gcc archive
author index for May, 2003

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)

'David Scott Urban

• 2003-05-21 14:01 Successful build, test and install of gcc 3.3 on Solaris 2.8

.....

• 2003-05-05 15:41 Letter
• 2003-05-05 15:44 Letter

<yunakaof-AT-usp.br>

• 2003-05-09 01:15 Re: GCC 3.3 Prerelease

石 峰

• 2003-05-02 03:05 Where to get lex.l for GNU C++

Pop Sébastian

• 2003-05-11 23:47 Re: bootstrap of tree-ssa fails with ada
• 2003-05-18 20:57 [tree-ssa] const declarations and temporaries in cc1plus
• 2003-05-20 12:01 Re: How to run over each node of a tree ?
• 2003-05-31 18:25 Re: Loop optimizer issues

Laczó Tibor

• 2003-05-12 08:51 g++ compiler error
• 2003-05-14 11:05 library

Branko Äibej

• 2003-05-15 19:06 Re: I want try...finally

Abramov, Evgenia

• 2003-05-25 11:58 Moving from gcc-3.2 to gcc-3.2.2: "cannot pass objects of non-POD type"

Alan Cox

• 2003-05-30 20:34 Re: Problem Installing Linux Kernel Module compiled with gcc-3.2.x

Alan Modra

• 2003-05-07 04:34 Re: analysis #2: alpha bootstrap failure on mainline
• 2003-05-07 12:55 Re: analysis #2: alpha bootstrap failure on mainline
• 2003-05-12 14:30 Re: unresolvable R_PPC_ADDR32 relocation against symbol
• 2003-05-14 23:03 Re: PATCH: Optimize protected call for i386
• 2003-05-14 23:51 Re: PATCH: Optimize protected call for i386
• 2003-05-15 00:51 Re: PATCH: Optimize protected call for i386
• 2003-05-16 05:13 Re: about stack/args growing up/down

Albert Chin

• 2003-05-28 19:22 Re: Bootstrap failure on Sparc Solaris2.8
• 2003-05-30 03:54 AIX 5.1 and g++ 3.3

Albert Chin-A-Young

• 2003-05-23 19:46 Building Ada in 3.3 on Solaris 9/SPARC with Sun CC
• 2003-05-24 03:42 [3.3] Bootstrap error building Ada on Solaris 2.6/SPARC

Albert Wang

• 2003-05-01 06:00 Is GCC still use bison or yacc?
• 2003-05-06 08:37 Is cc1 backend or frontend?

Aldy Hernandez

• 2003-05-02 00:52 Re: Vector modes and C++ not supported?
• 2003-05-02 01:03 Re: Vector modes and C++ not supported?
• 2003-05-02 19:01 bug or feature?
• 2003-05-07 20:00 Re: Bad testcase?
• 2003-05-23 15:15 rfc: splitting complex arguments
• 2003-05-29 18:41 [janitor] mips-tfile.c and mips-tdump.c
• 2003-05-31 13:28 [janitor] Call for approvers!

Alessandro Molina

• 2003-05-06 17:33 Dynamic Loading of classes in C++ without knowing their interface

Alexander Aganichev

• 2003-05-07 09:33 Porting GCC to Zilog z80
• 2003-05-08 08:17 Re: Porting GCC to Zilog z80
• 2003-05-21 05:25 Dummy questions on GCC internals
• 2003-05-21 14:31 Re: Dummy questions on GCC internals
• 2003-05-22 14:32 Dummy questions on GCC internals - 2
• 2003-05-27 13:02 How to define predicates for the particular set of registers?
• 2003-05-27 13:02 How to define predicates for the particular set of registers?
• 2003-05-29 17:37 unable to find a register to spill

Alexander Kabaev

• 2003-05-02 18:00 Re: Warnings about rcs_id strings: let's settle this

Alexander Roos

• 2003-05-30 13:14 Problem with gcc 3.2 on AIX 4.3.2

Alexandre Courbot

• 2003-05-02 11:03 Re: Minimal machine description file
• 2003-05-06 08:26 Re: Using mem_attrs to get the tree of a function being called?
• 2003-05-06 12:37 Re: Using mem_attrs to get the tree of a function being called?
• 2003-05-09 17:28 Getting knowledge of common declarations at the time they are declared in the source
• 2003-05-20 16:15 About EXTRA_ADDRESS_CONSTRAINT
• 2003-05-22 13:33 Re: About EXTRA_ADDRESS_CONSTRAINT
• 2003-05-23 08:55 Re: About EXTRA_ADDRESS_CONSTRAINT
• 2003-05-23 15:06 Re: problem when making a new target
• 2003-05-27 09:15 Re: Macros being updated??

Alexandre Oliva

• 2003-05-02 06:18 Re: When is stage 1 scheduled to close for 3.4?
• 2003-05-05 22:59 Re: GCJ and $PREFIX/include
• 2003-05-05 23:03 Re: GCJ and $PREFIX/include
• 2003-05-05 23:11 Re: Interleaving pthread_cleanups in C and C++
• 2003-05-06 00:50 Re: Interleaving pthread_cleanups in C and C++
• 2003-05-06 00:55 Re: GCJ and $PREFIX/include
• 2003-05-06 01:42 Re: Interleaving pthread_cleanups in C and C++
• 2003-05-06 05:09 Re: Interleaving pthread_cleanups in C and C++
• 2003-05-06 05:35 Re: volatile [was: GCC warnings for unused global variables]
• 2003-05-06 05:37 Re: volatile [was: GCC warnings for unused global variables]
• 2003-05-06 23:26 Re: volatile [was: GCC warnings for unused global variables]
• 2003-05-06 23:35 Re: implement __attribute__((cleanup(function)))
• 2003-05-07 00:13 Re: Constructor for new T[..]
• 2003-05-07 04:03 Re: volatile [was: GCC warnings for unused global variables]
• 2003-05-07 05:06 Re: Constructor for new T[..]
• 2003-05-08 14:57 Re: tree-ssa branch: Fortran libraries don't build
• 2003-05-08 19:06 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-08 20:19 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-09 22:35 Re: srcdir == objdir build issues [SC take note]
• 2003-05-10 04:57 Re: srcdir == objdir build issues [SC take note]
• 2003-05-15 01:44 Re: new register allocator and HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED
• 2003-05-15 01:46 Re: Some porting help
• 2003-05-15 08:42 Re: Some porting help
• 2003-05-15 10:19 Re: new register allocator and HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED
• 2003-05-15 19:07 Re: new register allocator and HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED
• 2003-05-15 23:31 Re: new register allocator and HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED
• 2003-05-16 00:57 Re: new register allocator and HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED
• 2003-05-16 22:51 Re: PROPOSAL: Policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-20 19:45 Re: compiling gcc-3.3
• 2003-05-30 18:46 Re: gcc_latest_snapshot CVS tag (was: gcc-ss-20030526 is now available)
• 2003-05-30 18:48 Re: GCC Bootstrap failure after upgrading Autoconf and Automake
• 2003-05-30 20:22 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-31 18:07 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-31 21:22 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-31 21:25 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]

Anders Ådland

• 2003-05-14 13:04 Some porting help
• 2003-05-14 17:24 Address modes
• 2003-05-14 19:22 Re: Fw: Some porting help
• 2003-05-15 06:59 Re: Some porting help
• 2003-05-19 17:42 Segmention fault when optimizing.

Andrea 'fwyzard' Bocci

• 2003-05-29 00:20 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html

Andrea Noda (Central-Apartment)

• 2003-05-26 10:04 Central-Apartment Duesseldorf

Andreas Jaeger

• 2003-05-01 18:29 Ada bootstrap broken with lineno changes
• 2003-05-02 18:30 Re: GCC inline parameters (PR 10160 testcase)
• 2003-05-02 19:27 Re: GCC inline parameters (PR 10160 testcase)
• 2003-05-03 09:05 Re: GCC inline parameters (PR 10160 testcase)
• 2003-05-05 08:55 Re: Experimenting with tree inliner parameter settings
• 2003-05-07 06:16 Re: Your ia64 patch may have broken libjava
• 2003-05-07 09:35 Re: Your ia64 patch may have broken libjava
• 2003-05-08 13:30 Re: tree-ssa branch: Fortran libraries don't build
• 2003-05-08 14:42 Mainline bootstrap failure on x86-64
• 2003-05-10 07:49 Re: off-topic traceback weirdness
• 2003-05-16 05:43 Re: gcc 3.3 is not able to compile quakeforge cvs with cpuoptimization greater than pentium 1
• 2003-05-19 06:18 libffi broken with your latest change
• 2003-05-19 06:34 Re: libffi broken with your latest change
• 2003-05-19 07:03 Re: libffi broken with your latest change
• 2003-05-19 15:41 Re: problem when making a new target
• 2003-05-20 13:27 problem running the testsuite
• 2003-05-22 06:54 Re: Bugzilla CPU targets
• 2003-05-30 08:09 Re: [GCOV] SPEC 2000: VORTEX and profiling
• 2003-05-30 17:37 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-30 19:52 CLASS_CANNOT_CHANGE_MODE and CANNOT_CHANGE_MODE_CLASS in df.c

Andreas Schwab

• 2003-05-13 12:41 Java build failure
• 2003-05-14 13:59 Re: How to implement branches?
• 2003-05-14 21:21 Re: strict-aliasing and typedefs
• 2003-05-16 22:10 Re: Does gcc violate the ia64 ABI?
• 2003-05-19 12:17 Bootstrap failure on ia64

Andreas Tobler

• 2003-05-05 11:49 bootstrap failure on darwin6.3 HEAD
• 2003-05-05 13:02 Re: bootstrap failure on darwin6.3 HEAD
• 2003-05-12 16:10 Re: Assembler warning: Warning: .space repeat count is zero, ignored
• 2003-05-12 17:19 Re: Assembler warning: Warning: .space repeat count is zero, ignored
• 2003-05-17 05:52 Re: Libffi problem on darwin (MacOSX)
• 2003-05-17 15:21 Re: Libffi problem on darwin (MacOSX)
• 2003-05-17 15:39 shared libgcc test question
• 2003-05-20 05:05 Re: shared libgcc test question
• 2003-05-25 19:00 [darwin] testsuite wchar_t-1.c & wint_t-1.c
• 2003-05-26 05:18 Re: Libffi problem on darwin (MacOSX)
• 2003-05-26 16:59 Re: [darwin] testsuite wchar_t-1.c & wint_t-1.c
• 2003-05-26 17:37 Re: [darwin] testsuite wchar_t-1.c & wint_t-1.c

Andrei Zmievski

• 2003-05-06 17:23 Constructor for new T[..]
• 2003-05-07 01:08 Re: Constructor for new T[..]
• 2003-05-07 14:23 Re: Constructor for new T[..]

Andrew Cagney

• 2003-05-24 01:23 Re: Libiberty license roundup (questions/potential problems)
• 2003-05-28 19:27 Re: Libiberty license roundup (questions/potential problems)

Andrew Haley

• 2003-05-01 08:28 GCC -O2 failure for mipsel
• 2003-05-01 08:46 Re: GCC -O2 failure for mipsel
• 2003-05-01 14:39 Problems with linking library libgnat.a
• 2003-05-01 17:17 Re: Add Giovanni Bajo as GNATS only maintainer
• 2003-05-06 11:02 Re: Why so many java failures on Linux/ia64?
• 2003-05-07 09:17 Re: Your ia64 patch may have broken libjava
• 2003-05-07 09:38 Re: Your ia64 patch may have broken libjava
• 2003-05-07 18:04 Re: Your ia64 patch may have broken libjava
• 2003-05-07 19:52 Re: Your ia64 patch may have broken libjava
• 2003-05-07 20:18 Re: Your ia64 patch may have broken libjava
• 2003-05-09 09:31 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-09 10:16 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-20 14:12 Re: "obvious" requirements

Andrew Lui

• 2003-05-03 19:28 test out the newly install gcc

Andrew MacLeod

• 2003-05-01 17:17 Re:[tree-ssa] variables being dragged out of their lexical scopes
• 2003-05-05 12:31 [tree-ssa] DCE and conditionals
• 2003-05-05 20:33 Re: [tree-ssa] DCE and conditionals
• 2003-05-05 21:18 Re: [tree-ssa] DCE and conditionals
• 2003-05-05 21:18 Re: [tree-ssa] DCE and conditionals
• 2003-05-05 21:48 Re: [tree-ssa] DCE and conditionals
• 2003-05-08 12:56 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge results as of 2003-05-06
• 2003-05-08 15:43 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge results as of 2003-05-06
• 2003-05-08 19:17 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge results as of 2003-05-06
• 2003-05-12 13:08 Re: tree-ssa branch: Call for preliminary testing
• 2003-05-12 13:22 Re: tree-ssa branch: Call for preliminary testing
• 2003-05-12 14:12 Re: tree-ssa branch: Call for preliminary testing
• 2003-05-12 14:16 Re: tree-ssa branch: Call for preliminary testing
• 2003-05-12 14:42 [tree-ssa] Out of SSA status and issues
• 2003-05-12 15:20 [tree-ssa] Eliminating unnecessary variables during out-of-ssa
• 2003-05-12 15:57 Re: [tree-ssa] Out of SSA status and issues
• 2003-05-12 16:10 Re: [tree-ssa] Out of SSA status and issues
• 2003-05-12 17:12 Re: [tree-ssa] Out of SSA status and issues
• 2003-05-12 18:57 Re: [tree-ssa] Out of SSA status and issues
• 2003-05-12 18:57 Re: [tree-ssa] Eliminating unnecessary variables during out-of-ssa
• 2003-05-12 19:47 Re: [tree-ssa] Eliminating unnecessary variables during out-of-ssa
• 2003-05-13 12:49 Re: [tree-ssa] Out of SSA status and issues
• 2003-05-13 12:50 Re: [tree-ssa] Out of SSA status and issues
• 2003-05-13 13:18 Re: [tree-ssa] Out of SSA status and issues
• 2003-05-13 13:29 Re: [tree-ssa] Out of SSA status and issues
• 2003-05-14 16:16 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Dropping INDIRECT_REF variables
• 2003-05-14 18:05 Re: [tree-ssa] Out of SSA status and issues
• 2003-05-29 22:25 Re: [tree-ssa]: Insertion at beginning of bb broken
• 2003-05-30 03:42 Re: [tree-ssa]: Overlap of variable with same variable?
• 2003-05-30 12:12 Re: [tree-ssa]: We don't update end of bb in before insertion whenwe should
• 2003-05-30 15:23 [tree-ssa] Switch stmts and inserting on edges
• 2003-05-30 15:59 Re: [tree-ssa]: Overlap of variable with same variable?
• 2003-05-30 18:42 Re: [tree-ssa] Switch stmts and inserting on edges
• 2003-05-30 18:46 Re: [tree-ssa] Switch stmts and inserting on edges
• 2003-05-30 19:41 Re: [tree-ssa] Switch stmts and inserting on edges
• 2003-05-30 20:27 Re: [tree-ssa] Switch stmts and inserting on edges
• 2003-05-30 21:21 Re: [tree-ssa] Switch stmts and inserting on edges
• 2003-05-30 21:23 [tree-ssa] Insert on edge comment
• 2003-05-30 23:27 Re: [tree-ssa] Insert on edge comment
• 2003-05-30 23:31 Re: [tree-ssa] Insert on edge comment
• 2003-05-31 02:46 Re: [tree-ssa] Insert on edge comment
• 2003-05-31 20:06 Re: [tree-ssa] Insert on edge comment
• 2003-05-31 20:35 Re: [tree-ssa] Insert on edge comment
• 2003-05-31 21:06 Re: [tree-ssa] Insert on edge comment

Andrew Pinski

• 2003-05-01 11:00 Re: GCC -O2 failure for mipsel
• 2003-05-01 14:54 [tree-ssa] cannot bootstrap on ppc-darwin
• 2003-05-01 15:24 Re: [tree-ssa] cannot bootstrap on ppc-darwin
• 2003-05-01 21:13 Re: Ada bootstrap broken with lineno changes
• 2003-05-02 00:58 Re: Vector modes and C++ not supported?
• 2003-05-03 00:12 Re: Optimization
• 2003-05-04 13:32 Re: 5 GCC regressions, 1 new, with your patch on 2003-05-04T03:18:05Z.
• 2003-05-05 12:41 Re: bootstrap failure on darwin6.3 HEAD
• 2003-05-07 15:32 Re: [tree-ssa] cannot bootstrap on ppc-darwin
• 2003-05-07 16:52 Re: [tree-ssa] cannot bootstrap on ppc-darwin
• 2003-05-08 01:35 RFC: using clz for comparing to zero on the tree level.
• 2003-05-08 13:28 Re: tree-ssa branch: Fortran libraries don't build
• 2003-05-08 14:03 Re: tree-ssa branch: Fortran libraries don't build
• 2003-05-09 02:02 Re: tree-ssa branch: Call for preliminary testing
• 2003-05-09 14:46 Re: RFC: using clz for comparing to zero on the tree level.
• 2003-05-09 14:52 Re: RFC: using clz for comparing to zero on the tree level.
• 2003-05-10 16:10 Re: 4 GCC regressions, 0 new, with your patch on 2003-05-10T10:23:38Z.
• 2003-05-10 21:54 Re: c++ errors in gcc 3.3 prelease 2?
• 2003-05-12 19:16 Re: Assembler warning: Warning: .space repeat count is zero, ignored
• 2003-05-12 19:23 Re: Assembler warning: Warning: .space repeat count is zero, ignored
• 2003-05-13 20:30 Re: gcc/gcc version.c
• 2003-05-14 14:10 Re: How to implement branches?
• 2003-05-15 03:15 Re: [tree-ssa] copy propagation and the abstraction penalty
• 2003-05-16 20:35 [tree-ssa] count-branch-reg optimization
• 2003-05-18 00:08 Fwd: [rtl-opt] bootstrap failure on darwin-pcc
• 2003-05-19 22:47 Re: State of C99 _Complex?
• 2003-05-20 01:24 Re: GCC build of gcc-3_3-branch failed for native with your patch on 2003-05-19T23:30:03Z.
• 2003-05-20 16:14 [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure on ppc-apple-darwin6.6
• 2003-05-20 18:38 Re: libsupc++, _cxa references, and Dinkum libcpp
• 2003-05-20 20:05 Re: Documentation Buglets (-fssa)
• 2003-05-20 20:08 Re: Documentation Buglets (-fssa)
• 2003-05-20 20:51 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure on ppc-apple-darwin6.6
• 2003-05-20 21:06 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure on ppc-apple-darwin6.6
• 2003-05-21 16:00 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure on ppc-apple-darwin6.6
• 2003-05-21 16:15 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure on ppc-apple-darwin6.6
• 2003-05-22 13:20 Re: cmov in asm()
• 2003-05-22 14:43 Re: Bugzilla CPU targets
• 2003-05-22 15:14 RFC: remove -fssa*
• 2003-05-23 14:59 Re: Bugzilla and gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
• 2003-05-23 15:05 Re: license of generated info docs (GFDL?) and man pages
• 2003-05-24 02:19 Bugzilla Error, every time I add to a bug.
• 2003-05-27 15:47 Re: Bugzilla Error, every time I add to a bug.

Andrew Stone

• 2003-05-27 14:37 Shared Object Dependencies

Andrew V. Fionik

• 2003-05-15 16:02 I want try...finally

Andris Pavenis

• 2003-05-25 17:57 Re: Old bug: the 14-character limit.
• 2003-05-27 05:55 Re: GCC Bootstrap failure after upgrading Autoconf and Automake

Andy Hall

• 2003-05-01 14:34 Problems with linking library libgnat.a

Anil Kumar

• 2003-05-08 07:03 Reg ABI
• 2003-05-08 17:51 Re: Reg ABI

Anthony Bucci

• 2003-05-08 17:14 suggested FAQ

Anthony Green

• 2003-05-05 02:41 Re: GCJ and $PREFIX/include
• 2003-05-06 21:52 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-07 15:02 .register pseudo-op (Was: PR 10656 and PR 10657)
• 2003-05-07 15:58 3.3 bootstrap failure on Solaris 2.8 w/ native tools
• 2003-05-07 16:11 Re: .register pseudo-op (Was: PR 10656 and PR 10657)
• 2003-05-07 23:03 Re: PR 10656 and PR 10657
• 2003-05-19 21:01 Re: libffi failure during bootstrap
• 2003-05-20 03:25 Re: MinGW (Was: Re: PROPOSAL: Variation on an Alternate policy forobsoleting targets)

Anton Litvinenko

• 2003-05-10 17:37 gcc implementation of rand() function

Ayal Zaks

• 2003-05-01 21:05 converting a loop to bzero

Bart Pit

• 2003-05-27 14:03 cannot make gcc 3.3

Ben Elliston

• 2003-05-02 06:51 Re: ARC/Argonaut questions
• 2003-05-03 00:26 Re: ARC/Argonaut questions
• 2003-05-05 05:04 Re: gcc && gdb
• 2003-05-09 07:10 Re: [Cobolforgcc-devel] Re: GCC front end for COBOL
• 2003-05-09 11:58 config.guess/config.sub updates
• 2003-05-22 00:42 Re: PROPOSAL: Policy for obsoleting targets

Benjamin Kosnik

• 2003-05-04 18:58 Re: GCJ and $PREFIX/include
• 2003-05-05 03:31 Re: GCJ and $PREFIX/include
• 2003-05-05 03:33 Re: GCJ and $PREFIX/include
• 2003-05-06 16:35 Re: GCJ and $PREFIX/include
• 2003-05-06 17:15 Re: Backporting pch support to 3.2?
• 2003-05-06 17:25 Re: GCC 3.3
• 2003-05-06 23:39 Re: Backporting pch support to 3.2?
• 2003-05-07 15:29 Re: bootstrap fails i686pclinuxgnu for libstdc++-v3
• 2003-05-07 17:50 Re: draft release notes for gcc 3.3
• 2003-05-07 21:30 Re: draft release notes for gcc 3.3
• 2003-05-07 22:14 Re: draft release notes for gcc 3.3
• 2003-05-08 15:19 Re: GCJ and $PREFIX/include
• 2003-05-09 02:59 Re: draft release notes for gcc 3.3
• 2003-05-09 04:28 Re: draft release notes for gcc 3.3
• 2003-05-09 16:24 Re: draft release notes for gcc 3.3
• 2003-05-09 16:34 Re: draft release notes for gcc 3.3
• 2003-05-09 16:39 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-10 01:12 Re: srcdir == objdir build issues [SC take note]
• 2003-05-22 17:24 how do you add host information to bugzilla items?
• 2003-05-22 19:08 Re: how do you add host information to bugzilla items?
• 2003-05-26 15:11 Re: Failure to run gcc 3.4 cvs HEAD libstdc++ testsuite oni686-linux with -fPIC: ICEs
• 2003-05-27 19:48 Re: emitting templates as 'T'? Changed from 3.2 to 3.3
• 2003-05-28 20:43 Re: templated specializations get emitted in 3.3?
• 2003-05-30 04:54 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]

Bernard Giroud

• 2003-05-02 13:54 Re: [open-cobol-list] GCC front end for COBOL
• 2003-05-04 20:24 Re: [open-cobol-list] GCC front end for COBOL

Bernd Jendrissek

• 2003-05-05 11:27 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-05 12:08 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-06 13:12 Re: Is cc1 backend or frontend?
• 2003-05-07 08:22 Re: Is cc1 backend or frontend?
• 2003-05-07 09:34 Re: volatile [was: GCC warnings for unused global variables]
• 2003-05-13 19:55 i386-mingw32-gcc can't find register in class FP_TOP_REG
• 2003-05-30 17:23 Re: Problem Installing Linux Kernel Module compiled with gcc-3.2.x
• 2003-05-30 18:02 Re: Problem Installing Linux Kernel Module compiled with gcc-3.2.x
• 2003-05-30 18:43 Re: Problem Installing Linux Kernel Module compiled with gcc-3.2.x

Bernd Trog

• 2003-05-06 09:04 Ada: pragma Machine_Attribute doesn't work
• 2003-05-07 21:48 Re: Ada: pragma Machine_Attribute doesn't work

bert hubert

• 2003-05-27 14:52 emitting templates as 'T'? Changed from 3.2 to 3.3
• 2003-05-27 17:08 Re: emitting templates as 'T'? Changed from 3.2 to 3.3
• 2003-05-28 08:12 templated specializations get emitted in 3.3?
• 2003-05-28 21:22 Re: templated specializations get emitted in 3.3?

