This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: C++ compile time (again)

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
To: Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot com>
Cc: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu>, Steven Bosscher <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: 13 Jun 2003 12:02:05 -0400
Subject: Re: C++ compile time (again)
Organization: Red Hat Canada
References: <200306130918.03390.bangerth@ices.utexas.edu> <3EE9EE36.5030605@student.tudelft.nl> <200306131042.11274.bangerth@ices.utexas.edu> <20030613085841.A15056@synopsys.com>

On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 11:58, Joe Buck wrote:

> It's fair if the overhead introduced by --enable-checking is equivalent
> for mainline and tree-ssa.  Is it?  (roughly).  If tree-ssa does more
> checks, then the compile time regression might be artificial.
> 
tree-ssa does a fair amount of tree checking.  When comparing tree-ssa
vs mainline, you must have checking disabled.


Diego.

References:
- C++ compile time (again)
  - From: Wolfgang Bangerth
- Re: C++ compile time (again)
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: C++ compile time (again)
  - From: Wolfgang Bangerth
- Re: C++ compile time (again)
  - From: Joe Buck

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]