This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: the size of tree_decl

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: law at redhat dot com
Cc: Dan Nicolaescu <dann at ics dot uci dot edu>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 13:34:49 -0800
Subject: Re: the size of tree_decl
References: <200302122025.h1CKPDkA024739@gremlin.ics.uci.edu> <200302141952.h1EJqNiO004950@localhost.redhat.com>

On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 12:52:23PM -0700, law@redhat.com wrote:
> Again, I'm just surpried.  I thought Objective-C had virtual function
> calls.  It's possible they're implemented without using vindex.

Yep.  Such calls go into the objc runtime for the lookup, at which point
they start using __builtin_apply (a continual source of problems) and such
to bounce to the target function.

r~

References:
- Re: the size of tree_decl
  - From: Dan Nicolaescu
- Re: the size of tree_decl
  - From: law

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]