Bonzini

• 2003-05-02 11:53 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-03 06:48 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-03 06:57 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-06 17:46 Re: oopack performance
• 2003-05-14 16:17 Re: How to implement branches?
• 2003-05-20 17:39 Re: MinGW (Was: Re: PROPOSAL: Variation on an Alternate policy for obsoleting targets)

Brad Lucier

• 2003-05-05 18:30 3.4 bootstrap failures on sparc-solaris2.8 and alpha-linux
• 2003-05-14 20:56 strict-aliasing and typedefs
• 2003-05-14 21:46 Re: strict-aliasing and typedefs
• 2003-05-14 22:07 Re: strict-aliasing and typedefs
• 2003-05-27 04:13 3.4 and fixincluding Darwin headers

Briltz, Denis

• 2003-05-30 14:09 PCH is used only for the first header
• 2003-05-31 11:35 RE: PCH is used only for the first header

Bruce Korb

• 2003-05-02 16:17 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 16:51 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-03 15:54 The meaning of -Wall
• 2003-05-03 21:50 Re: The meaning of -Wall
• 2003-05-04 00:16 Re: The meaning of -Wall
• 2003-05-04 19:01 Re: The meaning of -Wall
• 2003-05-06 16:09 Re: Solaris 2.6 & PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER
• 2003-05-09 20:43 Re: srcdir == objdir build issues [SC take note]
• 2003-05-18 16:40 PROPOSAL: Variation on an Alternate policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-19 15:41 Re: PROPOSAL: Variation on an Alternate policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-19 18:40 Re: PROPOSAL: Variation on an Alternate policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-19 21:24 legal ruling on aliasing
• 2003-05-20 04:22 Re: PROPOSAL: Variation on an Alternate policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-20 18:19 Re: PROPOSAL: Variation on an Alternate policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-26 19:02 Re: BUG: printf formatting libc.so.6
• 2003-05-29 21:22 RE: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-30 17:25 RE: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]

Bryan Helvey

• 2003-05-16 05:57 Varargs elimination!?

bud davis

• 2003-05-23 02:46 Request write acces to gcc bugzilla
• 2003-05-23 12:35 Re: g77 compiles illegal code in testsuite?
• 2003-05-23 15:34 Re: g77 compiles illegal code in testsuite?

c . christian . joensson

• 2003-05-20 18:08 Re: ICE for sparc{64,}-linux in gcc cvs HEAD 2003-05-{19,20}: /usr/share/bison/bison.simple:774: internal compiler error: in trunc_int_for_mode, at explow.c:56
• 2003-05-20 19:37 Re: ICE for sparc{64,}-linux in gcc cvs HEAD 2003-05-{19,20}: /usr/share/bison/bison.simple:774: internal compiler error: in trunc_int_for_mode, at explow.c:56

Carl Eugen Hoyos

• 2003-05-08 07:15 Re: PR 10656 and PR 10657

cgd

• 2003-05-01 17:27 Re: problems re: makeinfo '--split-size' arg?
• 2003-05-01 17:44 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 21:44 [patch]
• 2003-05-02 21:45 [patch] require makeinfo 4.2 or better
• 2003-05-24 16:12 Re: PATCH: Fix "proc find" in dejagnu
• 2003-05-28 21:15 Re: OT: How do people set up long term development

chiarra

• 2003-05-15 12:31 undisclose recipiens

chnze

• 2003-05-06 08:26 supply electric appliances

Chris Lattner

• 2003-05-30 17:43 Unnecessary pointer arithmetic in trees from the C/C++ front-end
• 2003-05-30 19:00 Re: [tree-ssa] Switch stmts and inserting on edge
• 2003-05-30 19:09 Re: [tree-ssa] Switch stmts and inserting on edge
• 2003-05-31 16:35 Re: [tree-ssa] Insert on edge comment
• 2003-05-31 20:43 Re: [tree-ssa] Insert on edge comment

Chris Proctor

• 2003-05-07 13:57 Re: Ada tasking broken on mainline x86-linux?

Christian Ehrhardt

• 2003-05-12 10:59 Re: Suggestion for a new GNATS policy
• 2003-05-12 15:10 Re: Suggestion for a new GNATS policy
• 2003-05-21 21:12 Re: Bugzilla doesn't print category in mail header
• 2003-05-21 21:25 Re: At the request of those drowing in gcc-bugs email
• 2003-05-26 22:33 Bugzilla: WAITING and ASSIGNED
• 2003-05-27 08:33 Re: Bugzilla: WAITING and ASSIGNED

Christian Joensson

• 2003-05-07 18:08 warnings in 3.3: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false
• 2003-05-10 06:06 Re: 3.4 bootstrap failures on sparc-solaris2.8 and alpha-linux
• 2003-05-18 06:16 Failure to build gcc cvs HEAD on i686-linux: .libs/libffi.so: undefined reference to `FFI_TYPE_DOUBLE'
• 2003-05-20 06:40 Successful build of gcc 3.3 on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
• 2003-05-20 06:48 Successful build of gcc 3.3 on sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu
• 2003-05-20 06:53 Successful build of gcc 3.3 on i686-pc-cygwin
• 2003-05-20 06:58 Successful build of gcc 3.3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu
• 2003-05-20 12:19 ICE for sparc64-linux in gcc cvs HEAD 2003-05-19: /usr/share/bison/bison.simple:774: internal compiler error: in trunc_int_for_mode, at explow.c:56
• 2003-05-25 09:26 Failure to run gcc 3.4 cvs HEAD libstdc++ testsuite on i686-linux with -fPIC: ICEs
• 2003-05-26 18:29 Re: GCC Bootstrap failure after upgrading Autoconf and Automake

Christopher Faylor

• 2003-05-14 20:32 Re: "Annotate" on GCC's CVSweb isn't working
• 2003-05-14 20:54 Re: "Annotate" on GCC's CVSweb isn't working
• 2003-05-15 17:06 Re: The great gnats->bugzilla switchover
• 2003-05-15 20:22 Re: The great gnats->bugzilla switchover
• 2003-05-21 03:22 Re: MinGW (Was: Re: PROPOSAL: Variation on an Alternate policy for obsoleting targets)
• 2003-05-21 03:27 Re: MinGW (Was Re: PROPOSAL: Variation on an Alternate policy for obsoleting targets)
• 2003-05-21 03:33 Re: MinGW (Was: Re: PROPOSAL: Variation on an Alternate policy for obsoleting ta

Cook, Kelley (R.K.)

• 2003-05-01 15:43 Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?
• 2003-05-09 17:33 "Annotate" on GCC's CVSweb isn't working
• 2003-05-12 13:47 RE: "Annotate" on GCC's CVSweb isn't working
• 2003-05-14 21:12 RE: "Annotate" on GCC's CVSweb isn't working

D.Venkatasubramanian, Noida

• 2003-05-05 06:56 inc_for_reload improvement

Dale Johannesen

• 2003-05-01 00:31 Re: new register allocator and HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED
• 2003-05-13 00:48 Re: Dead-code elimination can't remove string copy insns?
• 2003-05-14 16:55 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Dropping INDIRECT_REF variables
• 2003-05-14 17:09 Re: new register allocator and HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED
• 2003-05-16 21:24 Re: Libffi problem on darwin (MacOSX)
• 2003-05-18 23:00 Re: C aliasing rules question.

Dan Kegel

• 2003-05-19 23:42 Re: PROPOSAL: Policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-21 16:48 Re: PROPOSAL: Policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-21 17:39 Re: PROPOSAL: Policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-22 04:43 Re: PROPOSAL: Policy for obsoleting targets

Dan Nicolaescu

• 2003-05-06 13:29 oopack performance
• 2003-05-06 17:44 Re: oopack performance
• 2003-05-12 01:28 Re: oopack performance

Dan Towner

• 2003-05-06 14:28 If-conversion and conditional move.
• 2003-05-07 13:47 Re: If-conversion and conditional move.
• 2003-05-13 11:07 Re: If-conversion and conditional move.

Daniel Berlin

• 2003-05-01 01:54 Re: new register allocator and HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED
• 2003-05-01 16:07 Re: [tree-ssa] variables being dragged out of their lexical scopes
• 2003-05-01 16:24 Re: [tree-ssa] variables being dragged out of their lexical scopes
• 2003-05-01 20:29 Re: new register allocator and HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED
• 2003-05-02 02:22 Re: new register allocator and HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED
• 2003-05-04 23:20 Re: Experimenting with tree inliner parameter settings
• 2003-05-07 18:24 Re: tree-ssa branch: Call for preliminary testing
• 2003-05-10 15:34 Re: tree-ssa branch: Call for preliminary testing
• 2003-05-11 15:18 Re: new register allocator and HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED
• 2003-05-11 20:46 Re: Suggestion for a new GNATS policy
• 2003-05-12 00:51 Re: Suggestion for a new GNATS policy
• 2003-05-12 00:58 Re: Suggestion for a new GNATS policy
• 2003-05-12 01:24 Re: Suggestion for a new GNATS policy
• 2003-05-12 01:56 Re: Suggestion for a new GNATS policy
• 2003-05-12 02:23 Re: Suggestion for a new GNATS policy
• 2003-05-12 03:10 Re: Suggestion for a new GNATS policy
• 2003-05-12 04:16 Re: Suggestion for a new GNATS policy
• 2003-05-12 07:30 Re: Local binding DECLs
• 2003-05-12 13:46 Re: Suggestion for a new GNATS policy
• 2003-05-12 13:53 Re: Suggestion for a new GNATS policy
• 2003-05-12 13:59 Re: tree-ssa branch: Call for preliminary testing
• 2003-05-12 14:05 Re: tree-ssa branch: Call for preliminary testing
• 2003-05-12 17:42 Re: Suggestion for a new GNATS policy
• 2003-05-12 17:58 Re: Suggestion for a new GNATS policy
• 2003-05-12 18:56 Re: Suggestion for a new GNATS policy
• 2003-05-12 18:57 Re: [tree-ssa] Eliminating unnecessary variables during out-of-ssa
• 2003-05-12 18:57 Re: Suggestion for a new GNATS policy
• 2003-05-12 19:42 Re: [tree-ssa] Eliminating unnecessary variables during out-of-ssa
• 2003-05-13 04:18 Okay, reconfirmation is added
• 2003-05-13 14:39 Re: Suggested Bugzilla improvements
• 2003-05-13 14:41 Re: Suggested Bugzilla improvements
• 2003-05-13 14:55 Re: new register allocator and HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED
• 2003-05-13 15:01 Re: [tree-ssa] Out of SSA status and issues
• 2003-05-13 15:33 Re: Suggested Bugzilla improvements
• 2003-05-13 16:14 Re: new register allocator and HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED
• 2003-05-13 16:53 Re: Suggested Bugzilla improvements
• 2003-05-13 20:08 Re: new register allocator and HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED
• 2003-05-13 20:15 Re: new register allocator and HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED
• 2003-05-13 21:25 Re: Testcases in Bugzilla
• 2003-05-14 16:01 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Dropping INDIRECT_REF variables
• 2003-05-14 16:24 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Dropping INDIRECT_REF variables
• 2003-05-14 19:11 Re: [tree-ssa] Out of SSA status and issues
• 2003-05-15 00:12 Re: GCC 3.3 Branch Open
• 2003-05-15 14:04 Re: GCC 3.3 Branch Open
• 2003-05-15 14:08 Re: GCC 3.3 Branch Open
• 2003-05-15 15:59 Re: GCC 3.3 Branch Open
• 2003-05-15 17:04 The great gnats->bugzilla switchover
• 2003-05-15 17:53 Re: The great gnats->bugzilla switchover
• 2003-05-15 18:01 Re: [tree-ssa] copy propagation and the abstraction penalty
• 2003-05-15 20:26 Re: The great gnats->bugzilla switchover
• 2003-05-16 00:05 Re: new register allocator and HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED
• 2003-05-16 00:33 Re: The great gnats->bugzilla switchover
• 2003-05-21 15:05 gnats->bugzilla conversion currently happening
• 2003-05-21 15:38 gnats database conversion complete
• 2003-05-21 16:07 Re: gnats database conversion complete
• 2003-05-21 17:28 Re: gnats database conversion complete
• 2003-05-21 19:14 Re: [PATCH]: Beginning of HTML doc patches
• 2003-05-21 20:57 Re: Bugzilla doesn't print category in mail header
• 2003-05-21 21:06 At the request of those drowing in gcc-bugs email
• 2003-05-21 21:07 Re: BUGZILLA: Default no auto-mail for CC: changes
• 2003-05-21 21:20 Re: At the request of those drowing in gcc-bugs email
• 2003-05-21 21:28 Re: Bugzilla doesn't print category in mail header
• 2003-05-21 21:37 Re: At the request of those drowing in gcc-bugs email
• 2003-05-21 21:44 Re: BUGZILLA: Default no auto-mail for CC: changes
• 2003-05-21 21:49 Re: At the request of those drowing in gcc-bugs email
• 2003-05-21 23:16 Re: Bugzilla: number of bugs, milestones
• 2003-05-22 14:38 Re: Bugzilla CPU targets
• 2003-05-22 16:07 Re: Suggestion for new keywords in bugzilla
• 2003-05-22 16:43 Re:
• 2003-05-22 19:06 Re: how do you add host information to bugzilla items?
• 2003-05-23 06:06 Re: Bugzilla needs...
• 2003-05-23 14:34 Re: Bugzilla sanity check errors. :-)
• 2003-05-23 14:35 Re: Bugzilla needs...
• 2003-05-23 14:59 Re: your RESOLVED->CLOSED changes
• 2003-05-23 16:14 Re: your RESOLVED->CLOSED changes
• 2003-05-23 16:18 Re: Bugzilla sanity check errors. :-)
• 2003-05-23 16:55 Re: Strange mails from Bugzilla
• 2003-05-23 20:54 Re: Bugzilla doesn't print category in mail header
• 2003-05-23 20:56 Re: Bugzilla sanity check errors. :-)
• 2003-05-24 02:02 Re: A few suggestions for bugzilla mail to gcc-bugs
• 2003-05-24 02:20 Re: Bugzilla Error, every time I add to a bug.
• 2003-05-24 02:56 Re: A few suggestions for bugzilla mail to gcc-bugs
• 2003-05-24 03:50 Re: A few suggestions for bugzilla mail to gcc-bugs
• 2003-05-24 15:15 Re: Adding "foreign" submitters and CC's to bugzilla reports doesn't work
• 2003-05-24 15:17 Re: A few suggestions for bugzilla mail to gcc-bugs
• 2003-05-25 15:52 Re: Bugzilla name mixup?
• 2003-05-25 16:04 Re: bug submitters not converted from GNAT to bugzilla
• 2003-05-25 18:39 Re: bug submitters not converted from GNAT to bugzilla
• 2003-05-26 20:23 [tree-ssa]: INDIRECT_VAR patch badly breaks PTA
• 2003-05-26 23:41 Re: Bugzilla: WAITING and ASSIGNED
• 2003-05-27 12:35 Re: Bugzilla: WAITING and ASSIGNED
• 2003-05-27 21:33 Re: Bugzilla is dead.
• 2003-05-27 22:43 Re: Bugzilla is dead.
• 2003-05-29 21:11 Re: MMX/SSE/SSE2 intrinsics bugs and bugzilla problem
• 2003-05-29 21:11 Re: MMX/SSE/SSE2 intrinsics bugs and bugzilla problem
• 2003-05-29 22:00 [tree-ssa]: Insertion at beginning of bb broken
• 2003-05-29 22:04 Re: MMX/SSE/SSE2 intrinsics bugs and bugzilla problem
• 2003-05-29 22:52 Re: [tree-ssa]: Insertion at beginning of bb broken
• 2003-05-29 23:56 [tree-ssa]: Overlap of variable with same variable?
• 2003-05-30 02:29 Re: [tree-ssa]: Overlap of variable with same variable?
• 2003-05-30 05:45 [tree-ssa]: We don't update end of bb in before insertion when we should
• 2003-05-30 15:56 Re: [tree-ssa]: Overlap of variable with same variable?
• 2003-05-30 16:08 Re: [tree-ssa]: Overlap of variable with same variable?
• 2003-05-31 00:14 Re: [tree-ssa] Insert on edge comment
• 2003-05-31 03:57 Re: [tree-ssa] Insert on edge comment

Daniel Jacobowitz

• 2003-05-02 16:14 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-04 16:11 Re: x86 64 bit function argument bug?
• 2003-05-05 23:59 Re: Interleaving pthread_cleanups in C and C++
• 2003-05-06 12:36 Re: implement __attribute__((cleanup(function)))
• 2003-05-06 13:02 Re: implement __attribute__((cleanup(function)))
• 2003-05-07 17:44 Re: __attribute__((constructor)), shared object files and C++...
• 2003-05-07 18:05 Re: __attribute__((constructor)), shared object files and C++...
• 2003-05-07 18:49 Re: GCC 3.3 Prelease broken on s390
• 2003-05-07 21:25 Re: DW_OP_piece???
• 2003-05-08 17:53 Re: __attribute__((constructor)), shared object files and C++...
• 2003-05-09 15:56 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-10 14:56 Re: Add new target: vxworks for xscale
• 2003-05-10 19:02 Re: downloading GCC documentation
• 2003-05-12 14:22 Re: building a gcc-3.3-prerelease cross-compiler
• 2003-05-12 17:13 Re: building a gcc-3.3-prerelease cross-compiler
• 2003-05-12 18:03 Re: unresolvable R_PPC_ADDR32 relocation against symbol
• 2003-05-12 23:02 Re: RFC/Ada: removal of $(ADAC) support
• 2003-05-12 23:29 Re: RFC/Ada: removal of $(ADAC) support
• 2003-05-14 21:47 Re: strict-aliasing and typedefs
• 2003-05-14 22:04 Re: strict-aliasing and typedefs
• 2003-05-16 19:24 Re: PROPOSAL: Policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-18 04:10 Re: PROPOSAL: Policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-24 02:24 Re: A few suggestions for bugzilla mail to gcc-bugs
• 2003-05-24 14:59 Re: A few suggestions for bugzilla mail to gcc-bugs
• 2003-05-27 15:40 Re: emitting templates as 'T'? Changed from 3.2 to 3.3

Dara Hazeghi

• 2003-05-09 08:20 srcdir == objdir build issues
• 2003-05-10 03:32 Bug reporting instructions
• 2003-05-10 03:51 Re: srcdir == objdir build issues [SC take note]
• 2003-05-17 00:39 More about srcdir == objdir issues
• 2003-05-17 00:50 gengtype-lex.c and other generated files polluting srcdir
• 2003-05-25 08:51 Darwin multilibs
• 2003-05-25 17:02 Re: Darwin multilibs
• 2003-05-27 00:05 Re: Darwin multilibs
• 2003-05-27 20:09 Re: Darwin multilibs
• 2003-05-28 18:00 gcc-bugs archives down?
• 2003-05-30 23:11 gcc-bugs archive still down
• 2003-05-30 23:25 cygwin documentation + build instructions
• 2003-05-31 01:20 Re: gcc-bugs archive still down

Das (ext) Tapas-Kumar

• 2003-05-09 13:03 gcc 3.2.3 compiled successfully in alphaev56-dec-osf4.0d

databus

• 2003-05-25 11:21 successfully built and installation of GCC 3.3 on Slackware 9.0

Dave Jarvis

• 2003-05-28 23:58 http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html
• 2003-05-30 17:24 Cross Compiler and Linker for Linux
• 2003-05-30 18:57 Re: Cross Compiler and Linker for Linux
• 2003-05-30 21:17 Re: Cross Compiler and Linker for Linux

