gcc archive
author index for February, 2003

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)

'David Scott Urban

• 2003-02-05 21:19 Havving trouble running testsuite
• 2003-02-05 21:57 Re: Havving trouble running testsuite
• 2003-02-08 17:48 Successful build and test
• 2003-02-08 18:43 Re: Successful build and test
• 2003-02-13 21:14 Successful build

Anders Ådland

• 2003-02-26 15:55 Words endian is different in registers than in memory

Christian Jönsson

• 2003-02-06 06:35 ICE in gcc 3.4 20030203 sparc-linux: bfd/linker.c:2738: internal compiler error: output_operand: invalid expression as operand
• 2003-02-07 12:25 Re: PR 9479 (was Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (third iteration))
• 2003-02-08 16:52 Changing timeout for dejagnu runs of the testsuite?

Diego Rodrigo

• 2003-02-25 20:57 Gcc 3.2.2 Build

Håkan Hjort

• 2003-02-18 17:55 Re: optimizations
• 2003-02-18 18:27 Re: optimizations

Jörg Bartz

• 2003-02-11 13:33 GCC compiled successful for SUSE 8.1

Jörg Reiners

• 2003-02-18 13:36 successfully built on Suse 8.0, kernel 2.4.18-64GB-SMP, glibc 2.2.5-158

James Michael DuPont

• 2003-02-03 08:10 call for testing un uglified vcg 1.3

Pop Sébastian

• 2003-02-08 11:42 Re: Implementing OpenMP pragmas for the C front end
• 2003-02-14 20:46 Re: the size of tree_decl
• 2003-02-27 15:18 Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer
• 2003-02-27 16:15 Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer
• 2003-02-27 16:55 Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer
• 2003-02-27 17:13 Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer
• 2003-02-28 10:39 Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer
• 2003-02-28 10:55 Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer

Ralf Große Börger

• 2003-02-05 12:39 How to force 32bit access to bit fields ?

sushil page

• 2003-02-12 06:54 about extending frontend

Yek-Chong Yeo

• 2003-02-19 09:22 8051 port

Branko Čibej

• 2003-02-16 19:57 Re: The 'gcc-g++' module name is broken

Aaron Lehmann

• 2003-02-09 20:28 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - THE GRAPH
• 2003-02-25 19:45 Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up
• 2003-02-25 20:26 Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up

Abbas, Mohamed

• 2003-02-07 18:42 RE: __thread problem

Akshay Reddy

• 2003-02-15 22:40 Successful (C, C++, F77, Java)

Alan Modra

• 2003-02-11 00:47 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-11 00:57 Re: linking .common and .weak definitions
• 2003-02-26 00:01 Re: Bug in real.c rewrite

Alan Thompson

• 2003-02-12 05:56 build gcc 3.2.2 on Cygwin
• 2003-02-14 22:09 build of gcc 3.2.2 on Cygwin

Albert Chin

• 2003-02-09 07:15 Re: Successfull build of gcc 3.2.2 under IRIX6.5
• 2003-02-09 15:31 Oddity building 3.2.2 on AIX 4.3.2
• 2003-02-09 23:28 Re: libstdc++ multilibs installed where gcc won't find them
• 2003-02-09 23:54 Re: libstdc++ multilibs installed where gcc won't find them
• 2003-02-10 18:41 Re: Successfull build of gcc 3.2.2 under IRIX6.5
• 2003-02-10 19:02 Re: Successfull build of gcc 3.2.2 under IRIX6.5
• 2003-02-16 05:52 Re: Oddity building 3.2.2 on AIX 4.3.2

Alcino Dall'Igna Junior

• 2003-02-10 00:46 OpenMP

Aldy Hernandez

• 2003-02-06 23:40 Re: PPC E500 chip -- what are the -m switches supposed to be?
• 2003-02-13 21:02 rfc: auto-casted vector types
• 2003-02-17 19:16 Re: rfc: auto-casted vector types
• 2003-02-18 00:18 patch: Re: rfc: auto-casted vector types
• 2003-02-18 19:59 Re: rfc: auto-casted vector types
• 2003-02-27 20:30 Re: undocumented attributes

Alexander Kabaev

• 2003-02-19 18:23 Re: _GLIBCPP_USE_WCHAR_T undefined in FreeBSD's c++config.h?

Alexandre Oliva

• 2003-02-01 11:33 Re: Can't get GCC installed. HELP! (RPM related)
• 2003-02-03 13:07 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith)
• 2003-02-03 13:22 Re: Irix6 native long double libcalls progress report (and problem)
• 2003-02-03 13:29 Re: Irix6 casting long double to double yields bogus results
• 2003-02-03 16:37 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith)
• 2003-02-03 18:13 Re: Warnings for unhandled c++ exceptions?
• 2003-02-05 05:09 Re: gcc 3.2.2 release notes, third draft
• 2003-02-13 06:33 Re: ANSI/ISO Compliance
• 2003-02-13 08:04 Re: Oddity building 3.2.2 on AIX 4.3.2
• 2003-02-20 02:33 Re: Oddity building 3.2.2 on AIX 4.3.2

Allan Sandfeld

• 2003-02-27 14:44 Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)

Allen Gwinn

• 2003-02-19 12:47 Re: spam list ...was GCC 3.2.2 build error on Solaris 9 x86
• 2003-02-21 02:37 Re: spam list ...was GCC 3.2.2 build error on Solaris 9 x86
• 2003-02-21 02:45 Re: spam list ...was GCC 3.2.2 build error on Solaris 9 x86
• 2003-02-21 02:54 Re: spam list ...was GCC 3.2.2 build error on Solaris 9 x86

Andi Kleen

• 2003-02-09 22:13 cache misses in gcc 3.3
• 2003-02-09 22:47 Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3
• 2003-02-10 02:43 Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3
• 2003-02-10 06:18 Re: [Gomp-discuss] Re: Implementing OpenMP pragmas for the C front end
• 2003-02-10 16:13 Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3
• 2003-02-10 17:17 Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3
• 2003-02-10 18:11 Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3
• 2003-02-10 18:16 Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3
• 2003-02-12 17:21 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-13 23:13 Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3
• 2003-02-24 20:28 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-25 00:09 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-25 08:09 Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)
• 2003-02-25 19:51 Re: Breaking up the 'parse' time into 'parse/bison' and 'parse/other'
• 2003-02-26 09:52 Re: Breaking up the 'parse' time into 'parse/bison' and 'parse/other'
• 2003-02-26 11:38 Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)
• 2003-02-26 11:47 Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)
• 2003-02-26 21:50 Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)
• 2003-02-28 08:11 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2
• 2003-02-28 13:06 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2
• 2003-02-28 15:38 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2

andrea

• 2003-02-01 09:03 I n c r e a s e Muscle & Bone Density 3104PmUZ6-118FKjm6890vUlS1-86-27

Andrea Galbusera

• 2003-02-26 17:06 corrupted debug info?

Andreas Jaeger

• 2003-02-01 13:48 Re: failed bootstrap
• 2003-02-01 18:58 Re: x86 libffi installs broken in mainline
• 2003-02-11 07:28 Re: Installation of unwind header
• 2003-02-11 12:19 Re: Installation of unwind header
• 2003-02-11 20:09 Re: Bootstrap failure on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu, trunk
• 2003-02-14 17:29 Re: Wrong mappin of registers in location lists
• 2003-02-18 06:41 Re: Wrong mappin of registers in location lists
• 2003-02-19 08:52 Re: 3.3 target date?
• 2003-02-19 14:46 Re: 3.3 target date?
• 2003-02-22 05:30 Re: Pending patches for PRs 3782 and 8828
• 2003-02-24 14:47 Re: Where is the built-in functions for SSE2 ?
• 2003-02-24 16:14 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-24 16:48 Re: patch that caused regression PR opt/9357

Andreas Schwab

• 2003-02-03 20:45 Re: Warnings for unhandled c++ exceptions?
• 2003-02-07 11:52 IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-02-11 09:24 Re: IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-02-11 12:03 Re: IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-02-18 14:09 Re: concatenation of strings in #include directive.
• 2003-02-24 21:58 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-25 12:58 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-26 21:09 Re: [parisc-linux] 2.4.20-pa27 64bits smp problem!
• 2003-02-26 21:48 Re: [parisc-linux] 2.4.20-pa27 64bits smp problem!
• 2003-02-28 12:50 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2

Andreas Tobler

• 2003-02-08 09:16 Re: Regression tester has web pages again
• 2003-02-12 12:17 bootstrap failure on ppc darwin
• 2003-02-12 13:07 Re: bootstrap failure on ppc darwin AND PPClinux
• 2003-02-12 16:48 Re: bootstrap failure on ppc darwin
• 2003-02-13 21:38 Re: bootstrap failure on ppc darwin
• 2003-02-14 05:57 Re: bootstrap failure on ppc darwin
• 2003-02-16 16:17 dynamic/shared libraries for darwin?
• 2003-02-16 19:05 Re: dynamic/shared libraries for darwin?
• 2003-02-21 16:11 Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c
• 2003-02-21 17:04 Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c
• 2003-02-21 17:27 Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c
• 2003-02-21 17:40 Re: boostrap failure (ICE) on gcc-3_3-branch (todays sources)
• 2003-02-27 20:59 parallel make, do we have a FAQ ?
• 2003-02-27 21:32 Re: parallel make, do we have a FAQ ?

Andrew Haley

• 2003-02-03 13:20 Nonterminating exceptions with longjump?
• 2003-02-10 17:09 Installation of unwind header
• 2003-02-10 18:45 Re: Successfull build of gcc 3.2.2 under IRIX6.5
• 2003-02-10 19:49 Re: Successfull build of gcc 3.2.2 under IRIX6.5
• 2003-02-10 20:03 Re: Successfull build of gcc 3.2.2 under IRIX6.5
• 2003-02-11 10:12 Re: Installation of unwind header
• 2003-02-11 21:14 Re: Successfull build of gcc 3.2.2 under IRIX6.5
• 2003-02-13 18:33 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 19:03 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 19:26 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-14 16:57 Re: Wrong mappin of registers in location lists
• 2003-02-17 15:01 Re: Wrong mappin of registers in location lists
• 2003-02-26 16:08 Words endian is different in registers than in memory
• 2003-02-27 19:59 [tree-ssa] Inlining vs gimple vs compound expressions

Andrew J. Hutton

• 2003-02-21 17:25 Official Announcement: GCC Developer's Summit (2003)

Andrew MacLeod

• 2003-02-27 19:57 Re: [tree-ssa] Inlining vs gimple vs compound expressions
• 2003-02-27 20:06 Re: [tree-ssa] Inlining vs gimple vs compound expressions
• 2003-02-27 20:44 Re: [tree-ssa] Inlining vs gimple vs compound expressions
• 2003-02-27 21:01 Re: [tree-ssa] Inlining vs gimple vs compound expressions

Andrew Pinski

• 2003-02-01 09:38 failed bootstrap
• 2003-02-02 22:49 [PATCH] Re: strcat and config/darwin.c
• 2003-02-03 02:56 [PATCH, rs6000] Make branch_cost changeable on rs6000
• 2003-02-03 06:32 Re: [PATCH] Re: strcat and config/darwin.c
• 2003-02-09 18:32 Re: c++/9574: [3.4 regression] parser crash
• 2003-02-10 19:26 Re: gcc/gcc ChangeLog config/rs6000/rs6000.md conf ...
• 2003-02-18 18:13 Re: optimizations
• 2003-02-21 15:33 Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c
• 2003-02-24 05:18 Re: _Complex and _Imaginary datatypes

Andy Parker

• 2003-02-25 13:12 problems relocating code and rodata sections (gcc 3.2 / arm)

Anmol Paralkar

• 2003-02-08 14:25 Need help on tree-dumps in c3.2

Anna Fowles-Winkler

• 2003-02-27 23:04 Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?

Ansgar Esztermann

• 2003-02-20 13:09 Breaking up enormous source files
• 2003-02-20 14:14 Re: Breaking up enormous source files

Anthony Green

• 2003-02-16 21:44 Re: StrictMath.lo problem when building GCC (HEAD)

Anuradha Ratnaweera

• 2003-02-10 08:26 GCC 2.x vs 3.x for Linux kernel

Arnold Vogelsang

• 2003-02-19 11:21 Successful build of gcc-3.2.2 on alpha-dec-osf4.0f

Ashif S. Harji

• 2003-02-25 20:19 Re: -no-integrated-cpp flag
• 2003-02-26 21:08 Re: -no-integrated-cpp flag
• 2003-02-28 23:48 Re: -no-integrated-cpp flag (patches for gcc3.3)

ATS Stat Consulting Group

• 2003-02-21 11:15 Email Confirmation

Barry Fawthrop

• 2003-02-01 18:51 Gcc Programming

Ben Elliston

• 2003-02-12 03:55 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-14 11:42 new regression tester
• 2003-02-16 14:40 Re: The 'gcc-g++' module name is broken
• 2003-02-16 20:11 Re: The 'gcc-g++' module name is broken
• 2003-02-19 05:02 bug handling guidelines?

Benjamin Kosnik

• 2003-02-03 21:02 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
• 2003-02-03 21:45 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
• 2003-02-04 18:20 question on inlining functions vs. member functions
• 2003-02-05 15:18 Re: GCC 3.2.2 released
• 2003-02-10 18:58 Re: gcc 2.95.4 MT related crashes in basic_string class
• 2003-02-19 18:08 Re: _GLIBCPP_USE_WCHAR_T undefined in FreeBSD's c++config.h?
• 2003-02-19 19:47 Re: _GLIBCPP_USE_WCHAR_T undefined in FreeBSD's c++config.h?
• 2003-02-28 17:03 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2
• 2003-02-28 17:29 are there outstanding patches on the compiler side for gdbnamespace work?

Bernd Jendrissek

• 2003-02-06 07:54 Re: email-based regression search server
• 2003-02-12 07:59 Missing file? libjava/gnu/java/nio/natSelectorImpl.h
• 2003-02-13 09:05 ICE while bootstrapping HEAD of 2003-02-12 19:19:42 UTC

Bernd Trog

• 2003-02-21 21:10 Unfounded warnings in gcc-3.3
• 2003-02-22 15:35 Re: Unfounded warnings in gcc-3.3

Biagio Lucini

• 2003-02-10 17:57 Re: OpenMP, HPC, and the future of GCC
• 2003-02-10 23:14 Re: [Gomp-discuss] [gomp-branch] Merge with tree-ssa as of 2003-02-10

Billinghurst, David (CRTS)

• 2003-02-09 11:09 RE: Successfull build of gcc 3.2.2 under IRIX6.5
• 2003-02-26 10:11 RE: Bootstrap broken by recent fixincl change
• 2003-02-26 10:18 RE: Bootstrap broken by recent fixincl change

Bonzini

• 2003-02-03 15:24 Re: Warnings for unhandled c++ exceptions?
• 2003-02-04 20:03 Good reasons why mingling declarations and statements is gnu89?

Brad Lucier

• 2003-02-02 06:17 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
• 2003-02-18 19:20 One anomalous -O2 result
• 2003-02-19 15:05 fixed PRs
• 2003-02-19 16:21 Re: fixed PRs
• 2003-02-23 04:37 very strange problem on darwin6.4 with gcc-3.4
• 2003-02-25 17:54 mainline bootstrap failure on alphaev6-unknown-linux-gnu

Bruce Stephens

• 2003-02-14 00:48 Re: The 'gcc-g++' module name is broken

c . christian . joensson

• 2003-02-27 21:27 Should contrib/test_summary work with joined gcc/binutils/gdb?

cgd

• 2003-02-14 00:56 Re: The 'gcc-g++' module name is broken

ChangingLINKS.com

• 2003-02-17 17:00 LINK: gcc.gnu.org

Chester R. Hosey

• 2003-02-23 08:35 Re: Target-specific bugs (was Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up)

Chris Lattner

• 2003-02-03 19:39 Re: Warnings for unhandled c++ exceptions?
• 2003-02-13 20:57 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-14 04:48 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-14 18:34 Re: Forced initializing scalars
• 2003-02-25 16:56 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-26 23:04 'malloc' attribute?
• 2003-02-26 23:10 Re: 'malloc' attribute?
• 2003-02-26 23:44 Re: 'malloc' attribute?
• 2003-02-26 23:59 Re: 'malloc' attribute?
• 2003-02-27 00:00 Re: 'malloc' attribute?

chris.danx

• 2003-02-10 15:19 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER

Christian Cornelssen

• 2003-02-01 17:55 Re: x86 libffi installs broken in mainline
• 2003-02-05 00:37 Re: gcc 3.2.2 release notes, third draft
• 2003-02-05 13:38 Re: gcc 3.2.2 release notes, third draft
• 2003-02-05 14:16 Re: GCC 3.2.2 released
• 2003-02-05 17:27 Re: GCC 3.2.2 released
• 2003-02-05 18:23 Re: gcc-3.2.2 release notes (final)
• 2003-02-06 10:04 Re: gcc-3.2.2 release notes (final)
• 2003-02-06 15:03 Re: HTML: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.2/ appears out of date
• 2003-02-06 15:48 Re: Info-files missing in gcc 3.2.2
• 2003-02-06 16:41 Re: HTML: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.2/ appears out of date
• 2003-02-06 18:28 Re: Info-files missing in gcc 3.2.2
• 2003-02-06 22:09 Re: HTML: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.2/ appears out of date
• 2003-02-07 00:21 (wwwdocs) changes.html vs. index.html

Christian Ehrhardt

• 2003-02-20 14:27 Re: To const or not to const...
• 2003-02-25 08:31 Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves?
• 2003-02-27 16:39 Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves?
• 2003-02-28 10:29 Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves?

Christoph Hellwig

• 2003-02-12 07:33 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-25 22:07 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria

Christopher Faylor

• 2003-02-02 22:39 Re: Realure to build uberbaum tree for m68k-elf
• 2003-02-03 16:09 Re: Realure to build uberbaum tree for m68k-elf

Craig Rodrigues

• 2003-02-08 19:31 Re: c++/9440: [3.4 regression] error message about "non-lvalue in unary '&'" when using ?: operator
• 2003-02-09 18:28 Re: c++/9574: [3.4 regression] parser crash
• 2003-02-13 16:58 Re: fstream attach for g++3.2.1
• 2003-02-15 18:07 Re: new C++ parser bug
• 2003-02-19 17:44 _GLIBCPP_USE_WCHAR_T undefined in FreeBSD's c++config.h?
• 2003-02-20 13:32 Re: _GLIBCPP_USE_WCHAR_T undefined in FreeBSD's c++config.h?

D.Venkatasubramanian, Noida

• 2003-02-06 05:44 RE: New targets to Binutils for H8 series
• 2003-02-24 11:16 H8300-elf Cross compiler

Dale Johannesen

• 2003-02-13 00:40 Re: Using FDO to speed up compiler?
• 2003-02-19 20:07 Re: statistical profiling of gcc
• 2003-02-25 23:43 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria

Dan Kegel

• 2003-02-10 20:16 -Wformat-sign-mismatch?
• 2003-02-10 21:32 Re: -Wformat-sign-mismatch?
• 2003-02-10 21:55 Re: -Wformat-sign-mismatch?
• 2003-02-10 23:57 Re: Building a crosscompiler
• 2003-02-14 17:46 RE: new regression tester
• 2003-02-14 22:34 Samba and gcc3.2.2?
• 2003-02-19 19:11 Re: 3.3 target date?
• 2003-02-20 22:41 Re: information about gcc compiler
• 2003-02-20 22:44 Re: 3.3 target date?
• 2003-02-24 20:13 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-28 23:25 Internal compiler error in gcc3.0.2 for ppc403
• 2003-02-28 23:28 Re: Internal compiler error in gcc3.0.2 for ppc403

Dan Nicolaescu

• 2003-02-10 20:29 Re: [tree-ssa] decls in tree-ssa (fwd)
• 2003-02-10 22:18 the size of tree_decl
• 2003-02-12 20:25 Re: the size of tree_decl

Dan Towner

• 2003-02-17 16:53 Using multilibs for all library search paths

Daniel Berlin

• 2003-02-03 17:51 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-02-02
• 2003-02-03 18:06 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-02-02
• 2003-02-03 18:09 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-02-02
• 2003-02-04 04:14 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
• 2003-02-09 22:31 Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3
• 2003-02-10 03:07 Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3
• 2003-02-10 17:59 Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3
• 2003-02-10 21:00 Re: [tree-ssa] decls in tree-ssa (fwd)
• 2003-02-11 00:40 Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3
• 2003-02-11 22:39 [tree-ssa]: Always compute sets (Was Re: [tree-ssa] alias analysis)
• 2003-02-12 07:17 Re: [tree-ssa] alias analysis
• 2003-02-12 07:35 Re: vrp?
• 2003-02-12 14:15 Re: 3.2.2 & 3.3 branch & trunk compilation speed comparison (MICO)
• 2003-02-13 15:58 Re: [tree-ssa] alias analysis
• 2003-02-13 15:59 Re: [tree-ssa] alias analysis
• 2003-02-13 16:23 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP inefficiencies
• 2003-02-13 16:40 Re: Location lists again
• 2003-02-13 17:05 Re: [tree-ssa] alias analysis
• 2003-02-14 08:44 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP inefficiencies
• 2003-02-14 08:46 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP inefficiencies
• 2003-02-14 16:36 Re: Wrong mappin of registers in location lists
• 2003-02-14 16:42 Re: Wrong mappin of registers in location lists
• 2003-02-14 19:24 Re: Reference to .debug_loc
• 2003-02-14 20:23 Re: Reference to .debug_loc
• 2003-02-14 21:09 Re: Reference to .debug_loc
• 2003-02-15 01:40 Re: [tree-ssa] alias analysis
• 2003-02-19 13:29 Re: bug handling guidelines?
• 2003-02-19 23:15 Re: [tree-ssa] Returning to alias analysis
• 2003-02-20 23:22 Re: Bugzilla?
• 2003-02-23 02:06 Re: Garbage Collector interface - GTY
• 2003-02-23 02:23 Please test the gcc bugzilla interface
• 2003-02-23 19:26 Bugzilla user/group permissions
• 2003-02-24 04:14 Re: Bugzilla
• 2003-02-25 18:20 Re: Bugzilla
• 2003-02-25 18:48 Re: Bugzilla
• 2003-02-25 19:11 Re: Bugzilla
• 2003-02-26 07:17 Please test bugzilla web interface
• 2003-02-26 23:01 Re: Please test bugzilla web interface
• 2003-02-27 00:07 Re: Please test bugzilla web interface
• 2003-02-27 15:43 Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer
• 2003-02-27 15:48 Re: Please test bugzilla web interface
• 2003-02-27 19:15 Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer
• 2003-02-27 19:43 Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer
• 2003-02-27 20:34 Re: [tree-ssa] Inlining vs gimple vs compound expressions
• 2003-02-27 20:37 Re: tree-ssa status (was: Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer)
• 2003-02-28 13:25 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2
• 2003-02-28 20:58 Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer

Daniel Carrera

• 2003-02-27 07:08 gcc in IA64

Daniel Egger

• 2003-02-11 23:58 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment

Daniel Jacobowitz

• 2003-02-07 13:36 Re: PR 9479 (was Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (third iteration))
• 2003-02-07 15:19 Re: gcc 3.2.2 not on ftp.gnu.org
• 2003-02-07 18:52 Re: __thread problem
• 2003-02-10 20:49 Re: --enable-__cxa_atexit
• 2003-02-12 16:49 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-14 15:26 Re: Reference to .debug_loc
• 2003-02-14 15:31 Re: Location lists again
• 2003-02-14 19:51 Re: Reference to .debug_loc
• 2003-02-14 20:40 Re: Reference to .debug_loc
• 2003-02-15 13:52 Re: Mainline: C++ include files not found!
• 2003-02-20 18:27 Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
• 2003-02-24 14:37 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-24 20:37 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-24 22:55 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-25 23:01 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-26 17:29 Re: corrupted debug info?
• 2003-02-27 23:50 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2
• 2003-02-28 15:29 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2
• 2003-02-28 15:34 Re: gcc and include dirs -> do we need a /etc/includes.conf?
• 2003-02-28 19:35 Re: C++ optimization: compile time + memory consumption regression on gcc3.3 branch
• 2003-02-28 23:13 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2

Daniel Miranda

• 2003-02-12 12:56 undefined assembler operation

Dave . Salgueiro

• 2003-02-24 20:21 Does any version of the GCC support the Motorola MC68EC000 core ?
• 2003-02-24 20:26 answered my own question (in part)

Dave Hooper

• 2003-02-07 14:23 Re: instruction set hex intel 8086

Dave Murphy

• 2003-02-21 19:38 RE: gcc for ARM in thumb mode

David Carlton

• 2003-02-13 22:40 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-27 17:23 Re: ISO Aliasing rules question
• 2003-02-28 18:25 Re: are there outstanding patches on the compiler side for gdb namespace work?

David Edelsohn

• 2003-02-01 03:18 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
• 2003-02-03 21:31 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
• 2003-02-03 21:41 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
• 2003-02-03 23:03 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
• 2003-02-06 23:03 Re: PPC E500 chip -- what are the -m switches supposed to be?
• 2003-02-07 22:27 Re: Implementing OpenMP pragmas for the C front end
• 2003-02-09 23:24 Re: libstdc++ multilibs installed where gcc won't find them
• 2003-02-09 23:36 Re: libstdc++ multilibs installed where gcc won't find them
• 2003-02-10 16:04 Re: OpenMP, HPC, and the future of GCC
• 2003-02-11 18:32 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-11 19:19 bb-reorder.c AIX bootstrap failure
• 2003-02-11 19:40 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-11 20:33 Re: Bootstrap failure on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu, trunk
• 2003-02-12 15:50 Re: vrp?
• 2003-02-12 16:02 Re: bootstrap failure on ppc darwin
• 2003-02-12 17:40 Re: bootstrap failure on ppc darwin
• 2003-02-12 19:51 Re: vrp?
• 2003-02-13 21:47 Re: bootstrap failure on ppc darwin
• 2003-02-19 01:04 Re: optimizations
• 2003-02-19 21:26 Re: IBM gcc for AIX
• 2003-02-21 17:41 Re: unit-at-a-time option causes incorrect line numbers in warnings
• 2003-02-21 18:20 Re: unit-at-a-time option causes incorrect line numbers in warnings
• 2003-02-24 16:13 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-24 16:17 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-24 17:48 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-24 19:56 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-24 21:37 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-24 23:03 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-24 23:13 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-25 00:51 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-25 17:51 Re: Target deprecation, round three

David Morrison

• 2003-02-19 19:43 statistical profiling of gcc

David Rasmussen

• 2003-02-18 09:49 3.3 target date?

Devang Patel

• 2003-02-01 19:03 Re: GCC 3.2.1 -> GCC 3.3 compile speed regression
• 2003-02-03 21:54 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
• 2003-02-04 03:20 Symbol Separation
• 2003-02-11 00:59 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-11 20:28 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-11 20:46 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-12 15:17 Re: 3.2.2 & 3.3 branch & trunk compilation speed comparison (MICO)
• 2003-02-12 15:21 Re: 3.2.2 & 3.3 branch & trunk compilation speed comparison (MICO)
• 2003-02-27 21:45 Re: compile server design document
• 2003-02-28 19:19 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2
• 2003-02-28 19:22 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2
• 2003-02-28 19:27 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2

Diego Novillo

• 2003-02-01 17:38 Re: x86 libffi installs broken in mainline
• 2003-02-01 19:34 Re: x86 libffi installs broken in mainline
• 2003-02-02 13:47 Re: Branches, website & documentation
• 2003-02-03 17:29 [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-02-02
• 2003-02-03 17:47 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-02-02
• 2003-02-03 17:58 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-02-02
• 2003-02-03 19:36 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-02-02
• 2003-02-03 19:38 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-02-02
• 2003-02-03 23:44 [tree-ssa] New regressions in branch
• 2003-02-05 15:02 New branch for implementing OpenMP in GCC
• 2003-02-05 15:31 Re: New branch for implementing OpenMP in GCC
• 2003-02-08 15:52 Re: Need help on tree-dumps in c3.2
• 2003-02-08 16:55 Re: Need help on tree-dumps in c3.2
• 2003-02-09 20:18 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - THE GRAPH
• 2003-02-09 21:27 [tree-ssa] mainline merge as of 2003-02-09
• 2003-02-10 16:32 Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3
• 2003-02-10 17:39 Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3
• 2003-02-10 18:08 [tree-ssa] decls in tree-ssa (fwd)
• 2003-02-10 18:31 Re: OpenMP, HPC, and the future of GCC
• 2003-02-10 20:23 [gomp-branch] Merge with tree-ssa as of 2003-02-10
• 2003-02-10 20:44 Re: [tree-ssa] decls in tree-ssa (fwd)
• 2003-02-10 21:59 Re: [tree-ssa] decls in tree-ssa (fwd)
• 2003-02-11 18:44 Re: [tree-ssa] alias analysis
• 2003-02-11 18:58 Working on branches while copyright paperwork being processed?
• 2003-02-11 20:35 Re: [tree-ssa] alias analysis
• 2003-02-11 20:35 Re: [tree-ssa] alias analysis
• 2003-02-13 14:57 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-13 15:23 Re: [tree-ssa] alias analysis
• 2003-02-13 15:48 Re: [tree-ssa] alias analysis
• 2003-02-13 15:57 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP inefficiencies
• 2003-02-13 16:10 Re: [tree-ssa] alias analysis
• 2003-02-13 16:21 Re: [tree-ssa] alias analysis
• 2003-02-13 16:22 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP inefficiencies
• 2003-02-13 16:42 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP inefficiencies
• 2003-02-14 08:00 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP inefficiencies
• 2003-02-14 08:43 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-14 08:49 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP inefficiencies
• 2003-02-14 14:16 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP inefficiencies
• 2003-02-19 00:10 Re: [tree-ssa] alias analysis
• 2003-02-20 00:30 Re: [tree-ssa] alias analysis
• 2003-02-24 12:55 [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-02-23
• 2003-02-25 15:28 [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems
• 2003-02-25 15:37 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems
• 2003-02-25 15:50 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems
• 2003-02-25 16:00 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems
• 2003-02-25 16:12 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems
• 2003-02-25 16:16 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems
• 2003-02-25 16:31 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems
• 2003-02-25 16:57 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems
• 2003-02-25 17:23 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems
• 2003-02-25 17:24 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems
• 2003-02-25 17:59 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems
• 2003-02-25 18:22 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems
• 2003-02-25 22:20 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems
• 2003-02-27 00:01 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems
• 2003-02-27 19:52 Re: tree-ssa status (was: Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer)
• 2003-02-27 20:45 Re: tree-ssa status (was: Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer)
• 2003-02-27 21:03 Re: tree-ssa status (was: Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer)

Dirk Mueller

• 2003-02-25 01:44 Re: internal error in cp-lang.c

DJ Delorie

• 2003-02-24 18:27 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-27 21:23 Re: parallel make, do we have a FAQ ?

