gcc archive
date index for March, 2003

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

March 31, 2003
22:32 Delay in bugzilla switchover Daniel Berlin
22:15 Re: tree-ssa -fmudflap problems Eyal Lebedinsky
21:44 Re: 3.3 PRs Jan Hubicka
21:39 Re: review process Geoff Keating
21:32 Re: 3.3 PRs Mark Mitchell
21:22 Re: 3.3 PRs Jan Hubicka
21:11 Re: compiler error Phil Edwards
21:03 compiler error Morris Muller
21:02 Re: [PATCH] Duplicate entries in contrib.texi Janis Johnson
20:19 Re: PR 8730 Richard Kenner
20:16 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover Robert Dewar
20:08 Re: PR 8730 Mark Mitchell
20:07 Re: PR 8730 Richard Kenner
20:06 PR 8730 Mark Mitchell
20:03 Re: review process Alexandre Oliva
20:02 GCC installation on several machines Christian Jendeberg
19:54 Re: RFA: Ada variable-sized objects, bit_size_type == TImode, and divti3 Richard Kenner
19:52 Re: review process Daniel Berlin
19:41 Re: Patch approval process suggestion Bruce Korb
19:33 Re: review process Alexandre Oliva
19:24 Re: RFC: new rtl vec_set_unit/vec_get_unit Aldy Hernandez
18:59 Re: review process Richard Henderson
18:47 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover Phil Edwards
18:45 Re: review process Nathanael Nerode
18:42 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover Daniel Berlin
18:34 3.3 PRs Mark Mitchell
18:22 Re: record_effective_endpoints Richard Henderson
18:13 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover Phil Edwards
18:13 Re: [PATCH] Duplicate entries in contrib.texi Mike Stump
17:58 Re: review process Daniel Berlin
17:50 Re: review process Tom Tromey
17:40 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover Daniel Berlin
17:13 gcc-ss-20030331 is now available gccadmin
16:49 Re: c++ question Joe Buck
16:42 Re: review process Phil Edwards
16:15 Re: what is the meaning of '*'? Jason Thorpe
16:06 Re: review process Daniel Berlin
15:45 Re: Building OpenOffice with GCJ? Tom Tromey
15:29 record_effective_endpoints Kiran Kumar
14:40 Re: tree-ssa -fmudflap problems Frank Ch. Eigler
13:36 RE: [gnu.org #23233] FSF 3.3 GCC release Gerald Pfeifer
10:08 infinite loop in find_rgns Sanjiv Kumar Gupta, Noida
09:23 Peephole2 Null Patterns Shiv Sheshgiri
09:22 Re: Building OpenOffice with GCJ? Jakub Jelinek
09:08 RE: Building OpenOffice with GCJ? S. Bosscher
08:46 Building OpenOffice with GCJ? Gerald Pfeifer
08:38 Passes for a new porting gabriele
07:47 Re: review process Gerald Pfeifer
07:22 a problem with weak and alias attributes Ramana Radhakrishnan
06:35 Re: long long bit-fields Falk Hueffner
05:17 Re: what is the meaning of '*'? Segher Boessenkool
05:17 Re: long long bit-fields Segher Boessenkool

March 30, 2003
23:14 Re: Java/parellel build(?) related bootstrap failure Andrew Haley
22:09 Re: Java/parellel build(?) related bootstrap failure Gerald Pfeifer
22:08 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite Kai Henningsen
22:02 what is the meaning of '*'? Gabriele Caracausi
19:14 Re: Converting to ISO C89 Mark Mitchell
19:10 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite Richard Kenner
15:46 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite Robert Dewar
15:31 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite Laurent Guerby
14:55 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite Andreas Jaeger
14:47 Re: Java/parellel build(?) related bootstrap failure Andreas Jaeger
12:45 long long bit-fields Falk Hueffner
12:20 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite Arnaud Charlet
12:17 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite Arnaud Charlet
10:31 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite Laurent Guerby
10:20 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite Andreas Jaeger
09:51 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite Arnaud Charlet
08:20 Re: Converting to ISO C89 Gabriel Dos Reis
07:36 Re: Problems with gcc on Darwin/Mac OS X Geoff Keating
05:17 Visite a Disney Disney
03:26 Re: sparcv9 or sparc64 for solaris2.9? Richard Henderson
02:03 tree-ssa -fmudflap problems Eyal Lebedinsky

March 29, 2003
19:51 Re: Cerr error Paolo Carlini
19:48 Cerr error Hermione Granger
17:49 Re: Java/parellel build(?) related bootstrap failure Tom Tromey
17:16 Bootstrap failure building libjava on sparc-solaris2 caused by fix-header Kaveh R. Ghazi
17:12 Re: Ada: Bootstrap failure on i386-unknown-freebsd4.7 Laurent Guerby
16:43 c++ question gs01han
16:20 Re: 64-bit Solaris and shared libraries Anthony Green
15:51 [PATCH] Duplicate entries in contrib.texi Roger Sayle
15:44 Bootstrap failure on ia64 Andreas Schwab
15:11 Re: Java/parellel build(?) related bootstrap failure Andreas Jaeger
15:11 Re: Ada: Bootstrap failure on i386-unknown-freebsd4.7 Ritzert
14:04 Re: improving testing scheme (was Re: ACATS and GCC testsuite) Richard Kenner
13:45 Re: C++: Why do we nreverse CLASSTYPE_TAGS Gabriel Dos Reis
13:28 Re: improving testing scheme (was Re: ACATS and GCC testsuite) Robert Dewar
12:25 Java/parellel build(?) related bootstrap failure Gerald Pfeifer
11:47 RE: First scheduling pass Sanjiv Kumar Gupta, Noida
11:22 Re: improving testing scheme (was Re: ACATS and GCC testsuite) Richard Kenner
09:49 Re: new unroller vs ppc Zdenek Dvorak
09:16 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite Laurent Guerby
08:48 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite Arnaud Charlet
08:43 Re: improving testing scheme (was Re: ACATS and GCC testsuite) Laurent Guerby
08:32 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite Laurent Guerby
08:27 Re: 64-bit Solaris and shared libraries Jakub Jelinek
05:19 Re: SPEC2000 252.eon generates invalid results when compiled -O3with g++ 3.3 Andreas Jaeger
03:04 64-bit Solaris and shared libraries Anthony Green
02:58 Re: sparcv9 or sparc64 for solaris2.9? Kaveh R. Ghazi
01:17 Re: new unroller vs ppc David Edelsohn
00:27 Re: sparcv9 or sparc64 for solaris2.9? Richard Henderson

March 28, 2003
23:57 Re: SPEC2000 252.eon generates invalid results when compiled -O3 with g++ 3.3 Jan Hubicka
23:46 Re: SPEC2000 252.eon generates invalid results when compiled -O3 with g++ 3.3 Jan Hubicka
23:28 Re: sparcv9 or sparc64 for solaris2.9? Kaveh R. Ghazi
23:25 improving testing scheme (was Re: ACATS and GCC testsuite) Nathanael Nerode
22:07 Re: Namespace for <cfoo> headers incorrect? Daniel Jacobowitz
21:57 Re: Namespace for <cfoo> headers incorrect? Mike Stump
21:43 Re: SPEC2000 252.eon generates invalid results when compiled -O3 with g++ 3.3 Casey Leedom
21:23 sparcv9 or sparc64 for solaris2.9? Andreas Tobler
20:42 Namespace for <cfoo> headers incorrect? Eric Lemings
19:49 New Videos on Trannylife.com Sarah Staar
19:48 New Videos on Trannylife.com Sarah Staar
19:46 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite Laurent Guerby
19:19 Re: Exceptions in 2.7.2 Richard Henderson
18:52 Re: Stab string field for array types Ian Lance Taylor
18:30 Re: Microchip Porting... HELP! Mike Stump
16:29 Re: __STDC__ == 0 in System Headers on Solaris? Eric Botcazou
15:00 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite Geert Bosch
14:59 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover Gerald Pfeifer
14:57 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite Daniel Jacobowitz
14:53 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite Richard Kenner
14:50 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite Daniel Jacobowitz
14:47 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite Daniel Jacobowitz
13:59 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite Robert Dewar
12:06 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite Laurent Guerby
12:03 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite Matthieu Moy
11:58 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite Richard Kenner
11:56 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite Laurent Guerby
11:52 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite Richard Kenner
11:50 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite Laurent Guerby
11:40 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite Richard Kenner
11:36 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite Laurent Guerby
11:35 Re: SPEC2000 252.eon generates invalid results when compiled -O3 with g++ 3.3 Jan Hubicka
10:53 Microchip Porting... HELP! Gabriele Caracausi
10:37 Stab string field for array types Ludovic Courtès
10:36 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite Richard Kenner
08:47 Exceptions in 2.7.2 Aloy
07:49 Re: Ada: Bootstrap failure on i386-unknown-freebsd4.7 Michael Ritzert
07:29 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite Laurent Guerby
07:09 Compiler directed Page coloring Sarnath Kannan
04:21 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover Christopher Faylor
04:07 Re: Lapack test suite results for gcc 3.3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu POSchmid
02:12 Problems with "make check" Richard Kenner
01:21 Re: SPEC2000 252.eon generates invalid results when compiled -O3 with g++ 3.3 Jan Hubicka
00:58 What autogen is needed for GCC? Nathanael Nerode
00:19 Re: First scheduling pass Ayal Zaks
00:04 Re: SPEC2000 252.eon generates invalid results when compiled -O3 with g++ 3.3 Casey Leedom
00:03 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite Geert Bosch

March 27, 2003
23:49 Re: REQ_EQUAL and mems hoisted out of loops Richard Henderson
23:47 hey papi tammy
23:38 Re: SPEC2000 252.eon generates invalid results when compiled -O3 with g++ 3.3 Vladimir Makarov
23:29 Re: SPEC2000 252.eon generates invalid results when compiled -O3 with g++ 3.3 Casey Leedom
23:24 Re: SPEC2000 252.eon generates invalid results when compiled -O3 with g++ 3.3 Jan Hubicka
23:21 Re: RFC: new rtl vec_set_unit/vec_get_unit Jan Hubicka
23:04 Re: SPEC2000 252.eon generates invalid results when compiled -O3 with g++ 3.3 Casey Leedom
22:42 Re: SPEC2000 252.eon generates invalid results when compiled -O3 with g++ 3.3 Joe Buck
22:35 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite Laurent Guerby
22:10 ACATS & GCC testsuite (Was Re: Ada: Bootstrap failure on i386-unknown-freebsd4.7) Arnaud Charlet
22:07 Re: Ada: Bootstrap failure on i386-unknown-freebsd4.7 Laurent Guerby
21:35 SPEC2000 252.eon generates invalid results when compiled -O3 with g++ 3.3 Casey Leedom
21:17 RFC: new rtl vec_set_unit/vec_get_unit Aldy Hernandez
20:39 Re: Problem with TLS initialization Christian Parpart
20:38 Re: First scheduling pass Vladimir Makarov
20:19 Re: First scheduling pass Vladimir Makarov
20:18 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover Joe Buck
19:37 Don't generate a new SYMBOL_REF in write_resource_constructor Andrew Haley
19:15 Re: Problem with TLS initialization Richard Henderson
19:07 Re: First scheduling pass Richard Henderson
19:05 Re: First scheduling pass Richard Henderson
18:12 Re: Should typedef'd unnamed structs be supported? Philipp Thomas
17:55 Re: First scheduling pass Dale Johannesen
16:37 gcc question Rick Albright
16:35 __STDC__ == 0 in System Headers on Solaris? Jeffery Cavallaro
15:42 Re: First scheduling pass David Edelsohn
15:01 Re: DFA scheduling bug? Vladimir Makarov
14:45 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover Christopher Faylor
11:24 Problem with TLS initialization Manish Makkar
11:17 RE: First scheduling pass Sanjiv Kumar Gupta, Noida
10:51 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover Steven Bosscher
10:49 Re: bootstrap w/o compiler chestnut. Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng
10:33 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover Gerald Pfeifer
10:26 Re: First scheduling pass Falk Hueffner
10:04 First scheduling pass Sanjiv Kumar Gupta, Noida
09:41 Re: Should typedef'd unnamed structs be supported? Philipp Thomas
09:20 Re: Should typedef'd unnamed structs be supported? Richard Henderson
09:18 Re: Should typedef'd unnamed structs be supported? Richard Henderson
08:57 Re: Should typedef'd unnamed structs be supported? Philipp Thomas
08:49 Ada: Bootstrap failure on i386-unknown-freebsd4.7 Michael Ritzert
08:02 Re: Dwarf2 question Falk Hueffner
07:54 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover Gerald Pfeifer
07:42 Re: Dwarf2 question Eric Botcazou
03:32 Re: Should typedef'd unnamed structs be supported? Robert Dewar
02:11 Re: Dwarf2 question Richard Henderson
02:05 gcc 3.3 versus bench++ poschmid
01:57 Re: A nice improvement in GCC-3.3 Richard Henderson
01:53 Re: Should typedef'd unnamed structs be supported? Richard Henderson
00:59 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover Daniel Berlin
00:32 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover Gerald Pfeifer
00:12 Re: New Port Contribution tm_gccmail
00:06 Re: New Port Contribution tm_gccmail