Dave King

• 2003-05-20 20:07 Sparc -misalign flag

Dave Patterson

• 2003-05-19 21:41 GCC under OpenVMS/Alpha

David Edelsohn

• 2003-05-01 21:09 Re: Ada bootstrap broken with lineno changes
• 2003-05-06 17:15 Re: analysis: alpha bootstrap failure on mainline
• 2003-05-06 19:25 Re: GCC 3.3 Prerelease
• 2003-05-08 14:23 Re: RFC: using clz for comparing to zero on the tree level.
• 2003-05-08 16:37 Re: RFC: using clz for comparing to zero on the tree level.
• 2003-05-09 16:34 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-10 16:09 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-10 16:25 Re: 4 GCC regressions, 0 new, with your patch on 2003-05-10T10:23:38Z.
• 2003-05-10 17:41 Re: gcc implementation of rand() function
• 2003-05-14 16:58 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Dropping INDIRECT_REF variables
• 2003-05-19 14:25 Re: Bootstrap failure on ia64
• 2003-05-20 21:16 Re: Testsuite custom environment
• 2003-05-23 00:59 Re: speedup collect2 (by not using it)
• 2003-05-25 02:55 Re: md description for intruction that modifies multiple operands
• 2003-05-29 17:49 Re: MMX/SSE/SSE2 intrinsics bugs and bugzilla problem
• 2003-05-30 00:46 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-30 16:56 Re: [tree-ssa] Branch unfrozen
• 2003-05-30 17:09 Re: [tree-ssa] Branch unfrozen

David Frost

• 2003-05-06 08:33 id like to help with gcj

David Lawless

• 2003-05-24 11:21 gcc/g++ bootstrap on host 'powerpc-ibm-aix4.2.1.0'
• 2003-05-25 22:13 GCC 3.2.2 (C,C++) Successful Build [with tweaks] on 'powerpc-ibm-aix4.2.1.0'

David Mosberger

• 2003-05-07 04:39 Re: Your ia64 patch may have broken libjava
• 2003-05-07 05:47 Re: Your ia64 patch may have broken libjava
• 2003-05-07 07:24 Re: Your ia64 patch may have broken libjava
• 2003-05-07 16:56 Re: Your ia64 patch may have broken libjava
• 2003-05-07 18:25 Re: Your ia64 patch may have broken libjava
• 2003-05-07 22:22 Re: Your ia64 patch may have broken libjava

David O'Brien

• 2003-05-01 14:44 Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?
• 2003-05-02 15:03 Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?
• 2003-05-02 15:45 Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?
• 2003-05-02 15:46 Re: PATCH (head): -Wunused-static-variable
• 2003-05-02 15:48 Re: PATCH (head): -Wunused-static-variable
• 2003-05-02 15:55 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 16:01 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 16:35 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 16:36 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 21:21 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 21:23 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-03 05:32 Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?
• 2003-05-04 15:56 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-04 20:55 Re: GCJ and $PREFIX/include
• 2003-05-06 00:48 Re: GCJ and $PREFIX/include
• 2003-05-06 00:50 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-08 19:43 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-30 17:11 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-30 17:18 Re: OT: How do people set up long term development
• 2003-05-30 17:27 Re: Libiberty license roundup (questions/potential problems)
• 2003-05-30 19:44 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]

DEEPA SIVASANKARANE

• 2003-05-08 16:09 GCC Online Documentation

Denis Zaitsev

• 2003-05-19 17:40 GLIBC question

Devendra Rajput

• 2003-05-27 03:41 how to install gcc

Dharav Solanki

• 2003-05-22 05:42 win a playstation2
• 2003-05-22 06:03 win a ps2 xbox or gamecube

Diego Novillo

• 2003-05-01 01:41 When is stage 1 scheduled to close for 3.4?
• 2003-05-01 12:14 Re: When is stage 1 scheduled to close for 3.4?
• 2003-05-01 14:24 [tree-ssa] variables being dragged out of their lexical scopes
• 2003-05-01 15:03 Re: [tree-ssa] cannot bootstrap on ppc-darwin
• 2003-05-01 16:39 Re: When is stage 1 scheduled to close for 3.4?
• 2003-05-01 16:58 Re: When is stage 1 scheduled to close for 3.4?
• 2003-05-03 15:59 Re: When is stage 1 scheduled to close for 3.4?
• 2003-05-05 20:11 Re: [tree-ssa] DCE and conditionals
• 2003-05-05 20:45 Re: [tree-ssa] DCE and conditionals
• 2003-05-07 03:20 [tree-ssa] Merge results as of 2003-05-06
• 2003-05-07 12:15 Re: Is cc1 backend or frontend?
• 2003-05-07 12:58 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge results as of 2003-05-06
• 2003-05-07 13:00 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge results as of 2003-05-06
• 2003-05-07 14:25 tree-ssa branch: Call for preliminary testing
• 2003-05-07 14:30 Re: tree-ssa branch: Call for preliminary testing
• 2003-05-07 15:16 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge results as of 2003-05-06
• 2003-05-07 15:30 Re: [tree-ssa] cannot bootstrap on ppc-darwin
• 2003-05-07 15:44 Re: [tree-ssa] cannot bootstrap on ppc-darwin
• 2003-05-07 17:28 Re: [tree-ssa] cannot bootstrap on ppc-darwin
• 2003-05-07 17:47 Re: tree-ssa branch: Fortran libraries don't build
• 2003-05-08 11:33 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge results as of 2003-05-06
• 2003-05-08 13:23 Re: tree-ssa branch: Fortran libraries don't build
• 2003-05-08 13:26 Re: tree-ssa branch: Call for preliminary testing
• 2003-05-08 13:57 Re: tree-ssa branch: Fortran libraries don't build
• 2003-05-08 14:20 Re: tree-ssa branch: Fortran libraries don't build
• 2003-05-08 15:50 Re: tree-ssa branch: Fortran libraries don't build
• 2003-05-09 15:18 Daily snapshots of tree-ssa branch available
• 2003-05-09 17:28 Re: tree-ssa branch: Call for preliminary testing
• 2003-05-09 17:37 Re: tree-ssa branch: Call for preliminary testing
• 2003-05-12 12:43 Re: [tree-ssa]porofiling available
• 2003-05-12 12:43 Re: tree-ssa branch: Call for preliminary testing
• 2003-05-12 12:43 Re: Daily snapshots of tree-ssa branch available
• 2003-05-12 12:43 Re: tree-ssa branch: Call for preliminary testing
• 2003-05-12 12:43 Re: tree-ssa branch: Call for preliminary testing
• 2003-05-12 12:43 Re: bootstrap failure of tree-ssa on armv5l-linux
• 2003-05-12 13:09 Re: tree-ssa branch: Call for preliminary testing
• 2003-05-12 13:16 Re: tree-ssa branch: Call for preliminary testing
• 2003-05-12 13:23 Re: bootstrap failure of tree-ssa on armv5l-linux
• 2003-05-12 14:17 Re: tree-ssa branch: Call for preliminary testing
• 2003-05-12 15:38 Re: [tree-ssa] Out of SSA status and issues
• 2003-05-12 23:14 Re: Daily snapshots of tree-ssa branch available
• 2003-05-13 02:37 [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-05-11
• 2003-05-13 12:33 Re: [tree-ssa] Out of SSA status and issues
• 2003-05-13 12:42 Re: [tree-ssa] Out of SSA status and issues
• 2003-05-13 12:57 Re: [tree-ssa] Out of SSA status and issues
• 2003-05-13 13:05 Re: [tree-ssa] Out of SSA status and issues
• 2003-05-13 13:11 Re: [tree-ssa] Out of SSA status and issues
• 2003-05-13 13:27 Re: [tree-ssa] Out of SSA status and issues
• 2003-05-13 13:57 Re: [tree-ssa] Out of SSA status and issues
• 2003-05-13 14:52 Re: Daily snapshots of tree-ssa branch available
• 2003-05-13 16:30 Re: Dead-code elimination can't remove string copy insns?
• 2003-05-13 17:07 Re: Dead-code elimination can't remove string copy insns?
• 2003-05-13 17:24 Re: Dead-code elimination can't remove string copy insns?
• 2003-05-13 17:50 Re: Dead-code elimination can't remove string copy insns?
• 2003-05-14 12:46 Re: Daily snapshots of tree-ssa branch available
• 2003-05-14 12:46 Re: bootstrap failure of tree-ssa on armv5l-linux
• 2003-05-14 15:09 [tree-ssa] RFC: Dropping INDIRECT_REF variables
• 2003-05-14 16:06 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Dropping INDIRECT_REF variables
• 2003-05-14 16:11 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Dropping INDIRECT_REF variables
• 2003-05-14 18:33 Re: [tree-ssa] Out of SSA status and issues
• 2003-05-15 14:10 Re: [tree-ssa] copy propagation and the abstraction penalty
• 2003-05-15 19:32 Re: tree-ssa branch: Call for preliminary testing
• 2003-05-19 13:22 Re: [tree-ssa] Any good sources of documentation?
• 2003-05-20 10:53 Re: tree-ssa branch: Call for preliminary testing
• 2003-05-20 12:01 Re: How to run over each node of a tree ?
• 2003-05-20 12:01 Re: [tree-ssa] Any good sources of documentation?
• 2003-05-22 17:56 Re: [tree-ssa] vdefs vs DCE
• 2003-05-24 01:32 [tree-ssa] FE dropping volatile qualifier?
• 2003-05-24 03:57 [tree-ssa] GIMPLE grammar changes in function calls.
• 2003-05-24 04:07 Re: [tree-ssa] GIMPLE grammar changes in function calls.
• 2003-05-24 14:07 [tree-ssa] failure building perl in SPEC95
• 2003-05-27 14:49 Re: [tree-ssa] GIMPLE grammar changes in function calls.
• 2003-05-27 15:07 Re: [tree-ssa]: INDIRECT_VAR patch badly breaks PTA
• 2003-05-30 11:40 [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure on x86
• 2003-05-30 13:36 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure on x86
• 2003-05-30 16:54 [tree-ssa] Branch unfrozen
• 2003-05-30 17:02 Re: [tree-ssa] Branch unfrozen
• 2003-05-30 17:51 Re: [tree-ssa] Branch unfrozen
• 2003-05-30 18:33 Re: [tree-ssa] Branch unfrozen
• 2003-05-30 18:46 Re: [tree-ssa] Switch stmts and inserting on edges
• 2003-05-30 19:05 Re: [tree-ssa] Switch stmts and inserting on edge
• 2003-05-30 20:10 Re: [tree-ssa] Switch stmts and inserting on edges
• 2003-05-30 20:52 Re: [tree-ssa] Switch stmts and inserting on edges
• 2003-05-31 21:48 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-31 22:52 Re: [tree-ssa] Integrating g95

Diego Rodrigo

• 2003-05-15 18:36 gcc 3.3 build

DJ Delorie

• 2003-05-02 17:43 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-09 17:55 Re: srcdir == objdir build issues [SC take note]
• 2003-05-09 18:00 Re: What is the relationship between GCC and Cygnus / Red Hat?
• 2003-05-09 18:42 Re: srcdir == objdir build issues [SC take note]
• 2003-05-09 23:34 alignment: store_one_arg vs emit_push_insn
• 2003-05-10 00:27 Re: alignment: store_one_arg vs emit_push_insn
• 2003-05-10 01:40 Re: srcdir == objdir build issues [SC take note]
• 2003-05-11 00:46 Re: srcdir == objdir build issues [SC take note]
• 2003-05-11 02:22 Re: alignment: store_one_arg vs emit_push_insn
• 2003-05-11 14:33 Re: alignment: store_one_arg vs emit_push_insn
• 2003-05-11 15:30 Re: alignment: store_one_arg vs emit_push_insn
• 2003-05-12 18:19 Re: alignment: store_one_arg vs emit_push_insn
• 2003-05-12 22:47 Re: alignment: store_one_arg vs emit_push_insn
• 2003-05-15 20:30 about stack/args growing up/down
• 2003-05-16 05:29 Re: about stack/args growing up/down
• 2003-05-16 17:13 Re: about stack/args growing up/down
• 2003-05-16 17:42 Re: PROPOSAL: Policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-19 18:28 Re: PROPOSAL: Variation on an Alternate policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-19 19:04 Re: PROPOSAL: Variation on an Alternate policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-20 00:08 Re: MinGW (Was: Re: PROPOSAL: Variation on an Alternate policy for obsoleting targets)
• 2003-05-20 02:59 Re: [PATCH] Re: Option -fprofile-arcs fails for target avr and fr30
• 2003-05-20 16:16 Re: failure building gcc-3.3 (broken libiberty/vsprintf.c or build?)
• 2003-05-20 16:43 Re: PATCH: "make check" is broken in binutils
• 2003-05-20 21:38 Re: failure building gcc-3.3 (broken libiberty/vsprintf.c or build?)
• 2003-05-21 17:38 Re: failure building gcc-3.3 (broken libiberty/vsprintf.c or build?)
• 2003-05-21 17:49 Re: Dummy questions on GCC internals
• 2003-05-22 17:33 Re: failure building gcc-3.3 (broken libiberty/vsprintf.c or build?)
• 2003-05-22 20:05 TARGET_FUNCTION_ATTRIBUTE_INLINABLE_P docs are wrong
• 2003-05-23 19:23 Re: your RESOLVED->CLOSED changes
• 2003-05-23 19:41 Re: help: how to "quick rebuild" gcc ?
• 2003-05-23 19:44 Re: your RESOLVED->CLOSED changes
• 2003-05-23 19:51 Re: Old bug: the 14-character limit.
• 2003-05-23 20:01 Re: your RESOLVED->CLOSED changes
• 2003-05-23 20:53 Re: Old bug: the 14-character limit.
• 2003-05-23 21:34 Re: Old bug: the 14-character limit.
• 2003-05-23 23:06 Re: Libiberty license roundup (questions/potential problems)
• 2003-05-24 01:36 Re: Libiberty license roundup (questions/potential problems)
• 2003-05-24 03:05 Re: A few suggestions for bugzilla mail to gcc-bugs
• 2003-05-24 14:07 Re: Libiberty license roundup (questions/potential problems)
• 2003-05-24 14:12 Re: Old bug: the 14-character limit.
• 2003-05-27 17:51 Re: [patch] copyright notice correction on libiberty/make-relative-prefix.c(current notice grants no rights)
• 2003-05-29 18:01 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-30 19:00 Re: Libiberty license roundup (questions/potential problems)
• 2003-05-30 19:59 reload vs adds with clobbers
• 2003-05-30 22:14 Re: reload vs adds with clobbers
• 2003-05-30 22:21 Re: reload vs adds with clobbers
• 2003-05-31 01:44 Re: reload vs adds with clobbers

Doug Evans

• 2003-05-05 22:30 -Wstrict-prototypes and void foo () {}
• 2003-05-05 22:52 Re: -Wstrict-prototypes and void foo () {}
• 2003-05-07 19:28 GPL in libgcc2 files

Douglas B Rupp

• 2003-05-19 22:07 Re: GCC under OpenVMS/Alpha
• 2003-05-21 20:24 Re: HEADS UP: GCC manual soon to be printed
• 2003-05-23 17:49 [PATCH] Remove VMS section in documentation (was Re: HEADS UP: GCC manual soon to be printed)

E. Weddington

• 2003-05-16 14:58 Re: Downloads
• 2003-05-16 18:53 Re: PROPOSAL: Policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-20 16:14 Re: MinGW (Was: Re: PROPOSAL: Variation on an Alternate policy for obsoleting targets)
• 2003-05-27 15:52 Re: downloading GCC documentation
• 2003-05-29 19:22 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-30 15:14 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]

Eliuth Pomar

• 2003-05-20 16:29 gengenrtl error while compiling gcc

Eric Botcazou

• 2003-05-02 21:14 Re: GCC inline parameters (PR 10160 testcase)
• 2003-05-03 09:37 Re: GCC inline parameters (PR 10160 testcase)
• 2003-05-05 18:19 Re: GCC 3.3
• 2003-05-06 09:00 Re: Experimenting with tree inliner parameter settings
• 2003-05-06 12:14 Re: GCC 3.3
• 2003-05-06 13:34 Re: GCC 3.3
• 2003-05-07 11:43 Re: PR 10656 and PR 10657
• 2003-05-07 13:41 Re: a progression 3.2.2 -> 3.2.3 -- is there a testcase?
• 2003-05-08 07:16 Re: PR 10656 and PR 10657
• 2003-05-08 14:57 Re: .register pseudo-op (Was: PR 10656 and PR 10657)
• 2003-05-09 13:45 Re: GCC 3.3 Branch Frozen
• 2003-05-09 19:02 Re: tree-ssa branch: Call for preliminary testing
• 2003-05-12 18:18 Re: make check results for prerelease snapshot of gcc-3.3 on solaris 8/sun4m
• 2003-05-16 07:35 Re: gcc 3.3 is not able to compile quakeforge cvs with cpu optimization greater than pentium 1
• 2003-05-16 09:41 Re: non-portable construct in gcc configure script
• 2003-05-23 09:07 Register allocation and paradoxical subregs on SPARC64
• 2003-05-23 16:01 Re: Bootstrap failure on Sparc Solaris2.8
• 2003-05-23 21:53 Re: Re: Bootstrap failure on Sparc Solaris2.8
• 2003-05-24 20:17 Re: non-portable construct in gcc configure script
• 2003-05-27 17:42 Re: Bootstrap failure on Sparc Solaris2.8
• 2003-05-27 19:01 Re: Bootstrap failure on Sparc Solaris2.8
• 2003-05-28 15:38 Re: Re: Re: Bootstrap failure on Sparc Solaris2.8
• 2003-05-30 19:11 Re: 32 or 64 bit?
• 2003-05-31 07:22 Re: gcc 3.3 is not able to compile quakeforge cvs with cpu optimization greater than pentium 1
• 2003-05-31 18:37 Re: gcc 3.3 is not able to compile quakeforge cvs with cpu optimization greater than pentium 1

Eric Christopher

• 2003-05-01 22:19 Re: Mips C++ undefined reference tostd::_Alloc_traits<...>::_S_instanceless
• 2003-05-09 07:21 Re: Problem of cross-mipsel-compiler GLIBC-2.3.X
• 2003-05-09 17:14 Re: Problem of cross-mipsel-compiler GLIBC-2.3.X
• 2003-05-12 16:56 Re: Upgrade from 2.9 to 3.x?
• 2003-05-15 22:38 Re: gcc 3.2x under irix6.3 (R5000)
• 2003-05-16 22:34 Re: CONFIG2_H stuff in config/mips/t-*
• 2003-05-17 00:58 builtin-noret tests and _exit
• 2003-05-17 17:54 gcc.dg/c90-intconst-1.c
• 2003-05-17 22:02 Re: gcc.dg/c90-intconst-1.c
• 2003-05-17 23:45 Re: gcc.dg/c90-intconst-1.c
• 2003-05-19 05:37 combined tree build failure
• 2003-05-20 23:23 Re: combined tree build failure
• 2003-05-21 05:33 Re: Dummy questions on GCC internals
• 2003-05-27 19:16 Re: Dummy questions on GCC internals
• 2003-05-28 22:25 Re: Cooperation between "bug masters" and "bug fixers"
• 2003-05-29 00:10 Re: md description for intruction that modifies multiple operands
• 2003-05-29 17:58 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-29 18:03 Re: md description for intruction that modifies multiple operands
• 2003-05-29 18:36 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-29 18:44 Re: [janitor] mips-tfile.c and mips-tdump.c
• 2003-05-29 18:56 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-30 16:31 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-30 19:46 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]

Eric Kelm

• 2003-05-10 14:51 successfully build full distribution

Erik Christiansen

• 2003-05-20 06:49 Re: failure building gcc-3.3 (broken libiberty/vsprintf.c or build?)

Erik Trulsson

• 2003-05-12 18:10 Re: Does the keyword volatile work?

Experience Festival at The World University of Con

• 2003-05-23 00:29 Vedic Festival with Satsangs and Workshops
• 2003-05-23 00:31 Vedic Festival with Satsangs and Workshops

Eyal Lebedinsky

• 2003-05-12 00:01 Re: Turning warning "returning reference to temporary" into error?
• 2003-05-17 05:52 [tree-ssa mudflap] wrong defaults shown
• 2003-05-17 05:52 [tree-ssa mudflap] -fwritable-strings causes a violation
• 2003-05-17 17:19 [tree-ssa mudflap] per-thread items
• 2003-05-18 07:34 Re: [tree-ssa mudflap] per-thread items
• 2003-05-23 11:31 [tree-ssa mudflap] crash in gethostbyname()

F. Britt Snodgrass

• 2003-05-12 20:13 GCC 3.3 updates for Ada?

Fabio Alemagna

• 2003-05-05 15:35 Playing with attributes and functions...
• 2003-05-06 22:17 GCC target-specific extension
• 2003-05-06 22:27 Re: GCC target-specific extension
• 2003-05-06 22:33 Re: GCC target-specific extension
• 2003-05-06 23:51 Re: GCC target-specific extension
• 2003-05-07 00:20 Re: GCC target-specific extension
• 2003-05-07 06:08 Re: GCC target-specific extension
• 2003-05-07 11:33 Re: GCC target-specific extension

Falk Hueffner

• 2003-05-02 17:24 Re: Add Falk Hueffner as GNATS only maintainer
• 2003-05-03 12:31 Re: c/7425: deprecated attribute doesn't merge with multiple declarations
• 2003-05-04 13:22 Re: x86 64 bit function argument bug?
• 2003-05-04 13:54 Re: x86 64 bit function argument bug?
• 2003-05-04 16:02 Re: x86 64 bit function argument bug?
• 2003-05-04 16:55 Re: x86 64 bit function argument bug?,..
• 2003-05-05 17:02 strict_low_part question
• 2003-05-05 18:34 Re: strict_low_part question
• 2003-05-06 14:50 Re: analysis: alpha bootstrap failure on mainline
• 2003-05-07 01:25 Re: analysis: alpha bootstrap failure on mainline
• 2003-05-14 16:23 Re: How to implement branches?
• 2003-05-18 14:22 Re: C99 parsing error?
• 2003-05-18 21:47 Re: C aliasing rules question.
• 2003-05-18 23:11 Re: C aliasing rules question.

Felix Lee

• 2003-05-20 03:03 Re: State of C99 _Complex?