Dmitry

• 2003-02-18 16:19 gen_highpart() & volatile
• 2003-02-18 18:40 Re: gen_highpart() & volatile

Dmytro Bablinyuk

• 2003-02-20 02:19 gcc for ARM in thumb mode

Dominic Amann

• 2003-02-20 16:50 Broken compiler suite

Doron Wloschowsky

• 2003-02-13 13:01 wstring class not defined - fix

Eric Botcazou

• 2003-02-02 11:27 Re: hppa-linux regressions and 3.2.2 release
• 2003-02-02 16:06 Re: hppa-linux regressions and 3.2.2 release
• 2003-02-02 18:09 Re: hppa-linux regressions and 3.2.2 release
• 2003-02-02 22:35 Re: hppa-linux regressions and 3.2.2 release
• 2003-02-03 07:48 Re: hppa-linux regressions and 3.2.2 release
• 2003-02-03 10:39 Re: hppa-linux regressions and 3.2.2 release
• 2003-02-03 12:07 Re: hppa-linux regressions and 3.2.2 release
• 2003-02-03 13:36 Re: hppa-linux regressions and 3.2.2 release
• 2003-02-11 10:20 Re: ChangeLog conventions (was: hppa-linux regressions and 3.2.2 release)
• 2003-02-19 15:01 Re: 3.3 target date?
• 2003-02-20 19:52 Re: 3.2.2 successfully built :)
• 2003-02-22 09:01 Re: Solaris (Sparc and x86) status?
• 2003-02-25 08:31 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-26 19:47 Re: autoconf issues

Eric Christopher

• 2003-02-06 18:34 Re: [tree-ssa] Can't build because libmudflap needs C++
• 2003-02-11 23:26 Re: Backport fix for PR6362 to 3.2.x?

Eric de Jong

• 2003-02-04 10:35 ARM interworking with different linker sections
• 2003-02-12 08:30 Re: ARM interworking with different linker sections

Erik Trulsson

• 2003-02-13 19:38 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-23 21:50 Re: _Complex and _Imaginary datatypes

Evgenij Portnov

• 2003-02-25 19:01 limit number of errors/warnings for gcc before it gives up.

Falk Hueffner

• 2003-02-06 19:55 Re: alpha nobwx movqi/hi question

Fergus Henderson

• 2003-02-09 18:59 Re: GC impact (was Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4)
• 2003-02-09 19:25 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - THE GRAPH
• 2003-02-09 20:46 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - THE GRAPH
• 2003-02-10 07:43 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - THE GRAPH
• 2003-02-12 05:55 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-12 08:42 Re: i386 string patterns vs global registers
• 2003-02-12 10:39 Re: i386 string patterns vs global registers
• 2003-02-12 17:52 Re: i386 string patterns vs global registers
• 2003-02-12 17:58 Re: 3.2.2 & 3.3 branch & trunk compilation speed comparison (MICO)
• 2003-02-12 19:52 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - THE GRAPH
• 2003-02-13 18:29 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 19:19 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 19:47 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 19:50 Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3
• 2003-02-14 07:13 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-14 07:20 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-14 08:32 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-15 20:58 Re: Machine and hosting donation for the GCC project
• 2003-02-18 05:59 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-20 07:34 Re: How to get current stack size ?
• 2003-02-20 13:55 Re: Breaking up enormous source files
• 2003-02-20 18:18 Re: Broken compiler suite
• 2003-02-21 01:21 Re: Static chains and pointers to functions
• 2003-02-24 13:02 Re: objcopy copies not only symbols asked?
• 2003-02-25 02:57 Re: ISO Aliasing rules question
• 2003-02-25 03:06 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-25 15:36 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-28 13:15 Re: compile server design document

ferrimi

• 2003-02-07 12:02 instruction set hex intel 8086
• 2003-02-07 15:56 Re: instruction set hex intel 8086

Fiora

• 2003-02-09 23:13 Successfull build

Florian Weimer

• 2003-02-07 22:02 Re: [Fwd: failure notice]
• 2003-02-12 08:06 Re: vrp?
• 2003-02-13 21:38 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 21:49 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics

Frank Bagehorn

• 2003-02-07 12:50 Successfull build of gcc 3.2.2 under AIX 5.1

Frank Ch. Eigler

• 2003-02-06 16:29 Re: [tree-ssa] Can't build because libmudflap needs C++

Frank Haverkamp

• 2003-02-04 14:34 Detailed description of -pic -PIC and -relocatable using ppc tools

Franz Sirl

• 2003-02-02 17:27 Re: hppa-linux regressions and 3.2.2 release
• 2003-02-02 23:09 Re: hppa-linux regressions and 3.2.2 release
• 2003-02-03 11:42 Re: hppa-linux regressions and 3.2.2 release
• 2003-02-03 11:42 Re: hppa-linux regressions and 3.2.2 release
• 2003-02-03 13:18 Re: hppa-linux regressions and 3.2.2 release
• 2003-02-03 21:01 Re: hppa-linux regressions and 3.2.2 release
• 2003-02-07 10:15 Re: PR 9479 (was Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (third iteration))
• 2003-02-11 18:29 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-11 18:57 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-12 21:07 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-12 21:53 Re: PR 9479 (was Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (third iteration))
• 2003-02-12 22:26 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-24 21:14 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-24 21:42 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-25 11:55 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria

friz at chez dot com

• 2003-02-20 10:19 information about gcc compiler

Gabor Greif

• 2003-02-02 23:07 Nonterminating exceptions with longjump?
• 2003-02-04 01:16 Re: Nonterminating exceptions with longjump?

Gabriel Dos Reis

• 2003-02-01 16:19 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (second iteration)
• 2003-02-02 11:08 Re: hppa-linux regressions and 3.2.2 release
• 2003-02-02 20:19 Re: hppa-linux regressions and 3.2.2 release
• 2003-02-03 02:19 Re: hppa-linux regressions and 3.2.2 release
• 2003-02-03 11:03 Re: hppa-linux regressions and 3.2.2 release
• 2003-02-03 12:00 Re: hppa-linux regressions and 3.2.2 release
• 2003-02-03 13:32 Re: hppa-linux regressions and 3.2.2 release
• 2003-02-03 16:54 Re: hppa-linux regressions and 3.2.2 release
• 2003-02-03 18:17 Re: Warnings for unhandled c++ exceptions?
• 2003-02-03 19:31 Re: Warnings for unhandled c++ exceptions?
• 2003-02-03 20:08 Re: Warnings for unhandled c++ exceptions?
• 2003-02-03 20:12 Re: Warnings for unhandled c++ exceptions?
• 2003-02-03 20:15 Re: Warnings for unhandled c++ exceptions?
• 2003-02-03 21:17 Re: hppa-linux regressions and 3.2.2 release
• 2003-02-03 21:17 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
• 2003-02-03 21:42 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
• 2003-02-03 23:19 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (third iteration)
• 2003-02-03 23:50 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (third iteration)
• 2003-02-04 20:25 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (third iteration)
• 2003-02-05 01:04 gcc-3_2-branch is frozen
• 2003-02-05 01:14 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (third iteration)
• 2003-02-05 01:16 Re: gcc 3.2.2 release notes, third draft
• 2003-02-06 08:45 Re: gcc 3.2.2 release notes (final)
• 2003-02-06 08:56 Re: gcc-3.2.2 release notes (final)
• 2003-02-06 17:35 Re: Comparison of gcc 3.2.1 and gcc 3.2.2-20030203 with gdb
• 2003-02-07 08:45 Re: 3.2.2 successful builds: GNU/Linux, Solaris, HP-UX
• 2003-02-07 08:46 Re: Announcing pre-releases (was: Comparison of gcc 3.2.1 and gcc 3.2.2-20030203 with gdb
• 2003-02-07 22:15 [MAILER-DAEMON@sources.redhat.com] failure notice
• 2003-02-10 04:43 Re: Backport fix for PR6362 to 3.2.x?
• 2003-02-10 18:06 Re: gcc 2.95.4 MT related crashes in basic_string class
• 2003-02-10 18:26 Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3
• 2003-02-10 18:34 Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3
• 2003-02-10 20:56 Re: --enable-__cxa_atexit
• 2003-02-10 20:59 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-10 22:01 Re: --enable-__cxa_atexit
• 2003-02-10 22:35 Re: --enable-__cxa_atexit
• 2003-02-10 23:11 Re: --enable-__cxa_atexit
• 2003-02-10 23:22 Re: [C++] Compile-Time Reflection Branch
• 2003-02-10 23:49 Re: [C++] Compile-Time Reflection Branch
• 2003-02-12 10:10 Re: Backport fix for PR6362 to 3.2.x?
• 2003-02-12 10:21 Re: --enable-__cxa_atexit
• 2003-02-12 22:53 Re: the size of tree_decl
• 2003-02-13 09:26 Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3
• 2003-02-13 14:44 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 15:33 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 21:01 Re: new C++ parser bug
• 2003-02-13 21:05 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-14 06:59 [cxx-reflection] Merge from trunk as of 2003-02-14
• 2003-02-17 15:01 Re: Oddity building 3.2.2 on AIX 4.3.2
• 2003-02-17 15:02 Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;
• 2003-02-17 15:02 Re: GCC 3.2.2 build error on Solaris 9 x86
• 2003-02-18 07:40 Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;
• 2003-02-19 07:35 Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;
• 2003-02-19 07:55 Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;
• 2003-02-19 15:57 Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;
• 2003-02-20 09:54 Re: 3.2.2 broken on Solaris 8 on x86
• 2003-02-20 10:05 Re: C++ Protected Class Members are Private???
• 2003-02-20 10:07 Re: Turning off C++ casting?
• 2003-02-20 12:18 Re: Turning off C++ casting?
• 2003-02-20 12:56 Re: Turning off C++ casting?
• 2003-02-21 08:28 Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;
• 2003-02-21 08:37 Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3
• 2003-02-24 02:47 Re: Chances of gcc 3.2.3 release?
• 2003-02-24 18:44 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-24 19:36 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-24 20:04 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-25 09:15 Re: Bugzilla
• 2003-02-25 11:14 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-25 11:18 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-25 12:30 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-25 12:36 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-25 14:04 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-26 03:33 Re: additions to GCC 3.2 build status list
• 2003-02-26 03:34 Re: Bug in real.c rewrite
• 2003-02-26 03:39 Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)
• 2003-02-26 04:41 Re: Bootstrap broken by recent fixincl change
• 2003-02-26 10:45 Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)
• 2003-02-26 11:45 Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)
• 2003-02-26 11:53 Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)

Gabriel Dos_Reis

• 2003-02-03 22:26 GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (third iteration)
• 2003-02-05 12:45 GCC 3.2.2 released
• 2003-02-05 12:48 gcc-3_2-branch unfrozen
• 2003-02-05 14:20 Re: GCC 3.2.2 released

Gabriel Paubert

• 2003-02-12 23:50 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment

Gareth Pearce

• 2003-02-22 17:45 'partial preprocessing' option request.

