This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Suggested Bugzilla improvements
- From: Volker Reichelt <reichelt at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de>
- To: dberlin at dberlin dot org
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu, giovannibajo at libero dot it
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 11:12:07 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: Suggested Bugzilla improvements
- Reply-to: Volker Reichelt <reichelt at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de>
Hi Daniel,
thanks for your work with Bugzilla!
Alas I wasn't able to take part in the discussion yesterday since our
mailserver broke shortly after my initial posting of the "Suggestion
for a new GNATS policy" thread.
But it looks like most of yesterdays problems (real ones or just
misunderstandings) are resolved now.
There are, however, some points that still need to be addressed IMHO.
* Version: By now, one can only select one version. The bugs, however,
usually appear in more than one compiler version.
Would it be possible to change that into a text field or to rename it
into "Initial version"? Or are there better suggestions?
* What's the purpose of the URL field?
Sending an URL instead of a preprocessed file is a no-no.
Doesn't that encourage users to send us URLs?
* I'd like to propose the keyword "diagnostic" for reports that deal
with malformed/strange error messages and warnings.
There are more than 20 bugs that have the stamp "[diagnostic]" in the
synopsis line right now.
* The page "bug_status.html" needs updating, especially the parts about
the Platform/Operating System.
Regards,
Volker