March 26, 2003
23:42 updated 3.2.3 bug fix list (for release notes) Joe Buck
23:08 Re: New Port Contribution law
23:01 Re: CONSTANT_ADDRESS_P for i386/x86-64 Richard Henderson
22:54 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover Daniel Berlin
22:51 Re: New Port Contribution Dan Towner
22:26 Re: Lapack test suite results for gcc 3.3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu Toon Moene
21:31 Re: New Port Contribution law
21:23 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover Gerald Pfeifer
21:23 Re: On alignment Mark Mitchell
21:20 Re: Target-specific bugs Gerald Pfeifer
21:14 Re: Target-specific bugs Gerald Pfeifer
20:56 Re: bootstrap w/o compiler chestnut. Rainer Orth
20:43 Re: bootstrap w/o compiler chestnut. Russ Allbery
20:25 Re: New Port Contribution Dan Towner
20:01 Re: PATCH for Re: GCC 3.3 release Gabriel Dos Reis
19:54 Re: bootstrap w/o compiler chestnut. Andrew Haley
19:52 Re: new unroller vs ppc David Edelsohn
19:45 Re: bootstrap w/o compiler chestnut. Zack Weinberg
19:32 bootstrap w/o compiler chestnut. Andrew Haley
19:23 Re: New Port Contribution Gerald Pfeifer
19:19 PATCH for Re: GCC 3.3 release Gerald Pfeifer
19:14 Re: gcc 3.3 and libiberty? c . christian . joensson
19:11 Re: gcc 3.3 and libiberty? DJ Delorie
19:06 Re: gcc 3.3 and libiberty? Christian Joensson
19:04 Re: bootstrap w/o compiler chestnut. Eric Christopher
19:00 Re: gcc 3.3 and libiberty? DJ Delorie
18:52 Re: gcc 3.3 and libiberty? Christian Joensson
18:27 bootstrap w/o compiler chestnut. Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng
17:52 Re: rli->unpadded_align Jason Merrill
17:26 Re: rli->unpadded_align Richard Kenner
17:21 Re: gcc 3.3 and libiberty? DJ Delorie
16:34 Re: rli->unpadded_align Jason Merrill
16:07 Re: REQ_EQUAL and mems hoisted out of loops Matt Kraai
15:29 Re: Dwarf2 question Falk Hueffner
15:09 Unanalyzed PRs possibly relevant for 3.3 Wolfgang Bangerth
15:06 Dwarf2 question Eric Botcazou
14:58 Re: rli->unpadded_align Richard Kenner
13:33 Re: problem with g++ Andreas Schwab
12:58 Re: gcc 3.3 and libiberty? Christian Joensson
12:49 Re: INIT_CUMULATIVE_ARGS() Hans-Peter Nilsson
12:46 gcc 3.3 and libiberty? Christian Joensson
10:36 Re: On alignment Andrew Haley
09:55 problem with g++ Anjali Sharma
09:19 Re: INIT_CUMULATIVE_ARGS() Anders Ådland
08:49 Re: REQ_EQUAL and mems hoisted out of loops Alan Modra
07:05 Re: Converting to ISO C89 Zack Weinberg
06:59 Re: Converting to ISO C89 Gabriel Dos Reis
06:56 Re: Converting to ISO C89 Gabriel Dos Reis
00:05 rli->unpadded_align Jason Merrill

March 25, 2003
23:06 Re: Lapack test suite results for gcc 3.3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu poschmid
22:40 Re: Converting to ISO C89 Zack Weinberg
22:26 Re: Converting to ISO C89 Joe Buck
22:25 Re: Parsing mail to Bugzilla Daniel Berlin
22:23 Re: Converting to ISO C89 Raja R Harinath
22:23 Re: Converting to ISO C89 Joe Buck
22:17 Re: Converting to ISO C89 Falk Hueffner
22:13 Re: Converting to ISO C89 tm_gccmail
22:04 Re: Parsing mail to Bugzilla Daniel Jacobowitz
22:02 Re: Converting to ISO C89 Zack Weinberg
21:57 Re: Converting to ISO C89 Raja R Harinath
21:55 Re: Parsing mail to Bugzilla Daniel Berlin
21:43 Re: Converting to ISO C89 Falk Hueffner
21:41 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover Phil Edwards
21:41 Re: Converting to ISO C89 Zack Weinberg
21:27 Re: Parsing mail to Bugzilla Tom Tromey
21:24 A nice improvement in GCC-3.3 Art Haas
21:15 Re: Gcc Mail-list server misconfigured? Guillermo Ballester Valor
21:08 Re: On alignment Tom Tromey
21:01 Re: Parsing mail to Bugzilla Daniel Berlin
20:57 Parsing mail to Bugzilla Wolfgang Bangerth
20:45 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover Daniel Berlin
20:38 Re: ld.so mechanism Mike Stump
20:02 Re: [tm_gccmail@mail.kloo.net: Re: gcc for any microcontroller?] tm_gccmail
19:57 Re: Gcc Mail-list server misconfigured? David Edelsohn
19:54 Re: Converting to ISO C89 Raja R Harinath
19:53 Gcc Mail-list server misconfigured? Guillermo Ballester Valor
19:39 Re: On alignment Jason Merrill
19:14 Re: [tree-ssa] Grammar for GIMPLE condexprs Diego Novillo
19:06 CONSTANT_ADDRESS_P for i386/x86-64 Jan Hubicka
18:57 Re: [tree-ssa] Grammar for GIMPLE condexprs law
18:46 Re: On alignment Kevin B. Hendricks
18:41 Re: [tree-ssa] Grammar for GIMPLE condexprs Jason Merrill
18:39 Re: On alignment Tom Tromey
18:33 Re: [tree-ssa] Grammar for GIMPLE condexprs Diego Novillo
18:32 Re: On alignment Jason Merrill
18:27 Re: On alignment Jason Merrill
18:27 Re: rfc: replacing fp-bit with glibc's soft-fp implementation Hartmut Schirmer
18:25 Re: DFA scheduling bug? Vladimir Makarov
18:18 Re: [tree-ssa] Grammar for GIMPLE condexprs Jason Merrill
18:13 Re: REQ_EQUAL and mems hoisted out of loops David Edelsohn
17:52 Re: Converting to ISO C89 Kaveh R. Ghazi
17:38 Should typedef'd unnamed structs be supported? Philipp Thomas
17:28 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover Daniel Berlin
17:16 Re: INIT_CUMULATIVE_ARGS(): bug? Hans-Peter Nilsson
17:07 Re: Converting to ISO C89 Mark Mitchell
17:03 Non-Delivery Warning Postmaster
16:53 DFA scheduling bug? Dan Towner
16:48 Re: gcc issue on AIX David Edelsohn
16:45 Re: java testsuite on Linux i386: 2.4.18 Tom Tromey
16:36 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover Daniel Berlin
16:23 Re: On alignment Kevin B. Hendricks
16:06 Documentation problem James E. LaBarre
15:32 [tree-ssa] Grammar for GIMPLE condexprs Diego Novillo
15:20 RE: Loop Optimizer Deficiency revisited Nitin Gupta
15:16 Re: GCC review process: how to handle external submissions Gerald Pfeifer
15:11 RE: INIT_CUMULATIVE_ARGS(): bug? Martin York
15:05 Re: [tree-ssa] C++ EH question Jason Merrill
14:41 gcc issue on AIX HRumde
14:18 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%) Richard Guenther
14:16 Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up Gerald Pfeifer
14:02 Re: [tree-ssa] C++ EH question law
13:44 INIT_CUMULATIVE_ARGS(): bug? Anders Ådland
12:13 Re: Command Options/Compiler Passes page not updated. Jan Hubicka
12:12 REQ_EQUAL and mems hoisted out of loops Alan Modra
11:26 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover Gerald Pfeifer
11:20 Re: ld.so mechanism Andrea 'fwyzard' Bocci
10:59 Re: Converting to ISO C89 Gabriel Dos Reis
10:58 Re: C++: Why do we nreverse CLASSTYPE_TAGS Gabriel Dos Reis
10:16 Re: GCC 3.3 release Gunther Nikl
09:35 Massive libjava failures in mainline x86 Andrew Haley
09:29 Re: Command Options/Compiler Passes page not updated. Gerald Pfeifer
09:26 Re: On alignment Andrew Haley
07:12 ld.so mechanism Jeson Martajaya
06:59 Re: [tree-ssa] C++ EH question Jason Merrill
06:48 Re: Any GCC Porting for microSPARC(v8) on VxWorks? Eric Christopher
06:42 Converting to ISO C89 Mark Mitchell
06:38 Re: C++: Why do we nreverse CLASSTYPE_TAGS Jason Merrill
06:13 Re: Any GCC Porting for microSPARC(v8) on VxWorks? =?big5?b?UHVmZiBDaHVhbmcgLSCy+
05:42 Re: C++: Why do we nreverse CLASSTYPE_TAGS Gabriel Dos Reis
05:03 Re: C++: Why do we nreverse CLASSTYPE_TAGS Jason Merrill
04:18 java testsuite on Linux i386: 2.4.18 Andrew Pinski
03:25 Re: [tree-ssa] C++ Question Jason Merrill
03:13 Re: RFD - cleaning up C identifier lookup Gabriel Dos Reis
02:52 Re: Any GCC Porting for microSPARC(v8) on VxWorks? Zack Weinberg
02:40 Any GCC Porting for microSPARC(v8) on VxWorks? =?big5?b?UHVmZiBDaHVhbmcgLSCy+
02:27 Re: C++: Why do we nreverse CLASSTYPE_TAGS Gabriel Dos Reis
02:15 Re: On alignment Jason Merrill
01:01 Re: [tm_gccmail@mail.kloo.net: Re: gcc for any microcontroller?] Crispin Cowan

March 24, 2003
23:34 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%) Janis Johnson
23:10 Re: Lapack test suite results for gcc 3.3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu Toon Moene
22:58 Re: [tree-ssa] C++ Question law
22:40 Re: [tree-ssa] C++ Question Gabriel Dos Reis
22:33 Re: gcc for any microcontroller? Stephane Carrez
22:19 Re: gcc for any microcontroller? tm_gccmail
22:06 [tree-ssa] C++ Question law
21:51 Re: C++: Why do we nreverse CLASSTYPE_TAGS Gabriel Dos Reis
21:38 Re: C++: Why do we nreverse CLASSTYPE_TAGS Jamie Lokier
21:10 Re: gcc for any microcontroller? tm_gccmail
21:02 Re: C++: Why do we nreverse CLASSTYPE_TAGS Mark Mitchell
20:55 Re: C++: Why do we nreverse CLASSTYPE_TAGS Mike Stump
20:50 Re: gcc for any microcontroller? tm_gccmail
20:48 Re: gcc for any microcontroller? tm_gccmail
20:17 Re: C++: Why do we nreverse CLASSTYPE_TAGS Matt Austern
20:15 Lapack test suite results for gcc 3.3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu poschmid
20:08 Re: C++: Why do we nreverse CLASSTYPE_TAGS Gabriel Dos Reis
20:07 Re: Loop Optimizer Deficiency revisited Zdenek Dvorak
20:05 Re: gcc for any microcontroller? Stephane Carrez
19:56 Re: C++: Why do we nreverse CLASSTYPE_TAGS Matt Austern
19:36 Re: Using GCC's front-end to parse SystemC tm_gccmail
19:21 Re: C++: Why do we nreverse CLASSTYPE_TAGS Mark Mitchell
19:18 Re: C++: Why do we nreverse CLASSTYPE_TAGS Gabriel Dos Reis
18:51 Re: C++: Why do we nreverse CLASSTYPE_TAGS Mark Mitchell
18:49 Re: wwwdocs/bugzilla/docs/images caution.gif note.gif tip.gif warning.gif Joe Buck
18:44 Re: C++: Why do we nreverse CLASSTYPE_TAGS Gabriel Dos Reis
18:34 Re: Vr4131 Eric Christopher
18:31 Re: wwwdocs/bugzilla/docs/images caution.gif note.gif tip.gifwarning.gif Gerald Pfeifer
18:23 Re: Loop Optimizer Deficiency revisited Daniel Berlin
18:22 Re: C++: Why do we nreverse CLASSTYPE_TAGS Mark Mitchell
18:20 Re: PR optimization/9745 Mark Mitchell
18:14 C++: Why do we nreverse CLASSTYPE_TAGS Gabriel Dos Reis
18:04 Re: wwwdocs/bugzilla/docs/images caution.gif note.gif tip.gif warning.gif Daniel Berlin
17:13 gcc-ss-20030324 is now available gccadmin
16:33 Re: Massive libjava failures in mainline x86 Tom Tromey
16:15 Question about boehmgc Lars Segerlund
16:09 Re: PATCH: SYSROOT_SUBDIR_SPEC (was configure --with-sysroot) gp
16:01 Re: gcc for any microcontroller? Gabriel Paubert
15:56 Using GCC's front-end to parse SystemC Matthieu Moy
15:35 Re: PR optimization/9745 David Edelsohn
15:30 Re: gcc for any microcontroller? Petr Danecek
15:21 RE: Loop Optimizer Deficiency revisited Nitin Gupta
14:40 Command Options/Compiler Passes page not updated. Nitin Gupta
14:16 Massive libjava failures in mainline x86 Diego Novillo
13:43 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%) Richard Guenther
12:13 Re: GCC 3.3 release Gunther Nikl
11:34 Vr4131 Jurica Baricevic
11:08 Re: GCC 3.3 release Andreas Schwab
11:04 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover Gerald Pfeifer
10:50 Re: wwwdocs/bugzilla/docs/images caution.gif note.gif tip.gifwarning.gif Gerald Pfeifer
10:46 Re: RFA: Ada variable-sized objects, bit_size_type == TImode, and divti3 Richard Kenner
10:37 Re: GCC 3.3 release Gunther Nikl
10:06 3.3 Bootstrap failure (was Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%)) Richard Guenther
09:15 Re: gcc request Gerald Pfeifer
09:11 gcc request Yit
08:47 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%) Richard Guenther
08:27 PR optimization/9745 Mark Mitchell
08:25 PR 9772 Mark Mitchell
08:06 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%) Steven Bosscher
03:26 Re: Additional GCC warnings? Hans-Peter Nilsson
03:25 Re: how much work is it to port a backend from 2.95.3 to head: wasRe: define_delay working only when optimization on! Hans-Peter Nilsson

March 23, 2003
22:26 Re: PR opt/8414 Mark Mitchell
22:22 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%) Richard Guenther
22:18 Re: PR opt/8414 Steven Bosscher
22:14 PR opt/8414 Mark Mitchell
19:41 Successful 3.2.2 Port, PowerPC, MPC8xx Embedded Processor Family Thierry Moreau
19:40 Re: store double-cvtd-to-int to memory Dale Johannesen
19:01 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%) Richard Guenther
10:34 Re: PR 8730 Richard Kenner
04:30 Results for g++ 3.3 application testing on i686-pc-linux-gnu poschmid
02:48 recent 3.3 compile times for PR 8361 test case Janis Johnson
01:30 Re: ifcvt question Richard Henderson

March 22, 2003
21:48 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%) Janis Johnson
20:31 Re: gcc for any microcontroller? Svein E. Seldal
17:50 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover Christopher Faylor
17:03 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover Daniel Berlin
15:13 Re: build success Eric Botcazou
14:26 Re: build success Andreas Jaeger
13:40 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%) Steven Bosscher
13:24 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%) Steven Bosscher
13:04 build success vanh
10:31 Re: ifcvt question Eric Botcazou
09:35 Re: GCC 3.3 release Steven Bosscher
09:15 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover Joseph S. Myers
09:12 Re: On alignment Andrew Haley
07:17 Re: On alignment Tom Tromey
06:57 Re: Loop Optimizer Deficiency revisited Andreas Jaeger
06:26 Re: Loop Optimizer Deficiency revisited David Edelsohn
06:25 Re: Loop Optimizer Deficiency revisited Zack Weinberg
03:19 Re: Additional GCC warnings? Segher Boessenkool
02:57 Re: GCC 3.3 release Mark Mitchell
01:56 Re: GCC 3.3 release Nathanael Nerode
01:33 Re: GCC 3.3 release Steven Bosscher
00:58 Re: gcc for any microcontroller? tm_gccmail
00:25 Bugzilla switchover Nathanael Nerode
00:22 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover Geert Bosch
00:11 Re: how to implement pipeline errata? Eric Christopher