Gary Van Sickle

• 2003-02-13 19:31 Re: new-ra code sizes on Hitachi H8

GATMKORN

• 2003-02-09 13:51 bug in Intel V7 Linux compiler?

gcc

• 2003-02-24 07:39 Hello gcc !
• 2003-02-24 07:41 Hello gcc !
• 2003-02-24 07:41 Hello gcc !

gccadmin

• 2003-02-03 17:03 gcc-ss-20030203 is now available
• 2003-02-10 17:09 gcc-ss-20030210 is now available
• 2003-02-17 17:04 gcc-ss-20030217 is now available
• 2003-02-24 17:08 gcc-ss-20030224 is now available

Geert Bosch

• 2003-02-11 20:01 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-11 23:14 Re: Splitting adalib out into its own directory?
• 2003-02-14 13:30 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics

Geoff Keating

• 2003-02-03 22:32 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
• 2003-02-06 21:36 Re: #import, #pragma once to be removed in 3.4
• 2003-02-07 22:41 Re: Implementing OpenMP pragmas for the C front end
• 2003-02-09 06:19 Re: Regression tester has web pages again
• 2003-02-10 17:55 Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3
• 2003-02-11 16:33 Re: ANSI/ISO Compliance
• 2003-02-11 18:59 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-11 19:26 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-11 20:02 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-11 20:45 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-14 13:52 Re: new regression tester
• 2003-02-17 20:33 Re: [PATCH]: Stack alignment
• 2003-02-18 00:04 Re: rfc: auto-casted vector types
• 2003-02-19 20:56 Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
• 2003-02-22 01:06 Re: ISO Aliasing rules question
• 2003-02-22 19:25 Re: Garbage Collector interface - GTY
• 2003-02-23 01:33 Re: Garbage Collector interface - GTY

Geoffrey Keating

• 2003-02-04 02:45 Regression tester has web pages again

Gerald Pfeifer

• 2003-02-01 00:14 Re: ABI breakage in 3.2.1, 3.3 and mainline
• 2003-02-01 17:36 Re: Which dejagnu version do we require?
• 2003-02-02 13:19 Re: Branches, website & documentation
• 2003-02-05 15:06 Re: New branch for implementing OpenMP in GCC
• 2003-02-06 19:47 Re: Info-files missing in gcc 3.2.2
• 2003-02-06 20:38 Re: HTML: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.2/ appears out of date
• 2003-02-06 22:47 Re: HTML: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.2/ appears out of date
• 2003-02-06 22:47 Announcing pre-releases (was: Comparison of gcc 3.2.1 and gcc3.2.2-20030203 with gdb
• 2003-02-06 22:52 PATCH for Re: Minor update for http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html
• 2003-02-07 08:30 Re: "ways of accomplishing ... the basic goal"
• 2003-02-07 09:51 Re: (wwwdocs) changes.html vs. index.html
• 2003-02-07 22:41 Re: GCC 3.3 for OS/2
• 2003-02-08 01:05 Re: gcc 3.2.2 not on ftp.gnu.org
• 2003-02-08 08:34 PATCH for Re: Comparison of gcc 3.2.1 and gcc 3.2.2-20030203 withgdb
• 2003-02-08 08:53 Re: Regression tester has web pages again
• 2003-02-09 13:19 ChangeLog conventions (was: hppa-linux regressions and 3.2.2 release)
• 2003-02-09 23:37 PATCH for Re: ABI breakage in 3.2.1, 3.3 and mainline
• 2003-02-10 18:37 Re: copy of gcc sources
• 2003-02-10 23:05 Re: --enable-__cxa_atexit
• 2003-02-10 23:47 Re: [C++] Compile-Time Reflection Branch
• 2003-02-11 09:20 Broken links, please help
• 2003-02-13 10:48 libstdc++ related boostrap failure
• 2003-02-13 17:49 Re: ChangeLog conventions
• 2003-02-14 06:43 Re: c99status.html - split up per release?
• 2003-02-14 12:10 Re: new regression tester
• 2003-02-15 10:48 Mainline: C++ include files not found!
• 2003-02-15 16:56 Re: GCC 3.2.2 build error on Solaris 9 x86
• 2003-02-15 17:17 Re: GCC 3.2.2 build error on Solaris 9 x86
• 2003-02-16 19:24 Re: The 'gcc-g++' module name is broken
• 2003-02-16 21:08 PATCH for Re: Broken links, please help
• 2003-02-16 22:08 PATCH for Re: -Wformat-sign-mismatch?
• 2003-02-16 22:11 Mainline bootstrap failure on i386-...
• 2003-02-18 20:21 Bootstrap failure in toplev.c
• 2003-02-19 09:23 Re: 3.3 target date?
• 2003-02-19 09:39 Re: bug handling guidelines?
• 2003-02-19 15:23 Re: fixed PRs
• 2003-02-19 15:25 Re: 3.3 target date?
• 2003-02-21 17:59 Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c
• 2003-02-22 09:03 Re: Target-specific bugs (was Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs goingup)

Gerard Beekmans

• 2003-02-22 01:51 Regarding CVS commit gcc/gcc ChangeLog ggc-page.c @ Feb 4, 2003
• 2003-02-23 16:54 Re: gcc3.3 30% speedup in the past 2 weeks (MICO compilation)
• 2003-02-23 23:28 Re: gcc3.3 30% speedup in the past 2 weeks (MICO compilation)
• 2003-02-23 23:54 Re: gcc3.3 30% speedup in the past 2 weeks (MICO compilation)

Gerhard Tonn

• 2003-02-27 12:23 Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c
• 2003-02-27 14:10 Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c

Gerold J. Wucherpfennig

• 2003-02-28 07:25 gcc and include dirs -> do we need a /etc/includes.conf?
• 2003-02-28 15:31 Re: gcc and include dirs -> do we need a /etc/includes.conf?
• 2003-02-28 15:43 Re: gcc and include dirs -> do we need a /etc/includes.conf?
• 2003-02-28 23:07 Re: gcc and include dirs -> use the C_INCLUDE_PATH var.
• 2003-02-28 23:40 Re: gcc and include dirs

Gianni Mariani

• 2003-02-11 14:18 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-11 14:49 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-12 07:16 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER

Gianni Tedesco

• 2003-02-11 10:07 Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-11 14:49 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-11 14:57 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment

Graham Stott

• 2003-02-03 23:10 RFC: Odd code in sched-deps.c:compute_forward_dependences
• 2003-02-03 23:23 Re: RFC: Odd code in sched-deps.c:compute_forward_dependences
• 2003-02-11 20:45 Re: Failure to build uberbaum for m68k-elf
• 2003-02-16 22:15 Re: StrictMath.lo problem when building GCC (HEAD)
• 2003-02-18 20:32 Re: Bootstrap failure in toplev.c
• 2003-02-25 21:49 Re: All ARM compiler builds failing

Greg Schafer

• 2003-02-03 22:50 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (third iteration)
• 2003-02-03 23:42 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (third iteration)
• 2003-02-05 01:01 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (third iteration)
• 2003-02-05 03:06 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (third iteration)
• 2003-02-07 02:38 PR 9479 (was Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (third iteration))
• 2003-02-07 10:33 Re: PR 9479 (was Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (third iteration))

Grzegorz_Szostak

• 2003-02-19 19:56 IBM gcc for AIX

gyanindra mishra

• 2003-02-07 05:40 Hard Register ??
• 2003-02-10 05:06 Scope statement ???
• 2003-02-15 05:14 RTL generation ???

Gyurki, Istvan (MED)

• 2003-02-24 12:43 objcopy copies not only symbols asked?
• 2003-02-24 14:42 RE: objcopy copies not only symbols asked?

Hans-Peter Nilsson

• 2003-02-24 12:09 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-24 17:32 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-24 17:47 Re: Target deprecation, round three

Helmut Schlattl

• 2003-02-24 11:53 Successfully built: gcc-3.2.2

Herbert Schmid

• 2003-02-06 16:01 Re: Info-files missing in gcc 3.2.2
• 2003-02-24 15:10 Re: Where is the built-in functions for SSE2 ?

Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng

• 2003-02-24 20:52 Meta-expectations when testing
• 2003-02-25 10:50 Re: Meta-expectations when testing
• 2003-02-26 10:10 Re: Meta-expectations when testing
• 2003-02-26 20:01 Re: Meta-expectations when testing
• 2003-02-27 11:28 Re: Meta-expectations when testing

Idris Momoh

• 2003-02-10 08:14 Confirm

Igor Bukanov

• 2003-02-20 01:43 How to get current stack size ?

J.D. Bronson

• 2003-02-07 23:31 OpenBSD 3.2 and GCC 3.2.2
• 2003-02-15 02:36 GCC 3.2.2 build error on Solaris 9 x86
• 2003-02-17 16:33 Re: GCC 3.2.2 build error on Solaris 9 x86 (patch?)
• 2003-02-18 18:16 spam list ...was GCC 3.2.2 build error on Solaris 9 x86
• 2003-02-18 18:17 Re: GCC 3.2.2 build error on Solaris 9 x86

Jack Lloyd

• 2003-02-03 22:30 RE: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
• 2003-02-19 23:17 Re: Turning off C++ casting??
• 2003-02-20 17:57 Re: Turning off C++ casting?

Jakob Engblom

• 2003-02-24 10:13 Re: Feedback-driven optimization

Jakub Jelinek

• 2003-02-07 08:33 Re: PR 9479 (was Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (third iteration))
• 2003-02-14 20:35 Re: Reference to .debug_loc
• 2003-02-21 18:36 Re: [3.2 branch] alpha-linux bootstrap error building libffi
• 2003-02-24 20:32 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria

James Dennett

• 2003-02-04 21:08 Minor update for http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html

James Dessart

• 2003-02-26 19:01 autoconf issues
• 2003-02-26 19:49 Re: autoconf issues

James Michael DuPont

• 2003-02-01 02:22 HACK : getting dwarf2asm.c to compile in CVS head

Jan Hubicka

• 2003-02-01 01:43 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
• 2003-02-02 18:23 Re: Weird comment in flow.c
• 2003-02-06 14:43 Re: libcall problem during new unroller merge
• 2003-02-06 14:57 Re: libcall problem during new unroller merge
• 2003-02-07 15:40 Re: libcall problem during new unroller merge
• 2003-02-07 17:54 Re: IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-02-07 22:26 Re: GCC 3.3 for OS/2
• 2003-02-08 19:31 Re: GCC 3.3 for OS/2
• 2003-02-09 10:40 Re: IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-02-09 14:46 vector operations and scalar operands
• 2003-02-09 22:56 Re: vector operations and scalar operands
• 2003-02-09 23:57 Re: vector operations and scalar operands
• 2003-02-10 10:31 Re: vector operations and scalar operands
• 2003-02-10 12:25 Re: SSE intrinsics + auto-alignment (3.2.2)
• 2003-02-10 15:34 Re: OpenMP, HPC, and the future of GCC
• 2003-02-10 17:45 Re: OpenMP, HPC, and the future of GCC
• 2003-02-10 21:07 Re: [tree-ssa] decls in tree-ssa (fwd)
• 2003-02-11 09:12 Re: IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-02-11 10:18 Re: IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-02-11 12:05 Re: IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-02-11 12:58 Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3
• 2003-02-11 17:23 Re: IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-02-11 18:27 Re: IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-02-12 11:29 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-12 11:32 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-12 12:31 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-12 17:29 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-12 19:51 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-12 20:23 Re: vrp?
• 2003-02-12 21:17 Using FDO to speed up compiler?
• 2003-02-12 22:23 Re: Using FDO to speed up compiler?
• 2003-02-21 20:10 Re: unit-at-a-time option causes incorrect line numbers in warnings
• 2003-02-21 21:36 Re: howto debug ICE? [was: Re: boostrap failure (ICE) on gcc-3_3-branch (todays sources)]
• 2003-02-21 21:50 Re: howto debug ICE? [was: Re: boostrap failure (ICE) on gcc-3_3-branch (todays sources)]
• 2003-02-21 23:03 Re: Using FDO to speed up compiler?
• 2003-02-22 00:26 Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up
• 2003-02-22 10:20 Destrictiveness of expansion and tree inlining deadlock?
• 2003-02-22 11:25 Re: unit-at-a-time option causes incorrect line numbers in warnings
• 2003-02-22 15:41 Re: Difference between "-march=k6-3" and "-march=k6-2"?
• 2003-02-22 18:59 Re: Using FDO to speed up compiler?
• 2003-02-22 23:02 Why is delete_null_pointer_checks called twice
• 2003-02-23 11:00 Re: Feedback-driven optimization
• 2003-02-23 16:35 Re: disable subregs?
• 2003-02-24 17:12 Re: patch that caused regression PR opt/9357
• 2003-02-25 11:30 Re: All ARM compiler builds failing
• 2003-02-26 18:00 Re: All ARM compiler builds failing
• 2003-02-26 18:13 Re: Destrictiveness of expansion and tree inlining deadlock?
• 2003-02-27 11:22 Re: compile server design document
• 2003-02-28 09:56 Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer

Jan-Benedict Glaw

• 2003-02-14 11:48 Re: new regression tester
• 2003-02-14 11:52 Re: new regression tester
• 2003-02-20 14:02 To const or not to const...
• 2003-02-20 15:24 Re: To const or not to const...
• 2003-02-20 18:12 Re: To const or not to const...

Janis Johnson

• 2003-02-05 21:55 Re: email-based regression search server
• 2003-02-05 23:35 Re: email-based regression search server
• 2003-02-06 00:25 additions to build status lists
• 2003-02-06 19:51 Re: Comparison of gcc 3.2.1 and gcc 3.2.2-20030203 with gdb
• 2003-02-06 20:01 Re: Rogue Wave Ver. 7.1.1
• 2003-02-10 18:46 3.2.2 additions to build status list
• 2003-02-14 22:20 3.2.2 additions to GCC 3.2 build status list
• 2003-02-21 02:01 Re: Static chains and pointers to functions
• 2003-02-21 17:45 Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up
• 2003-02-21 18:36 Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up
• 2003-02-21 18:57 Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up
• 2003-02-24 16:45 patch that caused regression PR opt/9357
• 2003-02-24 16:46 patch that caused regression PR c++/9367
• 2003-02-24 16:47 patch that caused regression PR inline-asm/9570
• 2003-02-24 16:48 patch that caused regression PR c++/9676
• 2003-02-24 20:33 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-24 21:04 Re: Meta-expectations when testing
• 2003-02-25 16:59 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-25 17:11 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-25 17:43 Re: Meta-expectations when testing
• 2003-02-25 17:45 Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up
• 2003-02-25 18:01 Re: Target-specific bugs (was Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs goingup)
• 2003-02-25 18:17 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-25 18:34 Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up
• 2003-02-25 20:44 patches that affect regression PR c++/9820
• 2003-02-25 21:22 additions to GCC 3.2 build status list
• 2003-02-26 17:14 Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up
• 2003-02-26 17:46 Re: Meta-expectations when testing
• 2003-02-26 20:44 Re: Meta-expectations when testing

Jason Merrill

• 2003-02-21 23:01 Re: [tree-ssa] Multiple simplification calls
• 2003-02-27 21:23 Re: [tree-ssa] Inlining vs gimple vs compound expressions

Jason R Thorpe

• 2003-02-24 21:30 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-25 02:49 Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c
• 2003-02-27 01:12 Re: patch that caused regression PR c++/9367

Jean-Pierre Radley

• 2003-02-08 22:07 Re: gcc-3.2.2 and SCO Openserver 5.0.6A

Jeffrey Stephens

• 2003-02-08 10:16 Results of Building GCC 3.2.2

jeroen dobbelaere

• 2003-02-26 10:51 xscale arm build bootstrap fails

Jiang Alan

• 2003-02-24 14:21 Where is the built-in functions for SSE2 ?

