 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
17:26 Re: incorrect __vxworks__ usage in longlong.h (3.3) was ok in 3.2.3 Zack Weinberg
17:24 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Earnshaw
17:22 Re: GCC testsuite differences with and without gas on IRIX 6 Rainer Orth
17:22 Re: std::pow implementation Martin Reinecke
17:10 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Earnshaw
17:06 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
17:02 Re: std::pow implementation Joe Buck
17:01 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
16:59 Re: GCC testsuite differences with and without gas on IRIX 6 Richard Henderson
16:57 gcc-ss-3.4-20030730 is now available gccadmin
16:55 Re: #import, #pragma once yadda yadda mumble grumble Devang Patel
16:52 Re: std::pow implementation Joe Buck
16:50 Re: std::pow implementation Joe Buck
16:49 Re: std::pow implementation Scott Robert Ladd
16:47 Re: [tree-ssa]: Constant propagation into PHI's screws up IVR and PRE Daniel Berlin
16:40 Re: std::pow implementation Joe Buck
16:39 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
16:37 Re: std::pow implementation Scott Robert Ladd
16:36 Re: [tree-ssa]: Constant propagation into PHI's screws up IVR andPRE Andrew MacLeod
16:29 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Earnshaw
16:29 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
16:25 Re: std::pow implementation Scott Robert Ladd
16:24 incorrect __vxworks__ usage in longlong.h (3.3) was ok in 3.2.3 Ken Faiczak
16:17 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
16:16 Re: std::pow implementation Martin Reinecke
16:09 Re: std::pow implementation Robert Dewar
16:08 Re: Some questions of GCC cross tool 3.3 for ColdFire linux Bernardo Innocenti
16:06 Re: #import, #pragma once yadda yadda mumble grumble Jonathan Lennox
16:01 Re: std::pow implementation Scott Robert Ladd
15:56 Re: std::pow implementation Steven Bosscher
15:53 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
15:53 Re: std::pow implementation Steven Bosscher
15:50 Re: std::pow implementation Steven Bosscher
15:49 Re: std::pow implementation Robert Dewar
15:45 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
15:44 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
15:43 Re: std::pow implementation Scott Robert Ladd
15:42 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
15:33 Re: std::pow implementation Steven Bosscher
15:29 Re: std::pow implementation Scott Robert Ladd
15:29 [tree-ssa]: Constant propagation into PHI's screws up IVR and PRE Daniel Berlin
15:27 Re: std::pow implementation Scott Robert Ladd
15:08 Re: std::pow implementation Scott Robert Ladd
14:55 RE: ideas for modeling pipeline with bypass registers? Nitin Gupta--SSW, Noida
14:51 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
14:49 Re: Loop optimizer issues Jan Hubicka
14:48 Re: Loop optimizer issues Jan Hubicka
14:44 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
14:36 Re: std::pow implementation Martin Reinecke
14:33 Re: Loop optimizer issues Jan Hubicka
14:32 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
14:31 Re: std::pow implementation Paolo Carlini
14:29 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
14:26 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
14:25 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
14:24 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
14:21 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
14:19 Re: std::pow implementation Martin Reinecke
14:18 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Earnshaw
14:14 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
14:14 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
14:11 Re: std::pow implementation Robert Dewar
14:11 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
14:10 Re: std::pow implementation Robert Dewar
14:08 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
14:08 Re: std::pow implementation Robert Dewar
14:05 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
14:04 Re: std::pow implementation Martin Reinecke
14:04 Re: std::pow implementation Robert Dewar
14:02 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Earnshaw
14:01 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
13:59 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
13:59 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
13:56 Re: std::pow implementation Robert Dewar
13:53 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
13:52 Re: std::pow implementation Robert Dewar
13:51 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
13:51 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
13:49 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
13:47 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
13:46 Re: std::pow implementation Robert Dewar
13:41 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
13:40 Re: std::pow implementation Robert Dewar
13:38 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Earnshaw
13:30 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
13:26 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
13:25 Re: std::pow implementation Steven Bosscher
13:24 Re: std::pow implementation Andrew Pinski
13:22 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Earnshaw
13:19 Re: std::pow implementation Martin Reinecke
13:13 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
13:06 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
13:01 Re: std::pow implementation Steven Bosscher
12:59 Re: std::pow implementation Robert Dewar
12:55 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
12:47 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
12:46 Re: std::pow implementation Karel Gardas
12:42 Re: std::pow implementation Martin Reinecke
12:31 Re: std::pow implementation Steven Bosscher
12:23 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
12:20 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
12:13 Re: std::pow implementation Stephan T. Lavavej
12:11 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
12:09 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
11:58 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
11:57 Re: std::pow implementation Steven Bosscher
11:46 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
11:43 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
11:36 Re: std::pow implementation Steven Bosscher
11:31 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
10:46 Re: gcc do not consider the head file change when compiling??? Gerald Pfeifer
10:37 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Earnshaw
10:33 Re: std::pow implementation Alexandre Oliva
10:32 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Eric Botcazou
10:11 Re: Discouraging contributors Bernardo Innocenti
08:35 Mudflap based memprofiler alexili
07:21 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
07:17 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
06:57 Re: std::pow implementation Steven Bosscher
06:45 Re: std::pow implementation Alexandre Oliva
06:38 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
06:31 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
06:13 Re: Token Pasting operator Alexandre Oliva
06:08 Re: Token Pasting operator Neil Booth
05:45 Token Pasting operator Srivatsan S
05:40 Re: std::pow implementation Alexandre Oliva
05:33 Re: HP-UX 11 and ld +init John David Anglin
05:26 Re: std::pow implementation Alexandre Oliva
05:24 Re: #import, #pragma once yadda yadda mumble grumble Neil Booth
05:18 gcc do not consider the head file change when compiling??? Mojx
05:12 Re: Discouraging contributors (Was: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C) Alexandre Oliva
05:06 Re: Loop optimizer issues Alexandre Oliva
05:00 Re: Unit-at-a-time in real world (Re: Development plan *ducks*) Alexandre Oliva
04:58 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
04:56 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
04:25 Re: std::pow implementation Alexandre Oliva
04:19 Re: std::pow implementation Alexandre Oliva
01:40 Re: Optimizing hypot() Richard Henderson
00:40 Re: [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3.1 uClinux/ColdFire toolchain (20030725 snapshot) Bernardo Innocenti
00:40 Re: Possible bug in regrename.c??? Marty Hauff

July 29, 2003
23:47 Re: Loop optimizer issues tm_gccmail
23:38 Re: #import, #pragma once yadda yadda mumble grumble Jonathan Lennox
23:20 Re: #import, #pragma once yadda yadda mumble grumble Mike Stump
23:16 Tru64 UNIX bootstrap failure in libjava Rainer Orth
23:10 Re: #import, #pragma once yadda yadda mumble grumble Geoffrey Keating
23:05 Re: #import, #pragma once yadda yadda mumble grumble Jonathan Lennox
22:54 help if you can Dave Gibelli
22:26 #import, #pragma once yadda yadda mumble grumble Neil Booth
22:16 Re: HP-UX 11 and ld +init Mark Mitchell
22:02 Re: Loop optimizer issues Gerald Pfeifer
21:58 Re: libmudflap/mf-hooks2.c portability breakage Gerald Pfeifer
21:14 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
21:12 Re: Loop optimizer issues Diego Novillo
21:06 Re: FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once Kai Henningsen
21:06 Re: libmudflap/mf-hooks2.c portability breakage Kai Henningsen
21:01 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
20:58 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
20:54 Re: Loop optimizer issues Diego Novillo
20:49 Re: Loop optimizer issues Richard Henderson
20:37 Re: ideas for modeling pipeline with bypass registers? tm_gccmail
20:33 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
20:29 Re: Loop optimizer issues tm_gccmail
20:15 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zack Weinberg
20:14 Re: Loop optimizer issues Steven Bosscher
19:58 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zack Weinberg
19:50 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
19:42 Re: Loop optimizer issues Jan Hubicka
19:35 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
19:28 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap comparison failure on ppc and ppc64 law
19:15 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
19:15 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
19:11 Re: std::pow implementation Neil Booth
19:09 Re: Loop optimizer issues law
19:07 Re: Loop optimizer issues Daniel Berlin
19:00 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zack Weinberg
18:58 Re: HP-UX 11 and ld +init Zack Weinberg
18:50 Re: Loop optimizer issues Jason Merrill
18:42 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
18:35 Re: [tree-ssa]: GIMPLE lowering array references too early? Chris Lattner
18:28 Re: [tree-ssa]: GIMPLE lowering array references too early? Jason Merrill
18:27 Re: HP-UX 11 and ld +init Kelley Cook
18:26 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
18:23 Re: [tree-ssa]: GIMPLE lowering array references too early? law
18:20 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
18:19 Re: aliasing between const and non-const objects Michael Matz
18:18 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
18:16 Re: Loop optimizer issues Jan Hubicka
18:13 Re: Loop optimizer issues Steven Bosscher
18:12 Re: ideas for modeling pipeline with bypass registers? Greg McGary
18:11 Re: Development plan *ducks* (Re: Loop optimizer issues) Zdenek Dvorak
18:08 Re: aliasing between const and non-const objects Gabriel Dos Reis
18:08 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
18:07 Re: Unit-at-a-time in real world (Re: Development plan *ducks*) Jan Hubicka
18:06 Re: Loop optimizer issues Daniel Berlin
18:05 Re: [tree-ssa]: GIMPLE lowering array references too early? Chris Lattner
18:01 Re: Unit-at-a-time in real world (Re: Development plan *ducks*) Zack Weinberg
17:57 Re: [tree-ssa]: GIMPLE lowering array references too early? law
17:56 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zack Weinberg
17:53 Re: [tree-ssa]: GIMPLE lowering array references too early? Jason Merrill
17:53 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure Phil Edwards
17:48 Re: NullPointerException in a win32 application Tom Tromey
17:44 Re: aliasing between const and non-const objects Michael Matz
17:40 Re: [tree-ssa]: GIMPLE lowering array references too early? Chris Lattner
17:40 Unit-at-a-time in real world (Re: Development plan *ducks*) Jan Hubicka
17:25 Re: HP-UX 11 and ld +init Zack Weinberg
17:24 Re: Development plan *ducks* (Re: Loop optimizer issues) Jan Hubicka
17:15 RE: ideas for modeling pipeline with bypass registers? Nitin Gupta--SSW, Noida
17:15 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap comparison failure on ppc and ppc64 Diego Novillo
17:13 Re: Development plan *ducks* (Re: Loop optimizer issues) Jan Hubicka
17:10 Re: Development plan *ducks* (Re: Loop optimizer issues) Andrew Pinski
17:09 Re: ideas for modeling pipeline with bypass registers? Greg McGary
17:01 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap comparison failure on ppc and ppc64 law
17:00 Re: Development plan *ducks* (Re: Loop optimizer issues) Jan Hubicka
16:57 Re: Development plan *ducks* (Re: Loop optimizer issues) Jan Hubicka
16:50 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap comparison failure on ppc and ppc64 Diego Novillo
16:46 Re: [tree-ssa]: GIMPLE lowering array references too early? Daniel Berlin
16:30 Re: Installation questions Gerald Pfeifer
16:28 [tree-ssa]: GIMPLE lowering array references too early? Daniel Berlin
16:26 Installation questions Jim Keener
16:20 Re: aliasing between const and non-const objects Richard Earnshaw
16:15 Re: aliasing between const and non-const objects Michael Matz
16:15 Re: aliasing between const and non-const objects Gabriel Dos Reis
16:05 Re: aliasing between const and non-const objects Richard Earnshaw
15:59 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
15:59 aliasing between const and non-const objects Michael Matz
15:38 Jump threading after basic block reorder? Dave Hudson
15:37 RE: std::pow implementation Rob Taylor
15:33 Re: Loop optimizer issues Diego Novillo
15:24 Re: HP-UX 11 and ld +init Kelley Cook
15:11 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
14:51 Re: std::pow implementation Michael Matz
14:43 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
14:40 RE: ideas for modeling pipeline with bypass registers? Nitin Gupta--SSW, Noida
14:36 Re: std::pow implementation Michael Matz
14:36 Re: std::pow implementation Steven Bosscher
14:35 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
14:31 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
14:27 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
14:24 Re: HP-UX 11 and ld +init Albert Chin
14:24 Re: std::pow implementation Steven Bosscher
14:24 Re: [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3.1 uClinux/ColdFire toolchain (20030725 snapshot) Daniel Jacobowitz
14:23 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
14:22 public and extern Anders Ãdland
14:17 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
14:17 Re: libmudflap/mf-hooks2.c portability breakage law
14:14 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
14:08 Re: std::pow implementation Steven Bosscher
13:59 Re: libmudflap/mf-hooks2.c portability breakage Eyal Lebedinsky
13:36 Re: libmudflap/mf-hooks2.c portability breakage Andreas Jaeger
13:28 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
13:22 Re: tree-ssa internal compiler error Diego Novillo
13:14 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
13:14 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
13:05 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
13:00 Re: std::pow implementation Andrew Pinski
12:59 Re: std::pow implementation Steven Bosscher
12:58 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
12:55 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
12:53 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
12:53 Re: std::pow implementation Steven Bosscher
12:49 Re: std::pow implementation Paolo Carlini
12:49 Re: std::pow implementation Andrew Pinski
12:47 Re: std::pow implementation Steven Bosscher
12:44 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
12:38 libmudflap/mf-hooks2.c portability breakage Gerald Pfeifer
12:37 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
12:25 Re: std::pow implementation Steven Bosscher
12:14 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
12:14 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap comparison failure on ppc and ppc64 Diego Novillo
12:10 tree-ssa internal compiler error Jeffrey . S . Whitaker
12:10 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
12:04 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
12:02 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap comparison failure on ppc and ppc64 Andrew MacLeod
11:57 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
11:52 [tree-ssa] bootstrap comparison failure on ppc and ppc64 Diego Novillo
11:51 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
11:45 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
11:37 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
11:37 [tree-ssa] g95 bootstrap failure on alpha Diego Novillo
11:32 Re: Redundant Load Elimination in GCSE Ayal Zaks
11:04 std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
09:52 Re: HP-UX 11 and ld +init Mark Mitchell
09:48 Re: Development plan *ducks* (Re: Loop optimizer issues) Steven Bosscher
09:25 Re: Possible bug in regrename.c??? Anders Ãdland
07:06 [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure Steven Bosscher
06:50 Re: [Axiom-developer] portable cdecl 'elliptic' function calls Arthur Norman
06:25 Re: HP-UX 11 and ld +init John David Anglin
03:46 Re: [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3.1 uClinux/ColdFire toolchain (20030725 snapshot) Dan Kegel
01:29 Re: portable cdecl 'elliptic' function calls Fergus Henderson
01:15 ideas for modeling a condition-code FIFO? Greg McGary
00:31 Re: Discouraging contributors (Was: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C) Geoff Keating
00:20 Re: [tree-ssa] Problems building fortran (gmp) with latest cvs-version Joe Buck
00:11 Re: ideas for modeling pipeline with bypass registers? Greg McGary

July 28, 2003
23:55 Re: [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3.1 uClinux/ColdFire toolchain (20030725 snapshot) Bernardo Innocenti
23:31 Re: Development plan *ducks* (Re: Loop optimizer issues) Jan Hubicka
23:30 Re: ideas for modeling pipeline with bypass registers? tm_gccmail
23:22 Re: [tree-ssa] Problems building fortran (gmp) with latest cvs-version Michael Matz
23:17 Re: Development plan *ducks* (Re: Loop optimizer issues) Andrew Pinski
23:16 Re: Discouraging contributors (Was: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C) Richard Kenner
23:15 Re: Discouraging contributors (Was: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C) Bernardo Innocenti
23:13 Re: Loop optimizer issues Steven Bosscher
23:11 Re: Development plan *ducks* (Re: Loop optimizer issues) Steven Bosscher
23:08 HP-UX 11 and ld +init Mark Mitchell
22:58 Re: [autoconf-conversion] Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions Phil Edwards
22:58 ideas for modeling pipeline with bypass registers? Greg McGary
22:48 Re: [autoconf-conversion] Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions Paolo Bonzini
22:45 Re: Understanding Multilibs ;-) Ralf Corsepius
22:41 Re: [autoconf-conversion] Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions Phil Edwards
22:37 Re: Development plan *ducks* (Re: Loop optimizer issues) Phil Edwards
22:21 Re: [autoconf-conversion] Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions Paolo Bonzini
22:10 Re: Development plan *ducks* (Re: Loop optimizer issues) Zack Weinberg
22:00 Development plan *ducks* (Re: Loop optimizer issues) Steven Bosscher
21:34 portable cdecl 'elliptic' function calls Camm Maguire
21:33 Re: [tree-ssa] Problems building fortran (gmp) with latest cvs-version Daniel Berlin
21:31 Re: Discouraging contributors (Was: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C) Daniel Berlin
21:19 Re: Discouraging contributors (Was: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C) Ziemowit Laski
21:11 Re: Discouraging contributors (Was: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C) Richard Kenner
21:09 Re: PR 10540 Mark Mitchell
21:04 Re: Discouraging contributors (Was: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C) Bernardo Innocenti
20:58 Re: [tree-ssa] Problems building fortran (gmp) with latest cvs-version Phil Edwards
20:50 Re: [tree-ssa] Problems building fortran (gmp) with latestcvs-version Steven Bosscher
20:43 Re: gcc-3.3 with -fomit-frame-pointer finally works on ColdFire Bernardo Innocenti
20:42 [tree-ssa] Problems building fortran (gmp) with latest cvs-version Linus Sjöberg
20:40 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
20:36 Re: GCC testsuite differences with and without gas on IRIX 6 Rainer Orth
20:33 Re: GCC testsuite differences with and without gas on IRIX 6 Eric Christopher
20:24 Re: GCC testsuite differences with and without gas on IRIX 6 Rainer Orth
19:54 Re: [autoconf-conversion] Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions Phil Edwards
19:36 Re: Loop optimizer issues David Edelsohn
19:19 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
19:00 Re: Pseudo register replaced by a symbol_ref Peter Barada
17:25 Re: Understanding Multilibs ;-) Phil Edwards
17:03 gcc-ss-3.3-20030728 is now available gccadmin
16:58 Re: backward compatibility of g++ ? Joe Buck
16:45 Re: Fortran front end webpages Joe Buck
15:55 Re: stmts_are_full_exprs_p Mark Mitchell
15:36 Re: C++ standard Fergus Henderson
15:28 Re: gcc-3.3 with -fomit-frame-pointer finally works on ColdFire Peter Barada
15:25 Re: C++ standard Kelley Cook
15:13 Re: Implementing alloca with malloc Fergus Henderson
14:13 PowerPC Cross compailer Shulov Leonid
13:36 Re: Loop optimizer issues Andrew MacLeod
12:54 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
12:54 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
12:46 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
12:45 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
10:31 [tree-ssa] Using -M to create dependency list Erik Schnetter
09:59 Implementing alloca with malloc Stephen Biggs
09:08 Re: Understanding Multilibs ;-) Andreas Schwab
09:03 Re: Possible bug in regrename.c??? Marty Hauff
07:25 C++ standard voidbox
07:06 Re: Understanding Multilibs ;-) Nathanael Nerode
06:58 Re: Understanding Multilibs ;-) Ralf Corsepius
06:55 Re: Possible bug in regrename.c??? Anders Ãdland
06:35 Re: NullPointerException in a win32 application Ranjit Mathew
06:03 Re: [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3.1 uClinux/ColdFire toolchain (20030725 snapshot) Dan Kegel
04:25 Re: Understanding Multilibs ;-) Phil Edwards
03:58 Re: Discouraging contributors (Was: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C) Daniel Berlin
03:57 Understanding Multilibs ;-) Nathanael Nerode
03:24 Re: Discouraging contributors (Was: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C) Bernardo Innocenti
03:01 Re: [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3.1 uClinux/ColdFire toolchain (20030725 snapshot) Bernardo Innocenti
01:59 Re: Any idea what this is for? (fixincludes for svr4, _KERNEL) Bruce Korb
00:38 Re: [autoconf-conversion] Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions Phil Edwards
00:26 re: Help compiling gcc 3.3 Dan Kegel
00:16 Re: [autoconf-conversion] Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions Daniel Jacobowitz
00:15 Re: gcc floating point usage / -mno-implicit-fp status? Dan Kegel
00:01 Re: [autoconf-conversion] Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions Phil Edwards
00:00 Re: gcc floating point usage / -mno-implicit-fp status? kaz Kojima