March 21, 2003
23:59 Re: On alignment Jason Merrill
23:53 Re: how to implement pipeline errata? tm_gccmail
23:42 Re: how to implement pipeline errata? Joe Buck
23:39 Re: __thread Joe Buck
23:29 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover Phil Edwards
22:39 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover Daniel Berlin
22:38 Hey! abot
22:36 Hey! abot
22:16 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover Joseph S. Myers
22:13 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover Daniel Berlin
21:22 Re: GCC 3.3: inline-asm problems Mark Mitchell
20:52 Re: GCC 3.3: inline-asm problems Jan Hubicka
20:46 Re: gcc for any microcontroller? Mike Stump
20:40 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover Geert Bosch
20:33 Re: Optimization patches Jan Hubicka
20:31 Re: GCC 3.3: inline-asm problems Richard Henderson
20:31 Re: Optimization patches Jan Hubicka
20:26 Re: ifcvt question Richard Henderson
20:25 Re: Optimization patches Mark Mitchell
19:49 Re: Optimization patches Jan Hubicka
19:45 Re: GCC 3.3: inline-asm problems Jan Hubicka
19:44 Re: RFA: Ada variable-sized objects, bit_size_type == TImode, and divti3 Ulrich Weigand
19:35 Optimization patches Mark Mitchell
19:31 GCC 3.3: inline-asm problems Mark Mitchell
19:26 GCC 3.3 release Mark Mitchell
19:23 Successful build of gcc 3.2.1 in alphaev67-dec-osf5.1 João Boto Correia
17:49 Re: On alignment Tom Tromey
17:42 Re: Loop Optimizer Deficiency revisited Zack Weinberg
17:01 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover Daniel Berlin
16:34 Re: GCC Infrastructure File Janis Johnson
16:27 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover Gerald Pfeifer
16:20 About PR optimization/9279 Eric Botcazou
16:11 Linux binutils 2.13.90.0.20 is released H. J. Lu
15:52 Re: RFA: Ada variable-sized objects, bit_size_type == TImode, and divti3 Ulrich Weigand
15:41 Re: AVR target broken in mainline - abort in expand_mult Denis Chertykov
15:39 Re: GCC 3.2.1 Bug on XScale? Daniel Jacobowitz
15:28 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover Daniel Berlin
15:26 Re: On alignment Andrew Haley
15:18 Re: On alignment Michael Matz
15:02 native 3.x for m68k Gunther Nikl
14:11 Re: extended asm (Was: Re: decl_conflicts_with_clobbers_p problem) Gunther Nikl
13:41 On alignment Andrew Haley
12:23 gcc for any microcontroller? Petr Danecek
12:16 Loop Optimizer Deficiency revisited Nitin Gupta
11:49 ifcvt question Eric Botcazou
11:21 Re: powerpc-linux bootstrap failure Richard Earnshaw
11:16 Ready for an Assigment in dangerous Zone like middle East michel-friedman
10:38 On alignment Andrew Haley
09:50 Re: GCC Infrastructure File Gerald Pfeifer
09:39 Re: GCC Infrastructure File Paolo Carlini
09:34 Re: GCC Infrastructure File Gerald Pfeifer
09:16 Re: GCC anonymous CVS Gerald Pfeifer
08:40 GCC 3.2.1 Bug on XScale? Zhang, Yun
07:58 Re: Additional GCC warnings? Joseph S. Myers
07:51 Re: how to implement pipeline errata? Richard Henderson
07:50 Re: new unroller vs ppc Zdenek Dvorak
07:47 Re: build gcc Eric Botcazou
07:46 Re: how to implement pipeline errata? Richard Henderson
07:45 Re: __thread Richard Henderson
07:26 'xm_defines=POSIX' Nathanael Nerode
07:12 Re: RFA: Ada variable-sized objects, bit_size_type == TImode, and divti3 Richard Henderson
06:37 Re: Additional GCC warnings? Ross Smith
03:58 Re: how to implement pipeline errata? Daniel Jacobowitz
03:40 Build gcc on SFU(Windows service for Unix) zhengjun
03:26 Re: __thread Fergus Henderson
03:06 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover Daniel Berlin
02:18 Re: Automatic vectorization? Diego Novillo
02:09 Re: powerpc-linux bootstrap failure Michael Hayes
01:58 Automatic vectorization? Scott Robert Ladd
01:41 new unroller vs ppc Dale Johannesen
01:29 Re: RFA: Ada variable-sized objects, bit_size_type == TImode, and divti3 Ulrich Weigand
01:15 Re: RFA: Ada variable-sized objects, bit_size_type == TImode, and divti3 Ulrich Weigand
00:38 how to implement pipeline errata? Spundun Bhatt
00:35 Re: Additional GCC warnings? Jonah Graham
00:29 Re: define_delay working only when optimization on! Spundun Bhatt
00:25 Re: powerpc-linux bootstrap failure Alan Modra
00:25 how much work is it to port a backend from 2.95.3 to head: was Re:define_delay working only when optimization on! Spundun Bhatt
00:25 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover Phil Edwards
00:21 Re: __thread Jonathan Larmour
00:00 Re: RFA: Ada variable-sized objects, bit_size_type == TImode, and divti3 Neil Booth

March 20, 2003
23:44 On alignment Jason Merrill
23:18 PR 8730 Mark Mitchell
22:35 Re: RFA: Ada variable-sized objects, bit_size_type == TImode, and divti3 Janis Johnson
22:31 Re: RFA: Ada variable-sized objects, bit_size_type == TImode, and divti3 Richard Henderson
22:19 Re: RFA: Ada variable-sized objects, bit_size_type == TImode, and divti3 Geert Bosch
22:12 Re: RFA: Ada variable-sized objects, bit_size_type == TImode, and divti3 Ulrich Weigand
22:00 Re: RFA: Ada variable-sized objects, bit_size_type == TImode, and divti3 Richard Henderson
21:55 Re: __thread Richard Henderson
21:53 Re: Additional GCC warnings? Mike Stump
21:48 Re: powerpc-linux bootstrap failure Richard Henderson
20:59 RFA: Ada variable-sized objects, bit_size_type == TImode, and divti3 Ulrich Weigand
20:27 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover Daniel Berlin
20:25 Re: Additional GCC warnings? David Taylor
20:23 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover Geert Bosch
20:16 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover Daniel Berlin
19:58 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover Geert Bosch
19:49 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover Daniel Berlin
19:47 Re: Additional GCC warnings? Alexy Khrabrov
19:45 build gcc Mehdi Khaldi
19:32 Additional GCC warnings? David Taylor
19:27 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover Joe Buck
19:16 Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover Daniel Berlin
18:39 Re: __thread Jonathan Larmour
18:19 Re: [PATCH] Fix __builtin_expect (setjmp (buf) == 0, 1)) generatesbroken code Zack Weinberg
17:29 PATCH: SYSROOT_SUBDIR_SPEC (was configure --with-sysroot) gp
17:15 Problem with operator new on ARM Siarhei Yermalayeu
17:04 Re: -Wnotanidiot's future? Alexy Khrabrov
16:36 Re: Words endian is different in registers than in memory Andrew Haley
16:33 Re: Words endian is different in registers than in memory Andrew Haley
16:19 Re: Words endian is different in registers than in memory adland
15:24 Re: Words endian is different in registers than in memory Andrew Haley
15:09 Re: Words endian is different in registers than in memory adland
13:05 [PATCH] Fix __builtin_expect (setjmp (buf) == 0, 1)) generates broken code Jakub Jelinek
12:29 volatile with O2 thomas joseph
11:25 Re: Plan for GCC-3.2.3 Gerald Pfeifer
11:20 Re: __builtin_expect (setjmp (buf) == 0, 1)) generates broken code Jakub Jelinek
11:16 Re: __builtin_expect (setjmp (buf) == 0, 1)) generates broken code Richard Earnshaw
10:48 Parse error with xscale_be-g++ compiler sriram_ns
09:17 Re: GCC anonymous CVS Loic Dachary
09:05 Re: powerpc-linux bootstrap failure Geoff Keating
08:04 AVR target broken in mainline - abort in expand_mult Marek Michalkiewicz
07:51 Re: problem when build gcc Eric Botcazou
06:23 Re: powerpc-linux bootstrap failure Alan Modra
05:44 Re: Darwin gcc 3.3 sizeof of C++ structures with long long ints is strange David Edelsohn
05:28 Re: powerpc-linux bootstrap failure Alan Modra
05:24 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%) Albert Chin
02:31 Re: --program-prefix not working Daniel Jacobowitz
02:19 Re: Darwin gcc 3.3 sizeof of C++ structures with long long ints is strange Kevin B. Hendricks
00:57 Re: gengtype and typedef to enum Gabriel Dos Reis
00:29 Re: GCC anonymous CVS Mathieu Roy
00:23 Re: RFD - cleaning up C identifier lookup Per Bothner
00:14 --program-prefix not working Chris Plummer
00:12 Re: GCC anonymous CVS Gerald Pfeifer
00:00 Re: gengtype and typedef to enum Geoff Keating

March 19, 2003
23:52 Re: Darwin gcc 3.3 sizeof of C++ structures with long long ints is strange David Edelsohn
23:51 Re: powerpc-linux bootstrap failure Janis Johnson
23:47 Re: powerpc-linux bootstrap failure David Edelsohn
23:37 powerpc-linux bootstrap failure Janis Johnson
23:19 Re: gengtype and typedef to enum Gabriel Dos Reis
23:05 Re: gengtype and typedef to enum Mike Stump
22:46 gengtype and typedef to enum Gabriel Dos Reis
21:08 RE: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%) S. Bosscher
20:54 problem when build gcc Mehdi Khaldi
20:41 Re: __builtin_expect (setjmp (buf) == 0, 1)) generates broken code Zack Weinberg
20:12 Re: __builtin_expect (setjmp (buf) == 0, 1)) generates broken code Geoff Keating
20:06 Re: __builtin_expect (setjmp (buf) == 0, 1)) generates broken code Michael Matz
19:39 __builtin_expect (setjmp (buf) == 0, 1)) generates broken code Ulrich Weigand
19:21 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%) John David Anglin
14:22 Re: Questions about match_scratch in machine description files Richard Sandiford
13:06 Re: Reload question Eric Botcazou
12:51 Re: Darwin gcc 3.3 sizeof of C++ structures with long long ints is strange Kevin B. Hendricks
12:39 Re: Darwin gcc 3.3 sizeof of C++ structures with long long ints is strange Kevin B. Hendricks
12:38 Re: do I need cygwin for gcc on pc? Kris Warkentin
12:30 Re: Reload question Joern Rennecke
12:27 Re: do I need cygwin for gcc on pc? Fergus Henderson
12:21 do I need cygwin for gcc on pc? Drew Lebauer
10:20 Darwin gcc 3.3 sizeof of C++ structures with long long ints is strange Andrew Haley
10:15 GCC anonymous CVS Loic Dachary
10:08 Re: first shot at a draft 3.2.3 release note Andreas Schwab
07:07 Re: Improving gcc scalability wrt _extra_ large C files Neil Booth
06:58 gcc command syntax rahul bapat
05:06 Problem with 3.2.2 build. -- JAVA Problem? Justin Piszcz
03:00 Re: RFC: mp = &o.f; Christian Parpart
02:35 Re: define_delay working only when optimization on! Hans-Peter Nilsson
01:59 Questions about match_scratch in machine description files Fred Fish
01:20 Re: 3.2.2 successful builds: GNU/Linux, Solaris, HP-UX Joe Buck
00:43 define_delay working only when optimization on! Spundun Bhatt
00:40 first shot at a draft 3.2.3 release note Joe Buck
00:40 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%) John David Anglin
00:29 Re: Improving gcc scalability wrt _extra_ large C files Jacques THOMAS

March 18, 2003
23:59 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%) Steven Bosscher
23:54 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%) John David Anglin
23:42 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%) Michael Matz
23:07 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Fergus Henderson
22:57 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%) Albert Chin
22:47 Re: [tree-ssa] C++ CFG issue Richard Henderson
22:34 Re: [tree-ssa] C++ CFG issue law
21:36 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%) John David Anglin
21:16 Re: 3.2.2 successful builds: GNU/Linux, Solaris, HP-UX Kaveh R. Ghazi
21:13 Re: __attribute__ ((aligned)) weirdness Andreas Tobler
21:04 Re: Improving gcc scalability wrt _extra_ large C files Neil Booth
21:02 Re: Speed discussion ... Oscar Fuentes
20:57 [RFH] Puzzling behaviour with a wstring constructor Paolo Carlini
20:28 Re: [tree-ssa] C++ CFG issue Jason Merrill
20:24 Re: [tree-ssa] C++ CFG issue law
20:23 Re: Improving gcc scalability wrt _extra_ large C files Jacques THOMAS
20:01 Re: __attribute__ ((aligned)) weirdness Andrew Haley
19:56 Re: __attribute__ ((aligned)) weirdness Piotr Wyderski
19:39 Re: Improving gcc scalability wrt _extra_ large C files Jacques THOMAS
19:35 Re: Improving gcc scalability wrt _extra_ large C files Jacques THOMAS
19:05 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Joseph S. Myers
18:39 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Matt Austern
18:14 Re: i386.c: general_no_elim_operand Richard Kenner
18:00 Re: i386.c: general_no_elim_operand Richard Henderson
17:31 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Ross Smith
17:07 Re: 3.2.2 successful builds: GNU/Linux, Solaris, HP-UX Joe Buck
17:04 Re: RFC: mp = &o.f; Joe Buck
16:35 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%) Richard Guenther
16:31 Re: RFD - cleaning up C identifier lookup Zack Weinberg
16:16 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%) Steven Bosscher
15:50 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%) Albert Chin
15:33 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%) Richard Guenther
15:26 g++: __attribute__ ((aligned)) weirdness Andrew Haley
15:25 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%) Karel Gardas
15:20 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%) Richard Guenther
15:19 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%) Richard Guenther
15:19 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%) Michael Matz
15:12 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%) Michael Matz
15:09 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%) Michael Matz
15:09 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%) Karel Gardas
15:07 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%) Richard Guenther
15:03 Re: Speed discussion ... Andi Kleen
15:02 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%) Richard Guenther
14:50 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%) Richard Guenther
14:43 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Robert Dewar
14:25 How to imply a.out format in gcc? happy zh
13:22 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%) Karel Gardas
13:21 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%) Karel Gardas
12:56 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%) Richard Guenther
12:33 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%) Michael Matz
12:29 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%) Michael Matz
12:28 Re: Speed discussion ... Karel Gardas
12:26 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%) Karel Gardas
12:19 Speed discussion ... Lars Segerlund
12:14 3.3 compile time regression (22400%) Richard Guenther
11:40 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Richard Earnshaw
11:27 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Steven Bosscher
09:20 A mailing list for architectural changes? Sean McNeil
09:05 need some help in posix thread compilation option.. Duraivelan
08:48 Re: Bugzilla user/group permissions Gerald Pfeifer
07:57 RE: timing of lexical analysis in -ftime-report Brandon L Hewitt
07:41 Re: RFD - cleaning up C identifier lookup Geoff Keating
06:30 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Gabriel Dos Reis
05:57 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Ross Smith
05:50 Re: RFD - cleaning up C identifier lookup Zack Weinberg
05:50 Re: RFD - cleaning up C identifier lookup Zack Weinberg
04:18 Re: RFC: mp = &o.f; Christian Parpart
03:28 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Gabriel Dos Reis
03:16 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Robert Dewar
03:06 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Gabriel Dos Reis
02:47 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Robert Dewar
02:26 Re: i386.c: general_no_elim_operand Richard Kenner
00:55 Re: HOWTO: Test in-src build without requiring much extra disk space Daniel Jacobowitz
00:25 Re: i386.c: general_no_elim_operand Richard Henderson
00:01 Re: 3.2.2 successful builds: GNU/Linux, Solaris, HP-UX Gabriel Dos Reis