Jim Allan

• 2003-02-15 22:49 3.2.2 static build in cygwin

Jim Wilson

• 2003-02-06 21:46 Re: PPC E500 chip -- what are the -m switches supposed to be?
• 2003-02-10 22:48 Re: IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-02-11 15:24 Re: IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-02-11 18:22 Re: IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-02-17 22:25 Re: rfc: auto-casted vector types
• 2003-02-24 22:40 Re: IA64 simulator and board description?
• 2003-02-24 23:13 Re: Feedback-driven optimization
• 2003-02-26 04:29 Re: limit number of errors/warnings for gcc before it gives up.
• 2003-02-26 06:31 Re: failuer to build uberbaum --target=m68k-elf
• 2003-02-26 15:47 Re: failuer to build uberbaum --target=m68k-elf
• 2003-02-27 18:30 Re: failuer to build uberbaum --target=m68k-elf
• 2003-02-28 03:36 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2
• 2003-02-28 15:52 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2
• 2003-02-28 16:06 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2

Jing Luo

• 2003-02-08 22:30 gmake questions

Jochen Kmietsch

• 2003-02-19 22:06 3.2.2 broken on Solaris 8 on x86
• 2003-02-21 09:13 Re: 3.2.2 broken on Solaris 8 on x86

Joe Buck

• 2003-02-01 01:28 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
• 2003-02-03 16:55 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (second iteration)
• 2003-02-03 17:07 Re: Warnings for unhandled c++ exceptions?
• 2003-02-03 17:10 Re: hppa-linux regressions and 3.2.2 release
• 2003-02-04 21:07 gcc 3.2.2 release notes, third draft
• 2003-02-05 00:22 Re: GCC 3.3 Signal 11 again
• 2003-02-05 00:37 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (third iteration)
• 2003-02-05 00:49 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (third iteration)
• 2003-02-05 02:59 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (third iteration)
• 2003-02-05 17:20 gcc 3.2.2 release notes (final)
• 2003-02-05 23:06 Re: email-based regression search server
• 2003-02-05 23:43 Re: email-based regression search server
• 2003-02-06 03:10 Re: GCC 3.2.2 released
• 2003-02-06 17:41 3.2.2 successful builds: GNU/Linux, Solaris, HP-UX
• 2003-02-06 21:19 Re: #import, #pragma once to be removed in 3.4
• 2003-02-06 21:24 Re: 3.2.2 successful builds: GNU/Linux, Solaris, HP-UX
• 2003-02-06 21:31 Re: Info-files missing in gcc 3.2.2
• 2003-02-07 17:28 Re: PR 9479 (was Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (third iteration))
• 2003-02-07 22:22 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - THE GRAPH
• 2003-02-07 22:27 Re: GCC 3.3 for OS/2
• 2003-02-08 00:18 Re: possible red flag for new C++ parser
• 2003-02-08 00:21 Re: possible red flag for new C++ parser
• 2003-02-10 17:46 Re: possible red flag for new C++ parser
• 2003-02-10 17:51 Re: Installation of unwind header
• 2003-02-12 02:28 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-12 17:48 Re: Working on branches while copyright paperwork being processed?
• 2003-02-12 18:07 Re: Working on branches while copyright paperwork being processed?
• 2003-02-13 16:00 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 17:13 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 19:03 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 19:05 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 19:42 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-14 18:07 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-14 18:10 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-14 23:40 Re: Samba and gcc3.2.2?
• 2003-02-18 17:45 Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;
• 2003-02-18 18:10 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-18 18:13 Re: ANSI/ISO Compliance
• 2003-02-18 18:57 Re: ANSI/ISO Compliance
• 2003-02-19 23:57 Re: Machine and hosting donation for the GCC project
• 2003-02-21 20:29 Re: [tree-ssa] Multiple simplification calls

Joe Buehler

• 2003-02-14 18:14 gcc private static object constructor thread-safety (revisited)

Joel Sherrill

• 2003-02-03 14:32 Re: What CPU ports should have working Ada?
• 2003-02-03 23:27 Ignored errors building gcc 3.2 branch
• 2003-02-04 14:38 Re: Ignored errors building gcc 3.2 branch
• 2003-02-06 18:34 Re: POC for GCC ARM back end?
• 2003-02-07 15:06 gcc 3.2.2 not on ftp.gnu.org
• 2003-02-10 23:28 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-11 15:20 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-12 17:54 Re: Working on branches while copyright paperwork being processed?
• 2003-02-19 13:44 Re: 3.3 target date?
• 2003-02-19 16:54 m68k regression (PR9255) was Re: 3.3 target date?
• 2003-02-20 13:57 what binutils for m68hc11-elf and gcc 3.3-branch
• 2003-02-21 18:21 Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up
• 2003-02-21 20:29 Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c
• 2003-02-23 20:50 Re: Target-specific bugs (was Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs goingup)
• 2003-02-24 14:49 arc-*-* was Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-24 17:32 Re: arc-*-* was Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-25 14:42 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-25 15:33 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-25 18:25 Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up
• 2003-02-25 19:23 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-25 19:23 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-26 14:27 Re: failuer to build uberbaum --target=m68k-elf
• 2003-02-26 16:06 Re: failuer to build uberbaum --target=m68k-elf
• 2003-02-27 18:47 Re: failuer to build uberbaum --target=m68k-elf
• 2003-02-28 14:16 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?

Joern Rennecke

• 2003-02-21 15:53 unit-at-a-time option causes incorrect line numbers in warnings

John David Anglin

• 2003-02-03 00:25 Re: hppa-linux regressions and 3.2.2 release
• 2003-02-03 02:38 Re: hppa-linux regressions and 3.2.2 release
• 2003-02-03 05:02 Re: hppa-linux regressions and 3.2.2 release
• 2003-02-03 16:26 Re: hppa-linux regressions and 3.2.2 release
• 2003-02-03 18:02 Re: hppa-linux regressions and 3.2.2 release
• 2003-02-11 03:25 Bootstrap failure on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu, trunk
• 2003-02-11 17:25 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-11 19:37 Re: Bootstrap failure on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu, trunk
• 2003-02-11 19:59 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-11 20:29 Re: Bootstrap failure on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu, trunk
• 2003-02-11 22:51 Re: Bootstrap failure on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu, trunk
• 2003-02-12 16:21 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-12 22:31 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-13 06:14 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-13 17:59 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-17 19:52 [PATCH]: Stack alignment
• 2003-02-17 22:12 Re: [PATCH]: Stack alignment
• 2003-02-17 23:35 Re: [PATCH]: Stack alignment
• 2003-02-21 19:16 Bootstrap failure with todays 3.3 CVS on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
• 2003-02-26 21:13 Re: [parisc-linux] 2.4.20-pa27 64bits smp problem!
• 2003-02-26 22:50 Re: [parisc-linux] 2.4.20-pa27 64bits smp problem!
• 2003-02-27 16:59 Re: [parisc-linux] 2.4.20-pa27 64bits smp problem!

John Kopplin

• 2003-02-04 16:36 Free Gnu Makefiles for all Petzold programs

John Lu

• 2003-02-20 20:09 Static chains and pointers to functions

john mark

• 2003-02-22 17:29 what is the use of your services.
• 2003-02-22 17:30 what is the use of your services.

John Vickers

• 2003-02-06 11:01 HTML: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.2/ appears out of date

Jonah Graham

• 2003-02-04 18:09 instruction scheduler and passing arguments in registers
• 2003-02-04 18:10 instruction scheduler and passing arguments in registers
• 2003-02-10 00:27 Re: Regression tester has web pages again

Jonah Simandjuntak

• 2003-02-14 19:37 Successfully built and installed GCC 3.2.2

Jonathan A . Solomon

• 2003-02-10 18:07 copy of gcc sources

Jonathan Lennox

• 2003-02-07 16:47 Re: #import, #pragma once to be removed in 3.4
• 2003-02-12 01:24 GCC 3.2.2 successful build: alphaev6-dec-osf4.0f

Jonathan Thornburg

• 2003-02-03 13:30 successful build of gcc-3.2.1 (C,C++,F77) on i386-unknown-openbsd3.1
• 2003-02-24 20:44 successfully built/installed gcc-3.2.2 on i386-unknown-openbsd3.1

Jose E. Marchesi

• 2003-02-13 19:32 contributors HOWTO?

Josef Zlomek

• 2003-02-11 22:37 Re: Bootstrap failure on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu, trunk
• 2003-02-14 16:10 Re: Wrong mappin of registers in location lists
• 2003-02-14 16:17 Re: Wrong mappin of registers in location lists
• 2003-02-22 10:45 Garbage Collector interface - GTY
• 2003-02-22 20:29 Re: Garbage Collector interface - GTY
• 2003-02-23 10:04 Re: Garbage Collector interface - GTY

Joseph S. Myers

• 2003-02-03 17:30 Re: hppa-linux regressions and 3.2.2 release
• 2003-02-04 01:47 Re: Ignored errors building gcc 3.2 branch
• 2003-02-04 08:57 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 [off-topic: forks]
• 2003-02-04 20:50 Re: Good reasons why mingling declarations and statements is gnu89?
• 2003-02-06 17:44 Re: Info-files missing in gcc 3.2.2
• 2003-02-06 20:20 Re: Info-files missing in gcc 3.2.2
• 2003-02-07 00:11 Re: "ways of accomplishing ... the basic goal"
• 2003-02-08 00:17 Re: Implementing OpenMP pragmas for the C front end
• 2003-02-08 12:15 Re: Implementing OpenMP pragmas for the C front end
• 2003-02-09 23:24 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - THE GRAPH
• 2003-02-10 20:40 Re: -Wformat-sign-mismatch?
• 2003-02-10 21:46 Re: -Wformat-sign-mismatch?
• 2003-02-11 23:32 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-11 23:35 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - THE GRAPH
• 2003-02-12 07:52 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-13 16:36 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 16:45 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 22:56 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 23:03 Re: contributors HOWTO?
• 2003-02-14 00:38 Re: The 'gcc-g++' module name is broken
• 2003-02-14 18:51 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-14 18:59 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-16 22:27 Re: PATCH for Re: -Wformat-sign-mismatch?
• 2003-02-20 20:17 Re: To const or not to const...
• 2003-02-22 00:30 Re: ISO Aliasing rules question
• 2003-02-22 08:30 Re: Target-specific bugs (was Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs goingup)
• 2003-02-24 23:08 Re: ISO Aliasing rules question
• 2003-02-25 18:37 Re: Bugzilla
• 2003-02-25 18:40 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-26 23:41 Re: 'malloc' attribute?
• 2003-02-27 00:12 Re: 'malloc' attribute?
• 2003-02-27 10:49 Re: compile server design document
• 2003-02-27 20:15 Re: compile server design document
• 2003-02-27 20:55 Re: undocumented attributes

Julie Deslongchamps

• 2003-02-04 16:07 Problem with a map default argument initialization

Justin Hibbits

• 2003-02-23 20:18 _Complex and _Imaginary datatypes
• 2003-02-24 05:06 Re: _Complex and _Imaginary datatypes

Kai Henningsen

• 2003-02-01 14:54 Differences between gcc and src CVS
• 2003-02-07 08:34 Re: #import, #pragma once to be removed in 3.4
• 2003-02-16 08:17 Re: Broken links, please help
• 2003-02-19 07:45 Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;
• 2003-02-20 22:40 Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;
• 2003-02-22 14:25 PING: Patch: mainline bootstrap failure (libobjc)
• 2003-02-24 20:02 Re: PING: Patch: mainline bootstrap failure (libobjc)

Kaoru Fukui

• 2003-02-12 17:24 Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3
• 2003-02-12 17:29 Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3
• 2003-02-12 17:41 Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3
• 2003-02-12 21:42 [patch] for gcc-3.3 *Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3
• 2003-02-12 21:46 Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3
• 2003-02-21 17:57 Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3
• 2003-02-22 01:22 Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3

Karel Gardas

• 2003-02-07 14:14 Re: "ways of accomplishing ... the basic goal"
• 2003-02-10 17:50 gcc 2.95.4 MT related crashes in basic_string class
• 2003-02-10 19:05 Re: gcc 2.95.4 MT related crashes in basic_string class
• 2003-02-12 08:17 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-12 13:51 3.2.2 & 3.3 branch & trunk compilation speed comparison (MICO)
• 2003-02-12 14:21 Re: 3.2.2 & 3.3 branch & trunk compilation speed comparison (MICO)
• 2003-02-12 17:00 Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3
• 2003-02-12 17:05 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-12 21:03 Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3
• 2003-02-12 21:59 Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3
• 2003-02-12 22:11 Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3
• 2003-02-12 22:16 Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3
• 2003-02-13 22:08 Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3
• 2003-02-13 22:31 Re: GCC Compile-Time Regressions
• 2003-02-19 14:40 compare_test issue.
• 2003-02-19 15:52 Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3
• 2003-02-19 18:24 Re: _GLIBCPP_USE_WCHAR_T undefined in FreeBSD's c++config.h?
• 2003-02-19 18:25 Re: compare_test issue.
• 2003-02-21 15:13 boostrap failure (ICE) on gcc-3_3-branch (todays sources)
• 2003-02-21 15:33 Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c
• 2003-02-21 21:29 howto debug ICE? [was: Re: boostrap failure (ICE) on gcc-3_3-branch(todays sources)]
• 2003-02-23 00:29 gcc3.3 30% speedup in the past 2 weeks (MICO compilation)
• 2003-02-23 20:22 Re: gcc3.3 30% speedup in the past 2 weeks (MICO compilation)
• 2003-02-28 14:00 C++ optimization: compile time + memory consumption regression ongcc3.3 branch
• 2003-02-28 21:01 Re: C++ optimization: compile time + memory consumption regressionon gcc3.3 branch

Karol Szkudlarek

• 2003-02-24 20:02 internal error in cp-lang.c

Kaveh R. Ghazi

• 2003-02-01 04:32 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
• 2003-02-03 15:18 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith)
• 2003-02-06 20:46 Re: 3.2.2 successful builds: GNU/Linux, Solaris, HP-UX
• 2003-02-10 03:01 Backport fix for PR6362 to 3.2.x?
• 2003-02-10 05:36 Re: Backport fix for PR6362 to 3.2.x?
• 2003-02-11 15:31 Re: Backport fix for PR6362 to 3.2.x?
• 2003-02-11 16:12 Re: 3.2.2 successful builds: GNU/Linux, Solaris, HP-UX
• 2003-02-12 15:38 Re: 3.2.2 successful builds: GNU/Linux, Solaris, HP-UX
• 2003-02-12 16:16 Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3
• 2003-02-13 02:30 Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3
• 2003-02-17 16:27 Re: GCC 3.2.2 build error on Solaris 9 x86
• 2003-02-20 20:38 Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3
• 2003-02-21 00:46 Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3
• 2003-02-21 13:47 Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3
• 2003-02-21 14:29 Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c
• 2003-02-21 16:48 Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c
• 2003-02-21 16:59 Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c
• 2003-02-21 17:00 Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c
• 2003-02-22 00:39 Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3
• 2003-02-22 03:22 Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c
• 2003-02-22 16:02 Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c
• 2003-02-23 16:21 Re: gcc3.3 30% speedup in the past 2 weeks (MICO compilation)
• 2003-02-23 23:00 Re: gcc3.3 30% speedup in the past 2 weeks (MICO compilation)
• 2003-02-23 23:54 GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-24 23:29 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-24 23:56 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-25 02:06 Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c
• 2003-02-25 16:07 Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c
• 2003-02-25 16:18 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-25 16:24 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-25 22:05 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-26 04:10 Bootstrap broken by recent fixincl change
• 2003-02-26 14:50 RE: Bootstrap broken by recent fixincl change
• 2003-02-27 13:59 Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c
• 2003-02-28 03:58 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?

