This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: MinGW (Was Re: PROPOSAL: Variation on an Alternate policy for obsoleting targets)
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf at redhat dot com>
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 23:27:26 -0400
- Subject: Re: MinGW (Was Re: PROPOSAL: Variation on an Alternate policy for obsoleting targets)
- References: <20030520011613.GA629@doctormoo>
- Reply-to: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 09:16:13PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>Patches not getting reviewed in a reasonable amount of time is a known
>problem, and we're all working on it. :-/
Patches that are submitted for mingw which are covered by the parts of
gcc that I maintain are reviewed in a reasonable amount of time.
Patches in other parts of the tree get reviewed as fast as any other
patches get reviewed, AFAICT.
Sometimes mingw/cygwin *bugs* in gnats languish however.
I do what I can. I haven't seen anyone around who was willing to step
in to handle cygwin/mingw issues.
cgf
(windows, cygwin, mingw maintainer)