March 17, 2003
23:59 HOWTO: Test in-src build without requiring much extra disk space Loren James Rittle
23:53 Reload question Eric Botcazou
23:25 i386.c: general_no_elim_operand Richard Kenner
23:19 Re: 3.2.2 successful builds: GNU/Linux, Solaris, HP-UX Kaveh R. Ghazi
21:58 Re: RFD - cleaning up C identifier lookup Gabriel Dos Reis
21:52 Re: RFD - cleaning up C identifier lookup Geoff Keating
21:48 Re: RFD - cleaning up C identifier lookup Mike Stump
21:46 Re: [tree-ssa] C++ CFG issue Richard Henderson
21:33 RFD - cleaning up C identifier lookup Zack Weinberg
21:33 Re: [tree-ssa] C++ CFG issue Richard Henderson
21:29 Re: [tree-ssa] C++ CFG issue law
21:19 Re: [tree-ssa] C++ CFG issue Jason Merrill
21:07 Re: [tree-ssa] C++ CFG issue law
20:53 Re: [tree-ssa] C++ CFG issue Jason Merrill
20:49 RE: Is there a way to do the following with gcc? Andy Curtis
20:46 Re: XFAILing V3 tests. Mark Mitchell
20:43 Re: XFAILing V3 tests. Gabriel Dos Reis
20:40 Re: Is there a way to do the following with gcc? Andreas Schwab
20:37 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Joe Buck
20:36 What autogen is needed for GCC? Geert Bosch
20:33 Re: timing of lexical analysis in -ftime-report Neil Booth
20:31 [tree-ssa] C++ CFG issue law
20:29 Is there a way to do the following with gcc? Andy Curtis
20:22 Re: XFAILing V3 tests. Benjamin Kosnik
20:17 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Gabriel Dos Reis
20:14 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Gabriel Dos Reis
20:11 Re: XFAILing V3 tests. Gabriel Dos Reis
20:00 Re: timing of lexical analysis in -ftime-report Zack Weinberg
19:50 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Robert Dewar
19:46 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Robert Dewar
19:25 Re: New frontend: PL/I for gcc Mike Stump
19:22 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Joe Buck
19:19 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Ross Smith
19:16 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Mike Stump
18:32 timing of lexical analysis in -ftime-report blhewitt
17:59 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Matt Austern
17:50 Re: Can the function "connect()" & "listen() + accept()" be used with the same TCP port at the same time ? Joe Buck
17:48 Re: RFC: mp = &o.f; Joe Buck
17:47 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Matt Austern
17:34 Re: XFAILing V3 tests. Benjamin Kosnik
17:32 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Joe Buck
17:29 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Joe Buck
17:10 gcc-ss-20030317 is now available gccadmin
16:39 Re: extended asm (Was: Re: decl_conflicts_with_clobbers_p problem) Hans-Peter Nilsson
15:55 Re: RFC: mp = &o.f; Christian Parpart
14:55 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Robert Dewar
14:34 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed? Michael Matz
13:21 extended asm (Was: Re: decl_conflicts_with_clobbers_p problem) Gunther Nikl
13:18 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Andreas Schwab
12:30 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Steven Bosscher
11:56 Re: RFC: mp = &o.f; Nathan Sidwell
11:24 glibc problems with snapshot Tamás Gergely
10:47 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Andreas Schwab
10:39 RFC: mp = &o.f; Christian Parpart
10:14 Re: [3.3 regression?] flag_hosted and back-ends Richard Earnshaw
09:33 Re: [3.3 regression?] flag_hosted and back-ends Richard Earnshaw
08:13 Re: XFAILing V3 tests. Andreas Jaeger
08:02 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Tim Josling
07:18 Re: XFAILing V3 tests. Mark Mitchell
07:11 Re: XFAILing V3 tests. Zack Weinberg
07:08 Re: XFAILing V3 tests. Greg Schafer
06:46 Re: XFAILing V3 tests. Matthias Klose
06:15 Re: XFAILing V3 tests. Zack Weinberg
05:55 XFAILing V3 tests. Mark Mitchell
04:38 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Robert Dewar
03:02 Re: locked again Christopher Faylor
01:09 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Steven Bosscher
00:32 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Segher Boessenkool
00:32 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Segher Boessenkool
00:32 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Segher Boessenkool
00:11 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Richard Almquist
00:02 Re: Time to update documentation regarding supported configurationstyles? Nathanael Nerode

March 16, 2003
23:52 -Wnotanidiot's future? Alexy Khrabrov
23:37 GCC 3.2.2 Compiler Error With Pentium 4 Justin Piszcz
19:33 Re: Can the function "connect()" & "listen() + accept()" be used with the same TCP port at the same time ? Alexandre Oliva
19:31 Re: alloca + inline Alexandre Oliva
19:18 Re: locked again Alexandre Oliva
19:12 Re: alloca + inline Xanthakis Stelios
19:04 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Gabriel Dos Reis
19:02 Re: Time to update documentation regarding supported configuration styles? Alexandre Oliva
18:56 Re: Wrong as/ld picked by gcc configure Alexandre Oliva
18:41 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Alexandre Oliva
18:37 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Alexandre Oliva
18:31 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Alexandre Oliva
16:14 Re: New frontend: PL/I for gcc Robert Myers
15:45 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Bernd Schmidt
15:38 Re: Listings Toon Moene
15:30 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Robert Dewar
15:28 Re: New frontend: PL/I for gcc Toon Moene
15:19 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Bernd Schmidt
14:52 Re: alloca + inline Robert Dewar
14:44 Re: alloca + inline Robert Dewar
13:15 Re: alloca + inline Xanthakis Stelios
09:49 Re: [julias@macrovision.com: arg.] Gerald Pfeifer
09:35 Re: alloca + inline Gabriel Dos Reis
09:22 Re: alloca + inline Xanthakis Stelios
08:36 Re: New frontend: PL/I for gcc Fergus Henderson
07:47 GCC-3.2.1 behavior on p3/p4 Pramod Kumar Swami
06:18 Can the function "connect()" & "listen() + accept()" be used with the same TCP port at the same time ? Louie Chan
04:04 Listings William G. Lea
01:59 Re: alloca + inline Richard Henderson

March 15, 2003
23:37 Re: alloca + inline Geoff Keating
23:18 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Geoff Keating
23:04 Re: [3.3 regression?] flag_hosted and back-ends Geoff Keating
22:37 Re: New frontend: PL/I for gcc Lars Brinkhoff
21:54 Re: Patch submission process Phil Edwards
21:43 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Robert Dewar
21:41 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Robert Dewar
21:40 Re: alloca + inline Robert Dewar
21:39 Re: New frontend: PL/I for gcc Henrik
21:37 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Robert Dewar
21:36 Re: New frontend: PL/I for gcc Henrik
21:25 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Bernd Schmidt
21:19 Re: alloca + inline Neil Booth
20:52 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Bernd Schmidt
20:25 Re: [3.3 regression?] flag_hosted and back-ends Richard Henderson
20:09 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Robert Dewar
19:51 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Andreas Schwab
19:44 Can the function "connect()" & "listen() + accept()" be used with the same TCP port at the same time ? Louie Chan
19:33 Re: New frontend: PL/I for gcc Robert Dewar
19:32 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Robert Dewar
19:30 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Robert Dewar
19:28 Re: [3.3 regression?] flag_hosted and back-ends Robert Dewar
19:20 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Robert Dewar
19:19 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Robert Dewar
18:58 Re: New frontend: PL/I for gcc Lars Brinkhoff
18:52 alloca + inline Xanthakis Stelios
18:49 New frontend: PL/I for gcc Henrik
18:39 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Richard Earnshaw
18:36 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Daniel Jacobowitz
18:27 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Robert Dewar
18:24 Re: [3.3 regression?] flag_hosted and back-ends Richard Earnshaw
18:08 Re: [3.3 regression?] flag_hosted and back-ends Richard Earnshaw
17:51 Re: [3.3 regression?] flag_hosted and back-ends Robert Dewar
17:14 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Bernd Schmidt
17:05 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Bernd Schmidt
16:08 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Bernd Schmidt
15:54 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Gabriel Dos Reis
15:48 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Bernd Schmidt
15:34 Re: Why is subversions.gnu.org locked for long time? Raja R Harinath
15:20 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed? Kaveh R. Ghazi
14:33 Re: option for default 64-bit integers in g77 and gcc on ia64 Toon Moene
14:22 Re: [3.3 regression?] flag_hosted and back-ends Richard Earnshaw
13:47 Re: [3.3 regression?] flag_hosted and back-ends Robert Dewar
13:28 Re: [3.3 regression?] flag_hosted and back-ends Richard Earnshaw
13:09 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Richard Earnshaw
11:34 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Robert Dewar
10:40 Re: Patch submission process Glen Nakamura
10:40 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Allan Sandfeld
09:44 Re: Patch submission process Andreas Jaeger
09:28 Patch submission process Glen Nakamura
09:27 option for default 64-bit integers in g77 and gcc on ia64 Jiri Pittner
07:16 Problem in cvs repository Rubén Yáñez R.
04:34 Re: Mips C++ undefined reference to std::_Alloc_traits<...>::_S_instanceless gp
03:33 Re: backend question in alpha nobwx Spundun Bhatt
03:00 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed? Zack Weinberg
01:45 Re: [3.3 regression?] flag_hosted and back-ends Geoff Keating
01:44 Re: [3.3 regression?] flag_hosted and back-ends Richard Henderson
01:44 Re: [3.3 regression?] flag_hosted and back-ends Jason R Thorpe
01:40 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed? Kaveh R. Ghazi
01:38 Re: [3.3 regression?] flag_hosted and back-ends cgd
00:53 Re: Mips C++ undefined reference tostd::_Alloc_traits<...>::_S_instanceless Eric Christopher
00:50 recent additions to GCC 3.2 build status list Janis Johnson
00:22 Re: [3.3 regression?] flag_hosted and back-ends Jason R Thorpe

