This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: http://g95.sourceforge.net or http://gcc-g95.sourceforge.net
- From: Scott Robert Ladd <coyote at coyotegulch dot com>
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2003 09:45:34 -0400
- Subject: Re: http://g95.sourceforge.net or http://gcc-g95.sourceforge.net
- References: <31818.1054467651@www63.gmx.net>
on the front ends site is a link to http://g95.sourceforge.net/, but now
http://g95.sourceforge.net/ shall be integrated. Are these projects the same or
in what are these different? Why exists 2 projects g95 for gcc?
I watched this fork as an outside observer. I've been following the G95
saga for some time, given my personal interest in Fortran 95.
If you judge projects based on the spirit of "free" software, the
"gcc-g95" project is clearly the "true" g95 implementation. The gcc-g95
project is a cooperative group effort aimed at integrating Fortran 95
into GCC; the original g95 project is one man's private project, tightly
controlled, with limited access to source code and no aim of GCC
integration.
Sometimes, forks are necessary. It is too bad the FSF continues to
adhere to anti-forkism without recognizing what is best for the
community as a whole. The gcc-g95 fork came about after much
consideration and (in my perception) angst over "doing the right thing."
In the end, the decision was made to do the right thing for the GCC
community -- a fork.
I hope the FSF recognizes such dedication to the spirit of "free"
software. The karma of the gcc-g95 maintainers outweighs the dogma of
anti-forkism.
..Scott
--
Scott Robert Ladd
Coyote Gulch Productions (http://www.coyotegulch.com)
Professional programming for science and engineering;
Interesting and unusual bits of very free code.