This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GNAT and NPTL (3.3?)

From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie at shareable dot org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch at infradead dot org>, Arnaud Charlet <charlet at ACT-Europe dot FR>, Laurent Guerby <guerby at acm dot org>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 09:38:48 +0200
Subject: Re: GNAT and NPTL (3.3?)
References: <1051613443.12698.72.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20030429125857.B16060@dublin.int.act-europe.fr> <20030429120606.A27415@infradead.org> <20030430073427.GA13859@mail.jlokier.co.uk>
Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>

On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 08:34:27AM +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > if you have i686+ cpu and a kernel with threading monster patch (or a 2.5
> > kernel) it'll use nptl, else linuxthreads.
> 
> Do you know why it doesn't use nptl for lesser cpus?

NPTL doesn't support i386 (because of lack of cmpxchg, only supports i486+),
and we ship only i386 and i686 variants.

	Jakub

References:
- GNAT and NPTL (3.3?)
  - From: Laurent Guerby
- Re: GNAT and NPTL (3.3?)
  - From: Arnaud Charlet
- Re: GNAT and NPTL (3.3?)
  - From: Christoph Hellwig
- Re: GNAT and NPTL (3.3?)
  - From: Jamie Lokier

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]