March 14, 2003
23:54 Re: [3.3 regression?] flag_hosted and back-ends Geoff Keating
23:50 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Geoff Keating
23:46 urgent from thompson JAMES IDAHOSA
23:22 RE: Tail recursion problem (ptr_mode != Pmode) NASET,JEFFREY (HP-Richardson,e
23:21 Re: Make includes (was Re: Time to update documenatiopn regarding supported make implementations?) Tom Tromey
23:11 urgent from thompson Bodunde Thompson,
23:10 Re: Make includes (was Re: Time to update documenatiopn regarding supported make implementations?) DJ Delorie
23:10 Re: Tail recursion problem (ptr_mode != Pmode) Richard Henderson
22:59 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Joe Buck
22:59 [3.3 regression?] flag_hosted and back-ends Jason R Thorpe
22:44 locked again Robert McNulty Junior
22:01 Re: Make includes (was Re: Time to update documenatiopn regarding supported make implementations?) DJ Delorie
21:54 Re: Make includes (was Re: Time to update documenatiopn regarding supported make implementations?) Tom Tromey
21:52 Re: Time to update documentation regarding supported make implementations? Loren James Rittle
21:50 Re: Make includes (was Re: Time to update documenatiopn regarding supported make implementations?) DJ Delorie
21:41 Re: Make includes (was Re: Time to update documenatiopn regarding supported make implementations?) Tom Tromey
21:37 Re: Make includes (was Re: Time to update documenatiopn regarding supported make implementations?) DJ Delorie
21:36 Re: Make includes (was Re: Time to update documenatiopn regardingsupported make implementations?) Paul Jarc
21:35 Re: symbol resolution Mike Stump
21:32 Re: Make includes (was Re: Time to update documenatiopn regarding supported make implementations?) Tom Tromey
21:28 Re: Make includes (was Re: Time to update documenatiopn regarding supported make implementations?) DJ Delorie
21:27 Re: Time to update documentaion regarding supported configuration style DJ Delorie
21:25 Re: Make includes (was Re: Time to update documenatiopn regarding supported make implementations?) Tom Tromey
21:24 Re: Time to update documentaion regarding supported configuration style Nathanael Nerode
21:15 Re: Time to update documentation regarding supported configuration styles? Phil Edwards
21:13 Re: Time to update documentation regarding supported make implementations? Tom Tromey
21:11 Re: store double-cvtd-to-int to memory Richard Henderson
21:09 Mips C++ undefined reference to std::_Alloc_traits<...>::_S_instanceless gp
20:58 Re: Time to update documentation regarding supported configurationstyles? DJ Delorie
20:38 gcc/configure.in assembler search Nathanael Nerode
20:31 Re: Time to update documentation regarding supported configurationstyles? Laurent Guerby
20:10 Make includes (was Re: Time to update documenatiopn regarding supported make implementations?) Nathanael Nerode
20:03 Re: Time to update documentation regarding supported configuration styles? Nathanael Nerode
20:00 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Andreas Schwab
19:53 Re: store double-cvtd-to-int to memory Dale Johannesen
19:52 Re: unique test case names for gcc debug.exp and pch.exp Mike Stump
19:37 Re: store double-cvtd-to-int to memory Geoff Keating
19:15 Re: bootstrap failure in libstdc++-v3 Andreas Jaeger
18:55 Re: store double-cvtd-to-int to memory David Edelsohn
18:53 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Robert Dewar
18:52 Re: store double-cvtd-to-int to memory Dale Johannesen
18:51 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Matt Austern
18:41 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Fergus Henderson
18:40 symbol resolution James Dessart
18:35 Re: Time to update documentation regarding supported make implementations? Richard Henderson
18:25 Re: Time to update documentation regarding supported makeimplementations? Russ Allbery
18:08 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Robert Dewar
18:08 Re: Time to update documentation regarding supported make implementations? DJ Delorie
18:03 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Robert Dewar
17:55 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Matt Austern
17:44 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Andrea 'fwyzard' Bocci
17:41 Re: Wrong as/ld picked by gcc configure H. J. Lu
17:41 Re: Problem with Usage of GNU GCC compiler with VC++ Janis Johnson
17:37 Re: Time to update documentation regarding supported configuration styles? Phil Edwards
17:36 Re: Wrong as/ld picked by gcc configure H. J. Lu
17:36 Re: Wrong as/ld picked by gcc configure DJ Delorie
17:33 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Robert Dewar
17:32 Re: configure --with-sysroot gp
17:30 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Kevin Handy
17:29 Re: Wrong as/ld picked by gcc configure H. J. Lu
17:29 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Robert Dewar
17:29 Re: Wrong as/ld picked by gcc configure Phil Edwards
17:26 Re: Wrong as/ld picked by gcc configure Loren James Rittle
17:25 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Richard Earnshaw
17:17 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Robert Dewar
17:17 Re: Wrong as/ld picked by gcc configure DJ Delorie
16:50 Re: __thread Andreas Schwab
16:39 Re: Wrong as/ld picked by gcc configure H. J. Lu
16:33 Re: decl_conflicts_with_clobbers_p problem Hans-Peter Nilsson
16:25 Re: __thread Fergus Henderson
16:21 Re: Amazingly Slow GCC anon CVS access Matt Reppert
16:08 __thread Tamás Gergely
15:51 Amazingly Slow GCC anon CVS access Angelo Corsaro
14:56 Re: decl_conflicts_with_clobbers_p problem Gunther Nikl
13:54 Re: bootstrap failure in libstdc++-v3 Paolo Carlini
13:46 Re: another tree access question Pop Sébastian
13:30 Re: GCC tree access & Pretty-print Pop Sébastian
13:25 bootstrap failure in libstdc++-v3 Andreas Jaeger
12:14 Re: decl_conflicts_with_clobbers_p problem Hans-Peter Nilsson
12:14 Re: Improving gcc scalability wrt _extra_ large C files Gabriel Dos Reis
12:11 Re: Improving gcc scalability wrt _extra_ large C files Gabriel Dos Reis
12:10 Re: Improving gcc scalability wrt _extra_ large C files Gabriel Dos Reis
12:02 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Lars Segerlund
11:53 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Gabriel Dos Reis
11:41 RE: profiling API? Rob Taylor
11:24 Re: decl_conflicts_with_clobbers_p problem Gunther Nikl
11:11 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Olivier Galibert
11:10 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Lars Segerlund
10:49 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Richard Earnshaw
09:57 Re: -fobey-inline Andreas Schwab
09:44 Time to update documentation regarding supported make implementations? Loren James Rittle
09:40 Re: Problem with Usage of GNU GCC compiler with VC++ Andrea 'fwyzard' Bocci
09:29 300 Modelos de Cartas comerciais, avisos, convites, propostas, etc. Redação Comercial
09:24 300 Modelos de Cartas comerciais, avisos, convites, propostas, etc. Redação Comercial
08:33 Time to update documentation regarding supported configuration styles? Loren James Rittle
08:00 Re: Wrong as/ld picked by gcc configure Loren James Rittle
06:27 Problem with Usage of GNU GCC compiler with VC++ Pradeep Kumar
06:26 Testing bugzilla patch viewer for gcc patches Daniel Berlin
06:13 Re: Wrong as/ld picked by gcc configure H. J. Lu
05:27 Re: GCC 3.3: x86_64-suse-linux-gnu added to secondary evaluationplatforms Andreas Jaeger
05:04 Reg. gccipf pacakage (gcc-3.0) Vasanth.K
04:05 Re: Wrong as/ld picked by gcc configure Daniel Jacobowitz
03:17 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Robert Dewar
03:08 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Ziemowit Laski
03:05 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Dale Johannesen
03:00 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Robert Dewar
02:58 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Dale Johannesen
02:54 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Robert Dewar
02:46 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Robert Dewar
02:15 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Richard Kenner
02:10 Re: unique test case names for gcc debug.exp and pch.exp Zack Weinberg
01:25 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Eric Christopher
01:23 Re: [Bug-dejagnu] unique test case names for gcc debug.exp and pch.exp Rob Savoye
01:13 Wrong as/ld picked by gcc configure H. J. Lu
01:11 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Robert Dewar
00:49 unique test case names for gcc debug.exp and pch.exp Mike Stump
00:45 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Eric Christopher
00:37 Re: Improving gcc scalability wrt _extra_ large C files Geoff Keating

March 13, 2003
23:39 Re: Improving gcc scalability wrt _extra_ large C files Joseph S. Myers
23:34 Re: Improving gcc scalability wrt _extra_ large C files Neil Booth
23:18 Re: profiling API? William Brodie-Tyrrell
23:12 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Robert Dewar
23:05 Re: Improving gcc scalability wrt _extra_ large C files Jacques THOMAS
22:53 are you ready? mcblane
22:52 are you ready? mcblane
22:37 Re: backend question in alpha nobwx Richard Henderson
22:36 Re: store double-cvtd-to-int to memory Richard Henderson
22:34 Re: store double-cvtd-to-int to memory Richard Henderson
22:09 Re: GCC 3.3 Mike Stump
21:59 Re: Improving gcc scalability wrt _extra_ large C files Neil Booth
21:49 Tail recursion problem (ptr_mode != Pmode) Jeffrey Naset
21:49 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Andi Kleen
21:46 Re: GCC 3.3: x86_64-suse-linux-gnu added to secondary evaluationplatforms Toon Moene
21:36 Re: Improving gcc scalability wrt _extra_ large C files Mike Stump
21:21 Re: Improving gcc scalability wrt _extra_ large C files Zack Weinberg
21:16 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Richard Guenther
20:49 Improving gcc scalability wrt _extra_ large C files Jacques THOMAS
20:48 Improving gcc scalability wrt _extra_ large C files Jacques THOMAS
20:22 Re: gcc not recognizing all C99 hex float constants Neil Booth
20:19 another tree access question Jeffrey Richardson
19:43 gcc not recognizing all C99 hex float constants Michael Matz
19:30 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Andrew Haley
19:26 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Neil Booth
18:32 GCC tree access & Pretty-print Jeffrey Richardson
17:54 Re: profiling API? Nick Clifton
17:04 Re: decl_conflicts_with_clobbers_p problem Hans-Peter Nilsson
15:03 Re: decl_conflicts_with_clobbers_p problem Gunther Nikl
14:47 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Daniel Jacobowitz
14:19 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Lars Segerlund
14:18 Re: Turning off gcov build for embedded processor Nathan Sidwell
14:00 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Richard Earnshaw
14:00 RE: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) S. Bosscher
13:54 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Andrew Haley
13:49 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Richard Earnshaw
13:45 GCC 3.3: x86_64-suse-linux-gnu added to secondary evaluation platforms Kaveh R. Ghazi
13:25 Re: There is errors in the translation of gcc Joseph S. Myers
13:21 Re: There is errors in the translation of gcc Yann COLLETTE
13:01 There is errors in the translation of gcc Ander
12:35 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Olivier Galibert
12:12 Re: Turning off gcov build for embedded processor Dan Towner
12:03 Re: Turning off gcov build for embedded processor Nathan Sidwell
11:21 Re: decl_conflicts_with_clobbers_p problem Andreas Schwab
11:14 Re: Array subscript has type 'char' and constant expressions John Levon
11:07 Re: Array subscript has type 'char' and constant expressions Andreas Schwab
10:48 Turning off gcov build for embedded processor Dan Towner
10:46 Re: decl_conflicts_with_clobbers_p problem Gunther Nikl
10:43 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Richard Guenther
10:40 Array subscript has type 'char' and constant expressions John Levon
10:29 Re: cross gcc help needed Robert Schiele
10:21 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Richard Guenther
10:14 Modulo scheduling in GCC Jon Beniston
10:06 Re: decl_conflicts_with_clobbers_p problem Andreas Schwab
09:56 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Richard Earnshaw
09:51 Re: ChangeLog rotation time? Richard Earnshaw
09:46 Re: Supporting multiple instructions sets within a single machine description Richard Earnshaw
09:29 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Richard Guenther
09:20 decl_conflicts_with_clobbers_p problem Gunther Nikl
09:08 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Richard Guenther
08:46 Re: GCC 3.3 Olivier Hainque
08:20 Re: GCC 3.3 Olivier Hainque
05:55 backend question in alpha nobwx Spundun Bhatt
04:31 Re: can't build v850: aborts in schedule_block Hans-Peter Nilsson
04:03 Re: can't build v850: aborts in schedule_block DJ Delorie
04:01 Re: can't build v850: aborts in schedule_block Hans-Peter Nilsson
03:21 ChangeLog rotation time? Nathanael Nerode
03:20 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Mike Stump
03:15 Re: GCC suggestions Mike Stump
01:46 store double-cvtd-to-int to memory Dale Johannesen
01:33 Re: why doesn't "--program-prefix=<foo>" work? Josh Fryman
00:52 can't build v850: aborts in schedule_block DJ Delorie
00:47 Re: How to rename data and bss sections for powerpc-eabi? tm_gccmail
00:24 Re: libstdc++/1773: __cplusplus defined to 1, should be 199711L Benjamin Kosnik
00:10 Re: FW: GCC cross compiler question E. Weddington

March 12, 2003
23:53 How to rename data and bss sections for powerpc-eabi? reinhard . jessich
23:05 Re: wstring in gcc Phil Edwards
21:41 attribute(at) Piotr Wyderski
21:32 Re: libstdc++/1773: __cplusplus defined to 1, should be 199711L Nathanael Nerode
21:09 -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining) Richard Guenther
20:53 GCC suggestions James T Snell
20:24 cross gcc help needed toreador
20:20 Re: GCC 3.3 John David Anglin
20:18 Re: configure --with-sysroot Alexandre Oliva
20:13 FW: GCC cross compiler question Tom Gosselin
20:12 GCC 3.3 and CP patch for -include switch Sean McNeil
20:09 Re: why doesn't "--program-prefix=<foo>" work? Alexandre Oliva
20:09 Re: why doesn't "--program-prefix=<foo>" work? Daniel Jacobowitz
20:08 Re: Supporting multiple instructions sets within a single machinedescription tm_gccmail
20:08 Re: more pch questions Daniel Jacobowitz
20:06 GCC 3.3 and CP patch for -include switch Sean McNeil
19:20 Re: more pch questions Geoff Keating
18:42 Re: GCC 3.3 Janis Johnson
18:12 Re: the bugs database ... Mike Stump
18:05 Re: GCC 3.3 Mark Mitchell
18:03 RE: Target Deprecation Mark Mitchell
17:59 Re: GCC 3.3 Joe Buck
17:57 Re: What optimizations does -O1 enable? Bonzini
17:34 Re: What optimizations does -O1 enable? Andreas Schwab
17:31 RE: [gnu.org #23233] FSF 3.3 GCC release Edward Ho
17:02 Re: What optimizations does -O1 enable? Jan Hubicka
17:01 Re: What optimizations does -O1 enable? Lars Brinkhoff
16:57 Re: What optimizations does -O1 enable? Falk Hueffner
16:52 What optimizations does -O1 enable? Will Newton
16:28 CVS woes gp
16:07 Re: gprof inaccuracy Will Cohen
14:56 Re: GCC 3.3 law
14:51 ColdFire tweaked gcc available for download Peter Barada
14:51 wstring in gcc Abhijit Gupta
11:57 Re: the bugs database ... Steven Bosscher
11:48 the bugs database ... Lars Segerlund
11:33 Re: GCC 3.3 Eric Botcazou
11:25 Re: GCC 3.3 Richard Earnshaw
10:48 Re: proposal: Default settings from environment Richard Earnshaw
09:46 Re: C++ front-end question Eric Botcazou
09:42 Supporting multiple instructions sets within a single machine description Jon Beniston
09:35 RE: Target Deprecation Amit Kohli
07:46 Re: GCC 3.3 Mark Mitchell
07:22 [Edward_Ho@necelam.com: FSF 3.3 GCC release] [gnu.org #23233] Brett Smith
06:02 Re: more pch questions Gareth Pearce
04:52 Re: more pch questions Benjamin Kosnik
03:36 Re: GCC 3.3 Mark Mitchell
01:42 Re: [c++, cxx-reflection] Initial thoughts on type reflection. Joseph S. Myers
01:42 Sorting out the directories in Makefile.in Nathanael Nerode
01:41 Re: GCC 3.3 Janis Johnson
00:52 Re: GCC 3.3 Steven Bosscher
00:44 Re: GCC review process: how to handle external submissions Daniel Berlin
00:13 Re: GCC review process: how to handle external submissions Daniel Berlin
00:04 Re: GCC 3.3 Mike Stump

