This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Release Quality Control (was: DOC PATCH: GCC 3.2.3 releaseschedule)
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>
- To: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
- Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 23:17:12 +0100 (BST)
- Subject: Re: Release Quality Control (was: DOC PATCH: GCC 3.2.3 releaseschedule)
- References: <m2smt94zp4.fsf@dromion.integrable-solutions.net><Pine.BSF.4.53.0303271125000.52344@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at><m34r5pozaq.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net><Pine.BSF.4.53.0304062337430.8835@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
On Sun, 6 Apr 2003, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Until now, we basically said ``Nobody has complained that the release
> branch is broken on his platform, so let's go'' while we should wait
> to receive positive confirmation for every single primary and secondary
> platform (with a timeout for secondary platforms, but none for primary
> platforms).
Positive confirmation with testresults for the current testsuite on both
the to-be-released version and the previous versions mentioned in the
release criteria relative to which there are meant to be no regressions?
This used to be done and we should at least try to avoid regressions that
the testsuite shows up.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk