This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: MinGW (Was: Re: PROPOSAL: Variation on an Alternate policy forobsoleting targets)
- From: Anthony Green <green at redhat dot com>
- To: stl at caltech dot edu
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 19 May 2003 20:25:05 -0700
- Subject: Re: MinGW (Was: Re: PROPOSAL: Variation on an Alternate policy forobsoleting targets)
- Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
- References: <000401c31e57$32c69910$3c9fd783@northwood>
On Mon, 2003-05-19 at 15:37, Stephan T. Lavavej wrote:
> I'm talking about MinGW, which - as far as I can tell - receives fairly
> little attention from the gcc developers and the community in general,
Well, I don't know about that. The gcj maintainers and other
contributors have put a lot of work into 3.3. I think we were just one
patch short of building out of the box...
http://www.thisiscool.com/gcc33_mingw.htm
Considering the level of interest and activity these past few months,
I'd be really surprised if 3.4 didn't build/work out of the box.
AG
--
Anthony Green <green@redhat.com>
Red Hat, Inc.