This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: C++ compile time (again, take 2)

From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu>
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
Cc: Loren James Rittle <rittle at latour dot rsch dot comm dot mot dot com>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 10:03:39 -0500
Subject: Re: C++ compile time (again, take 2)
References: <200306132309.h5DN91C4034960@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com> <200306160943.23282.bangerth@ices.utexas.edu> <1055775535.3322.58.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com>

On Monday 16 June 2003 09:58 am, Diego Novillo wrote:
> >   2.95    :  46 min
> >   mainline:  73 min    (89 min)
> >   tree-ssa:  94 min   (118 min)
>
> Thanks Wolfgang.  I'm looking at compile time regressions this week.
> Jeff Law posted a patch to speed up constant propagation times.  I've
> got another patch testing that should speed up constant propagation some
> more.  I'll take a look at your code as well.

That's very much appreciated! Let me know when you think that things have 
become noticably faster, and I'd be happy to retest.

W.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Bangerth              email:            bangerth@ices.utexas.edu
                               www: http://www.ices.utexas.edu/~bangerth/

References:
- Re: C++ compile time (again)
  - From: Loren James Rittle
- Re: C++ compile time (again, take 2)
  - From: Wolfgang Bangerth
- Re: C++ compile time (again, take 2)
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]