July 27, 2003
23:59 Re: [autoconf-conversion] Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions Phil Edwards
23:50 Re: [autoconf-conversion] Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions Daniel Jacobowitz
23:49 Re: [autoconf-conversion] Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, newautoconf versions Zack Weinberg
23:33 Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions Phil Edwards
23:17 Re: Loop optimizer issues Steven Bosscher
23:12 Re: Loop optimizer issues David Edelsohn
23:06 Re: Loop optimizer issues Steven Bosscher
23:00 Re: Loop optimizer issues Steven Bosscher
22:58 Re: Loop optimizer issues David Edelsohn
22:46 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
22:18 Re: Fortran front end webpages Gerald Pfeifer
21:50 gcc floating point usage / -mno-implicit-fp status? Dan Kegel
20:14 Re: dia-0.91 fails compile on gcc 3.3 Daniel Jacobowitz
20:11 dia-0.91 fails compile on gcc 3.3 Hans Breuer
16:09 Re: [tree-ssa]: After edge insertion, two bb's share the same heda Daniel Berlin
14:02 Re: [tree-ssa]: After edge insertion, two bb's share the same heda Andrew MacLeod
12:06 Re: Patches Needed for MingW 3.4 Andrew Haley
06:25 Re: Is IR machine independent? Marty Hauff
06:09 Possible bug in regrename.c??? Marty Hauff
05:23 Re: [tree-ssa]: After edge insertion, two bb's share the same heda Daniel Berlin
03:07 Re: stmts_are_full_exprs_p Jason Merrill
02:18 att ressources humaines merci gerson . neptune
01:20 Re: [tree-ssa]: After edge insertion, two bb's share the same heda Daniel Berlin
01:08 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Scott Robert Ladd
00:03 Help compiling gcc 3.3 Deskin Miller

July 26, 2003
22:32 Re: gcc ./ChangeLog.tree-ssa ./Makefile.def ./Make ... Paul Brook
22:21 Re: gcc ./ChangeLog.tree-ssa ./Makefile.def ./Make ... Steven Bosscher
22:20 Re: Fortran front end webpages Steven Bosscher
22:11 Re: Fortran front end webpages Zack Weinberg
22:10 Re: Fortran front end webpages Paul Brook
21:55 Re: gcc ./ChangeLog.tree-ssa ./Makefile.def ./Make ... Paul Brook
21:18 Re: Fortran front end webpages Toon Moene
21:08 Re: [tree-ssa]: After edge insertion, two bb's share the same heda Daniel Berlin
20:59 Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions Phil Edwards
20:43 stmts_are_full_exprs_p Nathan Sidwell
19:57 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Marc Espie
19:57 Re: Fortran front end webpages Zack Weinberg
19:54 Re: (offtopic) SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Marc Espie
19:44 Re: Fortran front end webpages Zack Weinberg
19:26 Re: Template functions with STL in gcc 3.2.2 Nathan Sidwell
19:20 Template functions with STL in gcc 3.2.2 Rob Emanuele
19:10 Re: gcc ./ChangeLog.tree-ssa ./Makefile.def ./Make ... Joseph S. Myers
19:09 Fortran front end webpages Paul Brook
18:26 Re: mainline broken on newlib based targets? Dara Hazeghi
18:07 Re: URLConnection Anthony Green
17:59 Re: backward compatibility of g++ ? Gabriel Dos Reis
17:59 Re: mainline broken on newlib based targets? Dara Hazeghi
17:59 Re: URLConnection Tom Tromey
17:37 Re: backward compatibility of g++ ? Gabriel Dos Reis
17:26 Re: backward compatibility of g++ ? John Levon
17:22 mainline broken on newlib based targets? Dara Hazeghi
17:14 backward compatibility of g++ ? trinks
15:44 URLConnection Thijs Cadier
15:08 Re: NullPointerException in a win32 application Thijs Cadier
15:01 Re: NullPointerException in a win32 application Tom Tromey
13:53 Re: [tree-ssa]New fortran frontend Paul Brook
13:50 NullPointerException in a win32 application Thijs Cadier
12:42 Re: [tree-ssa]New fortran frontend Erik Schnetter
12:08 Re: [tree-ssa]New fortran frontend Paolo Bonzini
09:49 Re: Any idea what this is for? (fixincludes for svr4, _KERNEL) Kai Henningsen
05:16 Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions Nathanael Nerode
04:37 Re: GCC ToT boostrap error on hppa64* platform John David Anglin
04:33 Any idea what this is for? (fixincludes for svr4, _KERNEL) Nathanael Nerode
04:25 Re: Does C++ std::queue really conflict with C header 'struct queue'? Nathanael Nerode
02:47 Re: Does C++ std::queue really conflict with C header 'struct queue'? Phil Edwards
02:37 Re: [tree-ssa]: After edge insertion, two bb's share the same heda Andrew MacLeod
02:17 Does C++ std::queue really conflict with C header 'struct queue'? Nathanael Nerode
01:12 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Robert Dewar
00:41 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Robert Dewar
00:24 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Robert Dewar
00:02 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Gerald Pfeifer

July 25, 2003
22:48 Re: PR 11637 Janis Johnson
22:47 Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions Phil Edwards
22:47 [tree-ssa]: After edge insertion, two bb's share the same heda Daniel Berlin
17:34 Re: Bugzilla stuff (was: Re: 3.3.1 bug fix list ...) Daniel Berlin
16:53 Bugzilla stuff (was: Re: 3.3.1 bug fix list ...) Joe Buck
16:49 Re: [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3.1 uClinux/ColdFire toolchain (20030725 snapshot) Bernardo Innocenti
16:15 Re: Technical people needed for Using GCC editing phone conference Toon Moene
16:00 Re: gcc mirror site Gerald Pfeifer
15:55 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C Mark Mitchell
15:18 Re: [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3.1 uClinux/ColdFire toolchain (20030725snapshot) Benjamin Kosnik
15:11 Technical people needed for Using GCC editing phone conference Lisa M. Opus Goldstein
15:03 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6 Daniel Berlin
13:48 Pseudo register replaced by a symbol_ref Anders Ãdland
13:00 Re: gcc mirror site Jin-Shan Tseng
12:29 Re: [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3.1 uClinux/ColdFire toolchain (20030725 snapshot) Bernardo Innocenti
11:57 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-07-06 Diego Novillo
11:20 Re: Please review the patch for PR10060 (compile-time-hog, ice-on-valid-code, memory-hog) Andrew Pinski
11:04 Please review the patch for PR10060 (compile-time-hog,ice-on-valid-code, memory-hog) Steven Bosscher
10:55 RE: Register Rematerialization In New Register Allocator Mukta Punjani, Noida
10:46 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C Richard Kenner
10:21 Re: Ghost testcase eb42.C Joseph S. Myers
09:47 Re: [tree-ssa] Java byte compiler status Andrew Haley
09:03 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-07-06 Toon Moene
08:56 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C Nathan Sidwell
07:22 Re: PR 10540 Richard Sandiford
05:29 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C Mark Mitchell
05:29 Re: 3.3.1 bug fix list, first crude draft Mark Mitchell
04:22 [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3.1 uClinux/ColdFire toolchain (20030725 snapshot) Bernardo Innocenti
04:14 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6 Andrew Pinski
04:11 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C Per Bothner
03:39 Re: changing struct bitfield allocation ? DJ Delorie
03:32 Re: changing struct bitfield allocation ? Alexandre Oliva
03:01 Re: changing struct bitfield allocation ? DJ Delorie
02:56 Re: changing struct bitfield allocation ? Alexandre Oliva
02:37 Re: Ghost testcase eb42.C Phil Edwards
02:18 Re: Ghost testcase eb42.C Jean-Pierre Radley
02:05 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Tolga Dalman
02:02 Re: Ghost testcase eb42.C Andrew Pinski
02:00 changing struct bitfield allocation ? DJ Delorie
01:49 Ghost testcase eb42.C Daniel Jacobowitz
01:00 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C Richard Kenner
00:40 [cs] compile server branch creation Mike Stump
00:35 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C Mark Mitchell

July 24, 2003
23:49 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Xose Vazquez Perez
23:24 Bay Area GCC hackers luncheon Zack Weinberg
23:19 Bug in newlib malloc causing libstdc++ test failures Daniel Jacobowitz
23:13 Re: snprintfv 1.1 pre-release Paolo Bonzini
23:07 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Paul Jarc
23:01 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Tolga Dalman
22:04 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Don Lindsay
21:46 Re: GCC testsuite differences with and without gas on IRIX 6 Eric Christopher
21:27 Re: GCC ToT boostrap error on hppa64* platform Andrew Pinski
21:12 GCC ToT boostrap error on hppa64* platform Steve Ellcey
21:00 Re: (no) GCC pre-compiled headers on Cygwin Phil Edwards
20:32 Re: GCC testsuite differences with and without gas on IRIX 6 Thiemo Seufer
20:17 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' DJ Delorie
20:14 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Scott Robert Ladd
20:12 Re: Transformations to increase parallelism tm_gccmail
19:57 Re: Transformations to increase parallelism (peepholes?) tm_gccmail
19:51 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C Per Bothner
19:38 Re: Libtool and target libraries Paul Brook
19:37 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Mark Mielke
19:32 Re: GCC testsuite differences with and without gas on IRIX 6 Eric Christopher
19:29 Re: GCC testsuite differences with and without gas on IRIX 6 Joe Buck
19:21 Re: PR 8878 Mark Mitchell
19:09 Re: PR 8878 Aldy Hernandez
19:06 GCC testsuite differences with and without gas on IRIX 6 Rainer Orth
18:43 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Scott Robert Ladd
18:08 Re: Optimizing hypot() Zack Weinberg
18:02 Re: snprintfv 1.1 pre-release Dave Butenhof
17:37 Re:(offtopic) SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Xose Vazquez Perez
17:29 Re: PR 8878 Aldy Hernandez
17:22 Re: PR 8878 Mark Mitchell
17:18 Re: PR 8878 Aldy Hernandez
17:06 Re: Optimizing hypot() Roger Sayle
17:06 Re: snprintfv 1.1 pre-release Bruce Korb
17:02 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Bruce Korb
17:02 Re: snprintfv 1.1 pre-release Bruce Korb
16:58 Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea Mike Stump
16:50 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Joe Buck
16:41 Re: Translation of GCC Manual Joseph S. Myers
16:34 Re: snprintfv 1.1 pre-release Joseph S. Myers
16:32 installation help Green, Nick
16:23 Re: Translation of GCC Manual Zack Weinberg
16:21 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Bruce Korb
16:07 Re: Optimizing hypot() Zack Weinberg
16:06 Re: [tree-ssa] Loop detection broken by the last merges Jan Hubicka
15:49 snprintfv 1.1 pre-release Paolo Bonzini
15:37 Relocation of code with gcc sebastien dot di-mercurio at l
15:21 Re: [tree-ssa] Java byte compiler status Jeff Sturm
14:59 RE: Register Rematerialization In New Register Allocator Michael Matz
14:02 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Gerald Pfeifer
13:30 Re: Optimizing hypot() Roger Sayle
13:20 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-07-06 Toon Moene
13:06 RE: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' S. Bosscher
12:39 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Kean Johnston
12:35 unsubscibe Thomas Anders
12:30 Fixincludes/C++ namespaces question(s) Nathanael Nerode
12:30 [tree-ssa] Loop detection broken by the last merges Pop Sébastian
11:44 [FEATURE] to suppress nested attribute deprecated marked uses? Samium Gromoff
11:08 Is IR machine independent? Xingbo Wang
08:34 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-07-06 Toon Moene
08:25 unsubcribe hung
07:57 unsubcribe poulard
07:21 Translation of GCC Manual Xingbo Wang
05:48 RE: Register Rematerialization In New Register Allocator Mukta Punjani, Noida
04:25 Re: Optimizing hypot() Kaveh R. Ghazi
00:55 [tree-ssa mudflap] stikll problems with latest update Eyal Lebedinsky

July 23, 2003
23:58 gcc-ss-3.4-20030723 is now available gccadmin
23:56 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C Mark Mitchell
23:46 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C Per Bothner
23:29 PR 11637 Mark Mitchell
23:06 PR 8878 Mark Mitchell
23:04 PR 10540 Mark Mitchell
22:28 Optimizing hypot() Richard Guenther
21:53 Re: Transformations to increase parallelism Michael Meissner
21:45 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-07-06 Toon Moene
21:39 Re: (no) GCC pre-compiled headers on Cygwin Alexandre Oliva
20:28 Re: -std=c89 shouldn't allow post-statement declarations Hans-Peter Nilsson
19:40 gcc for windows XP Cezar Augusto de Freitas Ansel
19:35 g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C Mark Mitchell
18:40 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-07-22 Diego Novillo
18:37 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-07-22 Steven Bosscher
18:29 Re: RFC: some target macro->hook conversions Mark Mitchell
18:29 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-07-06 Diego Novillo
18:02 Re: [tree-ssa] Re: auto vectorization in gcc Daniel Berlin
17:51 Re: Unstable gcc mainline and the ia64 intrinsic work H. J. Lu
17:39 Re: Unstable gcc mainline and the ia64 intrinsic work Joe Buck
17:36 Re: [tree-ssa] Re: auto vectorization in gcc Pop Sébastian
17:15 [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-07-22 Diego Novillo
17:11 Unstable gcc mainline and the ia64 intrinsic work H. J. Lu
16:51 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Phil Edwards
16:48 [tree-ssa] Re: auto vectorization in gcc Dorit Naishlos
16:18 The Linux binutils 2.14.90.0.5 is released H. J. Lu
16:03 Re: Your change Vladimir Makarov
15:59 Re: (no) GCC pre-compiled headers on cygwin Kelley Cook
15:23 RE: Your change Lu, Hongjiu
15:21 Re: Transformations to increase parallelism Ayal Zaks
15:18 RE: Your change Lu, Hongjiu
14:12 Re: Your change Vladimir Makarov
12:36 Re: Transformations to increase parallelism (peepholes?) Jan Hoogerbrugge
12:36 Re: [tree-ssa] Java byte compiler status Andrew Haley
12:25 Re: [tree-ssa] Java byte compiler status Diego Novillo
12:17 Re: [tree-ssa] Java byte compiler status Andrew Haley
09:09 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Gerald Pfeifer
07:09 Your change Mark Mitchell
06:52 Re: Bug report - How to attach a file? Phil Edwards
06:20 Re: (no) GCC pre-compiled headers on Cygwin Phil Edwards
06:17 Re: (no) GCC pre-compiled headers on Cygwin Phil Edwards
06:11 Re: (no) GCC pre-compiled headers on Cygwin Alexandre Oliva
06:02 Re: (no) GCC pre-compiled headers on Cygwin Phil Edwards
05:14 Re: (no) GCC pre-compiled headers on Cygwin Alexandre Oliva
04:39 Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea Kaveh R. Ghazi
01:22 Re: Support for %d$c format specifier Ishikawa
01:21 Re: (no) GCC pre-compiled headers on cygwin Christopher Faylor
00:53 Re: Testing a speedup to libiberty/concat.c Kaveh R. Ghazi
00:43 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Robert Dewar
00:22 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' DJ Delorie
00:17 Re: Support for %d$c format specifier DJ Delorie
00:11 Re: Libtool and target libraries Alexandre Oliva
00:09 Re: -std=c89 shouldn't allow post-statement declarations Joseph S. Myers
00:07 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Alexandre Oliva
00:05 Re: (no) GCC pre-compiled headers on cygwin Geoff Keating
00:01 Re: (no) GCC pre-compiled headers on Cygwin Alexandre Oliva

