This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER

From: Michael S. Zick <mszick at goquest dot com>
To: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 08:27:28 -0600
Subject: Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
References: <0045B60F-3ADE-11D7-9ED6-000393673036@apple.com> <03020912503400.00966@localhost.localdomain> <20030209210913.GB6196@daikokuya.co.uk>

On Sunday 09 February 2003 03:09 pm, Neil Booth wrote:
> Michael S.Zick wrote:-
>
> > Taking several steps back from the current problem(s) for a broader
> > view...
> >
> > Perhaps it is the Open Source Development, Staffed by Volunteers
> > model that is the central point to be dealt with.
>
> Please, let's stop this volunteers excuse.  It really grates with
> me, being a volunteer.  I'll merely note that a very large proportion
> of slow-downs are in code committed by people paid to work on GCC.
>
> Neil.
Please read further into the post Neil.
I said good things about the volunteers and did not posit it as a
reason or an excuse.
Mike

References:
- GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - THE GRAPH
  - From: Ziemowit Laski
- Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
  - From: Michael S. Zick
- Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
  - From: Neil Booth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]