This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] Insert on edge comment
- From: law at redhat dot com
- To: Andrew MacLeod <amacleod at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot dot org>, vmakarov at redhat dot com, matz at suse dot de, gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 10:52:59 -0600
- Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Insert on edge comment
- Reply-to: law at redhat dot com
In message <1055263923.6414.190.camel@p4>, Andrew MacLeod writes:
>On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 12:42, law@redhat.com wrote:
>> In message <1055262334.6414.178.camel@p4>, Andrew MacLeod writes:
>
>> >
>> >Does that make any sense? It doesnt seem like a lot of work...
>> I was referring to dropping the nested structure entirely. Fixing
>> GOTOs, SWITCHES or any of them piecemeal isn't terribly difficult,
>> but taken as a whole it gets more complex.
>>
>
>You are still going to need to add a conditional goto/branch of some
>sort in order to do this tho right? That seems like the first step.
>then we can trivially "lower" from containers at an early stage until we
>just dont generate them any more :-)
Yup.
>Or we could simply tackle them right off the bat.... just more work
>upfront.
Possibly quite a bit. But as I mentioned, we may have to tackle this
as part of addressing the tree->rtl conversion cleanup.
jeff