This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER


Michael S. Zick wrote:
On Sunday 09 February 2003 10:14 pm, Robert Dewar wrote:

Please, let's stop this volunteers excuse.  It really grates with
me, being a volunteer.  I'll merely note that a very large proportion
of slow-downs are in code committed by people paid to work on GCC.
Which perhaps says that at least in some cases, the companies funding
gcc work do not find speeding up compile time to be a priority.

Possibly a very good point.  Which brings to mind the question...
Who is complaining?
If we can define the group for which this is a concern, then perhaps
we can define a way to satisfy that group.
I'm not a gcc developer watching the list for news of Gnat, but I have noted that many (usually Linux) users equate a release of GCC with slowness. One recent example was when discussing software performance trends and one of the first examples cited for degrading perfomance (in terms of speed) was gcc.

Don't know if this helps with your question.






Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]