This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Never gimplify ASM_EXPRs

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Cc: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 13:48:20 -0700
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Never gimplify ASM_EXPRs
References: <1054822579.19594.18.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com> <wvlllwgo8wr.fsf@prospero.boston.redhat.com> <20030605171518.GF20859@redhat.com> <wvlr868mho1.fsf@prospero.boston.redhat.com>

On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 03:46:22PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> I plan to do that, by reducing them to INDIRECT_REFs (if the operand isn't
> already a decl).

That's fine for GIMPLE, probably.

> Of course, that means that we don't get complex
> addressing modes, since I assume combine won't touch asms.

It will.


r~

References:
- [tree-ssa] RFC: Never gimplify ASM_EXPRs
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Never gimplify ASM_EXPRs
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Never gimplify ASM_EXPRs
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Never gimplify ASM_EXPRs
  - From: Jason Merrill

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]