March 11, 2003
23:51 Re: GCC review process: how to handle external submissions Craig Rodrigues
23:29 Re: GCC review process: how to handle external submissions Daniel Berlin
22:37 Re: [c++, cxx-reflection] Initial thoughts on type reflection. Phil Edwards
22:30 Re: GCC 3.3 Steven Bosscher
22:06 Re: [c++, cxx-reflection] Initial thoughts on type reflection. Gabriel Dos Reis
21:58 Re: TARGET_STRING problem on ppc Kumar Gala
21:49 Re: GCC 3.3 Mark Mitchell
21:48 Re: GCC 3.3 Geert Bosch
21:46 Re: GCC 3.3 Mark Mitchell
21:46 Re: [c++, cxx-reflection] Initial thoughts on type reflection. Mark Mitchell
21:44 Re: GCC 3.3 David Edelsohn
21:35 Re: GCC 3.3 Gabriel Dos Reis
21:33 Re: [c++, cxx-reflection] Initial thoughts on type reflection. Gabriel Dos Reis
21:31 GCC 3.3 Mark Mitchell
21:22 Re: TARGET_STRING problem on ppc Aldy Hernandez
21:08 Re: [c++, cxx-reflection] Initial thoughts on type reflection. Mark Mitchell
20:50 Re: [c++, cxx-reflection] Initial thoughts on type reflection. Gabriel Dos Reis
20:49 Re: TARGET_STRING problem on ppc David Edelsohn
20:48 Re: [c++, cxx-reflection] Initial thoughts on type reflection. Gabriel Dos Reis
20:47 Re: TARGET_STRING problem on ppc Geoff Keating
20:23 TARGET_STRING problem on ppc Aldy Hernandez
20:15 Re: Target Deprecation william
19:47 [Fwd: CVS Problems and Compile Errors] William G. Lea
19:29 Successful build Willard Myers
19:27 Re: proposal: Default settings from environment tm_gccmail
19:25 Re: more pch questions Geoffrey Keating
19:14 Target Deprecation Mark Mitchell
19:05 Re: proposal: Default settings from environment Paul Jarc
19:04 Re: proposal: Default settings from environment Phil Edwards
19:04 Re: more pch questions Benjamin Kosnik
18:56 Re: proposal: Default settings from environment Phil Edwards
18:55 Re: more pch questions Geoffrey Keating
18:39 Re: gcc gcc-3_3-branch has configure.in newer than configure Michael Elizabeth Chastain
18:35 Re: proposal: Default settings from environment Neal D. Becker
18:28 Re: proposal: Default settings from environment Steven Bosscher
18:25 Re: proposal: Default settings from environment Andrew Haley
18:21 Re: proposal: Default settings from environment Neal D. Becker
18:04 Re: proposal: Default settings from environment Andrew Haley
17:51 Re: proposal: Default settings from environment Neal D. Becker
17:33 Re: [c++, cxx-reflection] Initial thoughts on type reflection. Phil Edwards
17:33 Re: [c++, cxx-reflection] Initial thoughts on type reflection. Phil Edwards
17:16 Re: proposal: Default settings from environment Phil Edwards
17:07 Re: gcc-3.2.2, IRIX6.5, pthreads Eric Christopher
16:51 Mailing List Help Bauer, Rich
14:51 proposal: Default settings from environment Neal D. Becker
13:10 Exposing a relocatable functions when using a version script Dagan, Amit
09:16 Re: weak and alias Terje Eggestad
08:27 weak and alias Terje Eggestad
07:51 Re: [c++, cxx-reflection] Initial thoughts on type reflection. Mark Mitchell
07:41 Re: C++ front-end question Mark Mitchell
07:09 Re: gcc gcc-3_3-branch has configure.in newer than configure Andreas Jaeger
06:46 gcc gcc-3_3-branch has configure.in newer than configure Michael Elizabeth Chastain
05:47 Re: printf optimiziation in gcc-3.2.x Petko Manolov
05:26 more pch questions Benjamin Kosnik
04:17 Locked tight on trunk Robert McNulty Junior
04:12 Re: target_flags Hans-Peter Nilsson
02:51 Re: target_flags Zack Weinberg
02:44 Re: target_flags DJ Delorie
01:46 Re: printf optimiziation in gcc-3.2.x John David Anglin
01:41 Re: target_flags Zack Weinberg
01:39 Re: target_flags Mike Stump
01:38 Re: target_flags Mike Stump
01:38 Re: pch messages Zack Weinberg
01:26 CVS on subversions Sean McNeil
01:13 Re: pch messages [was: Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?] Geoff Keating
01:08 Re: gprof inaccuracy law
00:53 Re: gprof inaccuracy Daniel Jacobowitz
00:47 gprof inaccuracy Scott Dudley
00:45 Re: pch messages [was: Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?] Mike Stump
00:40 Re: pch messages [was: Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2compilation speed?] B. Kosnik

March 10, 2003
23:03 Re: printf optimiziation in gcc-3.2.x Falk Hueffner
21:47 Re: preprocess_constraints, reg-stack.c and register classes Michael Matz
21:39 vtable in read-only sections [again] Kenny Simpson
21:21 Re: Intel 386 and AMD x86-64 Options Falk Hueffner
20:58 Re: preprocess_constraints, reg-stack.c and register classes Christian Ehrhardt
20:53 Re: target_flags David Edelsohn
20:47 Re: vtable in read-only sections Geoff Keating
20:43 Re: target_flags Zack Weinberg
20:29 Re: target_flags DJ Delorie
20:24 Re: preprocess_constraints, reg-stack.c and register classes Michael Matz
20:22 vtable in read-only sections Kenneth . Simpson
20:22 target_flags Mike Stump
19:57 preprocess_constraints, reg-stack.c and register classes Christian Ehrhardt
19:07 Re: rfc: replacing fp-bit with glibc's soft-fp implementation David Edelsohn
19:05 Re: rfc: replacing fp-bit with glibc's soft-fp implementation Aldy Hernandez
19:04 Re: rfc: replacing fp-bit with glibc's soft-fp implementation Aldy Hernandez
18:59 Re: Stale CVS Lock? Ryan Braby
18:47 CVS access William G. Lea
18:34 Re: Stale CVS Lock? Steven Bosscher
18:32 pch messages [was: Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilationspeed?] Karel Gardas
18:22 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed? Mike Stump
18:21 Stale CVS Lock? Ryan Braby
18:08 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria Kaveh R. Ghazi
17:20 gcc-ss-20030310 is now available gccadmin
17:09 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria Janis Johnson
16:43 Re: [rtlopt] Location list data Josef Zlomek
16:39 Re: [rtlopt] Location list data Daniel Jacobowitz
16:35 Re: [rtlopt] Location list data Josef Zlomek
16:30 C++ front-end question Eric Botcazou
15:55 Re: [tree-ssa] unSSA questions and missing reference. law
15:24 Re: dejagnu/kernel bugs on darwin? Aldy Hernandez
15:20 Re: Problems getting gcc from CVS Fergus Henderson
15:14 Re: GCC review process: how to handle external submissions Steven Bosscher
15:09 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed? Anna Fowles-Winkler
15:01 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed? Anna Fowles-Winkler
14:45 Re: GCC review process: how to handle external submissions Wolfgang Bangerth
12:40 New #define EDGE_ALL_FLAGS in mainline Diego Novillo
12:30 Re: printf optimiziation in gcc-3.2.x Petko Manolov
12:25 Re: printf optimiziation in gcc-3.2.x Andreas Jaeger
12:18 Re: printf optimiziation in gcc-3.2.x Petko Manolov
11:59 Re: gcc and inlining Richard Guenther
11:49 Re: printf optimiziation in gcc-3.2.x Andreas Jaeger
11:19 printf optimiziation in gcc-3.2.x Petko Manolov
10:29 Problems getting gcc from CVS Lovely Aki
10:20 Re: future of gccbug bug reporting script? Joseph S. Myers
09:49 Re: gcc and inlining Richard Guenther
08:41 Re: rfc: unwinder, ppc-spe dual sized registers, and a patch... Richard Henderson
06:34 CVS bailing out when downloading trunk Robert McNulty Junior
06:10 Re: [c++, cxx-reflection] Initial thoughts on type reflection. Gabriel Dos Reis
05:50 Re: [c++, cxx-reflection] Initial thoughts on type reflection. Phil Edwards
05:34 Re: [c++, cxx-reflection] Initial thoughts on type reflection. Gabriel Dos Reis
05:28 Re: [rtlopt] Location list data Daniel Jacobowitz
05:21 Re: [c++, cxx-reflection] Initial thoughts on type reflection. Gabriel Dos Reis
05:15 Re: [c++, cxx-reflection] Initial thoughts on type reflection. Phil Edwards
05:07 Re: [c++, cxx-reflection] Initial thoughts on type reflection. Gabriel Dos Reis
05:04 Re: [rtlopt] Location list data Geoff Keating
04:43 Re: dejagnu/kernel bugs on darwin? Geoff Keating
04:36 Re: rfc: unwinder, ppc-spe dual sized registers, and a patch... Aldy Hernandez
04:27 Re: [rtlopt] Location list data Daniel Jacobowitz
04:20 [rtlopt] Location list data Daniel Jacobowitz
04:13 Re: [c++, cxx-reflection] Initial thoughts on type reflection. Phil Edwards
03:42 Re: [c++, cxx-reflection] Initial thoughts on type reflection. Zack Weinberg
03:24 Re: rfc: unwinder, ppc-spe dual sized registers, and a patch... Zack Weinberg
03:20 [c++, cxx-reflection] Initial thoughts on type reflection. Phil Edwards
03:04 rfc: unwinder, ppc-spe dual sized registers, and a patch... Aldy Hernandez
02:02 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria Kaveh R. Ghazi
01:22 dejagnu/kernel bugs on darwin? Aldy Hernandez
01:21 Plan for GCC-3.2.3 Gabriel Dos Reis
01:11 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria John David Anglin

March 09, 2003
23:34 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria Kaveh R. Ghazi
22:37 future of gccbug bug reporting script? Matthias Klose
22:33 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria Matthias Klose
22:30 CVS main tree Robert McNulty Junior
22:13 logging into subversions Robert McNulty Junior
21:11 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed? Benjamin Kosnik
20:49 Re: Anonymous structure return problem Daniel Jacobowitz
20:23 Re: rfc: replacing fp-bit with glibc's soft-fp implementation Jim Wilson
20:17 Re: rfc: replacing fp-bit with glibc's soft-fp implementation Jim Wilson
20:12 Anonymous structure return problem Dimitry Golubovsky
20:11 [PATCH]: Re: Is the loop pass allowed to introduce new call insns? John David Anglin
18:51 Re: Stormy16 doesn't build DJ Delorie
17:09 Re: email-based regression search server Hans-Peter Nilsson
17:04 Re: rfc: replacing fp-bit with glibc's soft-fp implementation Hans-Peter Nilsson
14:12 [tree-ssa] unSSA questions and missing reference. Jan Vroonhof
06:50 RE: cvs corrruption in gcc/unroll.c Robert McNulty Junior
06:31 Re: cvs corrruption in gcc/unroll.c Michael Elizabeth Chastain
05:58 May I Have Permission To... Pony Hunter
00:10 Re: cvs corrruption in gcc/unroll.c Robert Schiele

March 08, 2003
23:45 Re: cvs corrruption in gcc/unroll.c Hans-Peter Nilsson
23:42 Re: cvs corrruption in gcc/unroll.c Robert Schiele
22:57 Re: GCC review process: how to handle external submissions Laurent Guerby
22:17 Checking out gcc Robert McNulty Junior
22:09 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed? Geoff Keating
21:13 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed? Benjamin Kosnik
21:01 Re: GCC review process: how to handle external submissions Neil Booth
20:30 Re: GCC review process: how to handle external submissions Geoff Keating
20:27 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed? Geoff Keating
19:58 cvs corrruption in gcc/unroll.c Michael Elizabeth Chastain
19:48 alias problem during loop pass Roman Zippel
19:23 Re: GCC review process: how to handle external submissions Craig Rodrigues
19:00 Re: GCC review process: how to handle external submissions Joseph S. Myers
17:37 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Robert Dewar
17:26 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Robert Dewar
15:27 Stormy16 doesn't build Neil Booth
15:02 Re: GCC review process: how to handle external submissions Craig Rodrigues
13:09 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Toon Moene
11:21 Re: Why is subversions.gnu.org locked for long time? Andrew Walrond
08:45 Re: gcc 3.2 -> gcc 3.3 ABI change Mark Mitchell
08:24 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed? Benjamin Kosnik
06:40 GCC review process: how to handle external submissions Wolfgang Bangerth
04:30 Why is subversions.gnu.org locked for long time? Kaoru Fukui
04:05 Re: Exceptions, C, and Gcc Zack Weinberg
02:17 Re: Exceptions, C, and Gcc Kevin Atkinson
02:09 Re: Exceptions, C, and Gcc Zack Weinberg
02:00 Exceptions, C, and Gcc Kevin Atkinson
01:46 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Laurent Guerby
01:38 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed? Geoff Keating
00:44 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed? Benjamin Kosnik
00:37 Re: Using DLLs created with different compilers Janis Johnson
00:31 Re: tix fails to build for m68k-elf Hans-Peter Nilsson
00:19 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Steven Bosscher

March 07, 2003
23:55 Re: tix fails to build for m68k-elf Jim Wilson
23:35 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed? Mike Stump
23:29 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed? Devang Patel
23:24 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed? Mike Stump
23:20 Re: tix fails to build for m68k-elf Peter Barada
23:19 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end law
23:09 Re: tix fails to build for m68k-elf Jim Wilson
23:07 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Neil Booth
23:05 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Geert Bosch
23:02 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Neil Booth
23:02 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end tm_gccmail
22:57 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed? Geoff Keating
22:55 Using DLLs created with different compilers Singh, Diwakar V
22:50 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Geoff Keating
22:20 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Neil Booth
22:16 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed? Kaveh R. Ghazi
22:08 Re: New 3.3 libstdc++ testsuite failures on s390x (64-bit only) Benjamin Kosnik
21:57 Re: New 3.3 libstdc++ testsuite failures on s390x (64-bit only) Ulrich Weigand
21:57 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed? Geoff Keating
21:52 gcc-3.2.2, IRIX6.5, pthreads Charles Wilson
21:22 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Per Bothner
20:57 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Geoff Keating
20:51 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed? Karel Gardas
20:49 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed? Anna Fowles-Winkler
20:41 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed? Karel Gardas
20:40 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Per Bothner
20:23 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Neil Booth
20:13 Re: Does g77 have the equivalent of -r8 ??? Toon Moene
19:53 Stack-based pseudos tm_gccmail
19:41 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Joseph S. Myers
19:39 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed? Mike Stump
19:28 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed? Zack Weinberg
19:19 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed? tm_gccmail
19:18 Re: New 3.3 libstdc++ testsuite failures on s390x (64-bit only) Benjamin Kosnik
19:12 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed? Benjamin Kosnik
19:11 New 3.3 libstdc++ testsuite failures on s390x (64-bit only) Ulrich Weigand
19:04 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed? Mike Stump
18:34 Re: Mainline infinite recursion on ia64 John David Anglin
18:30 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Toon Moene
17:44 Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves? Denis Chertykov
17:44 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed? Anna Fowles-Winkler
17:20 Re: Mainline infinite recursion on ia64 David Edelsohn
17:05 Mainline infinite recursion on ia64 Andreas Schwab
16:35 Re: problem with subversions.gnu.org? Andrew Walrond
16:14 problem with subversions.gnu.org? Brad Lucier
15:52 AIX bootstrap failure David Edelsohn
15:26 Re: Compile time speed Kaveh R. Ghazi
14:33 Re: gcc-3.2.2 for armv5b - big endian not the default? Daniel Jacobowitz
14:07 Question MKAOUAR Mohamed
13:39 Re: Compile time speed Michael S . Zick
13:33 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed? Michael S . Zick
12:51 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Pop Sébastian
12:42 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed? Russell Shaw
12:24 return warning "regressions" on the tree-ssa branch Steven Bosscher
12:18 Re: Compile time speed Gabriel Dos Reis
11:25 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed? Lars Segerlund
11:19 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed? Lars Segerlund
11:15 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed? Karel Gardas
11:09 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed? Biagio Lucini
11:05 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed? Lars Segerlund
10:27 Re: Deprecating/Removing Targets Richard Earnshaw
10:27 c++ compilation perf. comparison (gcc, icc, como) [was: Re: Suggestionsfor improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?] Karel Gardas
10:21 Re: gcc-3.2.2 for armv5b - big endian not the default? Richard Earnshaw
10:17 Re: Compile time speed Andreas Jaeger
10:11 Compile time speed Richard Guenther
07:30 Re: GCC scalability wrt _extra_ large generated C files Zack Weinberg
06:52 Re: gcc 3.2 -> gcc 3.3 ABI change Gerhard Tonn
05:20 GCC scalability wrt _extra_ large generated C files Jacques THOMAS
04:01 Re: Incorrectly using call-clobbered registers Hans-Peter Nilsson
03:51 Re: Incorrectly using call-clobbered registers Fergus Henderson
02:52 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed? Kaveh R. Ghazi
02:19 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Per Bothner
02:07 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed? Russell Shaw
01:56 Re: Deprecating/Removing Targets Russell Shaw
01:55 gcc 3.2.2 on Mac OS X missing header?? vipul
01:22 tix fails to build for m68k-elf Peter Barada
00:58 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed? Anna Fowles-Winkler
00:51 Re: Build failure in libstdc++ Matt Austern
00:49 Re: Build failure in libstdc++ Andrew Pinski
00:41 Re: cvs archive problems Andrew Walrond
00:26 cvs archive problems Andrew Walrond
00:22 Build failure in libstdc++ Matt Austern
00:01 Re: -gstabs in ia64 Richard Henderson

