Re: your RESOLVED->CLOSED changes

["John Anthony Kazos Jr." <jkazos at vt dot edu>]

> On Fri, 23 May 2003, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>
> > >Besides, we were discussing the whole VERIFIED/RESOLVED/CLOSED issue
> > >off-list (and once we would have found an agreement among ourselves, we
> > >were going to bring the issue on the list of course). Theoretically,
> > >nobody
> > Honestly, better to discuss this one on-list.  Probably better to have
> > discussed it before the switchover, as well, but that's water under the
> > bridge.
>
> The distinction *was* discussed before the conversion - I raised several
> times the question of whether we needed that VERIFIED/RESOLVED/CLOSED
> distinction, though no conclusion may have been reached.

I suggest:

VERIFIED - It really is a bug, and it is being (or will be) worked on.
RESOLVED - A fix has been created, and now is being tested.
CLOSED - The fix is tested and determined to be good; bug eliminated.

Ii desu masu ne?