This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: treelang fix for rs6000 / treelang not proper front end

From: Tim Josling <tej at melbpc dot org dot au>
To: Steven Bosscher <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>
Cc: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2003 09:08:56 +1000
Subject: Re: treelang fix for rs6000 / treelang not proper front end
Organization: Melbourne PC User Group
References: <3EE2CBC1.5030809@melbpc.org.au> <87d6hpysey.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> <3EE3AA53.3020307@melbpc.org.au> <3EE3B63A.6060706@student.tudelft.nl>

Steven Bosscher wrote:

Remember that in an earlier discussion we had, I already _did_
offer you to make treelang 'proper' for a tree-ssa, and to
take over as a maintainer for that branch so that you would
only have to take care of mainline?  That was only a couple
of months ago, and you then said you didn't think it was
worth the effort.

Gr.
Steven

No I don't remember. What I seem to remember is a suggestion that I update it. I had a look at doing it but foundered on lack of documentation.

However if the offer is still open, I accept. This would certainly be a good step forward.

Tim Josling

Follow-Ups:
- Re: treelang fix for rs6000 / treelang not proper front end
  - From: Fergus Henderson
- Re: treelang fix for rs6000 / treelang not proper front end
  - From: Steven Bosscher

References:
- Re: treelang fix for rs6000 / treelang not proper front end
  - From: Tim Josling
- Re: treelang fix for rs6000 / treelang not proper front end
  - From: Steven Bosscher

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]