Kazu Hirata

• 2003-02-05 14:00 Re: How to force 32bit access to bit fields ?
• 2003-02-13 13:24 Re: new-ra code sizes on Hitachi H8
• 2003-02-13 23:00 Re: new-ra code sizes on Hitachi H8
• 2003-02-24 14:19 Re: H8300-elf Cross compiler

Kean Johnston

• 2003-02-25 11:45 RE: GCC 3.3 release criteria

Kelley Cook

• 2003-02-07 04:19 Re: GCC 3.3-Signal 11
• 2003-02-07 05:15 Re: GCC 3.3-Signal 11
• 2003-02-07 20:53 Suggestion: Rename gcc 3.3 -> 3.3.0
• 2003-02-07 20:59 Re: instruction set hex intel 8086
• 2003-02-21 20:22 Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c

Ken Chuang

• 2003-02-12 01:13 about libgcc and libc.so.6 problem

Kevin B. Hendricks

• 2003-02-07 16:18 Darwin gcc 3.3 sizeof of C++ structures with long long ints is strange

Kevin Puetz

• 2003-02-10 19:33 Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3

Kor Snyman

• 2003-02-28 08:20 Subject: GNU ARM cross compiler failing to call code in ram from flash

Krzysztof Parzyszek

• 2003-02-21 16:12 Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c
• 2003-02-21 17:40 Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c
• 2003-02-21 18:11 Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c

Kumar Gala

• 2003-02-17 22:27 Re: rfc: auto-casted vector types
• 2003-02-17 22:33 Re: rfc: auto-casted vector types
• 2003-02-26 03:14 Who to query about copyright assignment practices?

Kurt Wall

• 2003-02-28 01:38 Re: parallel make, do we have a FAQ ?

Larin Hennessy

• 2003-02-23 20:03 HAVE_probe macro

Lars Segerlund

• 2003-02-07 07:22 Re: "ways of accomplishing ... the basic goal"
• 2003-02-11 07:32 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-11 16:03 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-12 08:10 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-12 10:03 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - A QUESTION
• 2003-02-25 11:32 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria

Laurent Guerby

• 2003-02-02 13:03 Branches, website & documentation
• 2003-02-12 20:01 Machine and hosting donation for the GCC project
• 2003-02-12 21:26 Re: [wwwdocs] Where is the new_register_allocator anchor? (fwd)
• 2003-02-19 21:04 Re: Machine and hosting donation for the GCC project
• 2003-02-19 22:21 Re: Machine and hosting donation for the GCC project
• 2003-02-20 00:23 Re: Machine and hosting donation for the GCC project

law

• 2003-02-10 16:24 Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3
• 2003-02-10 17:51 Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3
• 2003-02-10 18:15 Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3
• 2003-02-10 18:23 Re: [tree-ssa] decls in tree-ssa (fwd)
• 2003-02-11 03:27 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-11 17:29 [tree-ssa] alias analysis
• 2003-02-11 18:51 Re: [tree-ssa] alias analysis
• 2003-02-12 04:35 Re: Working on branches while copyright paperwork being processed?
• 2003-02-12 04:37 Re: [tree-ssa] alias analysis
• 2003-02-12 06:30 Re: [tree-ssa] alias analysis
• 2003-02-12 06:41 Re: the size of tree_decl
• 2003-02-12 14:23 Re: Working on branches while copyright paperwork being processed?
• 2003-02-12 14:23 Re: vrp?
• 2003-02-12 19:16 Re: vrp?
• 2003-02-12 23:03 Re: the size of tree_decl
• 2003-02-12 23:04 [tree-ssa] CCP inefficiencies
• 2003-02-13 16:09 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP inefficiencies
• 2003-02-13 16:34 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP inefficiencies
• 2003-02-14 14:02 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP inefficiencies
• 2003-02-14 16:07 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP inefficiencies
• 2003-02-14 17:04 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP inefficiencies
• 2003-02-14 19:49 Re: the size of tree_decl
• 2003-02-14 23:14 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP inefficiencies
• 2003-02-14 23:30 Re: the size of tree_decl
• 2003-02-14 23:47 Re: [tree-ssa] Build Failure
• 2003-02-15 00:08 Re: [tree-ssa] alias analysis
• 2003-02-19 00:43 Re: [tree-ssa] alias analysis
• 2003-02-19 22:47 [tree-ssa] Returning to alias analysis
• 2003-02-20 00:25 Re: [tree-ssa] alias analysis
• 2003-02-20 18:11 Re: [tree-ssa] alias analysis
• 2003-02-21 16:45 [tree-ssa] Multiple simplification calls
• 2003-02-21 17:12 ISO Aliasing rules question
• 2003-02-21 19:33 Re: ISO Aliasing rules question
• 2003-02-22 00:01 Re: [tree-ssa] Multiple simplification calls
• 2003-02-22 23:09 Re: Why is delete_null_pointer_checks called twice
• 2003-02-24 21:23 Re: ISO Aliasing rules question
• 2003-02-25 00:29 Bug in real.c rewrite
• 2003-02-25 15:42 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems
• 2003-02-25 15:49 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems
• 2003-02-25 16:07 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems
• 2003-02-25 16:20 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems
• 2003-02-25 16:23 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems
• 2003-02-25 16:47 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems
• 2003-02-25 16:51 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems
• 2003-02-25 17:28 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems
• 2003-02-25 18:16 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems
• 2003-02-25 18:21 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems
• 2003-02-25 18:33 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems
• 2003-02-25 19:31 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems
• 2003-02-25 20:47 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems
• 2003-02-25 22:35 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems
• 2003-02-25 23:45 Re: Bug in real.c rewrite
• 2003-02-26 23:27 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems
• 2003-02-27 00:14 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems
• 2003-02-27 15:13 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems
• 2003-02-27 19:42 [tree-ssa] Inlining vs gimple vs compound expressions
• 2003-02-27 20:49 Re: [tree-ssa] Inlining vs gimple vs compound expressions
• 2003-02-27 20:56 Re: [tree-ssa] Inlining vs gimple vs compound expressions
• 2003-02-27 22:11 Re: tree-ssa status (was: Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer)
• 2003-02-27 22:47 Re: tree-ssa status
• 2003-02-28 14:25 Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer
• 2003-02-28 15:16 Re: [tree-ssa] Inlining vs gimple vs compound expressions

Leonardo

• 2003-02-24 10:44 Crosscompiler

Lew Bloch

• 2003-02-16 03:31 successful build of GCC 3.2.2

Linus Torvalds

• 2003-02-12 00:09 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-12 00:55 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-12 06:23 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-12 16:39 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-12 17:19 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-12 17:51 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER

Loic Dachary

• 2003-02-20 12:45 Re: Machine and hosting donation for the GCC project

Loren James Rittle

• 2003-02-01 02:49 Re: ABI breakage in 3.2.1, 3.3 and mainline
• 2003-02-07 03:19 New semicolon handling in specs uncovered questionable error text
• 2003-02-07 23:44 Re: New semicolon handling in specs uncovered questionable error text
• 2003-02-18 03:50 Re: Of threads and OpenBSD
• 2003-02-19 05:16 Re: Bootstrap failure in toplev.c

M. Lavasani

• 2003-02-19 09:37 Gcc-3.2.2 on HPUX-IA64

Marc Espie

• 2003-02-02 14:34 Re: What CPU ports should have working Ada?
• 2003-02-09 17:46 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - THE GRAPH
• 2003-02-10 18:12 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-11 15:55 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-11 16:03 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-12 12:38 Of threads and OpenBSD
• 2003-02-23 17:11 Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c

Marcel Cox

• 2003-02-09 15:13 Re: bug in Intel V7 Linux compiler?
• 2003-02-10 11:03 Re: GCC 2.x vs 3.x for Linux kernel
• 2003-02-14 07:46 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-23 21:24 Re: _Complex and _Imaginary datatypes

Marco Morandini

• 2003-02-24 12:21 Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c

Marcus Josiger

• 2003-02-13 09:49 GCC 2.7.x for HP-UX 10

Marcus Meissner

• 2003-02-08 17:06 Re: possible red flag for new C++ parser

Mario Jarosch

• 2003-02-06 08:38 Rogue Wave Ver. 7.1.1

Mark Hahn

• 2003-02-15 18:53 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics

Mark Mielke

• 2003-02-03 19:13 Re: Warnings for unhandled c++ exceptions?

Mark Mitchell

• 2003-02-01 01:32 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
• 2003-02-03 21:10 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
• 2003-02-03 21:15 Re: Ephemeral garbage [Was: GCC 3.2.1 -> GCC 3.3 compile speedregression]
• 2003-02-03 21:29 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
• 2003-02-03 21:53 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
• 2003-02-03 21:56 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
• 2003-02-11 18:55 Re: --enable-__cxa_atexit
• 2003-02-11 19:08 Re: Successfull build of gcc 3.2.2 under IRIX6.5
• 2003-02-11 19:14 RE: --enable-__cxa_atexit
• 2003-02-11 19:21 Re: --enable-__cxa_atexit
• 2003-02-11 22:00 Re: Successfull build of gcc 3.2.2 under IRIX6.5
• 2003-02-18 07:12 Re: rfc: auto-casted vector types
• 2003-02-18 07:23 Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;
• 2003-02-18 16:09 Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;
• 2003-02-18 16:26 Re: [Fwd: Fixing PR optimization/9258 and PR fortran/7681 on 3.3branch.]
• 2003-02-18 20:03 Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;
• 2003-02-19 18:18 Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;
• 2003-02-20 18:00 Re: 3.3 target date?
• 2003-02-20 19:32 Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3
• 2003-02-20 20:17 Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
• 2003-02-20 20:43 Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;
• 2003-02-20 21:18 Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
• 2003-02-20 22:48 Re: 3.3 target date?
• 2003-02-20 22:50 Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3
• 2003-02-21 19:13 Re: ISO Aliasing rules question
• 2003-02-21 19:58 Re: ISO Aliasing rules question
• 2003-02-21 20:03 Re: ISO Aliasing rules question
• 2003-02-21 20:30 Re: ISO Aliasing rules question
• 2003-02-21 23:03 SC gives Global Write Privileges to Zack Weinberg
• 2003-02-22 00:53 Re: SC gives Global Write Privileges to Zack Weinberg
• 2003-02-22 02:51 Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3
• 2003-02-24 07:21 PR 8805: EH vs. CFG
• 2003-02-24 07:35 Re: Destrictiveness of expansion and tree inlining deadlock?
• 2003-02-24 22:47 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-24 23:40 [Fwd: Re: Target deprecation, round three]
• 2003-02-25 02:39 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-25 02:40 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-26 05:13 Re: Who to query about copyright assignment practices?

Mark Wielaard

• 2003-02-16 22:28 Re: StrictMath.lo problem when building GCC (HEAD)

Martin Buchholz

• 2003-02-02 18:06 Re: C++ template parameter constraints

Massimiliano Cialdi

• 2003-02-27 08:22 undocumented attributes

Matt Austern

• 2003-02-03 22:40 GC overhead (Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4)
• 2003-02-03 22:53 Re: GC overhead (Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4)
• 2003-02-04 20:47 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
• 2003-02-06 21:41 Re: #import, #pragma once to be removed in 3.4
• 2003-02-09 18:00 Re: GC impact (was Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4)
• 2003-02-11 00:55 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-12 03:32 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-12 19:18 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-13 20:35 new C++ parser bug
• 2003-02-13 22:00 Re: GCC Compile-Time Regressions
• 2003-02-18 20:29 Re: Bootstrap failure in toplev.c
• 2003-02-18 22:39 Re: Bootstrap failure in toplev.c
• 2003-02-18 22:46 Re: Bootstrap failure in toplev.c
• 2003-02-25 00:32 Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)
• 2003-02-25 17:59 Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)
• 2003-02-25 20:58 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-25 22:22 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-25 23:20 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-26 21:45 Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)
• 2003-02-27 23:09 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?

Matthew Wilcox

• 2003-02-03 11:58 Re: What CPU ports should have working Ada?
• 2003-02-26 20:37 Re: [parisc-linux] 2.4.20-pa27 64bits smp problem!

Matthias Klose

• 2003-02-21 18:31 [3.2 branch] alpha-linux bootstrap error building libffi
• 2003-02-21 18:57 Re: [3.2 branch] alpha-linux bootstrap error building libffi
• 2003-02-22 16:10 Re: PING: Patch: mainline bootstrap failure (libobjc)
• 2003-02-25 06:43 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-25 17:08 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria

Matthias Oltmanns

• 2003-02-06 08:50 RE: How to supress this warning

Mattias Engdegård

• 2003-02-26 11:05 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria

Mehdi Khaldi

• 2003-02-20 16:24 gcc on solaris

Michael Elizabeth Chastain

• 2003-02-06 16:59 Comparison of gcc 3.2.1 and gcc 3.2.2-20030203 with gdb
• 2003-02-06 18:53 Re: Comparison of gcc 3.2.1 and gcc 3.2.2-20030203 with gdb
• 2003-02-07 16:02 Re: Comparison of gcc 3.2.1 and gcc 3.2.2-20030203 with gdb
• 2003-02-23 22:06 Chances of gcc 3.2.3 release?
• 2003-02-25 14:57 master copy of ltcf-c.sh, ltcf-gcj.sh, ltmain.sh?

