This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: ANSI/ISO Compliance
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- To: Robert Dewar <dewar at gnat dot com>
- Cc: jbuck at synopsys dot com, mike at whitehillfarm dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 14:26:58 -0800
- Subject: Re: ANSI/ISO Compliance
- References: <20030218221527.9EAF9F2E4E@nile.gnat.com>
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 05:15:27PM -0500, Robert Dewar wrote:
> OK, so that actually is much more liberal than you had suggested, and
> means that if the FSF was a licensee, for sure it could state the level
> of compliance with the Plum Hall suite.
Somewhere I recall a clause in which one may publish only whether
the compiler fails or passes the testsuite as a whole, and *not*
the results of the individual tests.
r~