Fergus Henderson

• 2003-05-01 02:04 Re: Using incomplete types to instantiate STL-Templates?
• 2003-05-02 02:49 Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?
• 2003-05-02 09:04 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 09:30 Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?
• 2003-05-02 14:15 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 16:04 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 18:31 Re: Warnings about rcs_id strings: let's settle this
• 2003-05-03 19:00 Re: volatile [was: GCC warnings for unused global variables]
• 2003-05-04 02:58 Re: Interleaving pthread_cleanups in C and C++
• 2003-05-04 11:19 Re: volatile [was: GCC warnings for unused global variables]
• 2003-05-04 12:20 Re: volatile [was: GCC warnings for unused global variables]
• 2003-05-04 14:05 Re: x86 64 bit function argument bug?
• 2003-05-04 14:27 Re: volatile [was: GCC warnings for unused global variables]
• 2003-05-07 06:54 Re: Is cc1 backend or frontend?
• 2003-05-08 11:57 Re: volatile [was: GCC warnings for unused global variables]
• 2003-05-08 12:05 Re: implement __attribute__((cleanup(function)))
• 2003-05-08 12:25 Re: Is cc1 backend or frontend?
• 2003-05-08 15:30 Re: volatile [was: GCC warnings for unused global variables]
• 2003-05-08 15:55 Re: volatile [was: GCC warnings for unused global variables]
• 2003-05-08 16:44 Re: volatile [was: GCC warnings for unused global variables]
• 2003-05-09 04:06 Re: C++ extension "cast-as-lvalues": time to deprecate?
• 2003-05-09 12:08 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-09 12:38 Re: C++ extension "cast-as-lvalues": time to deprecate?
• 2003-05-09 14:06 Re: C++ extension "cast-as-lvalues": time to deprecate?
• 2003-05-12 02:21 Re: Turning warning "returning reference to temporary" into error?
• 2003-05-12 17:32 Re: Does the keyword volatile work?
• 2003-05-12 17:58 Re: C++ extension "cast-as-lvalues": time to deprecate?
• 2003-05-12 18:10 Re: Does the keyword volatile work?
• 2003-05-13 02:01 Re: Does the keyword volatile work?
• 2003-05-13 18:00 Re: Does the keyword volatile work?
• 2003-05-14 21:07 Re: strict-aliasing and typedefs
• 2003-05-16 14:07 Re: Varargs elimination!?
• 2003-05-19 03:01 Re: Does gcc violate the ia64 ABI?
• 2003-05-20 16:37 Re: "obvious" requirements

Florin Iucha

• 2003-05-12 17:33 make check results for prerelease snapshot of gcc-3.3 on solaris 8/sun4m

Frank Ch. Eigler

• 2003-05-12 19:48 Re: profiling API?
• 2003-05-30 16:45 Re: [tree-ssa mudflap] -fwritable-strings causes a violation
• 2003-05-30 18:08 Re: [tree-ssa] Switch stmts and inserting on edges

Franz Sirl

• 2003-05-06 14:14 Re: GCC 3.3 branch frozen

Fred Channey

• 2003-05-02 21:42 Re: libstdc++/10350: thread-safety problem in std::string.

Fred Cook

• 2003-05-14 13:13 How to implement branches?
• 2003-05-14 13:18 Different addressing modes for loads and stores?
• 2003-05-21 16:25 Different addressing modes?

Fred Fish

• 2003-05-24 22:30 md description for intruction that modifies multiple operands
• 2003-05-25 15:50 Re: md description for intruction that modifies multiple operands
• 2003-05-26 23:47 Re: md description for intruction that modifies multiple operands
• 2003-05-29 16:28 Re: md description for intruction that modifies multiple operands
• 2003-05-29 17:30 Re: md description for intruction that modifies multiple operands
• 2003-05-29 17:41 Re: md description for intruction that modifies multiple operands
• 2003-05-29 17:53 Re: md description for intruction that modifies multiple operands
• 2003-05-30 17:25 Re: md description for intruction that modifies multiple operands

Fuxin Zhang

• 2003-05-01 05:40 GCC -O2 failure for mipsel
• 2003-05-01 08:42 Re: GCC -O2 failure for mipsel

Gabriel Dos Reis

• 2003-05-02 12:44 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 12:47 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 12:54 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 12:59 Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?
• 2003-05-02 13:00 Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?
• 2003-05-02 13:01 Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?
• 2003-05-02 13:08 Re: On alignment
• 2003-05-02 13:48 Re: Stopping daily bump of version.c on old/closed branches
• 2003-05-02 14:56 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 15:18 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 15:28 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 15:32 Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?
• 2003-05-02 15:47 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 16:00 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 16:39 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 16:43 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 16:58 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 17:11 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 17:19 Re: Warnings about rcs_id strings: let's settle this
• 2003-05-02 19:19 Re: Warnings about rcs_id strings: let's settle this
• 2003-05-02 20:27 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 21:57 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-04 08:38 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-04 11:06 [cxx-reflection] Some papers from the last WG21 meeting
• 2003-05-04 11:26 Re: volatile [was: GCC warnings for unused global variables]
• 2003-05-04 11:41 Re: GCJ and $PREFIX/include
• 2003-05-04 14:13 Re: volatile [was: GCC warnings for unused global variables]
• 2003-05-08 09:46 Re: draft release notes for gcc 3.3
• 2003-05-08 09:58 Re: On alignment
• 2003-05-08 11:59 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-08 12:05 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-08 12:30 Re: volatile [was: GCC warnings for unused global variables]
• 2003-05-08 12:44 Re: volatile [was: GCC warnings for unused global variables]
• 2003-05-08 12:48 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-08 14:26 Complex division (was Re: c/2995: __complex__ int typecasts maybe broken)
• 2003-05-08 15:39 Re: volatile [was: GCC warnings for unused global variables]
• 2003-05-08 15:45 Re: tree-ssa branch: Fortran libraries don't build
• 2003-05-08 15:56 Re: Complex division (was Re: c/2995: __complex__ int typecasts maybe broken)
• 2003-05-08 15:58 Re: volatile [was: GCC warnings for unused global variables]
• 2003-05-08 16:07 Re: volatile [was: GCC warnings for unused global variables]
• 2003-05-09 06:55 Re: C++ extension "cast-as-lvalues": time to deprecate?
• 2003-05-09 08:13 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-09 08:34 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-09 12:41 Re: C++ extension "cast-as-lvalues": time to deprecate?
• 2003-05-09 14:52 Re: What is the relationship between GCC and Cygnus / Red Hat?
• 2003-05-09 17:45 Re: C++ extension "cast-as-lvalues": time to deprecate?
• 2003-05-11 17:57 Re: Turning warning "returning reference to temporary" into error?
• 2003-05-11 19:05 Re: Turning warning "returning reference to temporary" into error?
• 2003-05-12 02:40 Re: Suggestion for a new GNATS policy
• 2003-05-13 12:57 Re: Does the keyword volatile work?
• 2003-05-13 13:06 Re: Your patch causes regressions
• 2003-05-13 21:31 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-14 21:08 Re: strict-aliasing and typedefs
• 2003-05-14 21:28 Re: strict-aliasing and typedefs
• 2003-05-14 21:30 Re: strict-aliasing and typedefs
• 2003-05-14 21:32 Re: strict-aliasing and typedefs
• 2003-05-14 21:53 Re: strict-aliasing and typedefs
• 2003-05-14 21:56 Re: strict-aliasing and typedefs
• 2003-05-14 21:59 Re: strict-aliasing and typedefs
• 2003-05-14 22:11 Re: strict-aliasing and typedefs
• 2003-05-14 22:17 Re: strict-aliasing and typedefs
• 2003-05-14 22:49 Re: two-element struct performance (was: strict-aliasing and typedefs)
• 2003-05-18 11:30 Re: Member specialisation bug (?) in 3.3 (C++)
• 2003-05-18 12:42 Warning for trigraphs in comment?
• 2003-05-19 06:49 Re: Warning for trigraphs in comment?
• 2003-05-19 06:51 Re: Warning for trigraphs in comment?
• 2003-05-19 14:45 Re: Warning for trigraphs in comment?
• 2003-05-19 20:51 Re: State of C99 _Complex?
• 2003-05-19 21:02 Re: Huge compile time & run time performance regression 3.3 -> HEAD
• 2003-05-19 21:14 Re: Huge compile time & run time performance regression 3.3 -> HEAD
• 2003-05-19 22:51 Re: State of C99 _Complex?
• 2003-05-23 07:39 Re: Instantiating a static data member of a class template
• 2003-05-26 00:33 Re: C++: Anticipated declaration of builtins.
• 2003-05-26 02:44 Re: C++: Anticipated declaration of builtins.
• 2003-05-31 21:31 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]

Gareth Pearce

• 2003-05-02 04:21 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-20 04:50 Re: MinGW (Was: Re: PROPOSAL: Variation on an Alternate policy for obsoleting ta

Gary Funck

• 2003-05-03 18:36 non-optimal constructor eval, MOVE_BY_PIECES_P() misuse?

gcc

• 2003-05-25 20:49 C++: Anticipated declaration of builtins

gccadmin

• 2003-05-05 17:13 gcc-ss-20030505 is now available
• 2003-05-12 18:56 gcc-ss-20030512 is now available
• 2003-05-19 17:26 gcc-ss-20030519 is now available
• 2003-05-26 17:13 gcc-ss-20030526 is now available

Geert Bosch

• 2003-05-07 14:01 Re: ACT tree new files
• 2003-05-07 21:13 Re: Ada: pragma Machine_Attribute doesn't work

Geoff Keating

• 2003-05-01 18:48 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-01 20:30 Re: gcc 3.3
• 2003-05-01 20:54 Re: When is stage 1 scheduled to close for 3.4?
• 2003-05-02 03:48 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 05:06 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 21:22 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-03 08:04 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-03 17:59 Re: GCC inline parameters (PR 10160 testcase)
• 2003-05-03 18:04 Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?
• 2003-05-03 18:08 Re: (subreg:SF (reg:SC)) question - 20020227-1.c failure
• 2003-05-04 06:02 Re: Interleaving pthread_cleanups in C and C++
• 2003-05-05 17:23 Re: bootstrap failure on darwin6.3 HEAD
• 2003-05-06 01:12 Re: Interleaving pthread_cleanups in C and C++
• 2003-05-06 04:28 Re: Interleaving pthread_cleanups in C and C++
• 2003-05-06 19:08 Re: Interleaving pthread_cleanups in C and C++
• 2003-05-06 19:09 Re: volatile [was: GCC warnings for unused global variables]
• 2003-05-06 21:00 Re: [Cobolforgcc-devel] Re: [open-cobol-list] GCC front end for COBOL
• 2003-05-13 00:07 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-13 18:41 Re: Does the keyword volatile work?
• 2003-05-13 18:50 Re: [tree-ssa] Out of SSA status and issues
• 2003-05-13 19:00 Re: RFC/Ada: removal of $(ADAC)
• 2003-05-14 01:14 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-14 18:31 Re: Local binding DECLs
• 2003-05-14 21:11 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-14 21:23 Re: How to implement branches?
• 2003-05-15 20:14 Re: Branch created: gcc-3_3-e500-branch
• 2003-05-16 06:27 Re: about stack/args growing up/down
• 2003-05-19 21:47 Re: legal ruling on aliasing
• 2003-05-25 14:51 Re: Darwin multilibs
• 2003-05-26 14:43 Re: [darwin] testsuite wchar_t-1.c & wint_t-1.c
• 2003-05-26 20:16 Re: Darwin multilibs
• 2003-05-27 17:08 Re: gcc_latest_snapshot CVS tag (was: gcc-ss-20030526 is now available)
• 2003-05-31 00:52 Re: reload vs adds with clobbers

Geoffrey Keating

• 2003-05-02 01:06 Why are variables in anonymous namespaces not static?
• 2003-05-02 04:59 Re: Why are variables in anonymous namespaces not static?

Gerald Pfeifer

• 2003-05-01 07:58 Re: Compilation time (was Re: GCC 3.3)
• 2003-05-01 08:02 Re: When is stage 1 scheduled to close for 3.4?
• 2003-05-01 08:40 Re: [Cobolforgcc-devel] Re: [open-cobol-list] GCC front end forCOBOL
• 2003-05-02 06:23 Re: problems re: makeinfo '--split-size' arg?
• 2003-05-02 09:44 Re: Stopping daily bump of version.c on old/closed branches
• 2003-05-02 19:11 Re: ARC/Argonaut questions
• 2003-05-02 19:18 Re: GCC 3.3
• 2003-05-02 19:31 Re: GCC inline parameters (PR 10160 testcase)
• 2003-05-03 23:44 Re: testcases [was: Warnings about rcs_id strings: let's settlethis]
• 2003-05-04 11:29 GCJ and $PREFIX/include
• 2003-05-05 12:32 Re: Experimenting with tree inliner parameter settings
• 2003-05-05 13:54 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR?12345
• 2003-05-05 20:46 Re: GNATS survey
• 2003-05-06 11:31 Re: Experimenting with tree inliner parameter settings
• 2003-05-06 12:57 Re: implement __attribute__((cleanup(function)))
• 2003-05-06 16:08 Further option handling bugs
• 2003-05-06 17:00 Re: GCC 3.3 Prerelease
• 2003-05-07 21:35 Re: draft release notes for gcc 3.3
• 2003-05-08 07:14 Re: draft release notes for gcc 3.3
• 2003-05-08 07:40 Re: Further option handling bugs
• 2003-05-08 09:29 Re: GCC 3.3 Prerelease
• 2003-05-08 10:32 Re: GCJ and $PREFIX/include
• 2003-05-08 10:37 Re: GCJ and $PREFIX/include
• 2003-05-08 13:40 Re: tree-ssa branch: Fortran libraries don't build
• 2003-05-08 15:29 Re: tree-ssa branch: Fortran libraries don't build
• 2003-05-09 11:59 Re: GCC 3.3 Prerelease
• 2003-05-09 14:35 What is the relationship between GCC and Cygnus / Red Hat?
• 2003-05-09 16:46 Re: tree-ssa branch: Call for preliminary testing
• 2003-05-10 14:19 Re: tree-ssa branch: Call for preliminary testing
• 2003-05-10 15:04 Re: tree-ssa branch: Call for preliminary testing
• 2003-05-12 09:36 Re: "Annotate" on GCC's CVSweb isn't working
• 2003-05-12 14:21 Re: tree-ssa branch: Call for preliminary testing
• 2003-05-12 18:10 Re: Upgrade from 2.9 to 3.x?
• 2003-05-13 12:27 PATCH for Re: New Mirror
• 2003-05-14 11:23 Re: 3.3 release notes
• 2003-05-14 15:07 Re: Suggested Bugzilla improvements
• 2003-05-15 10:22 Re: HEADS UP: GCC manual soon to be printed
• 2003-05-15 12:41 Re: GCC 3.3 Branch Open
• 2003-05-15 14:31 Re: GCC 3.3 Released
• 2003-05-15 19:05 Re: Downloads
• 2003-05-15 19:20 Re: The great gnats->bugzilla switchover
• 2003-05-16 08:53 Re: What is the relationship between GCC and Cygnus / Red Hat?
• 2003-05-16 10:09 Re: Downloads
• 2003-05-16 11:03 Re: suggested FAQ
• 2003-05-16 15:33 Re: Varargs elimination!?
• 2003-05-17 10:17 Re: What is the relationship between GCC and Cygnus / Red Hat?
• 2003-05-19 08:13 DejaGnu (was: gcc.dg/c90-intconst-1.c)
• 2003-05-19 08:49 PATCH for Re: Webpage not valid html
• 2003-05-19 09:20 Re: "obvious" requirements
• 2003-05-19 15:00 Re: PROPOSAL: Alternate policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-19 15:33 Heads up: today's GCC snapshot
• 2003-05-20 10:12 [tree-ssa] libmudflap/mf-hooks.c breaks bootstrap
• 2003-05-20 10:26 Re: tree-ssa branch: Call for preliminary testing
• 2003-05-20 11:39 Re: "obvious" requirements
• 2003-05-20 17:52 Re: "obvious" requirements
• 2003-05-20 20:42 Re: Heads up: today's GCC snapshot
• 2003-05-21 12:01 Manual contributions and copyright assignments
• 2003-05-23 09:32 Re: your RESOLVED->CLOSED changes
• 2003-05-23 09:53 Re: Bugzilla needs...
• 2003-05-23 15:54 Re: license of generated info docs (GFDL?) and man pages
• 2003-05-23 22:57 Re: GCC 3.3 Released
• 2003-05-23 23:40 Re: Heads up: today's GCC snapshot
• 2003-05-24 09:52 Re: downloading GCC documentation
• 2003-05-24 13:55 Re: PATCH: Fix "proc find" in dejagnu
• 2003-05-25 07:16 Re: doxygen, GPL incompatibility of FDL, and the horror
• 2003-05-26 11:27 PATCH for Re: Infomation site of M32R processor was changed.
• 2003-05-26 15:25 Today's snapshot
• 2003-05-27 09:15 Re: Today's snapshot
• 2003-05-27 11:55 gcc_latest_snapshot CVS tag (was: gcc-ss-20030526 is now available)
• 2003-05-27 19:19 Re: downloading GCC documentation
• 2003-05-27 19:22 Re: Bugzilla Error, every time I add to a bug.
• 2003-05-27 19:40 PATCH for Re: GCC development plan Web Page is not updated
• 2003-05-27 22:23 Re: Bugzilla is dead.
• 2003-05-28 07:27 Re: Bugzilla is dead.
• 2003-05-28 10:49 Re: Today's snapshot
• 2003-05-28 11:23 PATCH for Re: Today's snapshot
• 2003-05-28 13:47 Re: Bugzilla is dead.
• 2003-05-28 15:11 Re: OT: How do people set up long term development
• 2003-05-29 20:04 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-30 06:46 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-30 09:10 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-30 19:10 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-31 15:11 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]

Gianni Mariani

• 2003-05-07 03:12 Re: Dynamic Loading of classes in C++ without knowing their interface
• 2003-05-07 18:40 Re: Dynamic Loading of classes in C++ without knowing their interface

Giovanni Bajo

• 2003-05-01 16:00 Re: Add Giovanni Bajo as GNATS only maintainer
• 2003-05-06 01:40 Re: GNATS survey
• 2003-05-08 23:54 C++ extension "cast-as-lvalues": time to deprecate?
• 2003-05-09 12:49 Re: C++ extension "cast-as-lvalues": time to deprecate?
• 2003-05-09 18:48 Re: C++ extension "cast-as-lvalues": time to deprecate?
• 2003-05-12 02:00 Re: Suggestion for a new GNATS policy
• 2003-05-12 02:03 Re: Suggestion for a new GNATS policy
• 2003-05-12 02:08 Re: Suggestion for a new GNATS policy
• 2003-05-12 02:51 Re: Suggestion for a new GNATS policy
• 2003-05-16 01:15 Re: C++ extension "cast-as-lvalues": time to deprecate?
• 2003-05-22 14:59 Re: Suggestion for new keywords in bugzilla
• 2003-05-23 06:40 your RESOLVED->CLOSED changes
• 2003-05-23 08:40 Re: your RESOLVED->CLOSED changes
• 2003-05-23 09:54 Re: your RESOLVED->CLOSED changes
• 2003-05-23 10:19 Re: Suggestion for new keywords in bugzilla
• 2003-05-27 14:02 Re: Suggestion for new keywords in bugzilla

Gong, Richard

• 2003-05-26 10:01 help with dynamic library

gp

• 2003-05-16 21:21 libsupc++, _cxa references, and Dinkum libcpp
• 2003-05-20 16:17 Re: libsupc++, _cxa references, and Dinkum libcpp
• 2003-05-20 18:29 Re: libsupc++, _cxa references, and Dinkum libcpp
• 2003-05-20 18:59 Re: libsupc++, _cxa references, and Dinkum libcpp

Graham Stott

• 2003-05-10 14:43 Re: tree-ssa branch: Call for preliminary testing

Guillermo Ballester Valor

• 2003-05-18 10:27 Re: Failure to build gcc cvs HEAD on i686-linux: .libs/libffi.so: undefined reference to `FFI_TYPE_DOUBLE'
• 2003-05-20 18:42 Re: Is anyone working on SSE2 intrinsics?
• 2003-05-24 17:50 GCC development plan Web Page is not updated
• 2003-05-24 18:06 HEAD X86 Bootstrap error in libffi still here

Gunther Nikl

• 2003-05-22 14:02 [3.3] m68k bootstrap problem

H. J. Lu

• 2003-05-05 00:59 Why so many java failures on Linux/ia64?
• 2003-05-05 17:17 Re: Why so many java failures on Linux/ia64?
• 2003-05-05 20:33 Re: Why so many java failures on Linux/ia64?
• 2003-05-05 20:49 Re: Why so many java failures on Linux/ia64?
• 2003-05-05 21:08 Re: Why so many java failures on Linux/ia64?
• 2003-05-06 05:33 The Linux binutils 2.14.90.0.1 is released
• 2003-05-06 15:41 PATCH: Don't use empy files in ld-elfvers
• 2003-05-06 17:19 Re: Why so many java failures on Linux/ia64?
• 2003-05-07 02:54 Your ia64 patch may have broken libjava
• 2003-05-07 15:58 Re: Your ia64 patch may have broken libjava
• 2003-05-07 18:01 Re: __attribute__((constructor)), shared object files and C++...
• 2003-05-07 19:54 Bad testcase?
• 2003-05-07 20:11 Re: Your ia64 patch may have broken libjava
• 2003-05-08 20:01 gcc 3.3 failed on ia64 with the new binutils
• 2003-05-08 22:45 Re: gcc 3.3 failed on ia64 with the new binutils
• 2003-05-12 16:03 Assembler warning: Warning: .space repeat count is zero, ignored
• 2003-05-12 17:18 Re: Assembler warning: Warning: .space repeat count is zero, ignored
• 2003-05-13 23:36 libjava failed to build on ia64
• 2003-05-14 22:53 PATCH: Fix the relax finalize pass
• 2003-05-14 23:50 Re: PATCH: Optimize protected call for i386
• 2003-05-15 05:24 Re: PATCH: Fix the relax finalize pass
• 2003-05-15 05:42 Re: PATCH: Fix the relax finalize pass
• 2003-05-15 15:37 gcc failed to bootstrap on RedHat 9
• 2003-05-16 15:05 The Linux binutils 2.14.90.0.2 is released
• 2003-05-16 21:44 Does gcc violate the ia64 ABI?
• 2003-05-16 22:25 Re: Does gcc violate the ia64 ABI?
• 2003-05-17 01:45 Re: Does gcc violate the ia64 ABI?
• 2003-05-17 20:31 Re: Does gcc violate the ia64 ABI?
• 2003-05-17 20:43 Re: Does gcc violate the ia64 ABI?
• 2003-05-17 23:42 Re: Does gcc violate the ia64 ABI?
• 2003-05-18 01:55 Re: Does gcc violate the ia64 ABI?
• 2003-05-18 03:22 Re: Does gcc violate the ia64 ABI?
• 2003-05-19 06:57 PATCH: Fix "proc find" in dejagnu
• 2003-05-19 14:55 Re: Does gcc violate the ia64 ABI?
• 2003-05-19 15:10 Re: Does gcc violate the ia64 ABI?
• 2003-05-20 16:14 "make check" is broken in binutils
• 2003-05-20 16:19 PATCH: "make check" is broken in binutils
• 2003-05-20 18:24 Is anyone working on SSE2 intrinsics?
• 2003-05-20 22:58 Re: Does gcc violate the ia64 ABI?
• 2003-05-21 15:59 Re: gnats database conversion complete
• 2003-05-21 16:10 Re: gnats database conversion complete
• 2003-05-21 21:10 Re: At the request of those drowing in gcc-bugs email
• 2003-05-22 06:50 Bugzilla CPU targets
• 2003-05-22 07:03 Re: Bugzilla CPU targets
• 2003-05-22 07:08 Re: Bugzilla CPU targets
• 2003-05-22 14:55 Re: Bugzilla CPU targets
• 2003-05-22 15:13 Recognize Pentium 3/4
• 2003-05-23 19:09 The Linux binutils 2.14.90.0.3 is released
• 2003-05-25 15:24 The Linux binutils 2.14.90.0.4 is released
• 2003-05-25 18:17 Re: Darwin multilibs
• 2003-05-29 17:44 MMX/SSE/SSE2 intrinsics bugs and bugzilla problem
• 2003-05-29 18:18 Re: MMX/SSE/SSE2 intrinsics bugs and bugzilla problem
• 2003-05-29 19:05 Re: MMX/SSE/SSE2 intrinsics bugs and bugzilla problem

Hamdy Mobarak

• 2003-05-07 06:25 RE: PR 10656 and PR 10657

Hanno Böck

• 2003-05-18 22:31 Webpage not valid html

Hartmut Penner

• 2003-05-20 16:15 Special copyright assignment for libgcc

Henriette Wagner

• 2003-05-06 11:31 Mehr als nur ein Kaffee
• 2003-05-06 11:39 Mehr als nur ein Kaffee

Herman ten Brugge

• 2003-05-01 20:01 Re: new register allocator and HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED
• 2003-05-01 21:30 Re: new register allocator and HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED
• 2003-05-11 12:21 Re: new register allocator and HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED
• 2003-05-11 12:36 USE insn and new register allocator

Hilmi Ozdoganoglu

• 2003-05-05 16:19 emit_cmp_insn in alpha
• 2003-05-11 05:31 Re: emit_cmp_insn in alpha
• 2003-05-15 21:21 setcc_internal & bcc_normal (alpha)

Ian Lance Taylor

• 2003-05-10 04:56 Re: srcdir == objdir build issues [SC take note]
• 2003-05-12 17:39 Re: "Annotate" on GCC's CVSweb isn't working
• 2003-05-14 20:41 Re: "Annotate" on GCC's CVSweb isn't working
• 2003-05-14 21:02 Re: "Annotate" on GCC's CVSweb isn't working

ismail (cartman) donmez

• 2003-05-12 12:00 Re: g++ compiler error

Jack Howarth

• 2003-05-10 21:42 c++ errors in gcc 3.3 prelease 2?