Michael Hayes

• 2003-02-25 20:51 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria

Michael LeBlanc

• 2003-02-11 13:45 ANSI/ISO Compliance
• 2003-02-17 20:00 Re: ANSI/ISO Compliance
• 2003-02-18 21:35 Re: ANSI/ISO Compliance

Michael Matz

• 2003-02-01 00:21 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
• 2003-02-09 18:57 Re: vector operations and scalar operands
• 2003-02-10 17:01 Installation of unwind header
• 2003-02-12 10:40 Re: i386 string patterns vs global registers
• 2003-02-12 10:42 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - A QUESTION
• 2003-02-12 13:13 Re: [wwwdocs] Where is the new_register_allocator anchor?
• 2003-02-21 01:45 Re: Static chains and pointers to functions
• 2003-02-21 18:53 Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up
• 2003-02-21 19:00 Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up
• 2003-02-21 19:16 Re: ISO Aliasing rules question
• 2003-02-21 19:38 Re: ISO Aliasing rules question
• 2003-02-21 20:01 Re: ISO Aliasing rules question
• 2003-02-21 20:20 Re: ISO Aliasing rules question
• 2003-02-25 16:57 Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves?
• 2003-02-27 17:07 Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves?
• 2003-02-27 20:32 Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves?
• 2003-02-27 20:39 Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer
• 2003-02-27 21:18 Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c
• 2003-02-27 21:23 Re: parallel make, do we have a FAQ ?
• 2003-02-28 21:15 Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves?
• 2003-02-28 21:40 Re: C++ optimization: compile time + memory consumption regressionon gcc3.3 branch

Michael S . Zick

• 2003-02-04 13:33 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 [off-topic: forks]
• 2003-02-08 16:04 Re: acknowledge
• 2003-02-09 18:56 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-10 14:33 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-10 14:37 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-10 14:50 Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3
• 2003-02-10 17:39 Re: OpenMP, HPC, and the future of GCC
• 2003-02-10 20:50 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-11 02:24 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-11 14:32 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-11 16:03 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-11 20:13 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-14 15:50 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-14 17:14 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-22 14:11 Re: Target-specific bugs (was Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up)
• 2003-02-22 15:03 Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up
• 2003-02-26 02:38 Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up
• 2003-02-26 03:04 Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up
• 2003-02-26 03:05 Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up
• 2003-02-26 19:24 Repository CDs (Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up)
• 2003-02-28 14:21 Re: gcc and include dirs -> do we need a /etc/includes.conf?
• 2003-02-28 16:57 Re: gcc and include dirs -> do we need a /etc/includes.conf?
• 2003-02-28 19:03 Re: gcc and include dirs -> do we need a /etc/includes.conf?

Michael Vrencur

• 2003-02-20 22:20 gcc-3.2.2 on hpux10.20

Michal Ludvig

• 2003-02-13 16:28 Location lists again
• 2003-02-14 12:36 Re: Location lists again
• 2003-02-14 14:58 Reference to .debug_loc
• 2003-02-14 16:04 Wrong mappin of registers in location lists
• 2003-02-15 23:31 Re: Wrong mappin of registers in location lists
• 2003-02-17 15:02 Re: Reference to .debug_loc
• 2003-02-19 10:51 Re: Reference to .debug_loc

Michel LESPINASSE

• 2003-02-01 01:49 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
• 2003-02-13 06:31 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-13 06:34 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-25 20:36 Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)
• 2003-02-25 22:33 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria

Mike Cleary

• 2003-02-13 21:10 Make Error with GCC
• 2003-02-24 19:49 gcc make error

Mike Stump

• 2003-02-01 00:00 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
• 2003-02-03 18:06 3.3 branch comparison failures
• 2003-02-03 20:42 Re: Ephemeral garbage [Was: GCC 3.2.1 -> GCC 3.3 compile speed regression]
• 2003-02-04 02:28 Re: 3.3 branch comparison failures
• 2003-02-10 19:54 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-11 00:51 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-11 19:11 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-11 21:02 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-12 20:18 Re: Working on branches while copyright paperwork being processed?
• 2003-02-12 22:06 Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3
• 2003-02-12 22:10 Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3
• 2003-02-13 00:04 Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3
• 2003-02-13 22:54 Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3
• 2003-02-14 00:18 Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3
• 2003-02-14 23:41 Re: new regression tester
• 2003-02-16 00:13 static const double pi = 3.1415;
• 2003-02-16 18:56 Re: dynamic/shared libraries for darwin?
• 2003-02-18 22:12 Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;
• 2003-02-19 15:45 Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;
• 2003-02-19 17:12 Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;
• 2003-02-19 17:37 Re: Mainline: C++ include files not found!
• 2003-02-19 17:47 Re: compare_test issue.
• 2003-02-19 18:07 Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;
• 2003-02-19 22:12 Re: Machine and hosting donation for the GCC project
• 2003-02-19 23:41 Re: Machine and hosting donation for the GCC project
• 2003-02-20 18:42 Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;
• 2003-02-20 20:20 Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;
• 2003-02-20 22:42 Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3
• 2003-02-20 23:35 Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3
• 2003-02-24 23:07 Re: gcc3.3 30% speedup in the past 2 weeks (MICO compilation)
• 2003-02-25 00:54 Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c
• 2003-02-25 02:20 Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c
• 2003-02-25 22:58 Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c
• 2003-02-25 22:59 Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c
• 2003-02-26 21:50 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-26 22:24 Re: Who to query about copyright assignment practices?
• 2003-02-27 20:43 Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c
• 2003-02-28 18:47 Re: gcc and include dirs -> do we need a /etc/includes.conf?
• 2003-02-28 19:33 Re: C++ optimization: compile time + memory consumption regression on gcc3.3 branch
• 2003-02-28 23:26 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2

Mikulas Patocka

• 2003-02-06 15:01 GCC 3.3 for OS/2
• 2003-02-07 09:03 Re: GCC 3.3 for OS/2
• 2003-02-08 18:29 Re: GCC 3.3 for OS/2

Mongryong

• 2003-02-19 19:12 C++ Protected Class Members are Private???
• 2003-02-19 22:51 Turning off C++ casting??
• 2003-02-19 23:03 Re: C++ Protected Class Members are Private???
• 2003-02-19 23:37 Re: Turning off C++ casting??
• 2003-02-20 00:02 Re: Turning off C++ casting??
• 2003-02-20 02:05 Re: Turning off C++ casting??
• 2003-02-20 05:48 VTABLE placement heuristic
• 2003-02-20 05:52 Virtual function placement heuristic??
• 2003-02-20 06:11 Re: Virtual function placement heuristic??
• 2003-02-20 16:51 Re: Turning off C++ casting?

Morten Welinder

• 2003-02-12 18:06 TRUTH_OR_EXPR vs. TRUTH_ORIF_EXPR

Mr. Charles Ugboko,

• 2003-02-08 11:58 acknowledge

My List

• 2003-02-23 12:02 maillist

nabeel

• 2003-02-27 23:46 Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2

Nathan Myers

• 2003-02-04 06:59 Re: Performance of copy algorithm
• 2003-02-11 14:41 Re: [Patch] Fix libstdc++/9659
• 2003-02-11 21:04 Re: [Patch] Fix libstdc++/9659

Nathan Sidwell

• 2003-02-11 16:57 Re: [3.4] New parser problem?
• 2003-02-13 23:06 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-14 18:23 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-19 16:52 Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;
• 2003-02-19 17:25 Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;
• 2003-02-19 17:34 Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;
• 2003-02-20 10:12 Re: C++ Protected Class Members are Private???
• 2003-02-20 10:34 Re: VTABLE placement heuristic
• 2003-02-20 10:55 Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;
• 2003-02-20 17:27 Re: To const or not to const...

Nathanael Nerode

• 2003-02-11 22:20 Splitting adalib out into its own directory?
• 2003-02-12 08:26 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression
• 2003-02-22 05:13 Target-specific bugs (was Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up)
• 2003-02-22 07:13 Solaris (Sparc and x86) status?
• 2003-02-22 08:54 Re: Target-specific bugs (was Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs goingup)
• 2003-02-23 21:01 Re: Target-specific bugs (was Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up)
• 2003-02-23 22:15 Bugzilla
• 2003-02-25 08:42 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-25 09:00 Re: Bugzilla
• 2003-02-25 18:14 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-26 20:08 Re: Please test bugzilla web interface

Nehal

• 2003-02-06 06:04 building 3.2.1 cross-compiler

Neil Booth

• 2003-02-04 22:20 Re: Good reasons why mingling declarations and statements is gnu89?
• 2003-02-06 22:53 Re: GCC 3.3 for OS/2
• 2003-02-06 22:59 Re: #import, #pragma once to be removed in 3.4
• 2003-02-07 21:51 Re: GCC 3.3 for OS/2
• 2003-02-07 22:14 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - THE GRAPH
• 2003-02-07 22:18 Re: Implementing OpenMP pragmas for the C front end
• 2003-02-07 22:25 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - THE GRAPH
• 2003-02-07 22:37 Re: Implementing OpenMP pragmas for the C front end
• 2003-02-07 22:39 Re: Implementing OpenMP pragmas for the C front end
• 2003-02-07 22:51 Re: Implementing OpenMP pragmas for the C front end
• 2003-02-08 11:02 Re: Implementing OpenMP pragmas for the C front end
• 2003-02-08 12:07 Re: acknowledge
• 2003-02-08 12:17 Re: Implementing OpenMP pragmas for the C front end
• 2003-02-09 21:06 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - THE GRAPH
• 2003-02-09 21:09 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-09 21:15 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - THE GRAPH
• 2003-02-09 23:13 Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3
• 2003-02-10 07:06 Re: [Gomp-discuss] Re: Implementing OpenMP pragmas for the C front end
• 2003-02-10 07:10 Re: [Gomp-discuss] Re: Implementing OpenMP pragmas for the C front end
• 2003-02-10 20:46 Re: OpenMP, HPC, and the future of GCC
• 2003-02-10 20:50 Re: OpenMP, HPC, and the future of GCC
• 2003-02-10 20:58 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-10 22:54 Re: --enable-__cxa_atexit
• 2003-02-10 23:11 Re: --enable-__cxa_atexit
• 2003-02-10 23:31 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-11 20:25 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - THE GRAPH
• 2003-02-11 20:29 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-11 20:34 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-11 20:39 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-11 22:03 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-11 22:07 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-11 22:09 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-11 22:15 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-11 22:25 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-12 22:47 Re: the size of tree_decl
• 2003-02-13 20:47 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 20:55 Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3
• 2003-02-13 20:57 Re: GCC Compile-Time Regressions
• 2003-02-15 20:52 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-17 20:47 Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
• 2003-02-18 06:49 Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
• 2003-02-18 20:36 Re: concatenation of strings in #include directive.
• 2003-02-18 21:03 Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
• 2003-02-18 22:29 Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
• 2003-02-18 23:01 Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
• 2003-02-19 06:55 Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
• 2003-02-19 20:15 Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
• 2003-02-19 20:48 Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
• 2003-02-19 20:59 Re: C++ Protected Class Members are Private???
• 2003-02-19 21:05 Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
• 2003-02-19 21:06 Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
• 2003-02-19 21:11 Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
• 2003-02-19 23:37 Re: C++ Protected Class Members are Private???
• 2003-02-19 23:43 Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
• 2003-02-20 06:47 Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
• 2003-02-20 06:51 Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
• 2003-02-20 20:09 Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
• 2003-02-20 20:32 Bugzilla?
• 2003-02-20 21:16 Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
• 2003-02-22 15:05 Re: SC gives Global Write Privileges to Zack Weinberg
• 2003-02-24 06:58 Re: -no-integrated-cpp flag
• 2003-02-25 21:09 Re: -no-integrated-cpp flag
• 2003-02-25 23:09 Re: Bug in real.c rewrite
• 2003-02-26 20:17 Re: Please test bugzilla web interface
• 2003-02-26 21:18 Re: -no-integrated-cpp flag

Neol Anderson

• 2003-02-16 18:37 linking problem

Nick Burrett

• 2003-02-24 21:50 Re: Target deprecation, round three

Nick Clifton

• 2003-02-06 09:22 Re: POC for GCC ARM back end?
• 2003-02-11 18:12 Re: ARM interworking with different linker sections
• 2003-02-27 16:07 Re: xscale arm build bootstrap fails
• 2003-02-28 14:44 Re: Subject: GNU ARM cross compiler failing to call code in ram from flash

Nicola Pero

• 2003-02-07 00:48 Re: #import, #pragma once to be removed in 3.4
• 2003-02-07 00:52 Re: #import, #pragma once to be removed in 3.4
• 2003-02-12 12:48 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression

Nicolas Pioch

• 2003-02-13 10:18 successfully built gcc-3.2.2 on sparc-sun-solaris2.8

Nitin Gupta

• 2003-02-18 09:12 concatenation of strings in #include directive.

Nix

• 2003-02-17 15:02 Re: e: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-23 03:00 Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c

Oliver Jennrich

• 2003-02-12 10:56 Successful build of 3.2.2 on cygwin/WinXP
• 2003-02-14 08:17 Successful build of gcc3.2.2 on WinXP/cygwin

Olivier Galibert

• 2003-02-21 16:40 Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;
• 2003-02-26 09:40 Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)
• 2003-02-27 10:14 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems

ozzy

• 2003-02-10 11:20 SSE intrinsics + auto-alignment (3.2.2)
• 2003-02-20 18:27 3.2.2 successfully built :)

Paolo Bonzini

• 2003-02-20 08:59 Re: Turning off C++ casting?
• 2003-02-20 11:16 Re: Turning off C++ casting?
• 2003-02-20 12:21 Re: Turning off C++ casting?
• 2003-02-20 12:28 Re: Turning off C++ casting?
• 2003-02-25 14:17 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-25 15:35 Re: master copy of ltcf-c.sh, ltcf-gcj.sh, ltmain.sh?

Paolo Carlini

• 2003-02-01 09:41 Re: failed bootstrap
• 2003-02-01 12:34 Re: failed bootstrap
• 2003-02-01 18:56 Re: Gcc Programming
• 2003-02-04 09:01 Re: Performance of copy algorithm
• 2003-02-06 11:06 Re: HTML: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.2/ appears out of date
• 2003-02-06 15:13 Re: HTML: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.2/ appears out of date
• 2003-02-11 15:40 Re: [Patch] Fix libstdc++/9659
• 2003-02-13 13:09 Re: wstring class not defined - fix
• 2003-02-13 20:43 Re: new C++ parser bug
• 2003-02-18 15:09 Re: 3.3 target date?

