This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: C++ compile time (again)
- From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
- To: Steven Bosscher <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>
- Cc: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: 13 Jun 2003 11:32:15 -0400
- Subject: Re: C++ compile time (again)
- Organization: Red Hat Canada
- References: <200306130918.03390.bangerth@ices.utexas.edu> <3EE9EE36.5030605@student.tudelft.nl>
On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 11:31, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Yes but how? Is anyone testing/publishing C++ compile time performance
> on a regular basis? There are three SPEC testers and an autocrasher,
> but there's not enough C++ in there, as we've seen many times now...
>
I'm considering adding POOMA to the nightly testers if we ever get it to
compile in less than a decade. If anyone has a lighter-weight C++
suite, I'd be happy to throw it in the mix.
Diego.