March 06, 2003
23:53 Your Corporate Alumni Club Network CorporateFriends.com
23:52 Your Corporate Alumni Club Network CorporateFriends.com
23:31 Your Corporate Alumni Club Network CorporateFriends.com
23:29 Your Corporate Alumni Club Network CorporateFriends.com
23:16 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Michael Matz
23:15 RFC: target-specific overrides to block reordering heuristics DJ Delorie
23:07 Does g77 have the equivalent of -r8 ??? reg
23:00 Help needed!! Abe Stevens
22:52 Re: configure --with-sysroot gp
22:30 Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.3: Make -finline-limit work (PR/8387) Dale Johannesen
22:25 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Gabriel Dos Reis
22:23 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Karel Gardas
22:23 Re: Retargetting GCC for fictitious processors Mike Stump
22:16 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Michael Matz
22:09 Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.3: Make -finline-limit work (PR/8387) Michael Matz
21:38 Re: Question about PR/9447 Mark Mitchell
21:31 gcc-3.2.2 for armv5b - big endian not the default? Josh Fryman
20:52 -gstabs in ia64 David Wilder
20:49 Re: configure --with-sysroot Neil Booth
20:43 Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.3: Make -finline-limit work (PR/8387) Dale Johannesen
20:36 Deprecating/Removing Targets Mark Mitchell
20:23 Re: Extending Gcc For a New Language Kevin Atkinson
20:16 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Nathanael Nerode
20:03 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Tim Josling
19:48 Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.3: Make -finline-limit work (PR/8387) Mark Mitchell
19:26 Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.3: Make -finline-limit work (PR/8387) Geoff Keating
19:22 Re: Incorrectly using call-clobbered registers tm_gccmail
19:21 Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.3: Make -finline-limit work (PR/8387) Mark Mitchell
19:16 Re: Bootstrap failure on powerpc64 (mainline) Dale Johannesen
19:08 Re: Bootstrap failure on powerpc64 (mainline) David Edelsohn
18:25 Re: java status Richard Henderson
18:21 Re: configure --with-sysroot gp
18:08 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Richard Earnshaw
18:01 Re: Bootstrap failure on powerpc64 (mainline) Dale Johannesen
17:44 java status Aldy Hernandez
17:31 Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves? Daniel Berlin
17:27 successfully built and installed GCC Curtis C. Chen
17:25 Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves? Daniel Berlin
17:24 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Alexandre Oliva
17:17 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Alexandre Oliva
17:14 Please reply !! Abe Stevens
16:47 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Joern Rennecke
16:45 Re: gcc 3.2 -> gcc 3.3 ABI change Mark Mitchell
16:41 Re: Extending Gcc For a New Language Michael S . Zick
16:37 Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves? Denis Chertykov
16:36 Help on installing gcc 3.2 Andrew Haley
16:30 Re: Extending Gcc For a New Language Fergus Henderson
16:15 Help on installing gcc 3.2 Irish & Julie Spring
16:14 Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves? Michael Matz
16:14 Re: Is the loop pass allowed to introduce new call insns? law
15:38 Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves? Daniel Berlin
15:10 OpenRISC port (was: Re: Incorrectly using call-clobbered registers) Hans-Peter Nilsson
14:59 Re: problem for powerpc gcc David Edelsohn
14:50 Re: Incorrectly using call-clobbered registers Hans-Peter Nilsson
14:44 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Fergus Henderson
14:39 Re: Incorrectly using call-clobbered registers Carlos Sánchez de La Lama
14:27 Re: Bootstrap failure on powerpc64 (mainline) Josef Zlomek
14:24 Re: Bootstrap failure on powerpc64 (mainline) Hans-Peter Nilsson
14:12 Re: Bootstrap failure on powerpc64 (mainline) Josef Zlomek
13:33 Re: Incorrectly using call-clobbered registers Hans-Peter Nilsson
12:50 Incorrectly using call-clobbered registers Carlos Sánchez de La Lama
12:39 Re: Bootstrap failure on powerpc64 (mainline) Josef Zlomek
11:47 Re: Extending Gcc For a New Language Allan Sandfeld
11:39 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Andrew Haley
11:27 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Vladimir Merzliakov
11:08 Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves? Michael Matz
10:35 problem for powerpc gcc Anjali Sharma
10:18 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Richard Earnshaw
09:53 Re: C optimizer bug Eric Botcazou
09:23 Re: configure --with-sysroot Alexandre Oliva
09:17 Retargetting GCC for fictitious processors Marty Hauff
09:13 Re: bootstrap failure on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 with trunk Michael Ritzert
07:58 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Gabriel Dos Reis
07:53 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Olivier Galibert
07:53 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Lars Segerlund
07:30 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Karel Gardas
07:18 Re: PCH distcc improvements Neil Booth
07:08 Re: configure --with-sysroot Neil Booth
07:07 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Gabriel Dos Reis
06:49 Re: configure --with-sysroot Alexandre Oliva
06:49 gcc 3.2 -> gcc 3.3 ABI change Gerhard Tonn
06:29 C optimizer bug Russell Shaw
05:48 Re: configure --with-sysroot gp
04:26 Re: Bootstrap failure on powerpc64 (mainline) Andreas Jaeger
03:25 Re: Extending Gcc For a New Language Mike Stump
03:25 Re: Extending Gcc For a New Language Robert Dewar
03:24 Re: Extending Gcc For a New Language Robert Dewar
03:11 Re: Extending Gcc For a New Language Kevin Atkinson
03:09 Re: Extending Gcc For a New Language Mike Stump
02:58 Re: Extending Gcc For a New Language Robert Dewar
02:55 Re: Extending Gcc For a New Language Kevin Atkinson
02:04 Re: Extending Gcc For a New Language Robert Dewar
02:01 Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.3: Make -finline-limit work (PR/8387) Kurt Garloff
01:44 Re: Extending Gcc For a New Language Kevin Atkinson
01:36 Re: Extending Gcc For a New Language Mike Stump
01:21 Re: Extending Gcc For a New Language Kevin Atkinson
01:16 bootstrap failure on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 with trunk John David Anglin
01:14 Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves? Daniel Berlin
01:13 Re: Extending Gcc For a New Language Marty Hauff
01:10 PCH distcc improvements Mike Stump
00:49 Extending Gcc For a New Language Kevin Atkinson
00:15 Re: Bootstrap failure on powerpc64 (mainline) Janis Johnson

March 05, 2003
23:09 Re: Implementing unit-at-a-time for C++ Jan Hubicka
23:03 Re: Implementing unit-at-a-time for C++ Mark Mitchell
22:43 Re: configure --with-sysroot Alexandre Oliva
22:42 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Robert Dewar
22:24 Bootstrap failure on powerpc64 (mainline) Josef Zlomek
22:18 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Chris Lattner
22:14 Re: Implementing unit-at-a-time for C++ Jan Hubicka
22:12 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Zack Weinberg
22:05 Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.3: Make -finline-limit work (PR/8387) Zack Weinberg
22:04 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Karel Gardas
22:03 Re: Bootstrap failure on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu, trunk Josef Zlomek
22:01 Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves? Denis Chertykov
22:00 Re: Bootstrap failure on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu, trunk Josef Zlomek
21:46 Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.3: Make -finline-limit work (PR/8387) Geoff Keating
21:29 Orchids from Thailand Wanvisa Chaimusik
21:28 Orchids from Thailand Wanvisa Chaimusik
21:20 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Fabio Alemagna
21:07 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end tm_gccmail
20:17 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Toon Moene
19:20 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Benjamin Kosnik
19:18 Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.3: Make -finline-limit work (PR/8387) Kurt Garloff
19:11 Re: strange g++ -D behavior, Michael Meeks
19:10 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Mike Stump
18:56 Re: configure --with-sysroot gp
18:52 Re: configure --with-sysroot Daniel Jacobowitz
18:48 Re: configure --with-sysroot gp
18:46 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Matt Austern
18:42 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Mark Mitchell
17:57 Re: Implementing unit-at-a-time for C++ Mark Mitchell
17:54 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Dale Johannesen
17:33 Implementing unit-at-a-time for C++ Jan Hubicka
17:32 Re: why doesn't "--program-prefix=<foo>" work? Daniel Jacobowitz
17:29 Re: why doesn't "--program-prefix=<foo>" work? Josh Fryman
17:29 Re: GCC Extensions web page Janis Johnson
17:25 strange g++ -D behavior, Michael Meeks
17:04 Re: configure --with-sysroot Daniel Jacobowitz
16:58 Re: why doesn't "--program-prefix=<foo>" work? Daniel Jacobowitz
16:51 configure --with-sysroot gp
16:49 why doesn't "--program-prefix=<foo>" work? Josh Fryman
16:31 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Marc Espie
16:20 GCC Extensions web page E. Weddington
16:01 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Gabriel Dos Reis
14:24 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Robert Dewar
14:14 Fun with gcc 3_3-branch Andrew Walrond
13:03 Register allocation failure Dan Towner
11:59 Re: wrong C++ warning "fix" last year Michael Matz
10:51 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure (warning regression) Olivier Hainque
10:24 Mainline bootstrap failure (warning regression) Andreas Schwab
09:40 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Joseph S. Myers
08:48 Re: Target deprecation, round four Nathan Sidwell
07:57 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Tom Lord
07:41 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Lars Segerlund
07:19 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Gabriel Dos Reis
07:07 Re: [PATCH] Warn on always-false BIT_AND_EXPRs (PR 9944) Neil Booth
07:00 Re: FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once Mark Mitchell
06:17 Re: enable-languages=c doesn't turn off libstdc++ any more? Nathanael Nerode
05:22 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Zack Weinberg
05:13 Re: 3.2.2 successful builds: GNU/Linux, Solaris, HP-UX Kaveh R. Ghazi
05:06 Question about PR/9447 Jan Van Dijk
04:35 Re: [RFC] Parametrized macro names Fabio Alemagna
04:27 Re: [RFC] Parametrized macro names Fabio Alemagna
04:14 Re: [RFC] Parametrized macro names Tom Lord
03:43 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Robert Dewar
03:33 Re: [PATCH] Warn on always-false BIT_AND_EXPRs (PR 9944) Hans-Peter Nilsson
02:55 Re: [RFC] Parametrized macro names Fabio Alemagna
02:30 Re: FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once Paul Schlie
02:19 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Mark Mitchell
02:13 [RFC] Parametrized macro names Fabio Alemagna
02:09 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Gareth Pearce
01:43 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Michael S . Zick
00:54 [PATCH] Warn on always-false BIT_AND_EXPRs (PR 9944) John Levon
00:50 Re: Please clear my doubt Mike Stump
00:34 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Mike Stump