Jakub Jelinek

• 2003-05-04 20:57 Re: Experimenting with tree inliner parameter settings
• 2003-05-04 21:01 Re: Experimenting with tree inliner parameter settings
• 2003-05-19 15:02 Re: Does gcc violate the ia64 ABI?
• 2003-05-26 23:54 Re: BUG: printf formatting libc.so.6
• 2003-05-28 15:07 Re: OT: How do people set up long term development

James

• 2003-05-19 02:55 Urgent Apeal
• 2003-05-19 03:39 Urgent Apeal

James Membe

• 2003-05-14 22:25 Urgent Appeal

Jamie Lokier

• 2003-05-09 12:49 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-18 08:28 C99 parsing error?

Jan Hubicka

• 2003-05-01 21:06 Re: When is stage 1 scheduled to close for 3.4?
• 2003-05-02 22:44 Re: GCC inline parameters (PR 10160 testcase)
• 2003-05-06 22:52 Re: (subreg:SF (reg:SC)) question - 20020227-1.c failure
• 2003-05-09 22:01 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-09 22:06 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-09 22:19 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-09 22:24 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-09 22:44 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-09 22:51 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-09 22:59 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-09 23:23 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-12 18:57 Re: Assembler warning: Warning: .space repeat count is zero, ignored
• 2003-05-12 18:57 Re: Assembler warning: Warning: .space repeat count is zero, ignored
• 2003-05-12 19:28 Re: Assembler warning: Warning: .space repeat count is zero, ignored
• 2003-05-19 13:57 Re: [PATCH] Re: Option -fprofile-arcs fails for target avr and fr30
• 2003-05-20 09:15 Re: [PATCH] Re: Option -fprofile-arcs fails for target avr and fr30
• 2003-05-20 18:29 Re: Is anyone working on SSE2 intrinsics?

Jan Reimers

• 2003-05-27 15:53 RE: cannot make gcc 3.3

Jan Vroonhof

• 2003-05-01 18:07 Re: [tree-ssa] variables being dragged out of their lexical scopes
• 2003-05-14 17:19 Re: [tree-ssa] Out of SSA status and issues
• 2003-05-16 16:59 Re: PROPOSAL: Policy for obsoleting targets

Janis Johnson

• 2003-05-07 00:29 powerpc64-linux build failure for mainline
• 2003-05-09 23:12 additions to GCC 3.2 build status list
• 2003-05-12 17:29 Re: Suggestion for a new GNATS policy
• 2003-05-12 18:04 Re: Suggestion for a new GNATS policy
• 2003-05-13 18:33 Re: Testcases in Bugzilla
• 2003-05-15 23:32 initial entries in GCC 3.3 build status list
• 2003-05-16 15:06 Re: Varargs elimination!?
• 2003-05-16 19:52 Re: PROPOSAL: Policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-16 22:36 Re: PROPOSAL: Policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-16 23:37 Re: initial entries in GCC 3.3 build status list
• 2003-05-19 17:05 Re: Webpage not valid html
• 2003-05-19 20:16 Re: Webpage not valid html
• 2003-05-19 21:34 Re: GCC 3.3 missing from http://gcc.gnu.org/releases.html
• 2003-05-20 20:42 Re: initial entries in GCC 3.3 build status list
• 2003-05-20 20:48 Re: Testsuite custom environment
• 2003-05-20 21:44 Re: Testsuite custom environment
• 2003-05-20 22:00 Re: Testsuite custom environment
• 2003-05-30 23:14 additions to the build status lists

Jason Merrill

• 2003-05-05 14:56 Re: On alignment
• 2003-05-06 19:56 __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-06 21:04 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-07 04:04 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge results as of 2003-05-06
• 2003-05-07 13:43 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge results as of 2003-05-06
• 2003-05-07 13:54 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-07 21:21 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-07 23:01 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-08 02:57 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge results as of 2003-05-06
• 2003-05-08 03:28 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge results as of 2003-05-06
• 2003-05-08 06:25 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge results as of 2003-05-06
• 2003-05-08 06:54 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge results as of 2003-05-06
• 2003-05-08 07:21 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge results as of 2003-05-06
• 2003-05-08 15:02 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-08 17:45 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-08 19:37 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-08 21:18 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-15 17:00 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-16 18:30 Re: [tree-ssa]: C++ not generating GIMPLE expressions
• 2003-05-16 19:29 Re: [tree-ssa]: C++ not generating GIMPLE expressions
• 2003-05-21 16:17 Re: Daily snapshots of tree-ssa branch available
• 2003-05-24 01:23 Re: [tree-ssa] FE dropping volatile qualifier?
• 2003-05-24 04:08 Re: [tree-ssa] GIMPLE grammar changes in function calls.
• 2003-05-24 07:57 Re: [tree-ssa] GIMPLE grammar changes in function calls.
• 2003-05-27 14:46 Re: [tree-ssa] GIMPLE grammar changes in function calls.
• 2003-05-30 19:19 Re: [tree-ssa] Switch stmts and inserting on edges
• 2003-05-30 21:14 Re: [tree-ssa] Switch stmts and inserting on edges

Jason Molenda

• 2003-05-14 19:41 Re: "Annotate" on GCC's CVSweb isn't working

Jason Thorpe

• 2003-05-21 16:32 Re: PROPOSAL: Policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-21 16:35 Re: PROPOSAL: Policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-21 16:56 Re: PROPOSAL: Policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-23 13:59 Re: Bugzilla and gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
• 2003-05-27 16:30 Re: Darwin multilibs

Jean-Marc Monfort

• 2003-05-20 16:34 Calling a DLL from another DLL

Jeff Bailey

• 2003-05-06 22:02 Re: GCC 3.3 Prerelease

Jeff Epler

• 2003-05-06 22:47 a progression 3.2.2 -> 3.2.3 -- is there a testcase?
• 2003-05-07 13:20 Re: a progression 3.2.2 -> 3.2.3 -- is there a testcase?
• 2003-05-07 14:24 Re: a progression 3.2.2 -> 3.2.3 -- is there a testcase?

Jeff Sturm

• 2003-05-07 15:29 Re: .register pseudo-op (Was: PR 10656 and PR 10657)
• 2003-05-07 20:50 Re: .register pseudo-op (Was: PR 10656 and PR 10657)
• 2003-05-07 22:30 Re: PR 10656 and PR 10657
• 2003-05-07 22:59 Re: PR 10656 and PR 10657
• 2003-05-08 13:20 Re: PR 10656 and PR 10657
• 2003-05-28 22:50 Re: Help: failed to install gcc on my SCO UnixWare machine!
• 2003-05-29 18:59 Re: MMX/SSE/SSE2 intrinsics bugs and bugzilla problem
• 2003-05-30 18:56 Re: 32 or 64 bit?
• 2003-05-30 22:40 Re: Cross Compiler and Linker for Linux

Jeremy Sanders

• 2003-05-01 09:02 Re: Compilation time (was Re: GCC 3.3)

jeroen dobbelaere

• 2003-05-12 07:59 bootstrap failure of tree-ssa on armv5l-linux
• 2003-05-12 13:01 Re: bootstrap failure of tree-ssa on armv5l-linux
• 2003-05-13 08:50 Re: bootstrap failure of tree-ssa on armv5l-linux
• 2003-05-16 09:00 Re: bootstrap failure of tree-ssa on armv5l-linux
• 2003-05-23 08:57 Re: bootstrap failure of tree-ssa on armv5l-linux

jfmaquine

• 2003-05-18 15:22 GCC 3.3 : About the corrected bugs lised

Jie Zhang

• 2003-05-15 04:55 Re: GCC 3.3 Released
• 2003-05-16 09:53 Option -fprofile-arcs fails for target avr and fr30
• 2003-05-19 02:28 [PATCH] Re: Option -fprofile-arcs fails for target avr and fr30
• 2003-05-20 02:09 Re: [PATCH] Re: Option -fprofile-arcs fails for target avr and fr30

Jim Marshall

• 2003-05-07 21:30 wprintf warning

Jim Wilson

• 2003-05-07 06:36 Re: [steering] objective-c++
• 2003-05-07 07:16 Re: emit_cmp_insn in alpha
• 2003-05-07 07:28 Re: test out the newly install gcc
• 2003-05-07 18:58 Re: Porting GCC to Zilog z80
• 2003-05-09 00:30 Re: Reg ABI
• 2003-05-12 16:02 Re: emit_cmp_insn in alpha

Joe Buck

• 2003-05-01 16:17 Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?
• 2003-05-01 16:20 Re: Is GCC still use bison or yacc?
• 2003-05-01 16:27 Re: When is stage 1 scheduled to close for 3.4?
• 2003-05-01 16:35 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-01 16:38 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-01 17:23 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-01 18:09 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-01 19:57 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-01 20:51 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-01 20:53 Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?
• 2003-05-02 16:35 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 16:42 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 17:07 Warnings about rcs_id strings: let's settle this
• 2003-05-02 17:31 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 17:35 Re: Warnings about rcs_id strings: let's settle this
• 2003-05-02 17:39 Re: Warnings about rcs_id strings: let's settle this
• 2003-05-02 19:09 Re: Warnings about rcs_id strings: let's settle this
• 2003-05-02 19:11 Re: Warnings about rcs_id strings: let's settle this
• 2003-05-02 19:11 Re: Warnings about rcs_id strings: let's settle this
• 2003-05-03 00:21 Re: GCC 3.3: Branch Frozen
• 2003-05-05 21:12 tree-ssa branch: Fortran libraries don't build
• 2003-05-06 16:33 Re: GCC 3.3 Prerelease
• 2003-05-06 16:36 Re: oopack performance
• 2003-05-06 16:40 Re: id like to help with gcj
• 2003-05-06 19:21 Re: GCC 3.3 Prerelease
• 2003-05-06 19:23 Re: GCC 3.3 Prerelease
• 2003-05-06 21:45 Re: GCC 3.3 Prerelease
• 2003-05-06 22:25 Re: GCC target-specific extension
• 2003-05-06 23:00 Re: GCC target-specific extension
• 2003-05-07 15:45 Re: PR 10656 and PR 10657
• 2003-05-07 16:03 Re: GCC 3.3 Prelease broken on s390
• 2003-05-07 17:09 Re: GCC 3.3 Prelease broken on s390
• 2003-05-07 17:28 draft release notes for gcc 3.3
• 2003-05-07 18:06 Re: draft release notes for gcc 3.3
• 2003-05-07 19:32 Re: draft release notes for gcc 3.3
• 2003-05-07 22:17 Re: draft release notes for gcc 3.3
• 2003-05-07 22:46 Re: draft release notes for gcc 3.3
• 2003-05-08 00:57 Re: tree-ssa branch: Fortran libraries don't build
• 2003-05-08 23:59 Re: draft release notes for gcc 3.3
• 2003-05-09 16:20 Re: draft release notes for gcc 3.3
• 2003-05-09 16:55 Re: What is the relationship between GCC and Cygnus / Red Hat?
• 2003-05-09 17:09 Re: Fix handling of call clobbering readonly-result
• 2003-05-09 17:15 Re: C++ extension "cast-as-lvalues": time to deprecate?
• 2003-05-09 18:04 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-09 21:01 Re: C++ extension "cast-as-lvalues": time to deprecate?
• 2003-05-09 22:48 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-12 16:30 Re: C++ extension "cast-as-lvalues": time to deprecate?
• 2003-05-12 17:04 Re: Daily snapshots of tree-ssa branch available
• 2003-05-12 17:11 Re: C++ extension "cast-as-lvalues": time to deprecate?
• 2003-05-13 00:39 Re: Upgrade from 2.9 to 3.x?
• 2003-05-13 18:35 Re: Dead-code elimination can't remove string copy insns?
• 2003-05-14 00:48 Re: typename conundrum
• 2003-05-14 00:57 3.3 release notes
• 2003-05-14 17:27 Re: 3.3 release notes
• 2003-05-14 17:41 Re: 3.3 release notes
• 2003-05-14 17:50 3.3 release notes (final)
• 2003-05-14 21:21 Re: strict-aliasing and typedefs
• 2003-05-14 21:41 Re: strict-aliasing and typedefs
• 2003-05-14 22:29 two-element struct performance (was: strict-aliasing and typedefs)
• 2003-05-14 22:45 [tree-ssa] copy propagation and the abstraction penalty
• 2003-05-14 23:06 Re: two-element struct performance (was: strict-aliasing and typedefs)
• 2003-05-14 23:14 Re: strict-aliasing and typedefs
• 2003-05-15 17:09 Re: [tree-ssa] copy propagation and the abstraction penalty
• 2003-05-15 17:20 Re: GCC 3.3 Released
• 2003-05-15 17:28 Re: [tree-ssa] copy propagation and the abstraction penalty
• 2003-05-15 22:12 gcc 3.3 release notes addendum: Ada bugs were missing
• 2003-05-15 22:48 Re: [tree-ssa] copy propagation and the abstraction penalty
• 2003-05-15 22:51 Re: [tree-ssa] copy propagation and the abstraction penalty
• 2003-05-16 01:07 non-portable construct in gcc configure script
• 2003-05-16 01:23 Re: C++ extension "cast-as-lvalues": time to deprecate?
• 2003-05-16 16:34 Re: PROPOSAL: Policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-16 16:53 three 3.3 build reports (Red Hat 7.2/x86, Solaris 2.8, HP-UX 11)
• 2003-05-16 20:56 Re: PROPOSAL: Policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-16 23:35 gcc 3.3 builds OK on alphaev6-dec-osf5.1
• 2003-05-16 23:52 Re: libsupc++, _cxa references, and Dinkum libcpp
• 2003-05-16 23:55 Re: PROPOSAL: Policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-19 16:18 Re: What is the relationship between GCC and Cygnus / Red Hat?
• 2003-05-19 18:07 Re: Warning for trigraphs in comment?
• 2003-05-19 18:11 Re: PROPOSAL: Policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-19 23:27 Re: PROPOSAL: Variation on an Alternate policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-19 23:46 Re: MinGW (Was: Re: PROPOSAL: Variation on an Alternate policy for obsoleting targets)
• 2003-05-19 23:49 Re: PROPOSAL: Policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-20 01:24 gcc 3.3 build, tests on Red Hat 8.0 (i686), including Ada
• 2003-05-20 16:19 Re: PROPOSAL: Variation on an Alternate policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-20 16:47 Re: libsupc++, _cxa references, and Dinkum libcpp
• 2003-05-20 18:38 Re: libsupc++, _cxa references, and Dinkum libcpp
• 2003-05-21 17:12 Re: failure building gcc-3.3 (broken libiberty/vsprintf.c or build?)
• 2003-05-23 17:39 Re: Manual contributions and copyright assignments
• 2003-05-23 17:42 Re: failure building gcc-3.3 (broken libiberty/vsprintf.c or build?)
• 2003-05-23 18:17 Re: failure building gcc-3.3 (broken libiberty/vsprintf.c or build?)
• 2003-05-27 17:09 Re: How to write web applications in Linux/Apache/X windows/C++?
• 2003-05-27 19:13 Re: [patch] copyright notice correction on libiberty/make-relative-prefix.c (current notice grants no rights)
• 2003-05-27 19:36 Re: doxygen, GPL incompatibility of FDL, and the horror
• 2003-05-28 21:10 Re: Help: failed to install gcc on my SCO UnixWare machine!
• 2003-05-28 21:12 Re: templated specializations get emitted in 3.3?
• 2003-05-28 22:08 Re: Libiberty license roundup (questions/potential problems)
• 2003-05-28 22:23 Re: Libiberty license roundup (questions/potential problems)
• 2003-05-29 18:30 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-29 18:56 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-29 18:56 Re: [janitor] mips-tfile.c and mips-tdump.c
• 2003-05-29 21:45 Re: MMX/SSE/SSE2 intrinsics bugs and bugzilla problem
• 2003-05-30 01:00 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-30 16:50 Re: Problem Installing Linux Kernel Module compiled with gcc-3.2.x
• 2003-05-30 16:58 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-30 17:33 Re: Problem Installing Linux Kernel Module compiled with gcc-3.2.x
• 2003-05-30 19:02 Re: Problem Installing Linux Kernel Module compiled with gcc-3.2.x
• 2003-05-30 19:21 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-30 21:55 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-30 21:57 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]

Joe Laffey

• 2003-05-15 17:35 Downloads
• 2003-05-15 19:21 Re: Downloads
• 2003-05-15 22:25 Re: Downloads

Joel Sherrill

• 2003-05-02 17:08 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-05 20:55 Re: "Has Fix for PR3587 been included in gcc 3.2 release?"
• 2003-05-12 18:03 mcore-elf on 3.3 branch
• 2003-05-16 17:33 Re: PROPOSAL: Policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-16 21:55 Re: PROPOSAL: Policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-16 22:09 Re: PROPOSAL: Policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-16 22:27 Re: PROPOSAL: Policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-30 17:37 Re: Cross Compiler and Linker for Linux
• 2003-05-30 19:52 Re: Cross Compiler and Linker for Linux

Joern Rennecke

• 2003-05-01 22:20 severe libstdc++-v3 regression / pch
• 2003-05-06 15:50 Re: inc_for_reload improvement
• 2003-05-07 17:27 Re: Playing with attributes and functions...
• 2003-05-12 21:25 combiner weaknesses (Was: Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC)
• 2003-05-13 10:25 Re: new register allocator and HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED
• 2003-05-13 16:03 Re: new register allocator and HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED
• 2003-05-13 19:38 Re: new register allocator and HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED
• 2003-05-14 11:57 Re: new register allocator and HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED
• 2003-05-14 12:34 Re: new register allocator and HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED
• 2003-05-14 12:48 Re: new register allocator and HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED
• 2003-05-14 17:26 Re: new register allocator and HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED
• 2003-05-15 15:07 Re: RFA: Fix builtins/string-asm[12].c failures for __USER_LABEL_PREFIX__ != "" (Was: static-after-extern tests vs. mips explicit relocs)
• 2003-05-20 17:56 Re: PROPOSAL: Variation on an Alternate policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-22 16:45 RFC: address operand predicates other than address_operand?

John Anthony Kazos Jr.

• 2003-05-23 09:43 Re: your RESOLVED->CLOSED changes
• 2003-05-23 14:18 Re: your RESOLVED->CLOSED changes
• 2003-05-24 11:47 Re: gcc question
• 2003-05-28 01:01 Re: Bugzilla is dead.

