This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Suggested Bugzilla improvements
- From: Volker Reichelt <reichelt at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de>
- To: dberlin at dberlin dot org
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu, giovannibajo at libero dot it
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 17:58:42 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: Re: Suggested Bugzilla improvements
- Reply-to: Volker Reichelt <reichelt at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de>
On 13 May, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>> * What's the purpose of the URL field?
>> Sending an URL instead of a preprocessed file is a no-no.
>> Doesn't that encourage users to send us URLs?
> It was there, i never removed it, and probably won't (though i could
> make it invisible if you like).
Please make it invisible (that's at least my opinion).
>> * I'd like to propose the keyword "diagnostic" for reports that deal
>> with malformed/strange error messages and warnings.
>> There are more than 20 bugs that have the stamp "[diagnostic]" in the
>> synopsis line right now.
>
> People who can edit bugs can edit/add/remove keywords, specifically so
> you don't need my approval to do this type of thing.
Great.
>> * The page "bug_status.html" needs updating, especially the parts about
>> the Platform/Operating System.
>>
> Thanks, i'll do it.
The page should probably be merged with "bugs/management.html" somehow
when Bugzilla goes online. One page of documentation should be enough.
Regards,
Volker