This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: The 'gcc-g++' module name is broken

From: Ben Elliston <bje at redhat dot com>
To: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 17 Feb 2003 07:09:24 +1100
Subject: Re: The 'gcc-g++' module name is broken
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0302140033380.13966-100000@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk><87u1f7it55.fsf@cenderis.demon.co.uk><m3bs1cz3tj.fsf@scooby.brisbane.redhat.com><Pine.BSF.4.51.0302162023050.51750@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>

>>>>> "Gerald" == Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at> writes:

  >> Except that the modules file is not versioned and, so, removing a
  >> modules file entry makes it impossible (in some cases) to fetch old
  >> versions of the tree using scripts/users that expect those module
  >> aliases to exist.

  Gerald> Probably I misunderstood, but our modules file is in
  Gerald> CVS/RCS:

I did a poor job of explaining it.  The head revision of the
CVSROOT/modules file is always consulted, even when checking out
historic revisions or tags.

Ben

References:
- Re: The 'gcc-g++' module name is broken
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: The 'gcc-g++' module name is broken
  - From: Bruce Stephens
- Re: The 'gcc-g++' module name is broken
  - From: Ben Elliston
- Re: The 'gcc-g++' module name is broken
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]