This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: volatile [was: GCC warnings for unused global variables]


On May  7, 2003, Michael Eager <eager@eagercon.com> wrote:

> If you take the view that "a <op>= b" involves a read and a write, then
> translating it into load/operate/store is correct.

But then, so is a single instruction that loads, operates then stores,
right?  The thing is that GCC doesn't ever give such instruction a
chance if the variable is volatile.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                 aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist                Professional serial bug killer


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]