This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Does "complex xxx" work?

From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>
To: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 22:43:40 +0100 (BST)
Subject: Re: Does "complex xxx" work?
References: <20030621172429.GA25184@lucon.org><Pine.LNX.4.53.0306212048520.6223@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk><20030621204444.GA27806@lucon.org> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0306212157230.13631@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk><20030621211615.GA28248@lucon.org> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0306212220270.15962@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk><87fzm3w1ks.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com>

On Sat, 21 Jun 2003, Zack Weinberg wrote:

> Maybe a builtin typedef?

The point in this and the previous discussion is that "unsigned __int64"
won't work with a typedef.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk

References:
- Does "complex xxx" work?
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: Does "complex xxx" work?
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: Does "complex xxx" work?
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: Does "complex xxx" work?
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: Does "complex xxx" work?
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: Does "complex xxx" work?
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: Does "complex xxx" work?
  - From: Zack Weinberg

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]