John David Anglin

• 2003-05-02 18:25 GCC inline parameters (PR 10160 testcase)
• 2003-05-02 19:20 Re: GCC inline parameters (PR 10160 testcase)
• 2003-05-03 04:18 Re: GCC inline parameters (PR 10160 testcase)
• 2003-05-03 19:33 Re: (subreg:SF (reg:SC)) question - 20020227-1.c failure
• 2003-05-04 21:26 Re: (subreg:SF (reg:SC)) question - 20020227-1.c failure
• 2003-05-04 23:21 Re: Experimenting with tree inliner parameter settings
• 2003-05-05 17:41 Re: Why so many java failures on Linux/ia64?
• 2003-05-05 20:40 Re: Why so many java failures on Linux/ia64?
• 2003-05-05 21:04 Re: Why so many java failures on Linux/ia64?
• 2003-05-05 21:15 Re: Why so many java failures on Linux/ia64?
• 2003-05-06 22:37 Re: (subreg:SF (reg:SC)) question - 20020227-1.c failure
• 2003-05-07 01:41 Re: (subreg:SF (reg:SC)) question - 20020227-1.c failure
• 2003-05-12 02:13 Re: tree-ssa branch: Call for preliminary testing
• 2003-05-12 03:14 Re: Does anybody really know which pass it is?
• 2003-05-12 03:22 Re: bootstrap of tree-ssa fails with ada
• 2003-05-12 18:57 Re: Assembler warning: Warning: .space repeat count is zero, ignored
• 2003-05-15 17:50 Re: tree-ssa branch: Call for preliminary testing
• 2003-05-16 23:37 Re: Does gcc violate the ia64 ABI?
• 2003-05-17 18:58 Re: Does gcc violate the ia64 ABI?
• 2003-05-17 22:23 Re: Does gcc violate the ia64 ABI?
• 2003-05-18 03:10 Re: Does gcc violate the ia64 ABI?
• 2003-05-18 22:51 Re: Does gcc violate the ia64 ABI?
• 2003-05-22 22:28 Re: Re: speedup collect2 (by not using it)
• 2003-05-22 23:19 Re: speedup collect2 (by not using it)

John Levin

• 2003-05-10 20:01 Gcc build

John Love-Jensen

• 2003-05-05 11:45 Re: libstdc++/10350: thread-safety problem in std::string.

john_mauceri

• 2003-05-30 18:46 32 or 64 bit?

Jon Wells

• 2003-05-19 03:01 __CALLER__ This would be useful (at least to me)

Jonah Graham

• 2003-05-06 22:52 Re: If-conversion and conditional move.

Jonathan Lennox

• 2003-05-02 17:51 Re: Warnings about rcs_id strings: let's settle this
• 2003-05-07 18:19 Re: GCC 3.3 Prelease broken on s390
• 2003-05-07 18:30 Re: GCC 3.3 Prelease broken on s390

Joseph

• 2003-05-30 10:43 support "-march=c3" and "-march=c3-2"

Joseph D. Wagner

• 2003-05-26 18:08 GCC Bootstrap failure after upgrading Autoconf and Automake
• 2003-05-27 01:57 RE: GCC Bootstrap failure after upgrading Autoconf and Automake

Joseph S. Myers

• 2003-05-02 19:00 RE: Warnings about rcs_id strings: let's settle this
• 2003-05-02 19:14 Re: bug or feature?
• 2003-05-02 19:28 RE: Warnings about rcs_id strings: let's settle this
• 2003-05-03 16:07 Re: c/7425: deprecated attribute doesn't merge with multipledeclarations
• 2003-05-03 16:14 Re: The meaning of -Wall
• 2003-05-03 17:58 RE: Warnings about rcs_id strings: let's settle this
• 2003-05-03 19:22 RE: Warnings about rcs_id strings: let's settle this
• 2003-05-03 19:47 Re: testcases [was: Warnings about rcs_id strings: let's settlethis]
• 2003-05-03 22:39 Re: The meaning of -Wall
• 2003-05-04 10:06 RE: Warnings about rcs_id strings: let's settle this
• 2003-05-04 19:25 Re: GCJ and $PREFIX/include
• 2003-05-05 22:12 Re: GNATS survey
• 2003-05-08 15:27 Re: tree-ssa branch: Fortran libraries don't build
• 2003-05-08 15:39 Re: Complex division (was Re: c/2995: __complex__ int typecastsmaybe broken)
• 2003-05-08 15:58 Re: tree-ssa branch: Fortran libraries don't build
• 2003-05-09 08:34 Re: C++ extension "cast-as-lvalues": time to deprecate?
• 2003-05-09 17:16 Re: GCC 3.3: Second prerelease available
• 2003-05-09 17:23 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-09 22:39 Re: C++ extension "cast-as-lvalues": time to deprecate?
• 2003-05-10 10:02 Re: Bug reporting instructions
• 2003-05-10 13:09 Re: Add new target: vxworks for xscale
• 2003-05-11 20:55 Re: Suggestion for a new GNATS policy
• 2003-05-12 17:04 Re: building a gcc-3.3-prerelease cross-compiler
• 2003-05-12 19:28 Re: GCC 3.3: Second prerelease available
• 2003-05-13 10:20 Re: Suggested Bugzilla improvements
• 2003-05-13 14:52 Re: Suggested Bugzilla improvements
• 2003-05-13 20:50 Re: Suggested Bugzilla improvements
• 2003-05-13 21:14 Re: gcc/gcc version.c
• 2003-05-14 21:38 Re: 3.3 release notes
• 2003-05-15 10:19 Re: GCC 3.3 Branch Open
• 2003-05-15 22:14 Re: HEADS UP: GCC manual soon to be printed
• 2003-05-15 22:18 Re: GCC 3.3 Released
• 2003-05-15 22:19 Re: Doc patch testing procedure
• 2003-05-15 22:22 Re: Downloads
• 2003-05-16 10:20 Re: Downloads
• 2003-05-16 17:04 Re: PROPOSAL: Policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-16 21:12 Re: PROPOSAL: Policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-17 19:40 Re: gcc.dg/c90-intconst-1.c
• 2003-05-17 22:06 Re: gcc.dg/c90-intconst-1.c
• 2003-05-18 13:37 Re: C99 parsing error?
• 2003-05-18 22:17 Re: HEADS UP: GCC manual soon to be printed
• 2003-05-19 21:04 Re: Downloads
• 2003-05-20 18:21 Re: Downloads
• 2003-05-21 20:10 Re: HEADS UP: GCC manual soon to be printed
• 2003-05-21 20:28 Re: HEADS UP: GCC manual soon to be printed
• 2003-05-21 21:25 Re: At the request of those drowing in gcc-bugs email
• 2003-05-21 21:49 Bugzilla: number of bugs, milestones
• 2003-05-22 06:51 Re: Bugzilla: number of bugs, milestones
• 2003-05-22 06:51 Re: Does c-format.c allow creating specifiers which take no arguments?
• 2003-05-22 06:53 Re: Bugzilla categories
• 2003-05-22 18:19 Re: Bugzilla CPU targets
• 2003-05-22 18:20 Re: Suggestion for new keywords in bugzilla
• 2003-05-23 09:36 Re: your RESOLVED->CLOSED changes
• 2003-05-23 15:30 Re: license of generated info docs (GFDL?) and man pages
• 2003-05-24 09:27 Re: A few suggestions for bugzilla mail to gcc-bugs
• 2003-05-24 19:05 Re: A few suggestions for bugzilla mail to gcc-bugs
• 2003-05-25 16:30 Re: bug submitters not converted from GNAT to bugzilla
• 2003-05-27 09:39 Re: Today's snapshot
• 2003-05-27 16:49 Re: gcc_latest_snapshot CVS tag (was: gcc-ss-20030526 is now available)
• 2003-05-27 19:41 Re: doxygen, GPL incompatibility of FDL, and the horror
• 2003-05-28 08:30 Re: Bugzilla is dead.
• 2003-05-28 10:54 Re: Today's snapshot
• 2003-05-29 17:54 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-29 19:06 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-30 09:12 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-30 09:17 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-31 17:04 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-31 21:37 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-31 22:26 Re: [tree-ssa] Integrating g95
• 2003-05-31 23:32 Re: [tree-ssa] Integrating g95

Josh

• 2003-05-23 12:57 Bootstrap failure on Sparc Solaris2.8
• 2003-05-23 18:41 Re: Re: Bootstrap failure on Sparc Solaris2.8
• 2003-05-27 16:53 Re: Bootstrap failure on Sparc Solaris2.8
• 2003-05-27 18:02 Re: Bootstrap failure on Sparc Solaris2.8
• 2003-05-27 19:28 Re: Re: Bootstrap failure on Sparc Solaris2.8

Josh Loeb

• 2003-05-28 15:12 Re: Re: Re: Bootstrap failure on Sparc Solaris2.8
• 2003-05-28 17:48 Bootstrap failure on Sparc Solaris2.8

Kai Henningsen

• 2003-05-09 05:46 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-09 19:41 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-11 19:42 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC

Kai Ruottu

• 2003-05-20 10:44 Re: failure building gcc-3.3 (broken libiberty/vsprintf.c or build?)
• 2003-05-20 10:44 Re: failure building gcc-3.3 (broken libiberty/vsprintf.c or build?)
• 2003-05-22 11:44 Re: failure building gcc-3.3 (broken libiberty/vsprintf.c or build?)

Karim Yaghmour

• 2003-05-19 18:45 Re: PROPOSAL: Policy for obsoleting targets

Karl Eichwalder

• 2003-05-19 20:55 Re: Downloads
• 2003-05-20 16:17 Re: Downloads

Kate Minola

• 2003-05-16 17:12 sucessful bootstrap of gcc-3.3 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0

Katherine Donaldson

• 2003-05-02 20:36 gcc-3.2 on Mac OS X 10.1.5

Kaveh R. Ghazi

• 2003-05-01 15:30 When/how is cp/error.c:dump_expr() called?
• 2003-05-02 13:03 Re: PATCH (head): -Wunused-static-variable
• 2003-05-06 15:08 Re: GCC 3.3 branch frozen
• 2003-05-08 02:10 Re: draft release notes for gcc 3.3
• 2003-05-08 02:29 Re: warnings in 3.3: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false
• 2003-05-16 00:07 Re: The great gnats->bugzilla switchover
• 2003-05-16 00:30 Re: gcc 3.2x under irix6.3 (R5000)
• 2003-05-16 01:00 Re: initial entries in GCC 3.3 build status list
• 2003-05-16 22:56 Re: initial entries in GCC 3.3 build status list
• 2003-05-18 16:10 New bootstrap failure on sparc-solaris2.7, fails to define "sparc"
• 2003-05-19 03:08 Re: New bootstrap failure on sparc-solaris2.7, fails to define "sparc"
• 2003-05-20 20:59 Re: failure building gcc-3.3 (broken libiberty/vsprintf.c or build?)
• 2003-05-22 03:14 Does c-format.c allow creating specifiers which take no arguments?
• 2003-05-22 14:17 Why is there a `0' flag used with `%I' in asm_fprintf ?
• 2003-05-22 15:17 Re: Why is there a `0' flag used with `%I' in asm_fprintf ?
• 2003-05-22 15:59 Re: Does c-format.c allow creating specifiers which take no arguments?
• 2003-05-23 15:29 Re: failure building gcc-3.3 (broken libiberty/vsprintf.c or build?)
• 2003-05-29 17:27 Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-30 00:40 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-30 00:46 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-30 00:51 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-30 00:54 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-30 00:57 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-30 01:01 RE: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-30 01:04 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-30 01:07 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-30 01:26 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-30 20:26 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-30 20:38 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-31 19:35 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]

kaz Kojima

• 2003-05-23 03:33 GCC 3.3: bootstrap success report for GNU/Linux on SuperH

Kazuhiro Inaoka

• 2003-05-26 02:08 Infomation site of M32R processor was changed.

Kean Johnston

• 2003-05-01 17:04 RE: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-01 18:04 RE: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-01 18:16 RE: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 02:40 PATCH (head): -Wunused-static-variable
• 2003-05-02 04:18 RE: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 13:32 RE: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 15:48 RE: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 18:24 RE: Warnings about rcs_id strings: let's settle this
• 2003-05-02 18:41 RE: Warnings about rcs_id strings: let's settle this
• 2003-05-02 18:43 RE: Warnings about rcs_id strings: let's settle this
• 2003-05-02 19:13 RE: Warnings about rcs_id strings: let's settle this
• 2003-05-02 19:17 RE: Warnings about rcs_id strings: let's settle this
• 2003-05-02 21:17 RE: Warnings about rcs_id strings: let's settle this
• 2003-05-02 21:20 RE: GCC 3.3: Branch Frozen
• 2003-05-03 04:37 RE: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-03 17:13 RE: Warnings about rcs_id strings: let's settle this
• 2003-05-03 18:47 RE: Warnings about rcs_id strings: let's settle this
• 2003-05-03 19:59 RE: Warnings about rcs_id strings: let's settle this

Keisuke Nishida

• 2003-05-04 19:12 Re: [open-cobol-list] GCC front end for COBOL
• 2003-05-04 22:08 Re: [open-cobol-list] GCC front end for COBOL
• 2003-05-05 22:59 Re: [Cobolforgcc-devel] Re: GCC front end for COBOL

Kelley Cook

• 2003-05-16 20:16 target/10663 (was Re: non-portable construct in gcc configure script)
• 2003-05-20 13:32 Fwd: Add in Pentium III & Pentium 4 to config.sub
• 2003-05-20 14:00 Re: "obvious" requirements
• 2003-05-21 21:01 BUGZILLA: Default no auto-mail for CC: changes
• 2003-05-23 14:23 Re: help: how to "quick rebuild" gcc ?
• 2003-05-27 16:36 Re: gcc_latest_snapshot CVS tag (was: gcc-ss-20030526 is now available)
• 2003-05-28 14:01 Re: gcc_latest_snapshot CVS tag (was: gcc-ss-20030526 is now available)

Ken Faiczak

• 2003-05-30 13:46 problems with crtbegin/end with vxworks/mips gcc 3.2.3

Kendrick Hamilton

• 2003-05-30 15:27 Problem Installing Linux Kernel Module compiled with gcc-3.2.x
• 2003-05-30 17:32 Re: Problem Installing Linux Kernel Module compiled with gcc-3.2.x

kijjaporn

• 2003-05-16 09:02 report build successful GCC3.3

Kriang Lerdsuwanakij

• 2003-05-18 11:43 Re: Member specialisation bug (?) in 3.3 (C++)
• 2003-05-28 12:51 Re: Cooperation between "bug masters" and "bug fixers"

Kris Thielemans

• 2003-05-14 00:27 typename conundrum
• 2003-05-14 16:27 RE: typename conundrum

Kumar Gala

• 2003-05-15 04:10 Re: Branch created: gcc-3_3-e500-branch
• 2003-05-15 14:41 Re: Branch created: gcc-3_3-e500-branch
• 2003-05-15 14:45 altivec testsuite

Kunal Sachdeva

• 2003-05-12 13:47 Upgrade from 2.9 to 3.x?
• 2003-05-12 16:03 Re: Upgrade from 2.9 to 3.x?

Lance Zhang

• 2003-05-28 21:47 Subscribe lancexnz@yahoo.com

Laurent Guerby

• 2003-05-02 18:45 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 19:02 Some fun (Was: GCC warnings for unused global variables)
• 2003-05-02 19:23 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-07 10:55 Ada tasking broken on mainline x86-linux?
• 2003-05-08 20:16 Re: GCC 3.3 Prerelease
• 2003-05-09 23:18 Ada miscompilation on mainline
• 2003-05-10 06:26 Re: Ada miscompilation on mainline
• 2003-05-12 19:46 RFC/Ada: removal of $(ADAC) support
• 2003-05-13 10:20 Re: Ada miscompilation on mainline
• 2003-05-23 20:14 Re: Building Ada in 3.3 on Solaris 9/SPARC with Sun CC
• 2003-05-23 20:38 Re: Old bug: the 14-character limit.
• 2003-05-23 21:17 Re: Old bug: the 14-character limit.
• 2003-05-24 09:08 Re: Old bug: the 14-character limit.

law

• 2003-05-01 20:35 Re: [tree-ssa] variables being dragged out of their lexical scopes
• 2003-05-05 20:55 Re: [tree-ssa] DCE and conditionals
• 2003-05-05 20:57 Re: [tree-ssa] DCE and conditionals
• 2003-05-05 21:23 Re: [tree-ssa] DCE and conditionals
• 2003-05-05 21:25 Re: [tree-ssa] DCE and conditionals
• 2003-05-05 22:30 Re: [tree-ssa] DCE and conditionals
• 2003-05-07 04:25 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge results as of 2003-05-06
• 2003-05-07 18:00 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge results as of 2003-05-06
• 2003-05-07 18:02 Re: tree-ssa branch: Call for preliminary testing
• 2003-05-08 03:04 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge results as of 2003-05-06
• 2003-05-08 03:06 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge results as of 2003-05-06
• 2003-05-08 03:32 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge results as of 2003-05-06
• 2003-05-08 06:29 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge results as of 2003-05-06
• 2003-05-08 07:10 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge results as of 2003-05-06
• 2003-05-08 15:13 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge results as of 2003-05-06
• 2003-05-08 19:13 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge results as of 2003-05-06
• 2003-05-08 19:30 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge results as of 2003-05-06
• 2003-05-12 16:05 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-12 16:16 Re: [tree-ssa] Out of SSA status and issues
• 2003-05-12 17:08 Re: [tree-ssa] Out of SSA status and issues
• 2003-05-12 17:26 Re: [tree-ssa] Out of SSA status and issues
• 2003-05-12 17:39 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-13 17:16 Re: Dead-code elimination can't remove string copy insns?
• 2003-05-13 17:38 Re: Dead-code elimination can't remove string copy insns?
• 2003-05-13 18:02 Re: Dead-code elimination can't remove string copy insns?
• 2003-05-13 19:35 [tree-ssa] Improve eliminate_useless_stmts_and_vars [Was Re: Dead-code elimination can't remove string copy insns? ]
• 2003-05-22 14:45 [tree-ssa] vdefs vs DCE
• 2003-05-22 17:36 Re: RFC: remove -fssa*
• 2003-05-22 18:21 Re: [tree-ssa] vdefs vs DCE
• 2003-05-30 13:26 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure on x86
• 2003-05-30 19:27 Re: [tree-ssa] Switch stmts and inserting on edges
• 2003-05-30 21:21 Re: [tree-ssa] Switch stmts and inserting on edges
• 2003-05-30 23:05 Re: [tree-ssa] Insert on edge comment
• 2003-05-30 23:14 Re: [tree-ssa] Insert on edge comment
• 2003-05-30 23:54 Re: [tree-ssa] Insert on edge comment
• 2003-05-30 23:57 Re: [tree-ssa] Insert on edge comment

Li, Wei

• 2003-05-02 17:21 How to avoid typedef "redefinition of" error using gcc

Lisa M. Opus Goldstein

• 2003-05-15 14:23 Re: HEADS UP: GCC manual soon to be printed
• 2003-05-22 18:22 Re: HEADS UP: GCC manual soon to be printed

Long Fei

• 2003-05-13 17:12 gcc front end and IR documents ?
• 2003-05-19 08:12 is abstract syntax tree included in GCC 3.3 ?
• 2003-05-23 05:51 help: how to "quick rebuild" gcc ?

Loren James Rittle

• 2003-05-02 23:06 Re: libstdc++/10350: thread-safety problem in std::string.
• 2003-05-14 03:02 Re: 3.3 release notes
• 2003-05-28 08:55 Re: Failure to run gcc 3.4 cvs HEAD libstdc++ testsuite oni686-linux with -fPIC: ICEs
• 2003-05-30 21:55 Re: PCH is used only for the first header

Luca Saiu

• 2003-05-15 21:10 GCC 3.3: bootstrap success report
• 2003-05-15 21:14 GCC 3.3: bootstrap success report for GNU/Linux PowerPC

Ludovic Brenta

• 2003-05-15 10:37 Re: GCC 3.3 Released

Luzhangl

• 2003-05-27 16:19 How to write web applications in Linux/Apache/X windows/C++?

M. Lavasani

• 2003-05-20 10:12 compiling gcc-3.3

MAI HUONG

• 2003-05-26 19:23 WWW.SAPHI.TK : Sat uon gia dung / Iron Furniture

Marc Espie

• 2003-05-01 11:01 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 16:38 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-18 14:19 Re: PROPOSAL: Policy for obsoleting targets

Mark Mitchell

• 2003-05-01 05:00 Re: GCC 3.3
• 2003-05-01 14:30 Re: Lots and lots of inlining failures during v3 building
• 2003-05-01 16:26 Re: gcc 3.3
• 2003-05-01 16:48 Re: When is stage 1 scheduled to close for 3.4?
• 2003-05-01 16:51 Re: When/how is cp/error.c:dump_expr() called?
• 2003-05-02 18:38 Re: GCC inline parameters (PR 10160 testcase)
• 2003-05-02 19:53 GCC 3.3: Branch Frozen
• 2003-05-02 21:35 Re: GCC inline parameters (PR 10160 testcase)
• 2003-05-02 21:38 RE: GCC 3.3: Branch Frozen
• 2003-05-02 22:09 Re: GCC inline parameters (PR 10160 testcase)
• 2003-05-02 22:36 Re: GCC inline parameters (PR 10160 testcase)
• 2003-05-03 06:53 Interleaving pthread_cleanups in C and C++
• 2003-05-03 07:18 RE: Warnings about rcs_id strings: let's settle this
• 2003-05-04 01:07 Re: Interleaving pthread_cleanups in C and C++
• 2003-05-04 01:13 RE: Warnings about rcs_id strings: let's settle this
• 2003-05-05 15:34 Re: Interleaving pthread_cleanups in C and C++
• 2003-05-05 15:36 RE: Warnings about rcs_id strings: let's settle this
• 2003-05-05 15:40 GCC 3.3
• 2003-05-05 19:23 Re: [3.3] Fix for 10428 breaks template instantiation
• 2003-05-05 20:28 RE: Warnings about rcs_id strings: let's settle this
• 2003-05-05 20:33 Re: GCC 3.3
• 2003-05-05 21:57 GCC 3.3 branch frozen
• 2003-05-06 15:31 Re: GCC 3.3 branch frozen
• 2003-05-06 16:17 GCC 3.3 Prerelease
• 2003-05-06 16:42 Re: GCC 3.3 Prerelease
• 2003-05-06 18:10 Re: GCC 3.3 Prerelease
• 2003-05-06 18:53 Re: GCC 3.3 Prerelease
• 2003-05-06 19:39 Re: GCC 3.3 Prerelease
• 2003-05-06 20:30 Re: Solaris 2.6 & PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER
• 2003-05-06 21:24 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-06 22:56 Re: GCC 3.3 Prelease broken on s390
• 2003-05-07 02:32 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-07 05:53 Re: GCC 3.3 Prelease broken on s390
• 2003-05-07 06:10 PR 10656 and PR 10657
• 2003-05-07 15:53 Re: GCC 3.3 Prelease broken on s390
• 2003-05-07 15:56 Re: PR 10656 and PR 10657
• 2003-05-07 16:13 Re: GCC 3.3 Prelease broken on s390
• 2003-05-07 17:11 Re: GCC 3.3 Prelease broken on s390
• 2003-05-07 18:27 Re: GCC 3.3 Prelease broken on s390
• 2003-05-07 18:36 Re: GCC 3.3 Prelease broken on s390
• 2003-05-07 19:45 Re: GCC 3.3 Prelease broken on s390
• 2003-05-07 19:46 Re: GCC 3.3 Prelease broken on s390
• 2003-05-07 22:18 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-07 22:38 Re: PR 10656 and PR 10657
• 2003-05-08 18:40 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-08 19:47 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-08 19:54 Re: GCC 3.3 Prerelease
• 2003-05-09 01:14 GCC 3.3: 2nd prerelease
• 2003-05-09 04:27 GCC 3.3 Branch Frozen
• 2003-05-09 16:16 Re: GCC 3.3 Prerelease
• 2003-05-09 16:33 GCC 3.3: Second prerelease available
• 2003-05-09 16:47 Re: GCC 3.3 Prerelease
• 2003-05-09 18:32 Re: GCC 3.3 Branch Frozen
• 2003-05-09 23:21 Re: C++ extension "cast-as-lvalues": time to deprecate?
• 2003-05-12 15:19 Your patch causes regressions
• 2003-05-12 16:42 Re: C++ extension "cast-as-lvalues": time to deprecate?
• 2003-05-12 19:15 Re: GCC 3.3: Second prerelease available
• 2003-05-13 00:35 GCC 3.3: Final Release Tomorrowish
• 2003-05-13 20:35 Re: gcc/gcc version.c
• 2003-05-13 21:10 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-13 21:33 Re: gcc/gcc version.c
• 2003-05-13 21:41 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-13 23:59 CVS Mess Corrected
• 2003-05-14 23:45 GCC 3.3 Released
• 2003-05-14 23:48 GCC 3.3 Branch Open
• 2003-05-15 15:40 Re: GCC 3.3 Released
• 2003-05-15 15:43 Re: Branch created: gcc-3_3-e500-branch
• 2003-05-15 17:23 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-16 19:19 Re: Downloads
• 2003-05-29 21:35 Re: Cooperation between "bug masters" and "bug fixers"
• 2003-05-30 15:52 Re: AIX 5.1 and g++ 3.3

Marty Hauff

• 2003-05-05 12:55 Graphical RTL Tree viewer
• 2003-05-19 08:31 [tree-ssa] Any good sources of documentation?
• 2003-05-20 06:12 Re: [tree-ssa] Any good sources of documentation?
• 2003-05-20 12:33 Re: [tree-ssa] Any good sources of documentation?