July 22, 2003
23:57 Re: -std=c89 shouldn't allow post-statement declarations Joseph S. Myers
23:57 RE: (no) GCC pre-compiled headers on cygwin Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
23:53 Re: -std=c89 shouldn't allow post-statement declarations Jamie Zawinski
23:50 Re: (no) GCC pre-compiled headers on cygwin Alexandre Oliva
23:47 Re: -std=c89 shouldn't allow post-statement declarations Joe Buck
23:29 Re: Support for %d$c format specifier Paolo Bonzini
23:22 Re: -std=c89 shouldn't allow post-statement declarations Joseph S. Myers
23:12 Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea Zack Weinberg
22:49 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Per Bothner
22:39 -std=c89 shouldn't allow post-statement declarations Jamie Zawinski
22:32 Libtool and target libraries Paul Brook
22:31 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Stan Shebs
22:20 Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea Joseph S. Myers
22:04 Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea Zack Weinberg
22:04 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Jamie Lokier
21:57 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Jamie Lokier
21:41 Re: FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once David Ayers
21:40 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Steven Bosscher
21:13 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Shaun Jackman
21:00 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Zack Weinberg
20:42 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Joe Buck
19:47 Re: Transformations to increase parallelism tm_gccmail
19:42 Re: FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once Neil Booth
19:37 Re: Why does Makefile depend on version.c? Joseph S. Myers
19:36 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Kevin Handy
19:35 Re: Why does Makefile depend on version.c? Phil Edwards
19:31 Re: FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once Mike Stump
19:26 Re: Why does Makefile depend on version.c? Mark Mitchell
19:18 Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea DJ Delorie
19:17 Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea DJ Delorie
19:16 Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea Gabriel Dos Reis
19:15 Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea DJ Delorie
19:13 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Michael Elizabeth Chastain
19:12 Re: Why does Makefile depend on version.c? Joseph S. Myers
19:10 Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea Neil Booth
19:10 Re: Testing a speedup to libiberty/concat.c DJ Delorie
19:10 Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea Joseph S. Myers
19:06 Re: Why does Makefile depend on version.c? DJ Delorie
19:04 Re: Testing a speedup to libiberty/concat.c Neil Booth
18:56 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Phil Edwards
18:34 Re: Support for %d$c format specifier Bruce Korb
18:30 Why does Makefile depend on version.c? Mark Mitchell
18:27 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' DJ Delorie
18:24 Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea DJ Delorie
18:13 Re: FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once Mike Stump
18:11 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Olaf Hering
18:10 Re: [tree-ssa] Java byte compiler status Diego Novillo
18:00 Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea Kaveh R. Ghazi
18:00 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' DJ Delorie
17:56 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Per Bothner
17:43 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Mark Mielke
17:35 [tree-ssa] Java byte compiler status Andrew Haley
17:28 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6 Diego Novillo
17:23 [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6 Andrew Pinski
17:16 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Per Bothner
17:05 Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea DJ Delorie
17:04 Re: auto vectorization in gcc Martin Brain
16:53 Re: Support for %d$c format specifier Ishikawa
16:19 Re: Support for %d$c format specifier Bruce Korb
15:44 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Zack Weinberg
15:40 Testing a speedup to libiberty/concat.c Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:28 Re: (no) GCC pre-compiled headers on Cygwin Benjamin Kosnik
14:34 Re: (no) GCC pre-compiled headers on cygwin Christopher Faylor
14:28 SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Xose Vazquez Perez
14:21 Bug report - How to attach a file? Guy Voncken
14:01 Call for help: anyone running SysV r4? Nathanael Nerode
13:55 Re: auto vectorization in gcc Diego Novillo
13:48 Re: auto vectorization in gcc Dorit Naishlos
13:39 Re: Transformations to increase parallelism Dorit Naishlos
12:03 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-07-06 Diego Novillo
11:31 [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3.1 uClinux/ColdFire toolchain (20030722 snapshot) Bernardo Innocenti
11:17 Re: (no) GCC pre-compiled headers on Cygwin Corinna Vinschen
10:43 Re: need help Gerald Pfeifer
10:35 need help ggbg ddfd
09:49 Re: FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once Nicola Pero
08:12 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-07-06 Toon Moene
07:02 (no) GCC pre-compiled headers on Cygwin Alexandre Oliva
06:56 Re: MingW Ranjit Mathew
06:31 Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea Zack Weinberg
06:22 Re: FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once Christoph Hellwig
06:14 Re: Inquiry about RTL Colin Douglas Howell
04:17 Inquiry about RTL SRUTHY C.N.
02:18 gcc-3.3 with -fomit-frame-pointer finally works on ColdFire Bernardo Innocenti
02:04 Re: Cannot build C/ObjC on TOT... Phil Edwards
01:39 Re: Cannot build C/ObjC on TOT... Ziemowit Laski
01:26 Re: Cannot build C/ObjC on TOT... Ziemowit Laski
01:20 Re: Cannot build C/ObjC on TOT... Phil Edwards
01:18 Re: Cannot build C/ObjC on TOT... Ziemowit Laski
00:56 Re: Cannot build C/ObjC on TOT... Dara Hazeghi
00:24 Cannot build C/ObjC on TOT... Ziemowit Laski

July 21, 2003
23:51 updated 3.3.1 bug fix list jbuck
23:19 Re: First GCC 3.3.1 Prerelease Joe Buck
23:15 Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea DJ Delorie
23:11 Re: [C++] NEW_EXPR and PR c++/11406 Mark Mitchell
23:03 Re: [C++] NEW_EXPR and PR c++/11406 Gabriel Dos Reis
22:48 Re: C++ frontend bug involving pointers to arrays Jason Merrill
22:46 Re: New GCC Mirror Gerald Pfeifer
22:41 [C++] NEW_EXPR and PR c++/11406 Gabriel Dos Reis
21:57 Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea Zack Weinberg
21:54 RFC: target-defs.h inclusion backwards? DJ Delorie
21:43 RFC: target macro->hook migration idea DJ Delorie
21:23 Re: mips64-linux multilib vs -B mips64-linux/lib32/ Guido Guenther
21:19 Re: FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once Joe Buck
21:18 Re: FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once Mike Stump
21:11 Re: MingW Oscar Fuentes
21:09 Re: FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once Christoph Hellwig
21:03 Re: FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once Mike Stump
20:47 Re: Fwd: unsubscribe...... Neil Booth
19:25 Re: what happened to the donated FSF/Europe machine? Benjamin Kosnik
19:19 MingW elettronicmail
18:59 [gcc-3.3 patch] fix for "FAIL: g++.jason/thunk3.C" in gcc-3.3 testsuite Dan Kegel
18:49 Re: Transformations to increase parallelism tm_gccmail
18:04 Re: what happened to the donated FSF/Europe machine? Laurent GUERBY
17:51 Re: [C++] Deprecating default arguments on function types Mark Mitchell
17:41 Re: [C++] Deprecating default arguments on function types Gabriel Dos Reis
17:31 Re: [C++] Deprecating default arguments on function types Jason Merrill
17:18 Re: bit shifting CQImode values Richard Henderson
17:11 Re: 3.4 bootstrap failure linking jv-convert on Solaris2.8 Bradley Lucier
17:08 gcc-ss-3.3-20030721 is now available gccadmin
16:50 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-07-06 Toon Moene
16:45 Re: auto vectorization in gcc Daniel Berlin
16:35 what happened to the donated FSF/Europe machine? Benjamin Kosnik
15:22 Re: C++ frontend bug involving pointers to arrays Ulrich Weigand
15:15 Re: Implementing fine grain parallelism and automatic support forSIMD ISA extensions in gcc Martin Brain
14:40 Re: [C++] Deprecating default arguments on function types Mark Mitchell
14:23 Re[2]: modify gcc to handle byteorder issue automatically Georgy Yunayev
14:06 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-07-06 Diego Novillo
14:03 [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-07-06 Diego Novillo
13:57 Re: auto vectorization in gcc Dorit Naishlos
13:52 Re: auto vectorization in gcc Dorit Naishlos
13:43 Re: bit shifting CQImode values Alan Modra
13:31 Re: auto vectorization in gcc Dorit Naishlos
13:30 Re: modify gcc to handle byteorder issue automatically Theodore Papadopoulo
13:25 Re: [C++] Deprecating default arguments on function types Gabriel Dos Reis
13:24 Transformations to increase parallelism Jan Hoogerbrugge
13:16 Re: auto vectorization in gcc Dorit Naishlos
13:08 [C++] Deprecating default arguments on function types Nathan Sidwell
13:06 bit shifting CQImode values Alan Modra
13:04 Re: modify gcc to handle byteorder issue automatically Gabriel Dos Reis
12:53 modify gcc to handle byteorder issue automatically Georgy Yunayev
12:46 Re: Implementing fine grain parallelism and automatic support forSIMD ISA extensions in gcc Michael Matz
12:37 Fwd: unsubscribe...... Thomas Anders
11:50 Re: auto vectorization in gcc Dorit Naishlos
11:36 Implementing fine grain parallelism and automatic support for SIMDISA extensions in gcc Martin Brain
10:59 Re: Scopes in which __label__ can appear Fergus Henderson
10:52 New GCC Mirror Webmaster
09:10 GCC installed successfully Hameedullah Rasif
09:00 Re: FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once Nicola Pero
07:51 Re: Scopes in which __label__ can appear Gabriel Dos Reis
07:37 Re: strcpy(stc->val,var) = Segmention Fault Marcel Cox
06:11 First GCC 3.3.1 Prerelease Mark Mitchell
05:40 Re: FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once Neil Booth
05:31 Re: 3.4 bootstrap failure linking jv-convert on Solaris2.8 Bradley Lucier
05:19 unsubscribe...... HwanYoung,Lee
05:00 Re: 3.4 bootstrap failure linking jv-convert on Solaris2.8 Tom Tromey
03:08 Re: 3.4 bootstrap failure linking jv-convert on Solaris2.8 Bradley Lucier
02:23 Re: Scopes in which __label__ can appear Fergus Henderson
01:03 Re: 3.4 bootstrap failure linking jv-convert on Solaris2.8 Tom Tromey

July 20, 2003
23:24 Re: [RTLOPT] cannot compile branch Zdenek Dvorak
23:19 INITIAL_ELIMINATION_OFFSET() breakage in gcc 3.3 + ColdFire patches Bernardo Innocenti
22:34 [RTLOPT] cannot compile branch Andrew Pinski
21:13 Re: gcc-3.3 CVS failing during libjava compile with:./.libs/libgcj.so:undefined reference to `__gcc_personality_v0' Dan Kegel
19:43 3.4 bootstrap failure linking jv-convert on Solaris2.8 Bradley Lucier
15:58 Re: Why does -fschedule-insns2 in gcc 3.3 generates so many nops on ia64? H. J. Lu
14:57 statement expression and sequence point Gabriel Dos Reis
14:49 Why does -fschedule-insns2 in gcc 3.3 generates so many nops on ia64? H. J. Lu
14:34 Re: Scopes in which __label__ can appear Joseph S. Myers
13:46 Re: Label handling overhaul (C front end only) Gabriel Dos Reis
13:33 Re: Label handling overhaul (C front end only) Kai Henningsen
10:22 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-07-19) Steven Bosscher
04:04 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker Gabriel Dos Reis
03:45 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker Kaveh R. Ghazi
01:32 GCC Release Status (2003-07-19) Mark Mitchell
00:59 Re: Scopes in which __label__ can appear Gabriel Dos Reis
00:48 Important PRs assigned to you Mark Mitchell
00:41 Re: Scopes in which __label__ can appear Mark Mitchell

July 19, 2003
23:42 Re: Very strange ia64 code generation problem H. J. Lu
21:54 Re: Scopes in which __label__ can appear Gabriel Dos Reis
21:38 Re: Scopes in which __label__ can appear Gabriel Dos Reis
21:33 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker Gabriel Dos Reis
21:30 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker Gabriel Dos Reis
21:24 Re: Scopes in which __label__ can appear Mark Mitchell
19:52 Re: Scopes in which __label__ can appear Zack Weinberg
19:49 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker Zack Weinberg
19:46 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker Zack Weinberg
19:44 Re: Scopes in which __label__ can appear Gabriel Dos Reis
19:40 Re: Scopes in which __label__ can appear Zack Weinberg
19:31 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker Gabriel Dos Reis
19:27 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker Gabriel Dos Reis
19:25 Re: Scopes in which __label__ can appear Gabriel Dos Reis
19:11 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker Zack Weinberg
19:10 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker Zack Weinberg
19:08 Re: Scopes in which __label__ can appear Zack Weinberg
18:58 Re: Scopes in which __label__ can appear Gabriel Dos Reis
18:55 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker Gabriel Dos Reis
18:53 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker Gabriel Dos Reis
18:52 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker Zack Weinberg
18:52 Re: Scopes in which __label__ can appear Zack Weinberg
18:44 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker Gabriel Dos Reis
18:42 Re: Scopes in which __label__ can appear Gabriel Dos Reis
18:33 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker Zack Weinberg
18:32 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker Zack Weinberg
18:31 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker Gabriel Dos Reis
18:28 Scopes in which __label__ can appear Zack Weinberg
18:07 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker Gabriel Dos Reis
18:02 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker Kaveh R. Ghazi
17:58 Re: mips64-linux multilib vs -B mips64-linux/lib32/ Andreas Jaeger
17:12 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker Zack Weinberg
17:05 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker Gabriel Dos Reis
16:57 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker Gabriel Dos Reis
16:16 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker Zack Weinberg
16:12 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker Zack Weinberg
16:07 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker Gabriel Dos Reis
15:56 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:55 mips64-linux multilib vs -B mips64-linux/lib32/ Guido Guenther
15:52 Very strange ia64 code generation problem H. J. Lu
15:47 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker Gabriel Dos Reis
15:34 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker Zack Weinberg
15:12 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker Gabriel Dos Reis
14:02 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker Kaveh R. Ghazi
13:53 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags? Gerald Pfeifer
11:09 Another issue with diagnostic format-checker Gabriel Dos Reis
08:52 Re: Your changes to diagnostic machinery Gabriel Dos Reis
07:43 Re: How to mark a builtin function volatile? H. J. Lu
03:11 Re: Your changes to diagnostic machinery Kaveh R. Ghazi

July 18, 2003
23:53 Re: gcc 3 problem on sigaction and system tm_gccmail
22:31 Re: Your changes to diagnostic machinery Gabriel Dos Reis
22:15 gcc 3 problem on sigaction and system Kun Wei
22:05 Re: gcc mirror site Gerald Pfeifer
22:04 Re: Your changes to diagnostic machinery Kaveh R. Ghazi
21:50 Re: How to mark a builtin function volatile? Andrew Pinski
21:45 How to mark a builtin function volatile? H. J. Lu
21:09 Re: Your changes to diagnostic machinery Gabriel Dos Reis
20:49 Re: Your changes to diagnostic machinery Kaveh R. Ghazi
19:50 Your changes to diagnostic machinery Gabriel Dos Reis
19:44 Re: strcpy(stc->val,var) = Segmention Fault Steven Bosscher
19:36 strcpy(stc->val,var) = Segmention Fault "Uílton O. Dutra"
18:59 Re: Docs on At&T X86 asm syntax Kelley Cook
18:45 Re: Tru64 5.1 bootstrap fails with missing symbols: libiconv et al. Rainer Orth
18:21 Status of ACT GNAT with GCC mainline Rainer Orth
17:26 Re: auto vectorization in gcc Aldy Hernandez
17:20 Re: Tru64 5.1 bootstrap fails with missing symbols: libiconv et al. Russ Allbery
17:17 Re: Tru64 5.1 bootstrap fails with missing symbols: libiconv et al. Rainer Orth
17:09 Re: Is this a bad pointer bug? Joe Buck
17:06 Re: missing entry on build status list Janis Johnson
16:46 Re: Is this a bad pointer bug? Joe Buck
16:39 Re: ia64-linux binutils requirements? H. J. Lu
16:30 ia64-linux binutils requirements? Dara Hazeghi
16:06 Re: [FYI] Files with RCS keywords Joseph S. Myers
15:53 Tru64 5.1 bootstrap fails with missing symbols: libiconv et al. Dara Hazeghi
15:37 Re: How can GNU help me? Diego Novillo
15:14 How can GNU help me? Jhonny Everson
14:21 Re: Is this a bad pointer bug? Daniel Jacobowitz
14:18 Re: Docs on At&T X86 asm syntax Randy.Dunlap
14:13 comments on onlinedocs webpage Brian Sammon
14:12 Re: Is this a bad pointer bug? H. J. Lu
13:53 Re: issues with first scheduling pass on SH4 Vladimir N. Makarov
13:49 Re: [FYI] Files with RCS keywords Tom Tromey
12:39 Re: prolog vs prologue Gerald Pfeifer
11:42 Re: missing entry on build status list Andreas Jaeger
11:38 missing entry on build status list Jonathan Thornburg
11:17 RE: issues with first scheduling pass on SH4 Sanjiv Kumar Gupta, Noida
09:45 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure Rainer Orth
07:43 Re: Is this a bad pointer bug? Marcel Cox
07:10 Re: Docs on At&T X86 asm syntax H. J. Lu
06:09 Docs on At&T X86 asm syntax Sebastien DI MERCURIO
06:04 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure Andreas Tobler
04:17 Is this a bad pointer bug? H. J. Lu

July 17, 2003
23:38 Re: Re: Loading multiple versions of libstdc++ Joe Buck
22:33 RE: Re: Loading multiple versions of libstdc++ srajguru
22:12 Re: C++ frontend bug involving pointers to arrays Mark Mitchell
22:09 Re: 3.3.1 bug fix list, first crude draft Toon Moene
21:24 Re: auto vectorization in gcc Ayal Zaks
21:17 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Robert Dewar
21:11 Re: New compiler crash for PR8361 Geoff Keating
20:57 Re: 3.3.1 bug fix list, first crude draft jbuck
20:47 Re: A radical suggestion for g95 Steven Bosscher
20:44 Re: 3.3.1 bug fix list, first crude draft Toon Moene
20:40 Re: A radical suggestion for g95 Diego Novillo
20:37 Re: Finding unnecessary (K&R compat) casts Florian Krohm
20:30 Re: auto vectorization in gcc Michael Meissner
20:24 Re: A radical suggestion for g95 Toon Moene
20:16 Re: auto vectorization in gcc Daniel Berlin
19:57 Re: Loading multiple versions of libstdc++ Phil Edwards
19:53 Re: auto vectorization in gcc Steven Bosscher
19:43 Re: auto vectorization in gcc law
19:35 Re: auto vectorization in gcc Joern Rennecke
19:23 Re: Finding unnecessary (K&R compat) casts Kaveh R. Ghazi
19:21 Re: auto vectorization in gcc Diego Novillo
19:09 Re: gcc-ss-3.4-20030716 is now available Gerald Pfeifer
18:59 Re: gcc-ss-3.4-20030716 is now available Kelley Cook
18:45 Re: auto vectorization in gcc Daniel Berlin
18:43 Re: fixincl failure on solaris2 mainline Zack Weinberg
18:35 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Bradley Lucier
18:26 Re: auto vectorization in gcc law
18:20 Re: auto vectorization in gcc Richard Henderson
18:17 Re: fixincl failure on solaris2 mainline Phil Edwards
18:15 Re: auto vectorization in gcc David Edelsohn
18:12 Re: auto vectorization in gcc law
18:09 Re: auto vectorization in gcc Daniel Berlin
18:02 Re: auto vectorization in gcc Michael Matz
17:48 Re: auto vectorization in gcc Richard Henderson
17:43 Re: Release criteria (was: PATCH for Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrapbroken building 64-bit libgcc) Mark Mitchell
17:35 Re: fixincl failure on solaris2 mainline Zack Weinberg
17:25 fixincl failure on solaris2 mainline Phil Edwards
17:14 Re: Finding unnecessary (K&R compat) casts Florian Krohm
16:31 gcc 3.3 successfully built on RedHat 7.3 Dr. Jian-Xin Zhu
15:08 Re: New compiler crash for PR8361 Andrew Pinski
15:06 Re: Need help with dynamic_cast across shared libraries with gcc 3.2.3. Eljay Love-Jensen
15:04 C++ frontend bug involving pointers to arrays Ulrich Weigand
15:02 Re: Need help with dynamic_cast across shared libraries with gcc 3.2.3. Eljay Love-Jensen
14:47 Re: Need help with dynamic_cast across shared libraries with gcc 3.2.3. Yuly Novikov
14:44 Re: Need help with dynamic_cast across shared libraries with gcc 3.2.3. Eljay Love-Jensen
14:14 Need help with dynamic_cast across shared libraries with gcc 3.2.3. Yuly Novikov
14:09 Re: auto vectorization in gcc Diego Novillo
13:58 Finding unnecessary (K&R compat) casts Kaveh R. Ghazi
13:03 Re: New compiler crash for PR8361 Steven Bosscher
12:55 Re: Use-and-clobber insns and REG_DEAD notes (fwd) Ulrich Weigand
12:43 auto vectorization in gcc Dorit Naishlos
12:26 Re: New compiler crash for PR8361 Andrew Pinski
12:17 New compiler crash for PR8361 Gerald Pfeifer
11:52 Re: Tree-SSA failure on FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE Linus Sjöberg
11:33 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure Rainer Orth
10:07 Re: Using GCC as a C++ front-end. Pop Sébastian
10:01 Re: How to copy a tree ? Pop Sébastian
09:31 [FYI] Files with RCS keywords Florian Weimer
08:54 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure Andreas Tobler
08:18 Re: 3.3.1 bug fix list, first crude draft Eric Botcazou
07:47 How to copy a tree ? Matthieu Moy
06:33 Loading multiple versions of libstdc++ srajguru
06:17 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Eric Botcazou
06:01 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Eric Botcazou
04:17 Re: 3.3 regression, PR 11366 (was Re: GCC Release Status(2003-07-11)) Mark Mitchell
03:57 Mac OS X - seeking help Shashikant Hire
02:58 3.3 regression, PR 11366 (was Re: GCC Release Status (2003-07-11)) Phil Edwards
02:48 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure Kazu Hirata
00:48 Re: 3.3.1 bug fix list, first crude draft Joe Buck
00:32 Re: 3.3.1 bug fix list, first crude draft Rainer Orth
00:25 Re: 3.3.1 bug fix list, first crude draft Andrew Pinski
00:10 3.3.1 bug fix list, first crude draft Joe Buck

