This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Suggestion for new keywords in bugzilla
- From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo at libero dot it>
- To: "Volker Reichelt" <reichelt at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de>,<bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu>,<gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>,<gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>,<ehrhardt at mathematik dot uni-ulm dot de>
- Cc: "Daniel Berlin" <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
- Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 16:59:14 +0200
- Subject: Re: Suggestion for new keywords in bugzilla
- References: <200305221202.h4MC2aNZ002695@relay.rwth-aachen.de>
Volker Reichelt <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de> wrote:
> I'd like to add the following keywords:
>
> * diagnostic (for error messages/warnings that are misleading or broken
> and superfluous/missing warnings)
Maybe this should be a new component (like, c, c++, etc). On the other hand,
it's clear that e.g. some diagnosis bugs are stricly C++ related. I'm not
sure what it's best option. Of course, everything is better than the
[diagnosis] stamp in the summary.
> * error-recovery (we get an ICE/bailing-out-message after a sensible
> error message). This should be specified in addition to
> ice-on-invalid-code.
Yes, agreed. Is it possible to have some dropbox with keywords instead of
being forced to type them in manually?
Giovanni Bajo