Matt Austern

• 2003-05-02 03:38 Re: Why are variables in anonymous namespaces not static?
• 2003-05-09 18:13 Re: C++ extension "cast-as-lvalues": time to deprecate?
• 2003-05-14 00:35 Re: typename conundrum
• 2003-05-15 16:41 Re: I want try...finally
• 2003-05-19 16:06 Re: Huge compile time & run time performance regression 3.3 -> HEAD
• 2003-05-22 21:35 Instantiating a static data member of a class template
• 2003-05-22 22:31 Re: speedup collect2 (by not using it)
• 2003-05-30 23:29 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]

Matt Kraai

• 2003-05-18 23:24 "obvious" requirements
• 2003-05-19 15:06 Re: "obvious" requirements
• 2003-05-30 17:33 Re: [tree-ssa] Branch unfrozen

Matthias Klose

• 2003-05-09 07:24 Re: draft release notes for gcc 3.3
• 2003-05-20 23:31 Re: ICE for {i386,sparc{64,}}-linux in gcc cvs HEAD 2003-05-{19,20}: /usr/share/bison/bison.simple:774: internal compiler error: in trunc_int_for_mode, at explow.c:56
• 2003-05-23 14:55 license of generated info docs (GFDL?) and man pages
• 2003-05-24 07:08 Adding "foreign" submitters and CC's to bugzilla reports doesn't work
• 2003-05-25 08:18 bug submitters not converted from GNAT to bugzilla
• 2003-05-25 16:53 Re: bug submitters not converted from GNAT to bugzilla

Matthieu Moy

• 2003-05-08 21:07 Re: downloading GCC documentation
• 2003-05-19 12:58 Memory management in GCC.
• 2003-05-19 15:57 Memory problems in GCC ? (found with Valgrind)
• 2003-05-20 09:24 How to run over each node of a tree ?

mehdi

• 2003-05-30 08:28 g++ problem

Michael Buesch

• 2003-05-16 17:11 gcc-3.3 compiletime error

Michael Eager

• 2003-05-03 16:49 Re: volatile [was: GCC warnings for unused global variables]
• 2003-05-04 07:32 Re: volatile [was: GCC warnings for unused global variables]
• 2003-05-07 03:47 Re: volatile [was: GCC warnings for unused global variables]
• 2003-05-08 15:31 Re: volatile [was: GCC warnings for unused global variables]
• 2003-05-08 15:37 Re: volatile [was: GCC warnings for unused global variables]
• 2003-05-08 15:54 Re: volatile [was: GCC warnings for unused global variables]
• 2003-05-08 15:57 Re: Reg ABI
• 2003-05-10 16:36 Re: Reg ABI
• 2003-05-10 16:44 Re: downloading GCC documentation
• 2003-05-12 15:15 Re: Upgrade from 2.9 to 3.x?
• 2003-05-13 15:46 Re: building a gcc-3.3-prerelease cross-compiler
• 2003-05-13 16:00 Re: Does the keyword volatile work?
• 2003-05-13 18:56 Re: building a gcc-3.3-prerelease cross-compiler
• 2003-05-13 20:34 Re: building a gcc-3.3-prerelease cross-compiler

Michael Koch

• 2003-05-13 12:58 Re: Java build failure

Michael Matz

• 2003-05-03 19:29 testcases [was: Warnings about rcs_id strings: let's settle this]
• 2003-05-03 19:50 Re: (subreg:SF (reg:SC)) question - 20020227-1.c failure
• 2003-05-03 20:29 Re: (subreg:SF (reg:SC)) question - 20020227-1.c failure
• 2003-05-04 21:40 Re: Interleaving pthread_cleanups in C and C++
• 2003-05-04 22:05 Re: Experimenting with tree inliner parameter settings
• 2003-05-05 18:51 [3.3] Fix for 10428 breaks template instantiation
• 2003-05-05 19:26 Re: [3.3] Fix for 10428 breaks template instantiation
• 2003-05-06 11:53 Re: implement __attribute__((cleanup(function)))
• 2003-05-06 12:55 Re: implement __attribute__((cleanup(function)))
• 2003-05-09 12:41 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-09 14:37 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-09 15:05 Re: What is the relationship between GCC and Cygnus / Red Hat?
• 2003-05-09 15:57 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-12 16:05 Re: [tree-ssa] Out of SSA status and issues
• 2003-05-12 16:20 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-13 09:07 Re: [tree-ssa] Out of SSA status and issues
• 2003-05-13 09:30 Re: Dead-code elimination can't remove string copy insns?
• 2003-05-13 12:57 Re: [tree-ssa] Out of SSA status and issues
• 2003-05-13 13:40 Re: [tree-ssa] Out of SSA status and issues
• 2003-05-13 19:51 Re: new register allocator and HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED
• 2003-05-13 20:32 Re: new register allocator and HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED
• 2003-05-14 09:25 Re: Dead-code elimination can't remove string copy insns?
• 2003-05-14 12:05 Re: new register allocator and HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED
• 2003-05-14 12:37 Re: new register allocator and HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED
• 2003-05-14 12:52 Re: new register allocator and HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED
• 2003-05-15 09:46 Re: new register allocator and HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED
• 2003-05-15 11:39 Re: new register allocator and HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED
• 2003-05-15 19:27 Re: new register allocator and HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED
• 2003-05-16 11:36 Re: new register allocator and HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED
• 2003-05-16 14:24 Re: new register allocator and HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED
• 2003-05-30 18:25 Re: [tree-ssa] Switch stmts and inserting on edges
• 2003-05-30 22:25 Re: CLASS_CANNOT_CHANGE_MODE and CANNOT_CHANGE_MODE_CLASS in df.c
• 2003-05-30 22:44 Re: [tree-ssa] Insert on edge comment
• 2003-05-30 23:24 Re: [tree-ssa] Insert on edge comment

Michael Meissner

• 2003-05-03 00:26 Re: Minimal machine description file
• 2003-05-08 21:57 Re: RFC: using clz for comparing to zero on the tree level.
• 2003-05-11 02:17 Re: Gcc build
• 2003-05-19 14:37 Re: CONFIG2_H stuff in config/mips/t-*
• 2003-05-22 22:35 Re: Need help with object files.
• 2003-05-26 21:53 Re: Darwin multilibs
• 2003-05-27 21:46 Re: Darwin multilibs
• 2003-05-28 15:02 OT: How do people set up long term development
• 2003-05-28 20:44 Re: OT: How do people set up long term development

Michael S . Zick

• 2003-05-02 18:01 Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?
• 2003-05-02 23:34 Re: GCC inline parameters (PR 10160 testcase)
• 2003-05-07 14:53 Re: GCC target-specific extension
• 2003-05-10 16:57 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-13 05:59 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-13 15:08 Re: [tree-ssa] Out of SSA status and issues
• 2003-05-13 15:08 Re: RFC/Ada: removal of $(ADAC) support
• 2003-05-13 23:28 Re: [tree-ssa] Out of SSA status and issues
• 2003-05-14 12:27 Re: gcc front end and IR documents ?
• 2003-05-14 12:28 Re: CVS Mess Corrected
• 2003-05-15 12:54 Re: new register allocator and HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED
• 2003-05-16 14:17 Re: new register allocator and HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED
• 2003-05-16 14:34 Re: new register allocator and HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED
• 2003-05-17 17:09 Re: [tree-ssa] Out of SSA status and issues
• 2003-05-19 22:49 Re: PROPOSAL: Policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-21 12:02 Re: PROPOSAL: Policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-21 21:55 Re: PROPOSAL: Policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-22 12:17 Re: PROPOSAL: Policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-22 18:12 Re: Suggestion for new keywords in bugzilla
• 2003-05-24 02:14 Re: Old bug: the 14-character limit.
• 2003-05-27 22:02 Re: [patch] copyright notice correction on libiberty/make-relative-prefix.c (current notice grants no rights)
• 2003-05-31 02:12 Re: [tree-ssa] Insert on edge comment

Michel Cunha

• 2003-05-23 20:03 gcc question

Mike Stump

• 2003-05-07 22:58 Re: volatile [was: GCC warnings for unused global variables]
• 2003-05-07 23:16 Re: volatile [was: GCC warnings for unused global variables]
• 2003-05-07 23:53 Re: volatile [was: GCC warnings for unused global variables]
• 2003-05-08 17:44 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-08 18:02 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-08 18:30 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-08 19:36 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-08 21:17 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-08 21:35 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-08 22:02 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-08 22:29 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-08 23:09 Re: Porting GCC to Zilog z80
• 2003-05-09 17:10 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-12 23:57 Re: Does the keyword volatile work?
• 2003-05-13 00:23 Re: off-topic traceback weirdness
• 2003-05-14 01:41 -$ documentation
• 2003-05-19 20:52 Re: gcc.dg/c90-intconst-1.c
• 2003-05-19 21:04 Re: What is the relationship between GCC and Cygnus / Red Hat?
• 2003-05-20 23:21 Re: Testsuite custom environment
• 2003-05-23 19:03 Re: help: how to "quick rebuild" gcc ?
• 2003-05-23 20:45 Re: Someone broke bootstrap. *sigh*
• 2003-05-23 20:53 Re: Old bug: the 14-character limit.
• 2003-05-23 23:59 Re: Libiberty license roundup (questions/potential problems)
• 2003-05-27 19:28 Re: doxygen, GPL incompatibility of FDL, and the horror
• 2003-05-29 21:55 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-30 01:35 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]

Mostafa Hagog

• 2003-05-05 05:34 Redundant Load Elimination in GCSE
• 2003-05-05 12:06 RE: Redundant Load Elimination in GCSE
• 2003-05-08 16:46 Re: GCSE/PRE problem
• 2003-05-27 05:40 Re: GCSE/PRE problem

Muthukumar Ratty

• 2003-05-07 17:37 __attribute__((constructor)), shared object files and C++...
• 2003-05-07 17:52 Re: __attribute__((constructor)), shared object files and C++...
• 2003-05-07 18:25 Re: __attribute__((constructor)), shared object files and C++...

Nathan Sidwell

• 2003-05-01 17:21 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-01 21:02 Re: Ada bootstrap broken with lineno changes
• 2003-05-02 10:19 Re: PATCH (head): -Wunused-static-variable
• 2003-05-09 18:34 Re: C++ extension "cast-as-lvalues": time to deprecate?
• 2003-05-19 09:07 Re: [PATCH] Re: Option -fprofile-arcs fails for target avr and fr30

Nathanael Nerode

• 2003-05-12 16:34 Re: Suggestion for a new GNATS policy
• 2003-05-12 16:37 Re: Suggestion for a new GNATS policy
• 2003-05-12 16:44 Re: Suggestion for a new GNATS policy
• 2003-05-18 16:19 PROPOSAL: Alternate policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-19 16:49 libffi failure during bootstrap
• 2003-05-20 01:16 Re: MinGW (Was Re: PROPOSAL: Variation on an Alternate policy for obsoleting targets)
• 2003-05-22 17:13 Re: Suggestion for new keywords in bugzilla
• 2003-05-22 17:40 Re: Suggestion for new keywords in bugzilla
• 2003-05-23 05:28 Bugzilla needs...
• 2003-05-23 06:21 Bugzilla sanity check errors. :-)
• 2003-05-23 06:40 Re: Bugzilla needs...
• 2003-05-23 07:18 Re: your RESOLVED->CLOSED changes
• 2003-05-23 15:31 Re: your RESOLVED->CLOSED changes
• 2003-05-23 15:33 Re: Suggestion for new keywords in bugzilla
• 2003-05-23 15:36 Re: your RESOLVED->CLOSED changes
• 2003-05-23 15:41 Re: Suggestion for new keywords in bugzilla
• 2003-05-23 15:45 Re: your RESOLVED->CLOSED changes
• 2003-05-23 15:47 Re: Bugzilla sanity check errors. :-)
• 2003-05-23 15:50 Re: your RESOLVED->CLOSED changes
• 2003-05-23 16:19 Re: Bugzilla sanity check errors. :-)
• 2003-05-23 18:17 Re: Manual contributions and copyright assignments
• 2003-05-23 19:40 Old bug: the 14-character limit.
• 2003-05-23 19:42 Re: Old bug: the 14-character limit.
• 2003-05-23 19:57 Someone broke bootstrap. *sigh*
• 2003-05-23 20:54 Decision on gccbug?
• 2003-05-23 22:59 Libiberty license roundup (questions/potential problems)
• 2003-05-24 03:57 Re: Libiberty license roundup (questions/potential problems)
• 2003-05-24 04:58 Re: Libiberty license roundup (questions/potential problems)
• 2003-05-25 02:34 doxygen, GPL incompatibility of FDL, and the horror
• 2003-05-27 17:42 Re: [patch] copyright notice correction on libiberty/make-relative-prefix.c(current notice grants no rights)
• 2003-05-27 18:08 Re: [patch] copyright notice correction on libiberty/make-relative-prefix.c(current notice grants no rights)
• 2003-05-30 15:36 RE: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]

Naveen Sharma, Noida

• 2003-05-14 11:34 Re: Dead-code elimination can't remove string copy insns?

Neil Booth

• 2003-05-01 21:34 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 05:58 Re: Where to get lex.l for GNU C++
• 2003-05-02 19:28 Re: Warnings about rcs_id strings: let's settle this
• 2003-05-02 22:33 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-06 20:28 Re: Further option handling bugs
• 2003-05-09 22:12 Re: C++ extension "cast-as-lvalues": time to deprecate?
• 2003-05-09 22:14 Re: srcdir == objdir build issues [SC take note]
• 2003-05-09 22:21 Re: "Annotate" on GCC's CVSweb isn't working
• 2003-05-14 06:03 Re: -$ documentation
• 2003-05-18 08:52 Re: C99 parsing error?
• 2003-05-18 19:31 Re: New bootstrap failure on sparc-solaris2.7, fails to define "sparc"
• 2003-05-18 19:35 Re: Warning for trigraphs in comment?
• 2003-05-18 19:36 Re: Warning for trigraphs in comment?
• 2003-05-18 20:01 Re: New bootstrap failure on sparc-solaris2.7, fails to define "sparc"
• 2003-05-19 05:10 Re: New bootstrap failure on sparc-solaris2.7, fails to define "sparc"
• 2003-05-19 20:01 Re: Warning for trigraphs in comment?
• 2003-05-19 20:04 Re: Memory problems in GCC ? (found with Valgrind)
• 2003-05-19 21:10 Re: libffi failure during bootstrap
• 2003-05-22 06:33 Bugzilla categories
• 2003-05-23 20:00 Re: Bugzilla and gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
• 2003-05-23 20:44 Re: Old bug: the 14-character limit.
• 2003-05-31 15:06 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-31 23:45 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]

nelson

• 2003-05-04 18:24 Re: The meaning of -Wall

Nick Clifton

• 2003-05-13 17:23 Re: mcore-elf on 3.3 branch
• 2003-05-13 18:39 Re: mcore-elf on 3.3 branch

Nils O.

• 2003-05-19 07:33 Successful build , gcc 3.3 on NetBSD 1.6.1 x86

Ole Laursen

• 2003-05-18 10:59 Member specialisation bug (?) in 3.3 (C++)

Olivier Galibert

• 2003-05-02 20:00 Re: Warnings about rcs_id strings: let's settle this

Olivier Hainque

• 2003-05-10 21:10 Re: Add new target: vxworks for xscale
• 2003-05-11 10:14 Re: Add new target: vxworks for xscale
• 2003-05-13 13:30 Re: Add new target: vxworks for xscale

Olly Betts

• 2003-05-09 02:12 Re: RFC: using clz for comparing to zero on the tree level.

Paolo Carlini

• 2003-05-01 10:14 Lots and lots of inlining failures during v3 building
• 2003-05-01 14:24 Re: Lots and lots of inlining failures during v3 building
• 2003-05-18 15:29 Re: GCC 3.3 : About the corrected bugs lised
• 2003-05-18 20:14 Re: New bootstrap failure on sparc-solaris2.7, fails to define "sparc"
• 2003-05-19 21:45 GCC 3.3 missing from http://gcc.gnu.org/releases.html

Paul Brook

• 2003-05-23 14:19 Re: g77 compiles illegal code in testsuite?
• 2003-05-31 21:49 [tree-ssa] Integrating g95

Paul Jarc

• 2003-05-01 16:22 Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?
• 2003-05-02 14:52 Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?
• 2003-05-02 14:59 Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?
• 2003-05-02 15:07 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 15:22 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 15:45 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 16:23 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-06 17:32 Re: GCC 3.3 Prerelease

Paul Koning

• 2003-05-01 21:04 Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?
• 2003-05-02 13:23 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 15:08 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 15:27 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-08 22:08 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-09 13:25 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-09 18:15 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-12 16:59 Re: building a gcc-3.3-prerelease cross-compiler
• 2003-05-13 01:04 Re: alignment: store_one_arg vs emit_push_insn
• 2003-05-16 22:10 Re: PROPOSAL: Policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-19 13:08 Re: PROPOSAL: Variation on an Alternate policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-19 13:15 Re: PROPOSAL: Policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-19 13:20 Re: Warning for trigraphs in comment?
• 2003-05-19 14:35 Re: Warning for trigraphs in comment?
• 2003-05-19 14:51 Re: Warning for trigraphs in comment?

Pearson, Scott

• 2003-05-08 20:05 RE: __attribute__((constructor)), shared object files and C++...

Peter Barada

• 2003-05-16 16:31 Re: PROPOSAL: Policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-19 00:38 Re: PROPOSAL: Policy for obsoleting targets
• 2003-05-20 05:32 failure building gcc-3.3 (broken libiberty/vsprintf.c or build?)
• 2003-05-21 03:45 Re: failure building gcc-3.3 (broken libiberty/vsprintf.c or build?)
• 2003-05-21 06:34 Re: failure building gcc-3.3 (broken libiberty/vsprintf.c or build?)
• 2003-05-21 15:09 Re: failure building gcc-3.3 (broken libiberty/vsprintf.c or build?)
• 2003-05-21 16:46 Re: Different addressing modes?
• 2003-05-22 03:08 Re: failure building gcc-3.3 (broken libiberty/vsprintf.c or build?)
• 2003-05-22 13:27 Re: failure building gcc-3.3 (broken libiberty/vsprintf.c or build?)
• 2003-05-23 03:11 Re: failure building gcc-3.3 (broken libiberty/vsprintf.c or build?)
• 2003-05-23 17:59 Re: failure building gcc-3.3 (broken libiberty/vsprintf.c or build?)
• 2003-05-23 18:22 Re: failure building gcc-3.3 (broken libiberty/vsprintf.c or build?)
• 2003-05-27 15:26 Re: How to define predicates for the particular set of registers?
• 2003-05-30 19:04 Re: Cross Compiler and Linker for Linux

Peter Kovar

• 2003-05-22 12:56 cmov in asm()

phil

• 2003-05-08 20:57 downloading GCC documentation

Phil Edwards

• 2003-05-01 20:42 Re: Compilation time (was Re: GCC 3.3)
• 2003-05-02 16:47 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 17:06 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 17:12 Re: Warnings about rcs_id strings: let's settle this
• 2003-05-05 19:20 Re: GNATS survey
• 2003-05-05 20:50 Re: GNATS survey
• 2003-05-07 18:04 Re: draft release notes for gcc 3.3
• 2003-05-07 21:43 Re: draft release notes for gcc 3.3
• 2003-05-07 21:45 Re: draft release notes for gcc 3.3
• 2003-05-08 20:07 Re: __attribute__((constructor)), shared object files and C++...
• 2003-05-09 01:32 Re: GCC 3.3 Prerelease
• 2003-05-09 18:19 Re: srcdir == objdir build issues [SC take note]
• 2003-05-09 18:22 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-09 18:54 Re: srcdir == objdir build issues [SC take note]
• 2003-05-11 00:43 Re: srcdir == objdir build issues [SC take note]
• 2003-05-15 19:48 Re: The great gnats->bugzilla switchover
• 2003-05-21 21:21 Re: BUGZILLA: Default no auto-mail for CC: changes
• 2003-05-23 20:48 Re: Old bug: the 14-character limit.
• 2003-05-29 19:46 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]
• 2003-05-30 01:22 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]

Piotr Wyderski

• 2003-05-02 12:05 Optimization

Qiong Cai

• 2003-05-07 17:54 Re: tree-ssa branch: Call for preliminary testing
• 2003-05-09 01:20 [tree-ssa]porofiling available
• 2003-05-09 01:31 Re: tree-ssa branch: Call for preliminary testing
• 2003-05-26 04:26 [GCOV] SPEC 2000: VORTEX and profiling

Raimonds Cicans

• 2003-05-12 15:45 Bizarre addressing modes
• 2003-05-19 10:35 Questions about HAVE_POST_MODIFY_REG

Rainer Orth

• 2003-05-23 16:53 Strange mails from Bugzilla

Rakesh Kumar - Software, Noida

• 2003-05-12 11:00 Embedded Side-Effects

Ralf Corsepius

• 2003-05-07 06:44 Re: GCJ and $PREFIX/include

ramana

• 2003-05-07 09:37 bootstrap fails i686pclinuxgnu for libstdc++-v3
• 2003-05-07 09:38 bootstrap fails i686pclinuxgnu for libstdc++-v3

Randy Rude

• 2003-05-21 14:40 Re: failure building gcc-3.3 (broken libiberty/vsprintf.c or build?)
• 2003-05-21 16:56 Re: failure building gcc-3.3 (broken libiberty/vsprintf.c or build?)
• 2003-05-22 14:59 Re: failure building gcc-3.3 (broken libiberty/vsprintf.c or build?)
• 2003-05-23 19:37 Re: failure building gcc-3.3 (broken libiberty/vsprintf.c or build?)