July 16, 2003
23:19 Re: [tree-ssa] Coalescing/killing redundant labels? law
22:59 [tree-ssa] Coalescing/killing redundant labels? Steven Bosscher
22:39 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Mark Mitchell
22:35 Re: prolog vs prologue Ben Elliston
22:26 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Phil Edwards
22:18 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Eric Botcazou
21:28 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Mark Mitchell
21:23 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Michael Matz
21:19 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Eric Botcazou
21:17 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Phil Edwards
21:12 Re: A radical suggestion for g95 Gabriel Dos Reis
21:11 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Eric Botcazou
21:08 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Phil Edwards
21:07 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Paul Jarc
20:59 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Eric Botcazou
20:41 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Phil Edwards
20:41 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Mark Mitchell
20:38 Re: A radical suggestion for g95 Benjamin Kosnik
20:37 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure Kazu Hirata
20:35 Re: [tree-ssa] What does bsi_next_in_bb do? Andrew MacLeod
20:30 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Eric Botcazou
20:29 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc Eric Botcazou
20:22 Re: gcc-ss-3.4-20030716 is now available Ranjit Mathew
20:15 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Phil Edwards
20:10 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc Phil Edwards
20:05 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc Eric Botcazou
19:34 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc Phil Edwards
19:23 Re: [tree-ssa] What does bsi_next_in_bb do? Diego Novillo
19:14 [tree-ssa] What does bsi_next_in_bb do? Steven Bosscher
18:12 A radical suggestion for g95 Joe Buck
18:10 gcc-ss-3.4-20030716 is now available Gerald Pfeifer
18:04 Re: prolog vs prologue Joe Buck
17:08 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Phil Edwards
17:04 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Andreas Tobler
17:03 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding Mark Mitchell
17:01 Re: "Best development tool" award" Nathan Sidwell
16:52 "Best development tool" award" Paul Hudson
16:49 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Mark Mitchell
16:49 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Phil Edwards
16:35 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Mark Mitchell
16:29 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Eric Botcazou
16:24 Using GCC as a C++ front-end. Matthieu Moy
15:53 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining g95 Toon Moene
15:46 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Eric Botcazou
15:41 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Eric Botcazou
14:59 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining g95 Nick Burrett
13:52 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Eric Botcazou
13:40 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss Eric Botcazou
12:59 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining g95 Toon Moene
12:55 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss Andreas Schwab
12:34 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss Eric Botcazou
12:24 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss Eric Botcazou
12:17 Re: 3.4 mips64-linux build problem Guido Guenther
11:59 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding Eric Botcazou
11:59 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Eric Botcazou
10:07 Problems with multiple inheritance Pascal Francq
09:17 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss Andreas Schwab
08:47 Re: PR 11319 analyzed (Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR10021) Mark Mitchell
05:59 Re: Help needed - cannot convert void* to const void* Colin Douglas Howell
05:45 Re: Help needed - cannot convert void* to const void* Colin Douglas Howell
05:37 Help needed - cannot convert void* to const void* R Nagamanickam
05:10 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Andreas Tobler
03:24 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Joe Buck
02:01 Re: Use-and-clobber insns and REG_DEAD notes (fwd) Michael Matz
01:48 Re: PR 11319 analyzed (Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021) David Edelsohn
01:44 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding Kai Henningsen
01:44 Re: Why do we need to fixinclude HUGE_VAL definitions in math.h? Kai Henningsen
01:35 Re: prolog vs prologue Ben Elliston
01:35 Re: Decision on gccbug? Ben Elliston
01:31 Re: Use-and-clobber insns and REG_DEAD notes (fwd) Richard Henderson
01:31 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding Segher Boessenkool
01:21 Re: Use-and-clobber insns and REG_DEAD notes (fwd) Michael Matz
00:34 Re: Documenation in ifcvt.c Richard Kenner
00:21 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding Mark Mitchell
00:19 RFC: some target macro->hook conversions DJ Delorie
00:15 Re: structure members of packed structures Richard Henderson
00:12 Re: Documenation in ifcvt.c Richard Henderson
00:11 Re: PR 11319 analyzed (Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021) Dale Johannesen
00:05 Re: Documenation in ifcvt.c Richard Kenner
00:03 Re: Documenation in ifcvt.c Richard Henderson

July 15, 2003
23:55 Re: structure members of packed structures Dale Johannesen
23:26 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss Joseph S. Myers
23:26 RE: [tree-ssa] Maintaining g95 S. Bosscher
23:22 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining g95 Ben Elliston
23:13 Re: Testsuite custom environment (second try at posting) Ben Elliston
23:13 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding Richard Henderson
23:09 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Phil Edwards
23:09 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Phil Edwards
23:02 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss Eric Botcazou
22:59 Re: structure members of packed structures Richard Henderson
22:51 Re: PR 11319 analyzed (Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR10021) Jim Wilson
22:47 Re: Use-and-clobber insns and REG_DEAD notes (fwd) Richard Henderson
22:36 Re: Feature idea for GCC: link dependencies Martin Schaffner
22:30 Re: PR 11319 analyzed (Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021) Dale Johannesen
22:29 Re: PR 11319 analyzed (Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR10021) Jim Wilson
22:11 Re: PR 11319 analyzed (Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR10021) Jim Wilson
22:03 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss Nathanael Nerode
21:44 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Eric Botcazou
21:39 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Jeff Sturm
21:32 Documenation in ifcvt.c Richard Kenner
20:59 Re: PR 11319 analyzed (Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021) Dale Johannesen
20:54 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Mark Mitchell
20:39 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Eric Botcazou
20:34 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Eric Botcazou
20:31 Re: PR 11319 analyzed (Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR10021) Mark Mitchell
20:08 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure Rainer Orth
20:05 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure Kazu Hirata
20:02 Re: PR 11319 analyzed (Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021) Michael Matz
20:00 [tree-ssa]: remove_stmt in tree-cfg.c doesn't update bb end properly Daniel Berlin
19:55 Re: More info on gcc 3.3 ia64 bootstrap comparison failure Jim Wilson
19:52 PR 11319 analyzed (Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021) Franz Sirl
19:38 Re: GCC for 8051 based architectures tm_gccmail
19:35 Re: GCC for 8051 based architectures Dave Hudson
18:59 Re: Reloading failes Jim Wilson
18:57 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding Eric Botcazou
18:51 Re: PR 7993 Ziemowit Laski
18:36 Re: prefetch optimizations Janis Johnson
18:15 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Mark Mitchell
18:08 More info on gcc 3.3 ia64 bootstrap comparison failure H. J. Lu
18:07 Re: PR 7993 Stan Shebs
18:06 Re: GCC for 8051 based architectures Joe Buck
17:44 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure Rainer Orth
17:39 Re: GCC for 8051 based architectures Julia Nilsson
17:37 Re: 3.4 mips64-linux build problem DJ Delorie
17:37 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Jeff Sturm
17:35 Re: GCC for 8051 based architectures Julia Nilsson
17:35 Re: PR 8878 Mark Mitchell
17:32 Re: PR 8878 Aldy Hernandez
17:26 Re: dlopen and template instantiation Stefan Seefeld
17:25 Re: PR 7993 Mark Mitchell
17:22 Re: structure members of packed structures Mark Mitchell
17:20 PR 8878 Mark Mitchell
17:20 3.4 mips64-linux build problem Guido Guenther
17:19 Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Mark Mitchell
17:12 Re: Porting question: legitimate address Michael Meissner
17:12 Re: PR 7993 Nicola Pero
17:03 PR 7993 Mark Mitchell
16:52 Re: structure members of packed structures Alexandre Oliva
16:37 Re: structure members of packed structures Joe Buck
16:06 Re: prolog vs prologue jbuck
16:01 Successful build 3.2.3 / Red Hat 7.2 / binutils 2.11.90 Bram Wijngaarden
15:48 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding Phil Edwards
15:43 Re: dlopen and template instantiation H. J. Lu
15:38 dlopen and template instantiation Stefan Seefeld
15:25 Re: Time to rotate ChangeLog? law
15:09 Re: release tarballs should have LAST_UPDATED containing releasetag? Gerald Pfeifer
14:44 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding Andreas Schwab
14:43 Re: [PATCH] libffi/configure.in: Add arm-*-pe* Shaun Jackman
14:41 Re: Add -lwinsock -lcoredll to LIB_SPEC for arm-wince-pe [PATCH] Shaun Jackman
14:37 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding Kaveh R. Ghazi
14:34 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags? Daniel Jacobowitz
14:31 Re: Decision on gccbug? Volker Reichelt
14:29 Re: Enable newlib and libstdc++ for arm-wince-pe [PATCH] Shaun Jackman
14:24 Re: structure members of packed structures Hans-Peter Nilsson
14:09 Re: structure members of packed structures Nathan Sidwell
14:03 Porting question: legitimate address Anders Ãdland
14:02 Re: Decision on gccbug? Wolfgang Bangerth
13:27 Re: prolog vs prologue Hans-Peter Nilsson
13:07 Re: Decision on gccbug? Daniel Berlin
12:19 Re: structure members of packed structures Hans-Peter Nilsson
11:48 Re: structure members of packed structures Andreas Schwab
11:40 Re: structure members of packed structures Nathan Sidwell
11:35 New Mirror Webmaster
11:15 Re: structure members of packed structures Hans-Peter Nilsson
10:32 Re: Requesting scratch register Richard Earnshaw
10:30 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure Rainer Orth
09:54 Requesting scratch register Natasha Wilson
09:32 Re: Reloading failes Anders Ãdland
08:53 Re: structure members of packed structures Mark Mitchell
08:49 Re: structure members of packed structures Nathan Sidwell
07:47 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding Andreas Schwab
07:17 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding Eric Botcazou
07:03 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding Eric Botcazou
07:01 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc Eric Botcazou
07:01 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding Eric Botcazou
06:46 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding Russ Allbery
05:55 Re: prolog vs prologue Fergus Henderson
05:51 prolog vs prologue Ben Elliston
05:48 Re: [PATCH] libffi/configure.in: Add arm-*-pe* Jim Wilson
05:40 Re: structure members of packed structures Mark Mitchell
05:33 Re: Enable newlib and libstdc++ for arm-wince-pe [PATCH] Jim Wilson
05:32 Re: Sugesstion on gcc compiler Ben Elliston
05:29 Re: Decision on gccbug? Ben Elliston
05:28 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding Nathanael Nerode
05:08 Re: Add -lwinsock -lcoredll to LIB_SPEC for arm-wince-pe [PATCH] Jim Wilson
04:30 Re: Feature idea for GCC: link dependencies Fergus Henderson
04:15 Re: structure members of packed structures Hans-Peter Nilsson
04:01 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer Simon Law
03:40 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding Kaveh R. Ghazi
03:35 Re: structure members of packed structures Mark Mitchell
03:16 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding Andreas Jaeger
03:07 Re: structure members of packed structures Hans-Peter Nilsson
02:44 Re: install vs. install-sh Alexandre Oliva
01:33 Re: install vs. install-sh DJ Delorie
01:30 Re: install vs. install-sh Nathanael Nerode
01:06 Re: c-decl.c broken on 64-bit platforms Geoffrey Keating
01:00 Re: c-decl.c broken on 64-bit platforms Alexandre Oliva
00:57 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags? (was: gcc_latest_snapshot CVS tag) Alexandre Oliva
00:48 Re: release tarballs should have LAST_UPDATED containing release tag? Alexandre Oliva
00:45 install vs install-sh DJ Delorie
00:29 Re: Extra Changelog entry in 3.3? Mark Mitchell
00:08 Extra Changelog entry in 3.3? H. J. Lu

July 14, 2003
23:59 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc Phil Edwards
23:59 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer Ben Elliston
23:43 Time to rotate ChangeLog? Kazu Hirata
23:19 Re: Use-and-clobber insns and REG_DEAD notes (fwd) Ulrich Weigand
23:11 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding Eric Botcazou
22:56 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc Eric Botcazou
22:49 Re: starting compile server - advice needed Ziemowit Laski
22:47 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure Phil Edwards
22:39 Re: starting compile server - advice needed Matt Austern
22:35 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc Phil Edwards
22:28 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc Eric Botcazou
21:51 Re: structure members of packed structures Dale Johannesen
21:39 Re: structure members of packed structures Mark Mitchell
21:38 Cross from powerpc-linux-gnu to mipsel-linux-gnu broken? Daniel Egger
20:54 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding Geoff Keating
20:36 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc Phil Edwards
20:27 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure Rainer Orth
20:20 Re: Disabling PCH headers Kelley Cook
20:07 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure Phil Edwards
19:42 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure Rainer Orth
19:36 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure Phil Edwards
19:23 Re: Removing old-gcc (was: "Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags?") Joern Rennecke
19:18 GCC test results for SH targets Ryan Smiderle
18:26 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding Mark Mitchell
17:49 Re: Decision on gccbug? Phil Edwards
17:44 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding Kaveh R. Ghazi
17:32 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding David O'Brien
17:23 Removing old-gcc (was: "Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags?") Steven Bosscher
17:00 gcc-ss-3.3-20030714 is now available gccadmin
16:30 sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure Rainer Orth
15:58 structure members of packed structures Nathan Sidwell
15:07 Feature idea for GCC: link dependencies Martin Schaffner
14:48 Release criteria (was: PATCH for Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap brokenbuilding 64-bit libgcc) Gerald Pfeifer
14:32 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags? (was: gcc_latest_snapshot CVStag) Wolfgang Bangerth
14:18 Re: Decision on gccbug? Wolfgang Bangerth
13:53 Re: auto* versions for gcc? Bonzini
13:07 Re: INITIAL_ELIMINATION_OFFSET() in m68k backend Peter Barada
13:00 Re: auto* versions for gcc? Anthony Green
12:53 Re: release tarballs should have LAST_UPDATED containing releasetag? Andreas Schwab
12:26 Additional maintainer for our build machinery (*.in) Gerald Pfeifer
09:01 Re: target names and glibc versions on linux Ben Elliston
08:54 Re: building Ben Elliston
06:41 crosstool-0.12 release. Builds gcc/glibc cross-toolchain, runs gcc/g++/libstdc++testsuite remotely. Dan Kegel
05:38 INITIAL_ELIMINATION_OFFSET() in m68k backend Bernardo Innocenti
05:29 auto* versions for gcc? Randolph Chung
01:37 YES yzz