March 04, 2003
23:13 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Diego Novillo
23:07 Re: wrong C++ warning "fix" last year Matt Austern
23:06 Re: Donation to the GCC project is now handled by FSF Neil Booth
22:55 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Gareth Pearce
22:51 Donation to the GCC project is now handled by FSF Laurent Guerby
22:49 Re: FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once Neil Booth
22:43 Re: FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once Geoffrey Keating
22:39 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Michael Matz
22:32 Re: FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once Neil Booth
22:23 Re: FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once Geoffrey Keating
22:03 Re: compile server design document Michael Matz
22:03 Re: FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once Neil Booth
22:03 Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed Geert Bosch
22:02 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Geoff Keating
21:56 Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed Robert Dewar
21:52 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Gabriel Dos Reis
21:50 Re: compile server design document Per Bothner
21:49 Re: FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once Geoffrey Keating
21:48 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Michael Matz
21:46 Re: enable-languages=c doesn't turn off libstdc++ any more? Alexandre Oliva
21:44 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Michael Matz
21:38 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Michael Matz
21:31 Re: compile server design document Michael Matz
21:14 Re: compile server design document Per Bothner
21:10 FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once Neil Booth
21:05 Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves? Daniel Berlin
21:01 Re: gcc3.3 30% speedup in the past 2 weeks (MICO compilation) Gerard Beekmans
21:01 [julias@macrovision.com: arg.] Brett Smith
20:57 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Gabriel Dos Reis
20:50 Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed Oliver Kellogg
20:50 Re: gcc3.3 30% speedup in the past 2 weeks (MICO compilation) Karel Gardas
20:49 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Geoff Keating
20:42 Re: Optimizing GCC Gareth Pearce
20:37 Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed Oliver Kellogg
20:36 Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed Robert Dewar
20:32 Re: gcc3.3 30% speedup in the past 2 weeks (MICO compilation) Gerard Beekmans
20:29 Re: Optimizing GCC Robert Dewar
20:20 Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves? Denis Chertykov
20:08 Re: gcc3.3 30% speedup in the past 2 weeks (MICO compilation) Gerard Beekmans
20:07 Re: #include_next and absolute pathnames Kai Henningsen
20:02 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Gareth Pearce
19:56 Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed Geert Bosch
19:51 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Matt Austern
19:48 Re: Target deprecation, round four Richard Earnshaw
19:46 enable-languages=c doesn't turn off libstdc++ any more? Daniel Jacobowitz
19:45 Re: Target deprecation, round four Mark Ferrell
19:35 Re: Target deprecation, round four Zack Weinberg
19:25 Re: automated sizeof usage? Alexandre Oliva
18:38 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Zack Weinberg
18:37 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Richard Earnshaw
18:28 Re: PPC AltiVec request: add an abi variant Peter Bergner
18:26 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Daniel Berlin
18:21 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Geert Bosch
18:18 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Geert Bosch
18:14 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Zack Weinberg
17:55 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Dale Johannesen
17:53 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Nathanael Nerode
17:41 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Benjamin Kosnik
17:40 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Phil Edwards
17:36 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Phil Edwards
17:35 automated sizeof usage? Randy.Dunlap
17:33 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Tom Tromey
17:30 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Zack Weinberg
17:29 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Zack Weinberg
17:25 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Benjamin Kosnik
17:24 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Benjamin Kosnik
17:20 Re: PPC AltiVec request: add an abi variant Matt Thomas
17:18 wrong C++ warning "fix" last year Michael Matz
17:17 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Andrew Haley
17:08 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Zack Weinberg
17:06 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Steven Bosscher
16:57 [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed Oliver Kellogg
16:56 Re: Optimizing GCC Herbert Schmid
16:49 Re: Target deprecation, round four Nathanael Nerode
16:40 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Nathanael Nerode
16:35 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Nathan Sidwell
16:30 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Nathan Sidwell
16:29 Re: gcc3.3 30% speedup in the past 2 weeks (MICO compilation) Gerard Beekmans
16:09 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Kaveh R. Ghazi
16:01 Re: Turning off C++ casting? Paolo Bonzini
15:58 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:42 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Olivier Galibert
15:38 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Gabriel Dos Reis
15:34 Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves? Daniel Berlin
15:33 Re: Optimizing GCC Pop Sébastian
15:26 Re: PPC AltiVec request: add an abi variant Kumar Gala
15:19 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Lars Segerlund
15:19 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Gabriel Dos Reis
15:12 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria Ben Collins
15:11 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Richard Earnshaw
15:08 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Gabriel Dos Reis
15:06 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Olivier Galibert
15:05 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Lars Segerlund
15:03 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Gabriel Dos Reis
14:59 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Michael Matz
14:55 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Gabriel Dos Reis
14:53 Re: PPC AltiVec request: add an abi variant Peter Bergner
14:49 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria Kaveh R. Ghazi
14:46 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Richard Earnshaw
14:36 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria Kaveh R. Ghazi
14:35 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Olivier Galibert
14:33 FW: GCC on PIC Alex Monaghan
14:22 Re: Optimizing GCC Dag Bakke
14:21 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Richard Earnshaw
14:01 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Richard Earnshaw
13:57 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Lars Segerlund
13:52 Re: Please clear my doubt Michael S . Zick
13:49 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Olivier Galibert
12:46 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Nathan Sidwell
12:42 Re: Intel 386 and AMD x86-64 Options Ander
12:16 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Gabriel Dos Reis
12:11 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Gabriel Dos Reis
11:55 Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves? Michael Matz
11:43 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Richard Earnshaw
11:25 RE: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Rupert Wood
11:20 Please clear my doubt Binil K Babu
11:12 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Andreas Schwab
11:02 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Pop Sébastian
10:33 Re: Intel 386 and AMD x86-64 Options Allan Sandfeld
10:23 gcc-3.3 failed to compile M. Lavasani
10:19 Re: Target deprecation, round four Richard Earnshaw
10:06 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Gabriel Dos Reis
09:53 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Nathanael Nerode
09:20 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Gabriel Dos Reis
08:47 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Nathanael Nerode
08:35 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Gabriel Dos Reis
07:54 Re: Using Math Functions Anjali Sharma
07:40 Re: Is the loop pass allowed to introduce new call insns? John David Anglin
07:37 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Zack Weinberg
07:32 Re: Is the loop pass allowed to introduce new call insns? Richard Henderson
07:12 Re: Using Math Functions Tkil
07:01 Re: Using Math Functions Tkil
06:40 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Gabriel Dos Reis
06:06 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Zack Weinberg
05:54 Re: master copy of ltcf-c.sh, ltcf-gcj.sh, ltmain.sh? Andreas Tobler
05:45 Re: Target deprecation, round four Zack Weinberg
05:45 profiling API? William Brodie-Tyrrell
05:43 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end Gabriel Dos Reis
05:43 GCC 3.3 to include powerpc-darwin as an evaluation platform Kaveh R. Ghazi
05:35 Re: Target deprecation, round four Christopher Faylor
05:29 Target deprecation, round four Zack Weinberg
05:28 Using Math Functions calvesmit
05:24 Re: Is the loop pass allowed to introduce new call insns? John David Anglin
05:05 Re: Configuring GCC Eric Christopher
03:34 Configuring GCC pberger2
03:06 Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves? Daniel Berlin
02:27 Re: [PATCH]: Stack alignment - take 2 Richard Henderson
01:50 Putting C++ code into gcc front end Tom Tromey
01:42 Re: master copy of ltcf-c.sh, ltcf-gcj.sh, ltmain.sh? Alexandre Oliva
01:22 Re: #include_next and absolute pathnames Zack Weinberg
01:03 Re: #include_next and absolute pathnames Geoff Keating
00:57 Re: Is the loop pass allowed to introduce new call insns? Richard Henderson
00:55 Re: Is the loop pass allowed to introduce new call insns? Richard Henderson
00:20 Re: #include_next and absolute pathnames Zack Weinberg
00:17 Re: Is the loop pass allowed to introduce new call insns? John David Anglin
00:02 Re: Is the loop pass allowed to introduce new call insns? law
00:00 Re: #include_next and absolute pathnames Neil Booth
00:00 Re: #include_next and absolute pathnames Geoff Keating

March 03, 2003
23:55 Re: Intel 386 and AMD x86-64 Options Ander
23:51 Re: #include_next and absolute pathnames Geoff Keating
23:44 Re: inline-asm/9910: gcc dies on inline assembly Zack Weinberg
23:28 Re: Intel 386 and AMD x86-64 Options Richard Henderson
23:23 Re: PPC AltiVec request: add an abi variant Richard Henderson
23:12 Re: inline-asm/9910: gcc dies on inline assembly Richard Henderson
22:51 GCC Infrastructure File Michael S . Zick
22:20 Re: Is the loop pass allowed to introduce new call insns? John David Anglin
22:07 Re: PPC AltiVec request: add an abi variant tm_gccmail
21:46 Re: Is the loop pass allowed to introduce new call insns? Richard Henderson
21:42 Re: #include_next and absolute pathnames Neil Booth
21:10 Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves? Denis Chertykov
21:07 Re: gcc3.3 30% speedup in the past 2 weeks (MICO compilation) Gerard Beekmans
21:06 Re: PPC AltiVec request: add an abi variant Matt Thomas
20:57 Intel 386 and AMD x86-64 Options Ander
20:51 #include_next and absolute pathnames Geoff Keating
20:49 Re: PPC AltiVec request: add an abi variant tm_gccmail
20:47 Is the loop pass allowed to introduce new call insns? John David Anglin
20:42 bugzilla data about to be updated Daniel Berlin
20:35 Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves? Daniel Berlin
20:31 Re: At last: the bool problem seems to be due to omitted dependencyfrommake check* DJ Delorie
20:24 Re: master copy of ltcf-c.sh, ltcf-gcj.sh, ltmain.sh? Andreas Tobler
19:59 Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves? Michael Matz
19:49 Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves? Daniel Berlin
19:45 Re: At last: the bool problem seems to be due to omitted dependency from make check* Mike Stump
19:42 Re: PPC AltiVec request: add an abi variant Geoff Keating
19:41 Re: master copy of ltcf-c.sh, ltcf-gcj.sh, ltmain.sh? Alexandre Oliva
19:07 Re: PPC AltiVec request: add an abi variant Aldy Hernandez
18:35 PPC AltiVec request: add an abi variant Matt Thomas
18:25 Re: C++ optimization: compile time + memory consumption regressionon gcc3.3 branch Zack Weinberg
18:03 Re: C++ optimization: compile time + memory consumption regressionon gcc3.3 branch Karel Gardas
17:49 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2 Richard Henderson
17:37 Re: HP-UX 11 porting error: PARSE ERROR in malloc.h stefan . marquardt
17:27 Re: mixing LGPL and GPL in gcc Richard Earnshaw
17:25 Re: C++ optimization: compile time + memory consumption regressionon gcc3.3 branch Zack Weinberg
17:25 Re: rfc: replacing fp-bit with glibc's soft-fp implementation Richard Earnshaw
17:13 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed? Anna Fowles-Winkler
17:10 Re: rfc: replacing fp-bit with glibc's soft-fp implementation Aldy Hernandez
17:10 mixing LGPL and GPL in gcc Aldy Hernandez
17:04 gcc-ss-20030303 is now available gccadmin
16:33 Re: HP-UX 11 porting error: PARSE ERROR in malloc.h M. Lavasani
16:07 Re: [tree-ssa] coding style for structure fields law
15:43 [tree-ssa] coding style for structure fields Diego Novillo
15:12 Re: master copy of ltcf-c.sh, ltcf-gcj.sh, ltmain.sh? Andreas Tobler
15:03 New Port Contribution Dan Towner
14:54 Re: master copy of ltcf-c.sh, ltcf-gcj.sh, ltmain.sh? Michael Elizabeth Chastain
14:27 HP-UX 11 porting error: PARSE ERROR in malloc.h stefan . marquardt
14:21 Re: C++ optimization: compile time + memory consumption regressionon gcc3.3 branch Karel Gardas
13:39 Re: At last: the bool problem seems to be due to omitted dependencyfrom make check* Michael S . Zick
13:34 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-03-02 Diego Novillo
13:31 Re: C++ optimization: compile time + memory consumption regression on gcc3.3 branch Michael S . Zick
12:10 Re: C++ optimization: compile time + memory consumption regressionon gcc3.3 branch Karel Gardas
10:31 Re: C++ optimization: compile time + memory consumption regressionon gcc3.3 branch Karel Gardas
10:25 Re: Proposal: Require that GAS be built before GCC in a unified tree Alexandre Oliva
10:24 Re: Object files know where they're built?!? Alexandre Oliva
10:18 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2 Alexandre Oliva
10:09 Re: Should contrib/test_summary work with joined gcc/binutils/gdb? Alexandre Oliva
10:08 Re: compile server design document Alexandre Oliva
09:14 Re: At last: the bool problem seems to be due to omitted dependencyfrommake check* Joseph S. Myers
08:58 Re: master copy of ltcf-c.sh, ltcf-gcj.sh, ltmain.sh? Alexandre Oliva
07:01 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-03-02 Steven Bosscher
06:56 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2 Gabriel Dos Reis
06:46 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2 Neil Booth
05:21 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2 Mark Mitchell
05:05 Threading problem Vikas Gandhi
03:00 gcc-ss-20030224: configure gives warnings on i686-pc-cygwin Eric R. Krause
02:40 Re: At last: the bool problem seems to be due to omitted dependencyfrom make check* Fergus Henderson
01:19 Re: inline-asm/9910: gcc dies on inline assembly Zack Weinberg
00:54 [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-03-02 Diego Novillo
00:53 gcc dies on inline assembly jay

March 02, 2003
22:02 Re: IMPLICIT_EXTERN_C failure due to cpplib patch Neil Booth
21:58 Re: IMPLICIT_EXTERN_C failure due to cpplib patch Neil Booth
21:51 Re: IMPLICIT_EXTERN_C failure due to cpplib patch Neil Booth
21:41 IMPLICIT_EXTERN_C failure due to cpplib patch David Edelsohn
21:26 RE: Object files know where they're built?!? Bruce Korb
17:12 [3.3 branch regression] libjava build failure on arm-linux Matthias Klose
16:06 [PATCH] gcc-3.3: Make -finline-limit work (PR/8387) Kurt Garloff
14:11 Re: -no-integrated-cpp flag (patches for gcc3.3) Neil Booth
01:58 Re: Object files know where they're built?!? Nathanael Nerode
01:15 RE: Optimizing GCC Scott Robert Ladd

March 01, 2003
23:56 Re: -no-integrated-cpp flag (patches for gcc3.3) Ashif S. Harji
23:44 Re: gcc and include dirs Michael S . Zick
22:52 Re: gcc and include dirs Michael S . Zick
22:19 Re: At last: the bool problem seems to be due to omitted dependencyfrommake check* Tim Josling
22:06 Re: -no-integrated-cpp flag (patches for gcc3.3) Ashif S. Harji
21:49 Re: -no-integrated-cpp flag (patches for gcc3.3) Neil Booth
21:46 Re: -no-integrated-cpp flag (patches for gcc3.3) Peter A. Buhr
21:30 Re: gcc and include dirs Zack Weinberg
21:21 Re: gcc and include dirs Gerold J. Wucherpfennig
21:16 Optimizing GCC Paolo Carlini
21:14 Re: -no-integrated-cpp flag (patches for gcc3.3) Neil Booth
20:27 Re: Assembly code parametriaztion Piotr Wyderski
19:42 Re: Assembly code parametriaztion Andi Kleen
19:33 Assembly code parametriaztion Piotr Wyderski
19:32 [PATCH]: Stack alignment - take 2 John David Anglin
19:11 Re: Object files know where they're built?!? Richard Earnshaw
18:56 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2 Jason Molenda
18:35 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2 Andi Kleen
17:56 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria Matthias Klose
17:52 Object files know where they're built?!? Nathanael Nerode
16:42 Re: Proposal: Require that GAS be built before GCC in a unified tree Michael S . Zick
16:31 Re: Proposal: Require that GAS be built before GCC in a unified tree Joseph S. Myers
16:27 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria Ben Collins
16:23 Re: At last: the bool problem seems to be due to omitted dependencyfrom make check* Joseph S. Myers
16:21 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria Kaveh R. Ghazi
16:12 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2 Daniel Jacobowitz
16:11 Re: Proposal: Require that GAS be built before GCC in a unified tree Daniel Jacobowitz
16:05 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria Ben Collins
15:56 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria Kaveh R. Ghazi
14:52 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2 Jason Molenda
13:59 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria Richard Earnshaw
13:38 Re: Proposal: Require that GAS be built before GCC in a unified tree Michael S . Zick
13:36 Re: Proposal: Require that GAS be built before GCC in a unified tree Michael S . Zick
13:23 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2 Michael S . Zick
13:16 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria Bernd Schmidt
11:32 Re: At last: the bool problem seems to be due to omitted dependencyfrom make check* Tim Josling
11:29 Re: rfc: replacing fp-bit with glibc's soft-fp implementation Richard Earnshaw
10:48 Re: At last: the bool problem seems to be due to omitted dependencyfrom make check* Joseph S. Myers
10:41 At last: the bool problem seems to be due to omitted dependency from make check* Tim Josling
07:36 Re: Proposal: Require that GAS be built before GCC in a unified tree Eric Christopher
06:20 2.95 vs 3.2 on a SPARC Daniel Carrera
05:22 Re: Proposal: Require that GAS be built before GCC in a unified tree Nathanael Nerode
05:20 rfc: replacing fp-bit with glibc's soft-fp implementation Aldy Hernandez
05:12 Re: Proposal: Require that GAS be built before GCC in a unified tree Daniel Jacobowitz
05:09 Proposal: Require that GAS be built before GCC in a unified tree Nathanael Nerode
04:58 Re: Internal compiler error in gcc3.0.2 for ppc403 Daniel Jacobowitz
04:55 Re: GCC 3.2.2 build error on Solaris 9 x86 (patch?) Kaveh R. Ghazi
04:52 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2 Devang Patel
04:36 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2 Devang Patel
03:54 Hello gcc ! gcc
03:54 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2 Jim Wilson
03:53 Hello gcc ! gcc
02:05 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2 Richard Henderson
01:38 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2 Mark Mitchell
01:21 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2 Richard Henderson
00:42 Re: gcc and include dirs Michael S . Zick


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.2