Ranjit Mathew

• 2003-05-07 06:46 Re: PR 10656 and PR 10657
• 2003-05-07 10:18 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-08 07:49 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-09 09:23 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-09 09:54 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-20 04:24 Re: MinGW (Was: Re: PROPOSAL: Variation on an Alternate policy forobsoleting targets)
• 2003-05-20 04:49 Re: Heads up: today's GCC snapshot
• 2003-05-21 05:54 Re: Heads up: today's GCC snapshot
• 2003-05-27 04:48 Re: Today's snapshot
• 2003-05-27 10:01 Re: Today's snapshot

RenE J.V. Bertin

• 2003-05-15 17:47 gcc 3.2x under irix6.3 (R5000)

Rene Rebe

• 2003-05-12 12:00 building a gcc-3.3-prerelease cross-compiler
• 2003-05-12 13:59 unresolvable R_PPC_ADDR32 relocation against symbol
• 2003-05-12 16:51 Re: building a gcc-3.3-prerelease cross-compiler
• 2003-05-12 17:24 Re: unresolvable R_PPC_ADDR32 relocation against symbol
• 2003-05-12 19:24 Re: building a gcc-3.3-prerelease cross-compiler
• 2003-05-13 16:07 Re: building a gcc-3.3-prerelease cross-compiler
• 2003-05-13 19:44 Re: building a gcc-3.3-prerelease cross-compiler
• 2003-05-13 22:14 Re: building a gcc-3.3-prerelease cross-compiler

Rich

• 2003-05-22 22:05 Need help with object files.

Richard B. Kreckel

• 2003-05-11 22:01 Does anybody really know which pass it is?

Richard Earnshaw

• 2003-05-09 14:27 Re: RFC: using clz for comparing to zero on the tree level.
• 2003-05-09 15:04 Re: RFC: using clz for comparing to zero on the tree level.
• 2003-05-09 15:47 Re: RFC: using clz for comparing to zero on the tree level.
• 2003-05-10 12:07 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-12 09:07 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-23 10:26 Bugzilla and gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
• 2003-05-29 09:28 Re: md description for intruction that modifies multiple operands
• 2003-05-29 17:13 Re: md description for intruction that modifies multiple operands
• 2003-05-29 17:20 Re: md description for intruction that modifies multiple operands
• 2003-05-30 09:24 Re: md description for intruction that modifies multiple operands
• 2003-05-30 09:27 Re: Unaligned half-word load (ARM)
• 2003-05-30 10:14 Re: md description for intruction that modifies multiple operands

Richard Guenther

• 2003-05-03 16:56 Re: Vector modes and C++ not supported?
• 2003-05-03 17:45 Re: GCC inline parameters (PR 10160 testcase)
• 2003-05-04 20:45 Re: Experimenting with tree inliner parameter settings
• 2003-05-05 07:26 Re: Experimenting with tree inliner parameter settings
• 2003-05-05 08:49 Re: Experimenting with tree inliner parameter settings
• 2003-05-07 17:40 Inlining again...
• 2003-05-07 18:17 Re: Inlining again...
• 2003-05-07 19:22 Re: Inlining again...
• 2003-05-07 20:46 Another inlining idea
• 2003-05-11 17:11 Re: tree-ssa branch: Call for preliminary testing
• 2003-05-11 17:45 Turning warning "returning reference to temporary" into error?
• 2003-05-11 18:59 Re: Turning warning "returning reference to temporary" into error?
• 2003-05-11 19:47 Re: Turning warning "returning reference to temporary" into error?
• 2003-05-11 20:44 Re: Turning warning "returning reference to temporary" into error?
• 2003-05-12 06:59 Re: Turning warning "returning reference to temporary" into error?
• 2003-05-12 09:19 How to report bugs which testcase requires linking a library?
• 2003-05-12 13:02 Re: tree-ssa branch: Call for preliminary testing
• 2003-05-12 13:49 Re: tree-ssa branch: Call for preliminary testing
• 2003-05-18 12:18 Inlining cut-off limit in 3.3
• 2003-05-18 12:24 Re: Inlining cut-off limit in 3.3
• 2003-05-18 15:46 Huge compile time & run time performance regression 3.3 -> HEAD
• 2003-05-18 18:54 Re: Huge compile time & run time performance regression 3.3 -> HEAD
• 2003-05-18 19:22 Re: Huge compile time & run time performance regression 3.3 -> HEAD
• 2003-05-18 19:34 Re: Huge compile time & run time performance regression 3.3 -> HEAD
• 2003-05-18 21:38 C aliasing rules question.
• 2003-05-19 18:49 Re: Huge compile time & run time performance regression 3.3 -> HEAD
• 2003-05-19 20:43 Re: Huge compile time & run time performance regression 3.3 -> HEAD
• 2003-05-19 21:09 Re: Huge compile time & run time performance regression 3.3 -> HEAD
• 2003-05-19 21:14 Re: Huge compile time & run time performance regression 3.3 -> HEAD

Richard Henderson

• 2003-05-01 00:05 Re: Using mem_attrs to get the tree of a function being called?
• 2003-05-01 00:22 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-01 16:50 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-01 17:38 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-01 17:49 Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?
• 2003-05-01 21:00 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 02:46 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 02:51 Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?
• 2003-05-02 04:14 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 04:26 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 20:11 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 20:14 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 20:31 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-02 23:08 Re: Optimization
• 2003-05-02 23:13 Re: Warnings about rcs_id strings: let's settle this
• 2003-05-03 01:14 Re: Optimization
• 2003-05-03 19:02 Re: Interleaving pthread_cleanups in C and C++
• 2003-05-03 19:42 Re: Warnings about rcs_id strings: let's settle this
• 2003-05-04 02:39 Re: Interleaving pthread_cleanups in C and C++
• 2003-05-04 08:13 Re: Interleaving pthread_cleanups in C and C++
• 2003-05-04 22:40 Re: Interleaving pthread_cleanups in C and C++
• 2003-05-05 05:51 Re: x86 64 bit function argument bug?
• 2003-05-05 18:19 Re: strict_low_part question
• 2003-05-05 22:34 Re: -Wstrict-prototypes and void foo () {}
• 2003-05-06 10:26 Re: Using mem_attrs to get the tree of a function being called?
• 2003-05-06 17:07 Re: strict_low_part question
• 2003-05-06 18:15 Re: analysis: alpha bootstrap failure on mainline
• 2003-05-06 21:59 Re: GCC 3.3 Prelease broken on s390
• 2003-05-06 22:22 Re: GCC target-specific extension
• 2003-05-06 23:19 Re: GCC 3.3 Prelease broken on s390
• 2003-05-06 23:20 Re: GCC target-specific extension
• 2003-05-06 23:42 Re: GCC 3.3 Prelease broken on s390
• 2003-05-06 23:43 Re: If-conversion and conditional move.
• 2003-05-07 00:14 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-07 01:16 Re: GCC target-specific extension
• 2003-05-07 01:22 Re: GCC 3.3 Prelease broken on s390
• 2003-05-07 01:27 Re: GCC 3.3 Prelease broken on s390
• 2003-05-07 08:17 Re: GCC target-specific extension
• 2003-05-07 17:51 Re: GCC 3.3 Prelease broken on s390
• 2003-05-07 18:23 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-07 18:31 Re: a progression 3.2.2 -> 3.2.3 -- is there a testcase?
• 2003-05-07 18:38 Re: If-conversion and conditional move.
• 2003-05-07 22:30 Re: Your ia64 patch may have broken libjava
• 2003-05-07 23:15 Re: volatile [was: GCC warnings for unused global variables]
• 2003-05-08 05:31 Re: RFC: using clz for comparing to zero on the tree level.
• 2003-05-08 16:29 Re: RFC: using clz for comparing to zero on the tree level.
• 2003-05-08 17:56 Re: RFC: using clz for comparing to zero on the tree level.
• 2003-05-08 20:49 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-08 21:21 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-08 21:24 Re: analysis #2: alpha bootstrap failure on mainline
• 2003-05-08 22:04 Re: Local binding DECLs
• 2003-05-09 03:36 Re: RFC: using clz for comparing to zero on the tree level.
• 2003-05-09 21:04 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-09 21:12 Re: Getting knowledge of common declarations at the time they are declared in the source
• 2003-05-10 00:05 Re: alignment: store_one_arg vs emit_push_insn
• 2003-05-12 01:15 Re: Local binding DECLs
• 2003-05-12 01:26 Re: new register allocator and HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED
• 2003-05-12 01:28 Re: USE insn and new register allocator
• 2003-05-12 03:54 Re: alignment: store_one_arg vs emit_push_insn
• 2003-05-12 17:15 Re: Local binding DECLs
• 2003-05-12 19:41 Re: alignment: store_one_arg vs emit_push_insn
• 2003-05-12 20:15 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-12 23:14 Re: alignment: store_one_arg vs emit_push_insn
• 2003-05-13 21:25 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-13 21:27 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-13 22:11 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-13 22:14 Re: Dead-code elimination can't remove string copy insns?
• 2003-05-13 22:16 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-14 07:41 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-14 07:56 Re: libjava failed to build on ia64
• 2003-05-14 22:20 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-14 23:27 Re: PATCH: Optimize protected call for i386
• 2003-05-15 00:42 Re: PATCH: Optimize protected call for i386
• 2003-05-15 00:44 Re: PATCH: Optimize protected call for i386
• 2003-05-15 01:04 Re: PATCH: Fix the relax finalize pass
• 2003-05-15 05:40 Re: PATCH: Fix the relax finalize pass
• 2003-05-15 22:20 Re: [tree-ssa] copy propagation and the abstraction penalty
• 2003-05-16 06:35 Re: Varargs elimination!?
• 2003-05-17 00:45 Re: Does gcc violate the ia64 ABI?
• 2003-05-17 18:18 Re: Does gcc violate the ia64 ABI?
• 2003-05-18 00:02 Re: Does gcc violate the ia64 ABI?
• 2003-05-19 05:42 Re: Does gcc violate the ia64 ABI?
• 2003-05-19 20:24 Re: Does gcc violate the ia64 ABI?
• 2003-05-19 20:43 Re: shared libgcc test question
• 2003-05-21 02:06 Re: Does gcc violate the ia64 ABI?
• 2003-05-22 22:13 Re: cmov in asm()
• 2003-05-23 19:09 Re: gcc and the IA64 ABI

Richard Kenner

• 2003-05-02 10:26 Re: ARC/Argonaut questions
• 2003-05-09 11:53 Re: Fix handling of call clobbering readonly-result
• 2003-05-09 12:12 An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-09 14:01 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-09 14:10 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-09 15:36 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-09 16:08 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-09 16:18 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-09 21:36 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-09 22:17 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-09 22:26 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-09 22:30 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-09 22:51 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-09 23:13 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-10 02:21 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-10 02:24 Re: alignment: store_one_arg vs emit_push_insn
• 2003-05-10 12:22 Re: Add new target: vxworks for xscale
• 2003-05-10 14:49 Re: Add new target: vxworks for xscale
• 2003-05-10 14:54 Re: Add new target: vxworks for xscale
• 2003-05-10 15:29 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-10 16:49 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-10 17:04 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-10 17:35 Re: Add new target: vxworks for xscale
• 2003-05-10 18:08 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-10 18:12 Re: Add new target: vxworks for xscale
• 2003-05-10 21:21 Re: Add new target: vxworks for xscale
• 2003-05-11 11:31 Re: alignment: store_one_arg vs emit_push_insn
• 2003-05-11 14:49 Re: alignment: store_one_arg vs emit_push_insn
• 2003-05-11 19:58 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-12 11:16 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-12 16:25 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-12 20:36 Re: RFC/Ada: removal of $(ADAC) support
• 2003-05-12 21:08 Re: RFC/Ada: removal of $(ADAC) support
• 2003-05-12 21:27 Re: RFC/Ada: removal of $(ADAC) support
• 2003-05-12 21:47 Re: RFC/Ada: removal of $(ADAC) support
• 2003-05-12 22:14 Re: RFC/Ada: removal of $(ADAC) support
• 2003-05-12 22:21 Re: RFC/Ada: removal of $(ADAC) support
• 2003-05-12 23:11 Re: RFC/Ada: removal of $(ADAC) support
• 2003-05-13 01:12 Re: RFC/Ada: removal of $(ADAC) support
• 2003-05-13 01:14 Re: Upgrade from 2.9 to 3.x?
• 2003-05-13 13:17 Re: [tree-ssa] Out of SSA status and issues
• 2003-05-13 13:42 Re: [tree-ssa] Out of SSA status and issues
• 2003-05-13 15:21 Re: RFC/Ada: removal of $(ADAC)
• 2003-05-13 15:23 Re: [tree-ssa] Out of SSA status and issues
• 2003-05-13 15:52 Re: RFC/Ada: removal of $(ADAC)
• 2003-05-13 21:33 Re: __attribute__((cleanup(function)) versus try/finally
• 2003-05-16 21:42 CONFIG2_H stuff in config/mips/t-*
• 2003-05-30 13:26 Re: md description for intruction that modifies multiple operands
• 2003-05-30 22:19 Re: reload vs adds with clobbers
• 2003-05-30 22:22 Re: reload vs adds with clobbers

Richard Sandiford

• 2003-05-20 18:41 Re: Testsuite custom environment

Richard Stallman

• 2003-05-22 08:34 Re: Manual contributions and copyright assignments

Ritchard Nash

• 2003-05-27 22:19 Error on va_start and non-POD type

Ritu Sabharwal

• 2003-05-30 10:30 Problem with Gcc Installation on HP-UX Itanium box

Rob Savoye

• 2003-05-19 15:54 Re: PATCH: Fix "proc find" in dejagnu
• 2003-05-24 15:46 Re: PATCH: Fix "proc find" in dejagnu
• 2003-05-24 16:26 Re: PATCH: Fix "proc find" in dejagnu

Robert Dewar

• 2003-05-01 11:05 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-03 03:17 Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?
• 2003-05-03 05:47 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-03 05:59 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-04 15:41 Re: x86 64 bit function argument bug?
• 2003-05-12 07:23 Re: Turning warning "returning reference to temporary" into error?
• 2003-05-12 11:23 Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables
• 2003-05-12 11:36 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-12 11:37 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-12 22:03 Re: RFC/Ada: removal of $(ADAC) support
• 2003-05-12 22:05 Re: RFC/Ada: removal of $(ADAC) support
• 2003-05-12 22:14 Re: RFC/Ada: removal of $(ADAC) support
• 2003-05-14 21:38 Re: strict-aliasing and typedefs
• 2003-05-14 23:10 Re: strict-aliasing and typedefs
• 2003-05-16 02:03 Re: gcc 3.3 release notes addendum: Ada bugs were missing
• 2003-05-16 12:27 Re: gcc 3.3 release notes addendum: Ada bugs were missing
• 2003-05-20 22:08 Re: "obvious" requirements
• 2003-05-24 14:23 Re: Libiberty license roundup (questions/potential problems)
• 2003-05-28 22:11 Re: Libiberty license roundup (questions/potential problems)
• 2003-05-28 22:23 Re: Libiberty license roundup (questions/potential problems)
• 2003-05-29 21:43 Re: Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]

Robert Harris

• 2003-05-04 20:21 gcc on pic micro
• 2003-05-04 20:22 gcc on pic micro
• 2003-05-04 20:39 gcc on pic micro

Robert Myers

• 2003-05-11 02:06 Re: Gcc build

Robert Schiele

• 2003-05-16 06:31 test suite creates lines with CR+LF instead of CR only (was: problems with test result report for i486-suse-linux-gnu)

Robert Schweikert

• 2003-05-10 00:21 off-topic traceback weirdness
• 2003-05-10 10:20 Re: off-topic traceback weirdness

Roger Sayle

• 2003-05-06 14:37 analysis: alpha bootstrap failure on mainline
• 2003-05-07 04:02 analysis #2: alpha bootstrap failure on mainline
• 2003-05-07 14:17 Re: analysis #2: alpha bootstrap failure on mainline
• 2003-05-07 18:25 Re: analysis #2: alpha bootstrap failure on mainline
• 2003-05-13 14:36 Re: RFC/Ada: removal of $(ADAC)
• 2003-05-13 15:50 Re: RFC/Ada: removal of $(ADAC)
• 2003-05-19 13:40 Re: Bootstrap failure on ia64
• 2003-05-19 16:38 Re: Bootstrap failure on ia64
• 2003-05-24 14:05 Minor C/C++ parser clean-up request
• 2003-05-26 00:06 C++: Anticipated declaration of builtins.
• 2003-05-26 02:17 Re: C++: Anticipated declaration of builtins.

Roger.Gough

• 2003-05-02 10:41 Minimal machine description file
• 2003-05-19 15:27 problem when making a new target
• 2003-05-23 14:55 Re: problem when making a new target
• 2003-05-27 09:07 Macros being updated??

Roman Belenov

• 2003-05-15 07:54 Cross compiler (alpha-linux on cygwin host) build problems

Ronald Oussoren

• 2003-05-16 20:55 Libffi problem on darwin (MacOSX)
• 2003-05-17 06:03 Re: Libffi problem on darwin (MacOSX)
• 2003-05-25 20:44 Re: Libffi problem on darwin (MacOSX)
• 2003-05-26 05:24 Re: Libffi problem on darwin (MacOSX)

Russ Allbery

• 2003-05-09 15:10 Re: What is the relationship between GCC and Cygnus / Red Hat?

Ryan T. Sammartino

• 2003-05-05 20:47 Backporting pch support to 3.2?

S kris

• 2003-05-27 14:14 Naked Functions

S. Bosscher

• 2003-05-11 21:52 RE: Suggestion for a new GNATS policy
• 2003-05-20 10:12 GCC infrastructure and non-GPLed optimizers

Sander

• 2003-05-30 12:27 gcc 3.3 build on SuSE Linux 8.0 for buildstat.html

Sanjiv Kumar Gupta, Noida

• 2003-05-05 11:52 RE: Redundant Load Elimination in GCSE
• 2003-05-05 12:20 RE: Redundant Load Elimination in GCSE

Scott Dudley

• 2003-05-19 18:41 building an i686-to-m88k cross-compiler

Scott Robert Ladd

• 2003-05-09 20:30 Re: An issue for the SC: horrible documentation quality of GCC
• 2003-05-12 17:56 Re: Upgrade from 2.9 to 3.x?
• 2003-05-12 23:33 Re: Upgrade from 2.9 to 3.x?
• 2003-05-13 02:24 Re: Upgrade from 2.9 to 3.x?
• 2003-05-14 14:31 Re: library
• 2003-05-15 13:54 Successful Build, GCC 3.3, Debian unstable, beta Linux kernel
• 2003-05-19 19:01 State of C99 _Complex?
• 2003-05-19 22:40 Re: State of C99 _Complex?
• 2003-05-20 04:27 Re: State of C99 _Complex?

Scott Wheeler

• 2003-05-01 21:07 Re: Compilation time (was Re: GCC 3.3)

Segher Boessenkool

• 2003-05-03 01:18 Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?
• 2003-05-24 01:37 A few suggestions for bugzilla mail to gcc-bugs
• 2003-05-24 03:09 Re: A few suggestions for bugzilla mail to gcc-bugs
• 2003-05-29 01:29 Re: BUG: printf formatting libc.so.6

Shaun Jackman

• 2003-05-29 17:52 Unaligned half-word load (ARM)

Shrisha Rao

• 2003-05-15 01:32 gcc 3.3 successfully installed on PowerPC MacOSX 10.2.6/Darwin 6.6
• 2003-05-17 00:02 gcc 3.3 installed on GNU/Linux Mandrake 8.0 (kernel 2.4.3)

Simon Law

• 2003-05-22 02:31 Re: HEADS UP: GCC manual soon to be printed

smills_ho

• 2003-05-09 02:04 Problem of cross-mipsel-compiler GLIBC-2.3.X
• 2003-05-09 08:10 Re: Problem of cross-mipsel-compiler GLIBC-2.3.X

Stan Shebs

• 2003-05-02 21:56 Warning controls (was Re: Warnings about rcs_id strings: let's settlethis)
• 2003-05-06 18:14 Re: Backporting pch support to 3.2?
• 2003-05-26 17:12 Re: Darwin multilibs
• 2003-05-27 05:20 Re: Darwin multilibs

Stephan Jau

• 2003-05-13 10:23 New Mirror

Stephan T. Lavavej

• 2003-05-19 22:37 MinGW (Was: Re: PROPOSAL: Variation on an Alternate policy for obsoleting targets)
• 2003-05-20 00:33 Re: MinGW (Was: Re: PROPOSAL: Variation on an Alternate policy for obsoleting targets)
• 2003-05-20 20:00 Documentation Buglets
• 2003-05-20 20:13 RE: Documentation Buglets (-fssa)
• 2003-05-21 22:11 Re: HEADS UP: GCC manual soon to be printed