July 13, 2003
22:51 Re: release tarballs should have LAST_UPDATED containing releasetag? Dan Kegel
22:37 Re: SPAM[RBL] Re: [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3 uClinux toolchain 20030712 snapshot Bernardo Innocenti
22:36 Re: State of djgpp support? Dara Hazeghi
22:31 Re: release tarballs should have LAST_UPDATED containing releasetag? Gerald Pfeifer
22:05 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags? (was: gcc_latest_snapshot CVS tag) Christopher Faylor
22:03 Re: [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3 uClinux toolchain 20030712 snapshot Dan Kegel
21:55 Re: State of djgpp support? Andris Pavenis
21:38 State of djgpp support? Dara Hazeghi
21:19 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags? Andrew Pinski
21:15 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags? (was: gcc_latest_snapshot CVStag) Joseph S. Myers
21:08 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags? Kazu Hirata
20:54 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags? Alexandre Oliva
20:48 Re: gcc-3.3 CVS failing during libjava compile with:./.libs/libgcj.so: undefined reference to `__gcc_personality_v0' Martin Schlemmer
20:28 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags? (was: gcc_latest_snapshot CVStag) Gerald Pfeifer
20:21 Re: c-decl.c broken on 64-bit platforms Andreas Jaeger
20:09 Re: [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3 uClinux toolchain 20030712 snapshot Bernardo Innocenti
19:56 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags? (was: gcc_latest_snapshot CVS tag) Aaron Lehmann
19:21 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags? Geoff Keating
19:19 Re: gcc-3.3 CVS failing during libjava compile with: ./.libs/libgcj.so:undefined reference to `__gcc_personality_v0' Jeff Sturm
19:17 Re: "make check--target-libstdc++-v3" failing for cross-compiler Dan Kegel
19:11 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags? Geoff Keating
19:03 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags? Phil Edwards
18:59 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags? Gabriel Dos Reis
18:49 Re: "make check--target-libstdc++-v3" failing for cross-compiler Phil Edwards
18:47 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags? Phil Edwards
18:32 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags? Joseph S. Myers
18:27 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags? (was: gcc_latest_snapshot CVS tag) Phil Edwards
18:21 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags? Florian Weimer
18:10 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags? (was: gcc_latest_snapshot CVStag) Joseph S. Myers
18:06 Re: [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3 uClinux toolchain 20030712 snapshot Dan Kegel
17:46 [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3 uClinux toolchain 20030712 snapshot Bernardo Innocenti
17:35 "make check--target-libstdc++-v3" failing for cross-compiler Dan Kegel
17:26 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags? (was: gcc_latest_snapshot CVStag) Gerald Pfeifer
17:17 Re: acconfig.h and Makefile.in Manfred Hollstein
17:13 Re: gcc-3.3 CVS failing during libjava compile with:./.libs/libgcj.so: undefined reference to `__gcc_personality_v0' Martin Schlemmer
16:51 Re: acconfig.h and Makefile.in Zack Weinberg
16:21 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags? Joseph S. Myers
16:11 Re: make info and make dvi depend on make all? Joseph S. Myers
16:03 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags? (was: gcc_latest_snapshot CVStag) Joseph S. Myers
15:36 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags? Dara Hazeghi
15:36 Re: __WCHAR_TYPE__ and friends (was Re: OpenBSD tester wanted (fixincludes patch)) Neil Booth
15:25 Re: x86_64 ld error Andreas Jaeger
15:08 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags? Christopher Faylor
14:14 Re: make info and make dvi depend on make all? Gerald Pfeifer
14:09 x86_64 ld error Doug Shubert
12:50 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags? Kazu Hirata
12:16 Re: Fastjar, copyright, and upstream... Christoph Hellwig
12:01 removing old snapshot CVS tags? (was: gcc_latest_snapshot CVS tag) Gerald Pfeifer
11:53 acconfig.h and Makefile.in Richard Kenner
10:07 Re: Fastjar, copyright, and upstream... Matthias Klose
06:58 Re: Why do we need to fixinclude HUGE_VAL definitions in math.h? Zack Weinberg
06:33 Re: What happened to libfeutil? Gabriel Dos Reis
06:03 Re: Why do we need to fixinclude HUGE_VAL definitions in math.h? Nathanael Nerode
05:05 Re: TRANSLATION_UNIT_DECL breaks bootstrap Daniel Berlin
04:16 Re: Why do we need to fixinclude HUGE_VAL definitions in math.h? Bruce Korb
04:15 Re: TRANSLATION_UNIT_DECL breaks bootstrap Geoff Keating
04:01 Re: OpenBSD tester wanted (fixincludes patch) Geoff Keating
02:32 Re: What happened to libfeutil? Ben Elliston
02:32 Re: Decision on gccbug? Ben Elliston
01:32 Re: Fastjar, copyright, and upstream... Ranjit Mathew
01:12 Re: TRANSLATION_UNIT_DECL breaks bootstrap Daniel Berlin
00:10 Re: FW: trademark filings for GCC? Richard Stallman

July 12, 2003
23:37 Why do we need to fixinclude HUGE_VAL definitions in math.h? Nathanael Nerode
21:52 Re: GCC for 8051 based architectures Dave Hudson
21:43 Re: TRANSLATION_UNIT_DECL breaks bootstrap Geoff Keating
19:43 Re: Web Page Gabriel Dos Reis
19:14 Re: Web Page Nathanael Nerode
18:25 Re: Web Page Nathan Sidwell
18:22 Re: __WCHAR_TYPE__ and friends (was Re: OpenBSD tester wanted (fixincludes patch)) Gabriel Dos Reis
18:21 Re: Web Page Christopher Faylor
18:19 Re: Web Page Zack Weinberg
18:10 Re: Web Page Steven Bosscher
18:06 Web Page Andrew Pinski
17:42 Re: __WCHAR_TYPE__ and friends (was Re: OpenBSD tester...) Bruce Korb
16:35 __WCHAR_TYPE__ and friends (was Re: OpenBSD tester wanted (fixincludespatch)) Nathanael Nerode
16:21 Re: OpenBSD tester wanted (fixincludes patch) Bruce Korb
16:14 Re: RFC: DW_CFA_offset_range Hans-Peter Nilsson
16:12 Re: starting compile server - advice needed Jamie Lokier
12:52 c-decl.c broken on 64-bit platforms Andreas Jaeger
07:57 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc Eric Botcazou
07:10 Re: Fastjar, copyright, and upstream... Matthias Klose
06:54 Re: ppc64 unwinding problem Richard Henderson
05:44 Re: TRANSLATION_UNIT_DECL breaks bootstrap Daniel Berlin
05:32 Re: FW: trademark filings for GCC? Richard Stallman
05:06 Re: Disabling PCH headers Oscar Fuentes
05:01 Re: problems with gcc3.2.3 and wide character support Oscar Fuentes
04:31 problems with gcc3.2.3 and wide character support Sachin Zingade
04:23 Disabling PCH headers Robert McNulty Junior
04:20 Re: TRANSLATION_UNIT_DECL breaks bootstrap Geoff Keating
04:13 Re: Bootstap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6 due to warnings in cgraphunit.c Jan Hubicka
02:56 Bootstap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6 due to warnings in cgraphunit.c Andrew Pinski
02:14 Re: OpenBSD tester wanted (fixincludes patch) Nathanael Nerode
01:29 Re: OpenBSD tester wanted (fixincludes patch) Nathanael Nerode
01:28 Re: TRANSLATION_UNIT_DECL breaks bootstrap Steven Bosscher
01:16 Re: TRANSLATION_UNIT_DECL breaks bootstrap Geoff Keating
01:14 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-07-11) Steven Bosscher
00:42 Donating libffi (was: Fastjar, copyright, and upstream...) Anthony Green
00:36 Re: [PATCH] Fix: Re: Bootstrap failure on i686-unknown-openbsd3.1 Jim Wilson
00:28 Re: OpenBSD tester wanted (fixincludes patch) Andrew Pinski
00:18 Re: OpenBSD tester wanted (fixincludes patch) Andrew Pinski
00:08 Re: Fastjar, copyright, and upstream... Nathanael Nerode
00:05 Re: Fastjar, copyright, and upstream... Jim Wilson
00:03 Re: ppc64 unwinding problem Jakub Jelinek
00:00 Re: FW: trademark filings for GCC? Dale Johannesen

July 11, 2003
23:53 Re: OpenBSD tester wanted (fixincludes patch) Andrew Pinski
23:50 Re: OpenBSD tester wanted (fixincludes patch) Andrew Pinski
23:45 OpenBSD tester wanted (fixincludes patch) Nathanael Nerode
23:44 Re: FW: trademark filings for GCC? Jim Wilson
23:44 Re: Fastjar, copyright, and upstream... Joseph S. Myers
23:29 Re: FW: trademark filings for GCC? Jim Wilson
23:28 Fastjar, copyright, and upstream... Nathanael Nerode
23:27 Re: PR 10501 Jan Hubicka
23:25 Re: starting compile server - advice needed Per Bothner
23:24 Re: PR 10681 Richard Henderson
23:24 Tarball of contributed tool (gcc, gdb, binutils) modifications. cgd
23:23 GCC Release Status (2003-07-11) Mark Mitchell
23:22 Re: builtin_str{,n}cmp bug on s390{,x} Jakub Jelinek
23:15 Re: PR 10510 (was Re: PR 10501) Andrew Pinski
23:08 PR 10501 Mark Mitchell
23:06 Re: TRANSLATION_UNIT_DECL breaks bootstrap Mark Mitchell
23:04 PR 10681 Mark Mitchell
23:01 Re: TRANSLATION_UNIT_DECL breaks bootstrap Steven Bosscher
22:38 Re: GCC for 8051 based architectures tm_gccmail
22:16 Re: starting compile server - advice needed Mike Stump
21:59 Re: starting compile server - advice needed Gerald Pfeifer
21:58 Re: ppc64 unwinding problem Richard Henderson
21:45 Re: starting compile server - advice needed Daniel Jacobowitz
21:40 starting compile server - advice needed Per Bothner
21:14 TRANSLATION_UNIT_DECL breaks bootstrap Mark Mitchell
20:57 ppc64 unwinding problem Jakub Jelinek
20:53 Re: RFA: __imag__ and __real__ in C++ (bug 11437) Mark Mitchell
19:01 Re: FW: trademark filings for GCC? Mike Stump
18:39 Re: -Wcast-qual broken(?) for libstdc++ Gawain Bolton
16:17 Re: builtin_str{,n}cmp bug on s390{,x} Ulrich Weigand
16:07 [PATCH] Fix: Re: Bootstrap failure on i686-unknown-openbsd3.1 Andrew Pinski
15:57 RFC: DW_CFA_offset_range Jakub Jelinek
15:51 Bootstrap failure on i686-unknown-openbsd3.1 Andrew Pinski
15:28 Re: GCC for 8051 based architectures Julia Nilsson
14:28 [PATCH] libffi/configure.in: Add arm-*-pe* Shaun Jackman
14:22 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Gunther Nikl
14:16 Add -lwinsock -lcoredll to LIB_SPEC for arm-wince-pe [PATCH] Shaun Jackman
14:12 Enable newlib and libstdc++ for arm-wince-pe [PATCH] Shaun Jackman
14:09 Re: "make install" in libjava recompile many files? H. J. Lu
13:52 Re: GCC for 8051 based architectures Shaun Jackman
11:15 Re: Feature idea for GCC: link dependencies Martin Schaffner
10:22 Re: FW: trademark filings for GCC? Joseph S. Myers
10:06 "make install" in libjava recompile many files? Andrew Haley
10:04 Mainline bootstrap failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu Steven Bosscher
09:10 Re: [Bug middle-end/10060] ICE (stack overflow) on huge file (300klines) due to recursive behaviour of copy_rtx_if_shared, in emit_rtl.c Steven Bosscher
08:59 GCC for 8051 based architectures Julia Nilsson
07:13 Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure Kai Henningsen
06:55 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021 Jim Wilson
06:25 new Bugzilla keywords Nathanael Nerode
06:20 Re: Border color and background color Zack Weinberg
06:01 Border color and background color Cristina Camara
05:57 Re: [Bug middle-end/10060] ICE (stack overflow) on huge file (300k lines) due to recursive behaviour of copy_rtx_if_shared, in emit_rtl.c Daniel Berlin
05:52 Re: [Bugzilla] Missing option to go from WAITING to UNCONFIRMED? Daniel Berlin
05:45 Re: [Bugzilla] Missing options to go from WAITING to UNCONFIRMED? Daniel Berlin
05:25 Re: [Bugzilla] Missing options to go from WAITING to UNCONFIRMED? Andrew Pinski
05:18 Re: [Bugzilla] Missing options to go from WAITING to UNCONFIRMED? Daniel Berlin
05:12 Re: RFA: __imag__ and __real__ in C++ (bug 11437) Nathanael Nerode
05:08 Re: [Bugzilla] Missing option to go from WAITING to UNCONFIRMED? Nathanael Nerode
05:03 Re: [Bugzilla] Missing options to go from WAITING to UNCONFIRMED? Nathanael Nerode
05:02 Re: FW: trademark filings for GCC? Eben Moglen
04:49 Re: FW: trademark filings for GCC? Carl Oppedahl
03:55 Re: gcc Intermediate Representation Jim Wilson
03:49 Re: FW: trademark filings for GCC? Richard Stallman
03:41 Re: gcc-3.3 problem with reloading byte into address register onColdFire Jim Wilson
03:16 Re: RFA (Was: Re: RFC / RFA): dwarf2 unwinding for targets with Jim Wilson
03:07 Stunned Robert McNulty Junior
02:42 gcc mirror site Jin-Shan Tseng
01:12 Re: Reg near and far call syntax tm_gccmail
00:28 Reg near and far call syntax penumarthy sreenivas
00:25 Re: [tree-ssa] copy prop vs. debugging Andrew MacLeod

July 10, 2003
23:22 Feature idea for GCC: link dependencies Martin Schaffner
23:21 Re: [tree-ssa] copy prop vs. debugging law
23:16 Re: builtin_str{,n}cmp bug on s390{,x} Jakub Jelinek
23:06 Re: builtin_str{,n}cmp bug on s390{,x} Richard Henderson
23:05 Re: builtin_str{,n}cmp bug on s390{,x} Richard Henderson
22:59 Re: [PATCH] Fix do_div() for all architectures Bernardo Innocenti
22:57 Re: RFA: Use _Unwind_Ptr (Was: Re: RFC / RFA: dwarf2 unwinding for targets with call-part-clobbered registers) Richard Henderson
22:13 Re: fold-const declarations way longer than 80 chars law
22:05 #define and struct name Cheng, Cheuk
22:04 Re: [PATCH] Fix do_div() for all architectures Richard Henderson
21:21 Re: Support for %d$c format specifier in diagnostics.c Ishikawa
21:17 Re: Minor Documentation Problems Toon Moene
21:04 Re: Support for %d$c format specifier in diagnostics.c Ishikawa
20:49 Re: iconv problems Richard Kenner
20:44 Re: iconv problems Andrew Pinski
20:41 iconv problems Richard Kenner
20:20 Re: [PATCH] Fix do_div() for all architectures Andrea Arcangeli
19:54 Re: [PATCH] Fix do_div() for all architectures Dale Johannesen
19:52 Re: RFA: Use _Unwind_Ptr (Was: Re: RFC / RFA: dwarf2 unwinding for targets with call-part-clobbered registers) Joern Rennecke
19:32 Re: [PATCH] Fix do_div() for all architectures Bernardo Innocenti
19:31 How is "make install" supposed to work on sparc-sun-solaris2, 3.3-branch? Phil Edwards
19:22 "make install" in libjava recompile many files? H. J. Lu
19:07 Re: Debug initial line number Michael Elizabeth Chastain
18:57 Re: [Bugzilla] Missing option to go from WAITING to UNCONFIRMED? Daniel Berlin
18:47 Re: RFA: Use _Unwind_Ptr (Was: Re: RFC / RFA: dwarf2 unwinding for targets with call-part-clobbered registers) Joern Rennecke
18:47 Re: Hi! About mailinglist. Mike Stump
18:44 Re: builtin_str{,n}cmp bug on s390{,x} Ulrich Weigand
18:38 Hi! About mailinglist. Janne
18:13 Re: RFA: Use _Unwind_Ptr (Was: Re: RFC / RFA: dwarf2 unwinding for targets with call-part-clobbered registers) Richard Henderson
18:13 Re: prefetch optimizations tm_gccmail
18:08 Re: prefetch optimizations Mike Stump
17:57 Re: RFA: Use _Unwind_Ptr (Was: Re: RFC / RFA: dwarf2 unwinding for targets with call-part-clobbered registers) Andrew Pinski
17:57 Re: RFA: Use _Unwind_Ptr (Was: Re: RFC / RFA: dwarf2 unwinding fortargets with call-part-clobbered registers) Michael Matz
17:53 Re: RFA: Use _Unwind_Ptr (Was: Re: RFC / RFA: dwarf2 unwinding for targets with call-part-clobbered registers) Joern Rennecke
17:52 Re: builtin_str{,n}cmp bug on s390{,x} Jakub Jelinek
17:44 Re: builtin_str{,n}cmp bug on s390{,x} Ulrich Weigand
17:38 Re: Papers Bernardo Innocenti
17:24 Re: RFA: Use _Unwind_Ptr (Was: Re: RFC / RFA: dwarf2 unwinding for targets with call-part-clobbered registers) Richard Henderson
17:15 Debug initial line number John Parkes
17:07 Re: builtin_str{,n}cmp bug on s390{,x} Richard Henderson
16:20 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021 Mark Mitchell
16:19 Re: RFA: Use _Unwind_Ptr (Was: Re: RFC / RFA: dwarf2 unwinding for targets with call-part-clobbered registers) Joern Rennecke
16:07 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021 Marcus Meissner
16:01 Re: -Wcast-qual broken(?) for libstdc++ Mark Mitchell
15:53 builtin_str{,n}cmp bug on s390{,x} Jakub Jelinek
15:51 Re: RFA (Was: Re: RFC / RFA): dwarf2 unwinding for targets with Joern Rennecke
15:33 Re: -Wcast-qual broken(?) for libstdc++ Benjamin Kosnik
15:21 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021 David Edelsohn
14:50 Shcompact to SHmedia unwinding (Was: Re: RFA: dwarf2 unwinding for targets with call-part-clobbered) Joern Rennecke
13:36 Re: gcc-3.3 problem with reloading byte into address register on ColdFire Peter Barada
13:22 Re: gcc-3.3 problem with reloading byte into address register on ColdFire Peter Barada
13:15 C++ regression: comparing unsigned against integer literal Gerald Pfeifer
13:09 [Bugzilla] Missing option to go from WAITING to UNCONFIRMED? Steven Bosscher
12:43 Re: Proposed new target maintainers Ian Dall
12:39 gcc Intermediate Representation H E M A N T
12:38 problems with gcc3.2.3 and wstring Sachin Zingade
11:51 Re: bootstrap failure: libstdc++-v3/include/stdc++.h:83 Andrew Pinski
11:50 Re: -Wcast-qual broken(?) for libstdc++ Gerald Pfeifer
11:43 Re: gcc compiler Diego Novillo
11:41 prefetch optimizations Niavis Panagiotis
11:15 gcc compiler davidfranks
10:43 Re: bootstrap failure: libstdc++-v3/include/stdc++.h:83 Gerald Pfeifer
09:16 Re: sched-ebb.c bug (was Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure) Jakub Jelinek
08:08 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021 Franz Sirl
07:30 Re: bootstrap failure: libstdc++-v3/include/stdc++.h:83 Alexandre Oliva
07:03 Re: Proposed new target maintainers Eric Christopher
06:53 Re: Support for %d$c format specifier in diagnostics.c Gabriel Dos Reis
06:39 Re: RFA: __imag__ and __real__ in C++ (bug 11437) Gabriel Dos Reis
06:36 Re: RFA: __imag__ and __real__ in C++ (bug 11437) Gabriel Dos Reis
05:34 Re: sched-ebb.c bug (was Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure) Jim Wilson
05:28 Re: Support for %d$c format specifier in diagnostics.c Neil Booth
04:43 Re: fold-const declarations way longer than 80 chars Andreas Jaeger
04:28 Re: fold-const declarations way longer than 80 chars Andreas Jaeger
03:08 Re: Pre_dec and Post_inc insns Hans-Peter Nilsson
02:42 Re: RFA (Was: Re: RFC / RFA): dwarf2 unwinding for targets with call-part-clobbered Alexandre Oliva
02:29 Re: fold-const declarations way longer than 80 chars Steven Bosscher
02:23 fold-const declarations way longer than 80 chars Steven Bosscher
02:14 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021 Jim Wilson
02:03 Re: Papers (Was: PATCH: m68k: remove NO_ADDSUB_Q dependent code) Jim Wilson
01:56 Re: GCC can't find header files Jim Wilson
01:42 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Alan Modra
01:28 Re: sched-ebb.c bug (was Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure) H. J. Lu
00:54 Re: Pre_dec and Post_inc insns tm_gccmail
00:14 Re: Mainline snapshots, take 2 Gerald Pfeifer

July 09, 2003
23:45 Re: Support for %d$c format specifier in diagnostics.c Ishikawa
23:35 sched-ebb.c bug (was Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure) Jakub Jelinek
23:31 RE: ARC support, or lack thereof (was Re: [committing as obvious] Fix arc build.) Rich DAddio
23:19 Re: RFA (Was: Re: RFC / RFA): dwarf2 unwinding for targets withcall-part-clobbered Jim Wilson
23:15 Re: Mainline snapshots, take 2 Gerald Pfeifer
23:04 Re: Mainline snapshots, take 2 Joseph S. Myers
23:00 Re: bootstrap failure: libstdc++-v3/include/stdc++.h:83 Mark Mitchell
22:56 Re: RFA: __imag__ and __real__ in C++ (bug 11437) Wolfgang Bangerth
22:49 Re: RFA: document RETURN_ADDR_OFFSET (Was: Re: RFC / RFA: dwarf2unwinding for targets with call-part-clobbered registers) Jim Wilson
22:41 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer Jim Wilson
22:40 Re: ARC support, or lack thereof (was Re: [committing as obvious]Fix arc build.) Nathanael Nerode
22:25 Re: ARC support, or lack thereof (was Re: [committing as obvious]Fix arc build.) Hans-Peter Nilsson
22:22 Re: bootstrap failure: libstdc++-v3/include/stdc++.h:83 Gerald Pfeifer
22:19 Attn. Steering Committee Nathanael Nerode
22:15 ARC support, or lack thereof (was Re: [committing as obvious] Fix arc build.) Nathanael Nerode
22:03 RFA: __imag__ and __real__ in C++ (bug 11437) Nathanael Nerode
21:49 [tree-ssa] Maintaining g95 Kaveh R. Ghazi
21:26 Re: RFA: Use _Unwind_Ptr (Was: Re: RFC / RFA: dwarf2 unwinding for targets with call-part-clobbered registers) Richard Henderson
21:26 Re: static declaration Branko Äibej
21:25 Re: bootstrap failure: libstdc++-v3/include/stdc++.h:83 Mark Mitchell
21:18 Re: Problems linking FORTRAN to C++ Toon Moene
21:16 Re: Problem creating branch (Was: ObjC improvements and ObjC++) Ziemowit Laski
21:09 Re: Pre_dec and Post_inc insns Hans-Peter Nilsson
21:01 static declaration scott
20:46 Re: Pre_dec and Post_inc insns tm_gccmail
20:42 Re: RFA: Add ftruncate support to newlib/gdb-sim to unbreak -fprofile-arcs J. Johnston
20:35 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer Peter Barada
20:20 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer Jim Wilson
20:12 Re: RFA: Add ftruncate support to newlib/gdb-sim to unbreak -fprofile-arcs Joern Rennecke
20:10 Re: gcc-3.3 problem with reloading byte into address register on ColdFire Peter Barada
20:01 Re: RFA: Add ftruncate support to newlib/gdb-sim to unbreak -fprofile-arcs Nathan Sidwell
19:53 Re: Mainline snapshots, take 2 Ranjit Mathew
19:45 Re: Mainline snapshots, take 2 Ranjit Mathew
19:29 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer Jim Wilson
19:27 RFA: Add ftruncate support to newlib/gdb-sim to unbreak -fprofile-arcs Joern Rennecke
19:25 Re: Multifile test cases (Re: Intermodule patch) Benjamin Kosnik
19:20 Re: bootstrap failure: libstdc++-v3/include/stdc++.h:83 Gerald Pfeifer
19:18 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer Hans-Peter Nilsson
18:57 Re: gcc-3.3 problem with reloading byte into address register on ColdFire Richard Henderson
18:55 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer Bernardo Innocenti
18:43 Re: RFA (Was: Re: RFC / RFA): dwarf2 unwinding for targets with call-part-clobbered Joern Rennecke
18:23 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer Bernardo Innocenti
18:21 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer Peter Barada
18:19 Re: libtool reloadable object files versus multilib Alexandre Oliva
18:13 Re: RFA (Was: Re: RFC / RFA): dwarf2 unwinding for targets with call-part-clobbered Alexandre Oliva
18:11 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer Bernardo Innocenti
18:05 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer Hans-Peter Nilsson
18:05 Re: Proposed new target maintainers Eric Christopher
18:04 Re: bootstrap failure: libstdc++-v3/include/stdc++.h:83 John David Anglin
18:03 Re: bootstrap failure: libstdc++-v3/include/stdc++.h:83 Jan Hubicka
17:57 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer Bernardo Innocenti
17:51 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Bernardo Innocenti
17:49 Re: [tree-ssa] copy prop vs. debugging Richard Henderson
17:43 friend19.C regression Mark Mitchell
17:42 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer Bernardo Innocenti
17:02 Re: bootstrap failure: libstdc++-v3/include/stdc++.h:83 Andrew Pinski
16:59 Re: bootstrap failure: libstdc++-v3/include/stdc++.h:83 Vladimir Merzliakov
16:44 Re: bootstrap failure: libstdc++-v3/include/stdc++.h:83 Mark Mitchell
16:38 Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure Jakub Jelinek
16:13 Re: Your inlining change also breaks bootstrap Mark Mitchell
15:42 release tarballs should have LAST_UPDATED containing release tag? Dan Kegel
15:30 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021 David Edelsohn
15:25 Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure H. J. Lu
15:24 Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure H. J. Lu
15:17 Re: (fyi) gcc 3.3.1, small change in 'operator int' method name Michael Elizabeth Chastain
15:16 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer Peter Barada
15:10 (fyi) gcc 3.3.1, small change in 'operator int' method name Michael Elizabeth Chastain
14:33 Re: bootstrap failure: libstdc++-v3/include/stdc++.h:83 Andrew Pinski
14:30 Re: bootstrap failure: libstdc++-v3/include/stdc++.h:83 Jan Hubicka
14:22 Re: [tree-ssa] copy prop vs. debugging Andrew MacLeod
14:19 Re: bootstrap failure: libstdc++-v3/include/stdc++.h:83 Jan Hubicka
14:16 Re: Your inlining change also breaks bootstrap Jan Hubicka
14:12 Re: Your change breaks bootstrap Jan Hubicka
13:59 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Hans-Peter Nilsson
13:23 Mainline snapshots, take 2 Gerald Pfeifer
13:18 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Gunther Nikl
13:12 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer Richard Earnshaw
13:07 configure: error: no acceptable ld found in $PATH VENKATESH GANGAL
13:02 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Gunther Nikl
12:59 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer Andrew Pinski
12:34 RFA: Use _Unwind_Ptr (Was: Re: RFC / RFA: dwarf2 unwinding for targets with call-part-clobbered registers) Joern Rennecke
12:26 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer Hans-Peter Nilsson
12:23 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer Hans-Peter Nilsson
12:20 RE: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure Hans-Peter Nilsson
12:14 RFA: document RETURN_ADDR_OFFSET (Was: Re: RFC / RFA: dwarf2 unwinding for targets with call-part-clobbered registers) Joern Rennecke
12:11 RFA (Was: Re: RFC / RFA): dwarf2 unwinding for targets with call-part-clobbered Joern Rennecke
11:52 Re: bootstrap failure: libstdc++-v3/include/stdc++.h:83 Andrew Pinski
11:41 Re: bootstrap failure: libstdc++-v3/include/stdc++.h:83 Andreas Schwab
11:11 bootstrap failure: libstdc++-v3/include/stdc++.h:83 Gerald Pfeifer
10:34 RE: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure Gerald Pfeifer
09:47 Re: Your change breaks bootstrap Gerald Pfeifer
08:48 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021 Marcus Meissner
08:44 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021 Jim Wilson
08:43 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021 Marcus Meissner
08:19 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer Jim Wilson
08:12 Re[2]: [newbee] trouble compiling gcc 3.3 Sami Potirca
08:00 ICE building gcc cvs HEAD 20030709 on cygwin; sorry, unimplemented: had to relocate PCH in libstdc++-v3/testsuite/testsuite_hooks.cc Christian Joensson
07:59 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021 Jim Wilson
07:47 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer Bernardo Innocenti
06:44 trademark filings for GCC? Carl Oppedahl
06:24 Re: Minor Documentation Problems Per Bothner
05:27 Re: Proposed new target maintainers Hans-Peter Nilsson
05:20 Re: libtool reloadable object files versus multilib Hans-Peter Nilsson
05:17 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021 Andreas Jaeger
04:54 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021 David Edelsohn
04:52 Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure Zack Weinberg
04:48 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer Hans-Peter Nilsson
04:37 Re: Pre_dec and Post_inc insns Hans-Peter Nilsson
04:37 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021 David Edelsohn
04:32 Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure Hans-Peter Nilsson
03:45 GCC can't find header files Erwin Saranillo
03:37 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Hans-Peter Nilsson
03:26 Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure Jim Wilson
03:26 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021 Jim Wilson
02:49 Your inlining change also breaks bootstrap Mark Mitchell
02:14 Your change breaks bootstrap Mark Mitchell
02:03 Problem creating branch (Was: ObjC improvements and ObjC++) Ziemowit Laski
01:11 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Hans-Peter Nilsson
00:32 Re: ObjC improvements and ObjC++ Ziemowit Laski
00:26 Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure H. J. Lu
00:11 Re: ObjC improvements and ObjC++ Geoff Keating
00:10 Re: ObjC improvements and ObjC++ Daniel Berlin

July 08, 2003
23:52 Re: ObjC improvements and ObjC++ Ziemowit Laski
23:30 Re: Papers (Was: PATCH: m68k: remove NO_ADDSUB_Q dependent code) Bernardo Innocenti
23:30 RE: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure Jim Wilson
23:24 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Marc Espie
23:14 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Bernardo Innocenti
22:57 RE: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure S. Bosscher
22:53 Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure Jim Wilson
22:38 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Marc Espie
22:14 Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure Jim Wilson
22:12 Re: PATCH: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure Zack Weinberg
22:09 Re: PATCH: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure Andrew Pinski
22:08 Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure Zack Weinberg
22:08 Re: PATCH: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure H. J. Lu
22:07 Re: Pre_dec and Post_inc insns tm_gccmail
22:04 Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure Zack Weinberg
22:01 Re: PATCH: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure Zack Weinberg
22:01 Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure H. J. Lu
22:01 Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure Jakub Jelinek
21:56 PATCH: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure H. J. Lu
21:55 Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure Zack Weinberg
21:50 Re: ObjC improvements and ObjC++ Gerald Pfeifer
21:46 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Zack Weinberg
21:25 Re: question regarding atomicity.h on powerpc Geoff Keating
21:11 Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure H. J. Lu
21:07 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Bernardo Innocenti
20:57 gctest failure for sparc64-linux on gcc 3.3.1 20030707 snapshot Christian Joensson
20:29 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Zack Weinberg
19:39 Re: ObjC improvements and ObjC++ Stan Shebs
19:31 Re: lib1funcs.asm udivsi3 fails Shaun Jackman
19:30 Re: GCC version 2 on SunOS 4.1.4 Jim Wilson
19:24 Re: ObjC improvements and ObjC++ Stan Shebs
19:20 Re: Numbering of dump files in documentation Richard Henderson
19:19 Re: ObjC improvements and ObjC++ Matt Austern
19:15 Re: ObjC improvements and ObjC++ Mark Mitchell
19:04 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Jim Wilson
18:55 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Jim Wilson
18:53 Re: ObjC improvements and ObjC++ Ziemowit Laski
18:45 Re: ObjC improvements and ObjC++ Matt Austern
18:28 Re: ObjC improvements and ObjC++ Mark Mitchell
18:04 Re: ObjC improvements and ObjC++ David Edelsohn
17:55 Re: lib1funcs.asm udivsi3 fails Eric Christopher
17:51 Re: ObjC improvements and ObjC++ Mark Mitchell
17:44 Re: What happened to libfeutil? Geoffrey Keating
17:16 lib1funcs.asm udivsi3 fails Shaun Jackman
17:13 Re: Bootstrap broken because of missing intl routines John David Anglin
17:08 Re: --with-cpu Michael Eager
17:02 Re: [tree-ssa] PPC bootstraps still broken Olaf Hering
16:51 Re: [newbee] trouble compiling gcc 3.3 Janis Johnson
16:35 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Richard Henderson
16:34 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Richard Henderson
16:29 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Peter Barada
16:13 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Andreas Schwab
16:10 Re: [tree-ssa] PPC bootstraps still broken Diego Novillo
16:05 Re: [tree-ssa] PPC bootstraps still broken Olaf Hering
15:58 GCC version 2 on SunOS 4.1.4 Srinivasan Jagannathan
15:39 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Bernardo Innocenti
15:35 Re: -Wcast-qual broken(?) for libstdc++ Mark Mitchell
15:19 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap broken on cygwin Tobias Schlüter
15:12 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Peter Barada
15:10 [newbee] trouble compiling gcc 3.3 Sami Potirca
15:07 Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure H. J. Lu
14:45 Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure Andreas Schwab
14:37 Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure H. J. Lu
14:18 Re: [tree-ssa] PPC bootstraps still broken David Edelsohn
14:15 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Hans-Peter Nilsson
14:10 Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure Andreas Schwab
14:06 Re: [tree-ssa] PPC bootstraps still broken Diego Novillo
13:43 Re: [tree-ssa] PPC bootstraps still broken law
13:43 Re: ld -defsym option Fabio Alemagna
13:31 Re: [tree-ssa] PPC bootstraps still broken Diego Novillo
13:23 Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure Eric Botcazou
13:21 Re: [tree-ssa] PPC bootstraps still broken law
13:15 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Bernardo Innocenti
13:07 Re: ld -defsym option Andreas Schwab
13:05 [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure Andreas Schwab
13:02 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Michael Matz
12:52 Re: [tree-ssa] PPC bootstraps still broken Diego Novillo
12:50 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Gunther Nikl
12:46 Re: [tree-ssa] PPC bootstraps still broken law
12:33 [tree-ssa] PowerPC bootstrap ... Toon Moene
12:15 Re: ld -defsym option Fabio Alemagna
12:07 Re: [tree-ssa] PPC bootstraps still broken Andrew Pinski
12:03 RE: Register Rematerialization In New Register Allocator Mukta Punjani, Noida
11:38 question regarding atomicity.h on powerpc Marcus Meissner
11:34 [tree-ssa] PPC bootstraps still broken Diego Novillo
10:53 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Andreas Schwab
10:16 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Andreas Schwab
10:14 Re: ObjC improvements and ObjC++ Nicola Pero
10:01 Re: ObjC improvements and ObjC++ Nicola Pero
09:47 Re: gcc-ss-20030707 is now available Gerald Pfeifer
09:46 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Bernardo Innocenti
09:41 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Gunther Nikl
09:30 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Bernardo Innocenti
09:29 -Wcast-qual broken(?) for libstdc++ Gerald Pfeifer
08:36 RE: issues with first scheduling pass on SH4 Sanjiv Kumar Gupta, Noida
08:27 Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20030708 on cygwin: winnt.c:110: warning: unknown conversion type character `D' in format Christian Joensson
08:19 Re: What happened to libfeutil? Gabriel Dos Reis
08:05 Re: What happened to libfeutil? Marc Espie
08:03 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Gunther Nikl
07:47 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Gunther Nikl
06:37 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Bernardo Innocenti
06:29 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Bernardo Innocenti
06:20 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer Bernardo Innocenti
06:06 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Bernardo Innocenti
05:47 Re: ObjC improvements and ObjC++ Karel Gardas
05:47 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Bernardo Innocenti
05:36 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Bernardo Innocenti
05:19 Re: inquiry about RTL Alexandre Oliva
04:48 Re: [darwin] unwind context question Andreas Tobler
04:39 Re: Starting cleanup project: help wanted Zack Weinberg
04:36 inquiry about RTL SRUTHY C.N.
04:33 Re: Starting cleanup project: help wanted Nathanael Nerode
03:33 Re: ObjC improvements and ObjC++ Stan Shebs
03:32 Re: What happened to libfeutil? Fergus Henderson
03:30 Re: ObjC improvements and ObjC++ Matt Austern
03:11 Re: RFC / RFA: dwarf2 unwinding for targets with call-part-clobbered registers Jim Wilson
03:09 Re: C++ demangler horrors Alexandre Oliva
03:00 Re: ObjC improvements and ObjC++ Zack Weinberg
02:55 Re: What happened to libfeutil? Phil Edwards
02:39 Re: Backporting CRDS removal patch to 3.3.x (Was: remove CRDS supportfrom m68k back-end) Jim Wilson
02:37 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer Jim Wilson
02:21 Re: C++ demangler horrors DJ Delorie
02:19 Re: Reloading failes Jim Wilson
02:10 Re: ObjC improvements and ObjC++ Ziemowit Laski
01:47 ObjC improvements and ObjC++ Stan Shebs
01:19 Re: What happened to libfeutil? Alexandre Oliva
01:15 Re: C++ demangler horrors Alexandre Oliva
01:11 Re: What happened to libfeutil? Geoff Keating
00:39 Re: What happened to libfeutil? Zack Weinberg
00:09 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Richard Henderson
00:01 RE: What happened to libfeutil? S. Bosscher

July 07, 2003
23:32 Re: What happened to libfeutil? Benjamin Kosnik
23:01 Re: What happened to libfeutil? Geoffrey Keating
22:59 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap miscomparison failure on PPC Diego Novillo
22:59 Re: What happened to libfeutil? Mark Mitchell
22:55 Re: What happened to libfeutil? Zack Weinberg
22:49 Re: Starting cleanup project: help wanted Zack Weinberg
22:44 Re: Support for %d$c format specifier in diagnostics.c Ishikawa
22:40 Re: Support for %d$c format specifier in diagnostics.c Ishikawa
22:17 Re: --with-cpu Daniel Jacobowitz
22:14 Re: --with-cpu Shaun Jackman
21:24 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Marc Espie
21:23 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Marc Espie
20:59 Re: [darwin] unwind context question Geoffrey Keating
20:59 Re: --with-cpu Daniel Jacobowitz
20:57 --with-cpu Shaun Jackman
20:16 Re: [darwin] unwind context question Andreas Tobler
19:56 Re: extract_muldiv bug Richard Kenner
19:52 extract_muldiv bug Jakub Jelinek
19:39 Re: How is limits.h handled ?!?!? Joseph S. Myers
19:31 Re: What happened to libfeutil? Andreas Jaeger
19:30 Re: What happened to libfeutil? David Edelsohn
19:29 Re: Fixincludes cleanup + system headers Alexandre Oliva
19:24 Re: What happened to libfeutil? Geoffrey Keating
19:16 Re: What happened to libfeutil? Andreas Jaeger
19:05 Re: Building with AIX gcc 3.3 David Edelsohn
19:04 Fixincludes cleanup + system headers Bruce Korb
19:03 Re: Starting cleanup project: help wanted Jeff Sturm
18:47 What happened to libfeutil? Geoffrey Keating
18:39 Re: [darwin] unwind context question Geoffrey Keating
18:28 Re: Errors in -start targets for stage2 and later Russ Allbery
18:24 Problems linking FORTRAN to C++ Gustavo Bevilacqua Leal
18:14 [darwin] unwind context question Andreas Tobler
18:05 Starting cleanup project: help wanted Nathanael Nerode
18:04 Re: trunk broken for arm-elf target. Janis Johnson
17:25 How is limits.h handled ?!?!? Nathanael Nerode
17:13 Re: Use-and-clobber insns and REG_DEAD notes Ulrich Weigand
17:10 Re: gcc-ss-20030707 is now available Christian Joensson
17:05 Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20030705 on cygwin: *** No rule to make target `../intl/libintl.a', needed by `cc1.exe'. Christian Joensson
17:01 gcc-ss-20030707 is now available gccadmin
16:37 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap miscomparison failure on PPC Diego Novillo
16:35 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap miscomparison failure on PPC law
16:25 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap miscomparison failure on PPC Diego Novillo
16:14 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap miscomparison failure on PPC law
15:53 Re: issues with first scheduling pass on SH4 Dorit Naishlos
15:22 Re: %D Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:05 Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20030705 on cygwin: *** No rule to make target `../intl/libintl.a', needed by `cc1.exe'. Alexandre Oliva
15:02 Re: const warning... Alexandre Oliva
15:00 Re: Minor Documentation Problems Kaveh R. Ghazi
14:47 Re: Subject: Re: gcc-3.3 problem with reloading byte into address register onColdFire Joern Rennecke
14:41 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap miscomparison failure on PPC Diego Novillo
14:29 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc Mark Mitchell
14:15 Re: Subject: Reloading failes Joern Rennecke
14:03 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Franz Sirl
13:53 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Gunther Nikl
13:53 [tree-ssa] Bootstrap broken on cygwin Tobias Schlüter
13:40 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Gunther Nikl
13:35 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Bernardo Innocenti
13:34 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Gunther Nikl
13:23 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Franz Sirl
13:21 Re: gcc-3.3 problem with reloading byte into address register onColdFire Peter Barada
13:15 Reloading failes andersa
13:11 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Bernardo Innocenti
13:00 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Gunther Nikl
12:50 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Bernardo Innocenti
12:47 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc Gerald Pfeifer
12:24 %D Robert McNulty Junior
11:43 Building with AIX gcc 3.3 Ken Foskey
11:13 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Gunther Nikl
11:11 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Gunther Nikl
11:05 Re: [tree-ssa] Computed gotos Richard Sandiford
10:46 Re: const warning... Laurent GUERBY
10:35 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Bernardo Innocenti
09:46 regression search server moves to the web Phil Edwards
09:37 trunk broken for arm-elf target. Karel Gardas
09:32 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Karel Gardas
09:30 Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20030705 on cygwin: *** No rule to make target `../intl/libintl.a', needed by `cc1.exe'. Christian Joensson
09:24 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Andreas Schwab
09:19 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-07-04) Nathan Sidwell
09:00 Re: gcc-3.3 problem with reloading byte into address register onColdFire Andreas Schwab
08:22 Re: const warning... Gabriel Dos Reis
08:19 Re: const warning... Gabriel Dos Reis
08:05 Re: C++ defect reports: how to behave Gabriel Dos Reis
07:31 Re: Minor Documentation Problems Gerald Pfeifer
07:24 Errors in -start targets for stage2 and later Matt Kraai
07:00 Re: Unbreaking news Andreas Jaeger
06:18 Re: Use-and-clobber insns and REG_DEAD notes Michael Matz
06:18 Re: Mainline snapshots Ranjit Mathew
05:41 Re: gcc-3.3 problem with reloading byte into address register onColdFire Jim Wilson
05:37 Re: Bootstrap broken because of missing intl routines Kaveh R. Ghazi
05:09 Re: gcc-3.3 problem with reloading byte into address register onColdFire Peter Barada
04:44 Minor Documentation Problems Ranjit Mathew
04:32 Re: GCC Intermediate Representation & recommended reading & examples Jim Wilson
03:28 Re: gcc-3.3 problem with reloading byte into address register onColdFire Jim Wilson
02:59 Re: [tree-ssa] Computed gotos Fergus Henderson
02:48 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc Jeff Sturm
02:43 Re: Bootstrap broken because of missing intl routines Kaveh R. Ghazi
02:06 Re: Unbreaking news Hans-Peter Nilsson
01:02 Re: [tree-ssa] Computed gotos Zack Weinberg
00:26 Re: [tree-ssa] Computed gotos Erik Trulsson
00:10 Re: [tree-ssa] Computed gotos Zack Weinberg

July 06, 2003
23:40 Re: [tree-ssa] Computed gotos Branko Äibej
23:17 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc Eric Botcazou
22:47 GCC 3.4 broken on Cygwin Robert McNulty Junior
22:27 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc Phil Edwards
22:22 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-07-04) Phil Edwards
22:10 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc Gerald Pfeifer
21:49 Re: Failure to build gcc cvs HEAD 20030706 on i686-linux: /usr/bin/ld:libstdc++-symbol.ver:59: parse error in VERSION script Phil Edwards
19:47 Re: Failure to build gcc cvs HEAD 20030706 on i686-linux: /usr/bin/ld:libstdc++-symbol.ver:59: parse error in VERSION script Christian Joensson
19:17 Re: Failure to build gcc cvs HEAD 20030706 on i686-linux: /usr/bin/ld:libstdc++-symbol.ver:59: parse error in VERSION script Phil Edwards
19:13 Re: [tree-ssa] Computed gotos Zack Weinberg
18:58 Re: [tree-ssa] Computed gotos Andreas Jaeger
18:42 Re: Bootstrap broken because of missing intl routines Richard Kenner
18:17 Re: Bootstrap broken because of missing intl routines Zack Weinberg
17:55 Re: [tree-ssa] Computed gotos Zack Weinberg
17:46 Re: Bootstrap broken because of missing intl routines Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:17 Re: gcj: java.lang.reflect.InvocationHandler Tom Tromey
14:43 Re: bad dead code detection ? Fergus Henderson
13:55 Re: Numbering of dump files in documentation Graham Stott
13:23 Re: [tree-ssa] Computed gotos Jamie Lokier
13:21 Re: [tree-ssa] Computed gotos Jamie Lokier
11:56 Re: libstdc++ check-abi not selfcontained Olaf Hering
11:26 gcj: java.lang.reflect.InvocationHandler Thijs Cadier
08:37 Re: Proposed targets to deprecate (sigh) Ian Dall
08:03 Failure to build gcc cvs HEAD 20030706 on i686-linux: /usr/bin/ld:libstdc++-symbol.ver:59: parse error in VERSION script Christian Joensson
07:03 function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer Bernardo Innocenti
03:38 Re: Packed structs and C++ Mark Mitchell
03:37 Take me off this list UVMDudeMan
03:15 Re: Unbreaking news Hans-Peter Nilsson
02:47 Re: [tree-ssa] Computed gotos Segher Boessenkool
02:30 Re: [tree-ssa libmudflap long] multithreading fixes, build reorg, testsuite extensions Eyal Lebedinsky
01:56 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Kaveh R. Ghazi
01:08 Re: make info and make dvi depend on make all? Dara Hazeghi
00:31 Re: make info and make dvi depend on make all? Joseph S. Myers
00:21 Re: Bootstrap broken because of missing intl routines Zack Weinberg

July 05, 2003
23:30 Re: Bootstrap broken because of missing intl routines David Edelsohn
22:53 Re: Bootstrap broken because of missing intl routines David Edelsohn
22:35 Use-and-clobber insns and REG_DEAD notes Ulrich Weigand
21:32 Re: patch format Felix Lee
20:33 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Bernardo Innocenti
19:29 Moving fixinc to top level? Nathanael Nerode
19:27 Packed structs and C++ Nathan Sidwell
18:57 Re: [tree-ssa libmudflap long] multithreading fixes, build reorg, testsuite extensions Frank Ch. Eigler
18:43 make info and make dvi depend on make all? Dara Hazeghi
17:45 Re: bad dead code detection ? David Jobet
17:44 Re: C++ defect reports: how to behave Matt Austern
17:11 Re: Backporting CRDS removal patch to 3.3.x (Was: remove CRDS support from m68k back-end) Bernardo Innocenti
17:01 Re: objects_must_conflict_p Zack Weinberg
16:56 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc John David Anglin
16:38 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Kaveh R. Ghazi
16:33 Re: objects_must_conflict_p Richard Kenner
15:41 Re: objects_must_conflict_p Eric Botcazou
14:38 Re: patch format Eric Botcazou
14:25 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend Andreas Jaeger
14:25 Re: patch format Andrew Pinski
14:22 Re: Trunk broken for MMIX, CRIS, i960, m32r, (v850, ARM) Andreas Jaeger
14:20 patch format Bernardo Innocenti
14:17 Re: Trunk broken for MMIX, CRIS, i960, m32r, (v850, ARM) Jan Hubicka
14:11 Re: [tree-ssa libmudflap long] multithreading fixes, build reorg, testsuite extensions Eyal Lebedinsky
13:45 Re: objects_must_conflict_p Richard Kenner
13:23 Cleanups for the m68k backend Bernardo Innocenti
13:20 Re: objects_must_conflict_p Eric Botcazou
12:59 Re: const warning... Robert Dewar
12:57 Re: Trunk broken for MMIX, CRIS, i960, m32r, (v850, ARM) Andrew Pinski
12:47 Re: New problem building on Alpha Nathan Sidwell
12:46 Re: [tree-ssa libmudflap long] multithreading fixes, build reorg, testsuite extensions Frank Ch. Eigler
12:40 Re: const warning... Michael N. Moran
12:34 Re: New problem building on Alpha Richard Kenner
12:32 Re: Unbreaking news Hans-Peter Nilsson
12:31 Re: const warning... Robert Dewar
12:31 Re: const warning... Laurent GUERBY
12:23 Re: New problem building on Alpha Andreas Jaeger
12:19 New problem building on Alpha Richard Kenner
12:04 Re: objects_must_conflict_p Richard Kenner
12:02 Re: objects_must_conflict_p Richard Kenner
12:00 Re: objects_must_conflict_p Eric Botcazou
11:55 Re: objects_must_conflict_p Eric Botcazou
11:50 Re: Unbreaking news Andreas Jaeger
11:30 Re: Mainline bootstrap broken for i686-pc-linux-gnu Andreas Jaeger
11:24 Re: Mainline bootstrap broken for i686-pc-linux-gnu Andreas Jaeger
11:24 Re: Mainline bootstrap broken for i686-pc-linux-gnu Christian Joensson
11:15 Re: Mainline bootstrap broken for i686-pc-linux-gnu Andreas Jaeger
11:01 Mainline bootstrap broken for i686-pc-linux-gnu Colin Douglas Howell
10:47 Re: objects_must_conflict_p Richard Kenner
10:41 Re: Support for %d$c format specifier in diagnostics.c Joseph S. Myers
09:45 Re: Support for %d$c format specifier in diagnostics.c Bonzini
09:02 objects_must_conflict_p Eric Botcazou
09:00 Re: ICE bootstrapping gcc cvs HEAD 20030704 on sparc64-linux: error: head insn 102 for block 0 not found in the insn stream Christian Joensson
08:57 Re: ICE bootstrapping gcc cvs HEAD 20030704 on sparc-linux: error: head insn 98 for block 0 not found in the insn stream Christian Joensson
08:37 Re: Unbreaking news Andreas Jaeger
08:03 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc Eric Botcazou
07:55 Re: gcc cvs HEAD 20030705 on sparc64-linux: toplev.h:63: warning: `__gcc_diag__' is an unrecognized format function type Christian Joensson
07:01 Re: Bootstrap broken because of missing intl routines Zack Weinberg
06:40 Re: gcc cvs HEAD 20030705 on sparc64-linux: toplev.h:63: warning: `__gcc_diag__' is an unrecognized format function type Kaveh R. Ghazi
06:31 Re: const warning... Fergus Henderson
06:26 gcc cvs HEAD 20030705 on sparc64-linux: toplev.h:63: warning: `__gcc_diag__' is an unrecognized format function type Christian Joensson
06:25 Re: Bootstrap broken because of missing intl routines Kaveh R. Ghazi
06:21 Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20030705 on cygwin: *** No rule to make target `../intl/libintl.a', needed by `cc1.exe'. Christian Joensson
06:18 Re: Unbreaking news (was: Re: Trunk broken for MMIX, CRIS, i960, m32r, (v850, ARM)) David Edelsohn
06:10 Re: Unbreaking news (was: Re: Trunk broken for MMIX, CRIS, i960,m32r, (v850, ARM)) Hans-Peter Nilsson
05:52 Re: ICE bootstrapping gcc cvs HEAD 20030704 on sparc64-linux: error:head insn 102 for block 0 not found in the insn stream Hans-Peter Nilsson
05:51 Unbreaking news (was: Re: Trunk broken for MMIX, CRIS, i960, m32r,(v850, ARM)) Hans-Peter Nilsson
05:35 Re: const warning... Robert Dewar
05:29 Re: libstdc++ check-abi not selfcontained Phil Edwards
05:17 ICE bootstrapping gcc cvs HEAD 20030704 on sparc64-linux: error: head insn 102 for block 0 not found in the insn stream Christian Joensson
05:13 ICE bootstrapping gcc cvs HEAD 20030704 on sparc-linux: error: head insn 98 for block 0 not found in the insn stream Christian Joensson
04:51 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc Andreas Jaeger
04:40 Re: Trunk broken for MMIX, CRIS, i960, m32r, (v850, ARM) Andreas Jaeger
04:28 Re: Trunk broken for MMIX, CRIS, i960, m32r, (v850, ARM) Andrew Pinski
04:20 Re: Trunk broken for MMIX, CRIS, i960, m32r, (v850, ARM) Andreas Jaeger
04:14 Re: Trunk broken for MMIX, CRIS, i960, m32r, (v850, ARM) Andreas Jaeger
03:54 Bootstrap broken because of missing intl routines David Edelsohn
03:45 Re: [tree-ssa libmudflap long] multithreading fixes, build reorg, testsuite extensions Eyal Lebedinsky
02:45 Re: gcc-3_3-branch bootstrap broken, $$r undeclared H. J. Lu
01:06 Bootstrap broken because of missing intl routines Kaveh R. Ghazi
00:59 Re: Problem with iconv undefined Zack Weinberg
00:32 Re: Problem with iconv undefined Richard Kenner
00:29 Re: Problem with iconv undefined Zack Weinberg
00:28 Problem with iconv undefined Richard Kenner
00:17 Re: Support for %d$c format specifier in diagnostics.c Zack Weinberg
00:15 Re: Should we eliminate HOST_PTR_PRINTF ? Kaveh R. Ghazi

July 04, 2003
23:44 Support for %d$c format specifier in diagnostics.c Ishikawa
23:21 Re: Trunk broken for MMIX, CRIS, i960, m32r, (v850, ARM) Andrew Pinski
23:21 Re: Trunk broken for MMIX, CRIS, i960, m32r, (v850, ARM) David Edelsohn
23:07 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap miscomparison failure on PPC Diego Novillo
23:03 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc Phil Edwards
22:54 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc John David Anglin
22:53 Trunk broken for MMIX, CRIS, i960, m32r, (v850, ARM) Hans-Peter Nilsson
22:50 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc Eric Botcazou
22:31 Re: bad dead code detection ? Fergus Henderson
22:26 Re: bad dead code detection ? Fergus Henderson
22:20 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap miscomparison failure on PPC Diego Novillo
22:16 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap miscomparison failure on PPC law
22:12 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap miscomparison failure on PPC Diego Novillo
22:07 Re: gcc-3_3-branch bootstrap broken, $$r undeclared Olaf Hering
22:07 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap miscomparison failure on PPC Diego Novillo
22:05 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap miscomparison failure on PPC law
21:58 Re: const warning... Fergus Henderson
21:47 Re: gcc-3_3-branch bootstrap broken, $$r undeclared Olaf Hering
21:41 Re: [tree-ssa] performance with loops Daniel Berlin
21:32 gcc-3_3-branch bootstrap broken, $$r undeclared Olaf Hering
21:14 Re: Disabling warnings from within the source Phil Edwards
21:12 Re: Disabling warnings from within the source Phil Edwards
21:12 Re: Disabling warnings from within the source Phil Edwards
21:11 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc Phil Edwards
21:04 Re: gcc-3.3 problem with reloading byte into address register onColdFire Peter Barada
20:31 Re: [tree-ssa] performance with loops Steven Bosscher
19:58 Re: [tree-ssa] performance with loops Toon Moene
19:51 RFC / RFA: dwarf2 unwinding for targets with call-part-clobbered registers Joern Rennecke
19:47 Re: Should we eliminate HOST_PTR_PRINTF ? Joseph S. Myers
19:35 Should we eliminate HOST_PTR_PRINTF ? Kaveh R. Ghazi
19:32 successful build/install of gcc 3.3 on i386-unknown-openbsd3.3 Jonathan Thornburg
18:52 Re: const warning... Theodore Papadopoulo
18:36 Re: const warning... Diego Novillo
18:21 const warning... Theodore Papadopoulo
17:17 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-07-04) Andrew Pinski
17:15 Re: Changes concerning GCC snapshots (and releases) Gerald Pfeifer
17:11 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-07-04) Eric Botcazou
17:08 Re: Changes concerning GCC snapshots (and releases) Guido Guenther
16:54 Re: (Parallel) bootstrap failure due to recent libstdc++ change Gerald Pfeifer
16:46 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-07-04) Ranjit Mathew
16:15 GCC Release Status (2003-07-04) Mark Mitchell
16:04 Re: (Parallel) bootstrap failure due to recent libstdc++ change Benjamin Kosnik
15:57 Disabling warnings from within the source Andre Majorel
15:16 Re: [tree-ssa] performance with loops Steven Bosscher
15:15 [tree-ssa] bootstrap miscomparison failure on PPC Diego Novillo
15:13 [tree-ssa] performance with loops Steven Bosscher
15:03 [tree-ssa mudflap] things are better now Eyal Lebedinsky
14:22 i686->arm cross gcc3.2.3 miscompilation of MICO. Karel Gardas
13:22 Re: GCC Intermediate Representation & recommended reading & examples Robert Myers
12:59 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc Andrew Pinski
12:53 Good frontend manuals? Henrik Sorensen
12:51 Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc Rainer Orth
11:55 Re: gcc-3.3 problem with reloading byte into address register onColdFire Peter Barada
09:29 (Parallel) bootstrap failure due to recent libstdc++ change Gerald Pfeifer
07:14 Re: GCC 3.3 build on AIX 5.2, done Alexy Khrabrov
05:39 Re: C compile time Ben Elliston
05:07 Numbering of dump files in documentation Josef Zlomek
04:14 Re: gcc-3.3 problem with reloading byte into address register onColdFire Peter Barada
03:42 Re: NOTICE: Downtime for gcc.gnu.org Christopher Faylor
03:04 Re: Stange gcc 3.3 bug on Linux/ia64 H. J. Lu
02:49 Re: Support for VxWorks Pentium Jim Wilson
02:42 Re: GCC Intermediate Representation & recommended reading & examples Jim Wilson
02:32 Re: Linking a libraray Jim Wilson
02:31 Re: compiling ipv4 sorce file Jim Wilson
02:27 Re: Sugesstion on gcc compiler Jim Wilson
02:19 Re: gcc-3.3 problem with reloading byte into address register onColdFire Jim Wilson
02:01 Re: Stange gcc 3.3 bug on Linux/ia64 Jim Wilson
02:00 Re: [tree-ssa] Computed gotos Jamie Lokier
02:00 Re: Loop optimizer issues Richard Kenner
01:55 Re: Using gcc for C++ backend to checking exceptions? Jim Wilson
01:40 Re: Verbose Output error? Jim Wilson
00:56 Re: GCC 3.3 build on AIX 5.2, ICE Segher Boessenkool
00:55 Re: [tree-ssa] Computed gotos Segher Boessenkool

July 03, 2003
23:16 Re: Is gcc mainline broken? law
23:09 Re: Loop optimizer issues law
23:08 Re: Is gcc mainline broken? Graham Stott
23:05 Re: Loop optimizer issues law
22:53 Re: issues with first scheduling pass on SH4 Vladimir Makarov
22:09 Re: Solaris 9/Intel Ada bootstrap broken law
21:45 Re: Solaris 9/Intel Ada bootstrap broken H. J. Lu
21:44 Re: Is gcc mainline broken? Phil Edwards
21:41 Is gcc mainline broken? H. J. Lu
20:44 Re: Loop optimizer issues Geoff Keating
20:13 Re: GCC 3.3.1 and GCC 3.4 Schedule Toon Moene
20:10 Re: Solaris 9/Intel Ada bootstrap broken law
19:11 Re: GCC 3.3 build on AIX 5.2, done Alexy Khrabrov
19:09 Re: GCC 3.3 build on AIX 5.2, done David Edelsohn
19:05 [Bug c/448] Re: stdint.h Joseph S. Myers
19:04 Solaris 9/Intel Ada bootstrap broken Rainer Orth
18:55 Re: What does PWD = $${PWDCMD-pwd} do in make? Alexandre Oliva
18:51 stdint.h Shaun Jackman
18:48 Re: Loop optimizer issues Richard Kenner
18:45 Re: Loop optimizer issues Richard Kenner
18:41 Re: Loop optimizer issues Steven Bosscher
18:38 Re: What does PWD = $${PWDCMD-pwd} do in make? Phil Edwards
18:37 Re: Loop optimizer issues law
18:29 Re: GCC 3.3 build on AIX 5.2, done Alexy Khrabrov
18:28 Re: Loop optimizer issues Richard Kenner
18:26 Re: Loop optimizer issues Richard Kenner
18:12 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
18:07 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
17:31 Re: What does PWD = $${PWDCMD-pwd} do in make? Rainer Orth
17:26 NOTICE: Downtime for gcc.gnu.org law
17:16 Re: [tree-ssa] copy prop vs. debugging Jan Vroonhof
17:08 Re: [Bug target/10129] Ada bootstrap fails on PPC-Darwin - invalid assembler emitted - PIC related Dale Johannesen
16:57 Re: What does PWD = $${PWDCMD-pwd} do in make? H. J. Lu
16:51 Re: What does PWD = $${PWDCMD-pwd} do in make? Zack Weinberg
16:48 Re: [tree-ssa] copy prop vs. debugging law
16:12 Re: What does PWD = $${PWDCMD-pwd} do in make? H. J. Lu
16:01 Re: RFC: Moving gcc/intl to toplevel; syncing both copies to 0.12.1 Andrew Cagney
16:00 Re: [tree-ssa] copy prop vs. debugging Richard Henderson
15:21 [tree-ssa] copy prop vs. debugging Jason Merrill
14:45 GCC Intermediate Representation & recommended reading & examples Eric Dillaber
13:44 Ada bootstrap failure Rainer Orth
13:15 Linking a libraray Mohamed Zouari
13:11 compiling ipv4 sorce file jagadish rouniyar
11:43 Re: Loop optimizer issues Michael Matz
11:02 Sugesstion on gcc compiler Siddharth
11:00 Re: Mainline snapshots Ranjit Mathew
10:54 Ada bootstrap failure on ia64 Andreas Schwab
10:19 Re: issues with first scheduling pass on SH4 Sanjiv Kumar Gupta, Noida
10:14 Re: Mainline snapshots Gerald Pfeifer
09:18 Support for VxWorks Pentium BORSENBERGER Pierre
08:49 Re: Loop optimizer issues Jan Hubicka
07:41 Re: Warning in Ada front end breaks mainline bootstrap Colin Douglas Howell
07:27 Warning in Ada front end breaks mainline bootstrap Colin Douglas Howell
07:15 Mark Golden/APPLIED MATERIALS is out of the office. Out_Of_Office
05:35 Re: Mainline snapshots Ranjit Mathew
04:19 Re: [Bug target/10129] Ada bootstrap fails on PPC-Darwin - invalid assembler emitted - PIC related Richard Henderson
03:04 Peter Huisken/EHV/RESEARCH/PHILIPS is out of the office. peter . huisken
01:13 Re: Loop optimizer issues Richard Kenner
00:31 Re: Stange gcc 3.3 bug on Linux/ia64 H. J. Lu

July 02, 2003
23:58 Re: [tree-ssa] any plans to merge from mainline??? Diego Novillo
23:35 Re: Stange gcc 3.3 bug on Linux/ia64 H. J. Lu
23:34 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
23:12 Re: [Bug target/10129] Ada bootstrap fails on PPC-Darwin - invalidassembler emitted - PIC related Stan Shebs
23:10 Re: Mainline snapshots Joseph S. Myers
23:01 Re: libstdc++ check-abi not selfcontained Nix
23:01 Re: Ovidiu Predescu's address in MAINTAINERS bounces Nix
22:48 [tree-ssa] any plans to merge from mainline??? Steven Bosscher
22:43 Re: Loop optimizer issues David Edelsohn
22:33 Re: Loop optimizer issues Jan Hubicka
22:27 Re: [Bug target/10129] Ada bootstrap fails on PPC-Darwin - invalid assembler emitted - PIC related Geert Bosch
22:14 Re: [Bug target/10129] Ada bootstrap fails on PPC-Darwin - invalidassembler emitted - PIC related Zack Weinberg
22:11 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
22:07 Re: Loop optimizer issues David Edelsohn
22:07 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
22:04 RE: Loop optimizer issues S. Bosscher
22:01 Re: [Bug target/10129] Ada bootstrap fails on PPC-Darwin - invalid assembler emitted - PIC related Dale Johannesen
21:59 Re: Loop optimizer issues David Edelsohn
21:50 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
21:46 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
21:45 Re: Loop optimizer issues Richard Henderson
21:38 Re: Loop optimizer issues law
21:37 Re: still using frame pointer when compiling with -fomit-frame-pointer Richard Henderson
21:32 Changes concerning GCC snapshots (and releases) Gerald Pfeifer
21:24 Re: Loop optimizer issues David Edelsohn
21:16 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
21:14 Re: Loop optimizer issues David Edelsohn
21:06 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
20:58 Re: [Bug target/10129] Ada bootstrap fails on PPC-Darwin - invalid assembler emitted - PIC related Andrew Pinski
20:52 Re: [Bug target/10129] Ada bootstrap fails on PPC-Darwin - invalid assembler emitted - PIC related Geert Bosch
20:31 Re: [tree-ssa] computed goto edges law
20:07 [tree-ssa] computed goto edges Jason Merrill
19:49 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug 9745 / 10021 Mark Mitchell
19:23 Disabling PCH Robert McNulty Junior
19:10 Re: Loop optimizer issues Geoff Keating
19:05 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug 9745 /Â?10021 Geoff Keating
18:49 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021 Mark Mitchell
18:37 Re: still using frame pointer when compiling with-fomit-frame-pointer Johan Rydberg
18:33 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
18:26 Re: still using frame pointer when compiling with -fomit-frame-pointer Richard Henderson
18:17 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021 Michael Matz
18:00 Successful Build Report for GCC 3.2.3 Simon Gareth Best
18:00 Re: /tmp full DJ Delorie
18:00 Re: gcc support for memory debuggers (operator delete) ? Lassi A. Tuura
17:59 Re: RFC: Moving gcc/intl to toplevel; syncing both copies to 0.12.1 Phil Edwards
17:56 Re: RFC: Moving gcc/intl to toplevel; syncing both copies to 0.12.1 Zack Weinberg
17:56 Re: /tmp full Alexy Khrabrov
17:51 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021 Franz Sirl
17:49 Re: RFC: Moving gcc/intl to toplevel; syncing both copies to 0.12.1 Andrew Cagney
17:40 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021 Dale Johannesen
17:27 Re: GCC Code-Size Benchmark Environment (CSiBE) Joel Sherrill
17:23 Re: Register Rematerialization In New Register Allocator Vladimir Makarov
17:22 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021 David Edelsohn
17:15 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021 Mark Mitchell
17:08 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021 David Edelsohn
17:07 RFC: Moving gcc/intl to toplevel; syncing both copies to 0.12.1 Zack Weinberg
16:29 still using frame pointer when compiling with -fomit-frame-pointer Johan Rydberg
16:08 Re: [tree-ssa] SSAPRE failure caused by other pass? Diego Novillo
16:03 Re: gcc support for memory debuggers (operator delete) ? Felvegi Peter Andras
16:01 Re: std::cout causes EXC_BAD_ACCESS from a dynamic library (applegcc 3.3) Gerald Pfeifer
16:01 Re: std::cout causes EXC_BAD_ACCESS from a dynamic library (apple gcc 3.3) Andrew Pinski
15:57 std::cout causes EXC_BAD_ACCESS from a dynamic library (apple gcc 3.3) Vivek Rajan
15:39 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug 9745 / 10021 Mark Mitchell
15:36 Re: PR 2873 Mark Mitchell
15:36 Re: PRs assigned to you Mark Mitchell
15:16 GCC Code-Size Benchmark Environment (CSiBE) Arpad Beszedes
14:53 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug 9745 /?10021 David Edelsohn
14:36 Mainline snapshots Gerald Pfeifer
14:35 Re: Stange gcc 3.3 bug Alexandre Oliva
14:31 Re: gcc support for memory debuggers (operator delete) ? Alexandre Oliva
13:37 gcc-3.3 problem with reloading byte into address register on ColdFire Peter Barada
13:26 Re: Removing -fssa Diego Novillo
13:03 Re: question about "precompiled headers" Andrew Pinski
12:55 question about "precompiled headers" Hirschmiller, Rainer, ISO23
12:55 Re: Draft: Changes concerning GCC snapshots (and releases) Gerald Pfeifer
12:46 Re: New 7.cc tests Jerry Quinn
12:44 Re: New 7.cc tests Benjamin Kosnik
12:27 RE: Packed structures Agust Karlsson
12:06 Re: Packed structures John Love-Jensen
11:03 Packed structures Phil Prentice
10:41 Re: Draft: Changes concerning GCC snapshots (and releases) Gabriel Paubert
10:33 Re: New 7.cc tests Paolo Carlini
09:24 Re: gettext should not be a builtin Joseph S. Myers
07:23 Re: PRs assigned to you Gabriel Dos Reis
07:14 Re: PR 2873 Zack Weinberg
06:59 Re: Stange gcc 3.3 bug on Linux/ia64 Zack Weinberg
06:55 Re: gettext should not be a builtin Andris Pavenis
06:48 Re: Stange gcc 3.3 bug on Linux/ia64 H. J. Lu
06:43 Patch fixing 3.3 bug 9745 /?10021 Marcus Meissner
06:19 Re: Stange gcc 3.3 bug Zack Weinberg
05:51 Re: PR 7910/11021 Mark Mitchell
05:39 RE: new-reg-alloc branch status ? Mukta Punjani, Noida
05:04 Stange gcc 3.3 bug H. J. Lu
04:57 PR 2873 Mark Mitchell
04:55 PRs assigned to you Mark Mitchell
04:51 Re: PR 7910/11021 Christopher Faylor
04:07 Re: Your error5.C test Mark Mitchell
03:53 /tmp full Alexy Khrabrov
03:43 Re: Removing -fssa Mark Mitchell
03:42 New 7.cc tests Mark Mitchell
03:41 Re: GCC 3.3 build on AIX 5.2, ICE David Edelsohn
03:37 Re: Removing -fssa law
03:33 Re: GCC 3.3 build on AIX 5.2, ICE Alexy Khrabrov
03:27 Verbose Output error? Matt
02:19 Re: Removing -fssa Mark Mitchell
02:10 Re: Removing -fssa Andrew Pinski
02:03 Removing -fssa Mark Mitchell
00:58 Re: New compilation failure in bi-arch x86-64 libstdc++ build Phil Edwards

July 01, 2003
22:44 gcc support for memory debuggers (operator delete) ? Felvegi Peter Andras
22:30 Re: Your error5.C test Giovanni Bajo
22:19 New compilation failure in bi-arch x86-64 libstdc++ build Jan Hubicka
22:03 [tree-ssa] field names Dennis Dams
21:33 Re: C++ demangler horrors H. J. Lu
21:16 Re: Ovidiu Predescu's address in MAINTAINERS bounces Stan Shebs
21:08 Re: PR 7910/11021 Danny Smith
20:47 Problems building 64-bit version of GCC on AIX (Power 4) 5.1 SP. Ray Sheppard
20:39 Re: GCC 3.3 build on AIX 5.2, ICE David Edelsohn
20:36 Re: GCC 3.3 build on AIX 5.2, ICE Alexy Khrabrov
20:30 Re: Patch for Granlund's soft-fp lib Hartmut Schirmer
20:09 Re: Pre_dec and Post_inc insns Alexandre Oliva
18:59 Re: C++ demangler horrors Daniel Jacobowitz
18:57 Re: C++ demangler horrors Daniel Jacobowitz
18:56 Re: gettext should not be a builtin Joseph S. Myers
18:50 Re: gettext should not be a builtin DJ Delorie
18:47 Re: Pre_dec and Post_inc insns Zdenek Dvorak
18:32 Re: gettext should not be a builtin Joseph S. Myers
18:27 Your patch breaks mainline H. J. Lu
18:19 PR 7910/11021 Mark Mitchell
18:15 Re: Successful build of gcc-3.3 on alpha-dec-osf4.0f Benjamin Kosnik
18:03 Your error5.C test Mark Mitchell
17:54 Re: Draft: Changes concerning GCC snapshots (and releases) Andreas Schwab
17:44 Re: Successful build of gcc-3.3 on alpha-dec-osf4.0f Janis Johnson
16:43 Re: GCC gprof statistics Ishikawa
16:21 Re: Draft: Changes concerning GCC snapshots (and releases) Phil Edwards
16:20 Re: configure.in (Cygnus and autoconf versions) Shaun Jackman
16:05 Re: Dell vs. GPL (Apologies) Scott Robert Ladd
16:02 Re: configure.in (Cygnus and autoconf versions) Andrew Pinski
15:59 Re: Dell vs. GPL Scott Robert Ladd
15:56 configure.in (Cygnus and autoconf versions) Shaun Jackman
15:52 Re: 'make check' in libiberty, 31 failures Michael Elizabeth Chastain
15:52 Re: C++ demangler horrors H. J. Lu
15:43 Re: 'make check' in libiberty, 31 failures DJ Delorie
15:43 Re: 'make check' in libiberty, 31 failures Michael Elizabeth Chastain
15:42 Re: C++ demangler horrors DJ Delorie
15:36 'make check' in libiberty, 31 failures Michael Elizabeth Chastain
15:29 Re: C++ demangler horrors Alexandre Oliva
15:14 Re: Getting information on symbols and linkages at run-time Dr William Bland
15:12 Re: Successful build Andrew Pinski
15:08 Re: C++ demangler horrors H. J. Lu
15:06 Successful build Dan Schult
14:59 Draft: Changes concerning GCC snapshots (and releases) Gerald Pfeifer
14:57 Re: RFA: Please review the new C++ demangler patch Alexandre Oliva
14:54 Re: C++ demangler horrors Alexandre Oliva
14:45 Re: fix-header crash (gcc 3.3.1 20030630) Alexandre Oliva
14:38 gettext should not be a builtin DJ Delorie
14:38 Re: Pre_dec and Post_inc insns Alexandre Oliva
14:24 Re: C++ demangler horrors H. J. Lu
14:17 Re: libstdc++ check-abi not selfcontained Olaf Hering
13:56 Re: RFA: Please review the new C++ demangler patch Robert Dewar
13:49 Re: RFA: Please review the new C++ demangler patch Alexandre Oliva
13:47 Re: C++ demangler horrors Alexandre Oliva
11:16 RE: Register Rematerialization In New Register Allocator Michael Matz
10:30 Successful build of gcc-3.3 on alpha-dec-osf4.0f Arnold Vogelsang
10:11 RE: Register Rematerialization In New Register Allocator Mukta Punjani, Noida
09:21 Re: GCC gprof statistics Ishikawa
06:23 Ovidiu Predescu's address in MAINTAINERS bounces Zack Weinberg
05:32 Re: New bootstrap failures with remaining clk_* uses Neil Booth
04:06 New bootstrap failures with remaining clk_* uses Kaveh R. Ghazi
03:08 Re: gcc-3.3 CVS failing during libjava compile with: ./.libs/libgcj.so:undefined reference to `__gcc_personality_v0' Jeff Sturm
03:01 Re: [tree-ssa] Computed gotos Robert Dewar
02:57 Re: GCC 3.3 build on AIX 5.2, ICE David Edelsohn
02:01 Re: GCC gprof statistics Ishikawa
01:47 Re: some profiling numbers graydon hoare
01:13 Re: C99 features Scott Robert Ladd
00:56 Re: Would you help me? Marty Hauff
00:30 fix-header crash (gcc 3.3.1 20030630) Brian R. Gaeke
00:05 Re: Req: Disable I18N/L10N translation for gcc -print-search-dirsoutput. Ishikawa


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3