Paul Brook

• 2003-02-14 18:56 [tree-ssa] Build Failure
• 2003-02-17 23:53 Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
• 2003-02-18 21:01 Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
• 2003-02-27 21:17 Re: tree-ssa status

Paul Jarc

• 2003-02-11 19:17 Re: --enable-__cxa_atexit

Paul Repacholi

• 2003-02-08 14:49 Installation instructions unclear regarding BINUTILS

Pedro Manuel Augusto

• 2003-02-05 10:12 Re: Build error - still there

Per Abrahamsen

• 2003-02-07 16:12 C++: size of binaries
• 2003-02-11 13:32 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-12 07:57 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER

Per Bothner

• 2003-02-04 07:57 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 [off-topic: forks]
• 2003-02-10 05:42 Re: [Gomp-discuss] Re: Implementing OpenMP pragmas for the C frontend
• 2003-02-10 08:13 Re: [Gomp-discuss] Re: Implementing OpenMP pragmas for the C frontend
• 2003-02-10 17:19 Re: OpenMP, HPC, and the future of GCC
• 2003-02-15 20:47 Re: the size of tree_decl
• 2003-02-27 04:07 compile server design document
• 2003-02-27 06:58 Re: compile server design document
• 2003-02-27 07:27 Re: compile server design document
• 2003-02-27 19:18 Re: compile server design document
• 2003-02-27 23:36 Re: compile server design document
• 2003-02-28 00:02 Re: compile server design document
• 2003-02-28 00:38 Re: compile server design document

Peter Barada

• 2003-02-02 22:13 Realure to build uberbaum tree for m68k-elf
• 2003-02-03 16:04 Re: Realure to build uberbaum tree for m68k-elf
• 2003-02-06 05:56 Re: failuer to build uberbaum --target=m68k-elf
• 2003-02-09 15:21 Re: bug in Intel V7 Linux compiler?
• 2003-02-11 02:33 Failure to build uberbaum for m68k-elf
• 2003-02-11 21:07 Re: Failure to build uberbaum for m68k-elf
• 2003-02-19 13:58 Re: 3.3 target date?
• 2003-02-24 20:47 Re: Does any version of the GCC support the Motorola MC68EC000 core ?
• 2003-02-26 16:35 Re: failuer to build uberbaum --target=m68k-elf
• 2003-02-27 15:26 Re: Please test bugzilla web interface
• 2003-02-27 16:06 Re: Please test bugzilla web interface
• 2003-02-28 15:24 Re: unrecognizable insn help

Phil Edwards

• 2003-02-03 19:45 Re: Warnings for unhandled c++ exceptions?
• 2003-02-03 20:14 Re: Warnings for unhandled c++ exceptions?
• 2003-02-03 23:21 email-based regression search server
• 2003-02-05 19:43 Re: email-based regression search server
• 2003-02-05 21:22 Re: Havving trouble running testsuite
• 2003-02-05 23:34 Re: email-based regression search server
• 2003-02-05 23:54 Re: email-based regression search server
• 2003-02-06 15:31 Re: email-based regression search server
• 2003-02-07 22:08 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - THE GRAPH
• 2003-02-10 19:11 Re: gcc 2.95.4 MT related crashes in basic_string class
• 2003-02-10 20:55 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-11 19:44 Re: ChangeLog conventions (was: hppa-linux regressions and 3.2.2 release)
• 2003-02-11 21:00 Re: Problem with a map default argument initialization
• 2003-02-13 18:44 Re: libstdc++ related boostrap failure
• 2003-02-14 00:31 The 'gcc-g++' module name is broken
• 2003-02-14 03:06 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-14 17:25 Re: new regression tester
• 2003-02-18 19:53 Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;
• 2003-02-20 16:52 Need a C++ expert: libstdc++/9756
• 2003-02-20 17:57 Re: _GLIBCPP_USE_WCHAR_T undefined in FreeBSD's c++config.h?
• 2003-02-21 21:26 Re: boostrap failure (ICE) on gcc-3_3-branch (todays sources)
• 2003-02-25 17:48 Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up
• 2003-02-25 18:30 Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up

Philippe Elie

• 2003-02-11 22:50 Re: [Patch] Fix libstdc++/9659

Phillip Porch

• 2003-02-01 22:56 Successful Build on SCO Openserver 5.0.6A
• 2003-02-08 18:16 gcc-3.2.2 and SCO Openserver 5.0.6A

Piotr Kasztelowicz

• 2003-02-17 19:51 Re: successful build gcc-3.2.2 solaris x86

Rainer Orth

• 2003-02-10 19:35 Re: Successfull build of gcc 3.2.2 under IRIX6.5
• 2003-02-10 19:58 Re: Successfull build of gcc 3.2.2 under IRIX6.5

Ralf Corsepius

• 2003-02-25 10:57 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-25 15:28 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-27 05:55 arm-elf MULTILIBS_DEFAULT
• 2003-02-28 05:54 Re: arm-elf MULTILIBS_DEFAULT
• 2003-02-28 10:46 Re: arm-elf MULTILIBS_DEFAULT

Randall Smith

• 2003-02-06 18:25 Re: POC for GCC ARM back end?

Randolph Chung

• 2003-02-02 07:22 hppa-linux regressions and 3.2.2 release
• 2003-02-02 23:21 Re: hppa-linux regressions and 3.2.2 release

Ranjit Mathew

• 2003-02-06 20:29 Re: 3.2.2 successful builds: GNU/Linux, Solaris, HP-UX

Remi . Arena

• 2003-02-05 15:18 gcc 2-95.3

Ricardo Anguiano

• 2003-02-13 15:45 Re: gcc internals question

Rich Persaud

• 2003-02-26 03:26 re: hmm

Richard Earnshaw

• 2003-02-05 10:56 Re: gcc 3.2.2 release notes, third draft
• 2003-02-10 15:19 linking .common and .weak definitions
• 2003-02-11 09:43 Re: linking .common and .weak definitions
• 2003-02-12 17:30 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-13 16:14 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 18:05 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-14 12:47 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-20 10:44 Re: gcc for ARM in thumb mode
• 2003-02-21 17:15 unit-at-a-time build failure on arm-elf
• 2003-02-21 17:18 Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c
• 2003-02-22 12:09 Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c
• 2003-02-22 13:10 Re: gcc for ARM in thumb mode
• 2003-02-22 16:26 Re: unit-at-a-time build failure on arm-elf
• 2003-02-25 10:13 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-25 10:26 Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c
• 2003-02-25 10:34 All ARM compiler builds failing
• 2003-02-25 11:08 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-25 12:13 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-25 12:31 Re: All ARM compiler builds failing
• 2003-02-25 13:51 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-25 13:53 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-25 14:45 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-26 13:44 Re: xscale arm build bootstrap fails
• 2003-02-26 13:58 Re: All ARM compiler builds failing
• 2003-02-27 10:36 Re: arm-elf MULTILIBS_DEFAULT
• 2003-02-27 16:03 Re: Please test bugzilla web interface
• 2003-02-28 10:16 Re: arm-elf MULTILIBS_DEFAULT

Richard Guenther

• 2003-02-11 15:50 [3.4] New parser problem?

Richard Henderson

• 2003-02-04 02:03 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
• 2003-02-04 02:08 Re: Weird comment in flow.c
• 2003-02-06 02:23 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-02-02
• 2003-02-06 20:41 Re: alpha nobwx movqi/hi question
• 2003-02-09 06:19 Re: libcall problem during new unroller merge
• 2003-02-09 06:33 Re: IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-02-09 19:00 Re: vector operations and scalar operands
• 2003-02-10 00:31 Re: vector operations and scalar operands
• 2003-02-11 00:33 Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3
• 2003-02-11 00:36 Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3
• 2003-02-12 00:42 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-12 00:52 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-12 01:10 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-12 01:19 Re: Splitting adalib out into its own directory?
• 2003-02-12 06:58 vrp?
• 2003-02-12 09:17 Re: i386 string patterns vs global registers
• 2003-02-12 18:59 Re: vrp?
• 2003-02-12 19:57 Re: vrp?
• 2003-02-12 20:57 Re: vrp?
• 2003-02-12 21:46 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-12 22:08 Re: Using FDO to speed up compiler?
• 2003-02-12 23:37 Re: bootstrap failure on ppc darwin
• 2003-02-13 00:31 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-13 08:20 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-13 17:54 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 17:58 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 18:58 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 19:04 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 22:04 Re: bootstrap failure on ppc darwin
• 2003-02-13 22:24 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-14 21:22 Re: [tree-ssa] CCP inefficiencies
• 2003-02-14 21:30 Re: Wrong mappin of registers in location lists
• 2003-02-14 21:35 Re: the size of tree_decl
• 2003-02-15 00:10 Re: 64-bit Sparc support and -fstack-check
• 2003-02-15 02:01 Re: [Fwd: Fixing PR optimization/9258 and PR fortran/7681 on 3.3 branch.]
• 2003-02-18 18:20 Re: Wrong mappin of registers in location lists
• 2003-02-18 18:27 Re: gen_highpart() & volatile
• 2003-02-18 19:00 Re: gen_highpart() & volatile
• 2003-02-18 22:27 Re: ANSI/ISO Compliance
• 2003-02-18 22:41 Re: Bootstrap failure in toplev.c
• 2003-02-21 22:28 Re: Unfounded warnings in gcc-3.3
• 2003-02-23 09:16 Re: Feedback-driven optimization
• 2003-02-25 18:01 Re: PR 8805: EH vs. CFG
• 2003-02-25 18:45 Re: Bug in real.c rewrite
• 2003-02-25 23:05 Re: Bug in real.c rewrite
• 2003-02-25 23:43 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-25 23:55 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-26 00:06 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-26 00:08 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-26 00:11 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-26 00:23 Re: problems relocating code and rodata sections (gcc 3.2 / arm)
• 2003-02-28 23:03 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2
• 2003-02-28 23:26 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2

Richard Kaiser

• 2003-02-08 08:17 successful gcc 3.2.2 install on i686 RH 7.3 and test results

Richard Kenner

• 2003-02-05 00:24 Re: Expand the definition of gnu89 slightly
• 2003-02-10 18:30 Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3
• 2003-02-11 18:34 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-11 19:03 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-11 19:18 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-11 19:43 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-11 19:44 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-11 20:33 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-11 20:36 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-11 21:10 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-11 22:05 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-11 22:10 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-11 22:18 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-11 22:28 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-12 13:54 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-13 13:05 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 14:38 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 14:58 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 15:26 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 15:32 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 15:36 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 15:45 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 15:55 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 16:03 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 16:04 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 16:13 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 17:35 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 18:21 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 18:25 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 18:29 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 18:56 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-14 13:58 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-14 14:24 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-14 22:22 64-bit Sparc support and -fstack-check
• 2003-02-15 01:57 Re: 64-bit Sparc support and -fstack-check
• 2003-02-24 21:47 Re: arc-*-* was Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-24 21:49 Re: arc-*-* was Re: Target deprecation, round three

Richard Sandiford

• 2003-02-10 09:45 Re: Backport fix for PR6362 to 3.2.x?

Richard Stallman

• 2003-02-26 23:24 Re: Who to query about copyright assignment practices?

Rob Taylor

• 2003-02-11 11:56 RE: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-12 09:56 RE: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER

Robert Dewar

• 2003-02-03 12:43 Re: What CPU ports should have working Ada?
• 2003-02-03 21:25 Re: Warnings for unhandled c++ exceptions?
• 2003-02-03 21:37 Re: Warnings for unhandled c++ exceptions?
• 2003-02-04 12:02 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 [off-topic: forks]
• 2003-02-05 04:17 Re: gcc 3.2.2 release notes, third draft
• 2003-02-05 13:21 Re: How to force 32bit access to bit fields ?
• 2003-02-10 04:11 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - THE GRAPH
• 2003-02-10 04:14 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-10 14:56 Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3
• 2003-02-10 18:11 Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3
• 2003-02-10 18:29 Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3
• 2003-02-10 18:39 Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3
• 2003-02-10 21:23 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-11 04:44 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-11 18:59 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-11 22:27 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-11 22:28 Re: Splitting adalib out into its own directory?
• 2003-02-12 12:23 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-13 18:15 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 18:39 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 18:50 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 18:52 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 18:54 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 19:06 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 19:07 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 19:08 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 19:10 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 19:23 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 19:37 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 19:56 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 19:58 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 19:59 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 20:14 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 21:09 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-14 04:39 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-14 04:45 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-14 14:14 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-14 14:43 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-16 12:41 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-18 18:25 Re: ANSI/ISO Compliance
• 2003-02-18 22:15 Re: ANSI/ISO Compliance
• 2003-02-19 12:58 Re: spam list ...was GCC 3.2.2 build error on Solaris 9 x86
• 2003-02-19 20:11 Re: IBM gcc for AIX
• 2003-02-21 17:55 Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up
• 2003-02-24 00:30 Re: _Complex and _Imaginary datatypes
• 2003-02-24 00:34 Re: Feedback-driven optimization
• 2003-02-24 02:48 Re: Feedback-driven optimization
• 2003-02-25 12:10 Re: Bugzilla
• 2003-02-25 12:25 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-25 12:44 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-25 19:28 Re: Bugzilla
• 2003-02-26 01:14 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-26 14:57 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-26 22:04 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-28 13:09 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2

Robert Hoffmann

• 2003-02-15 21:15 successful build gcc-3.2.2 solaris x86
• 2003-02-15 23:32 Re: successful build gcc-3.2.2 solaris x86
• 2003-02-16 02:21 Re: successful build gcc-3.2.2 solaris x86

Robert McNulty Junior

• 2003-02-05 00:18 GCC 3.3 Signal 11 again
• 2003-02-05 00:27 RE: GCC 3.3 Signal 11 again
• 2003-02-05 00:39 GCC 3.3-Signal 11
• 2003-02-07 05:58 RE: GCC 3.3-Signal 11
• 2003-02-28 05:21 GCC 3.4

Robert Myers

• 2003-02-23 07:04 Feedback-driven optimization
• 2003-02-24 01:00 Re: Feedback-driven optimization
• 2003-02-24 01:16 Re: Feedback-driven optimization

Roger Sayle

• 2003-02-11 21:18 Re: Bootstrap failure on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu, trunk
• 2003-02-13 02:43 Re: vrp?
• 2003-02-13 14:31 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 15:00 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 15:35 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 15:52 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 16:00 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 16:09 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 17:54 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 18:06 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 18:16 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 18:53 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-13 22:37 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics

Russ Allbery

• 2003-02-28 20:23 Re: gcc and include dirs -> do we need a /etc/includes.conf?

S. Bosscher

• 2003-02-19 09:31 RE: 3.3 target date?
• 2003-02-19 09:34 RE: 3.3 target date?

s.saravanan

• 2003-02-06 04:04 Facing problem with gcc 2.95.2 in hp-11.00

Sanjiv Kumar Gupta, Noida

• 2003-02-21 09:09 IA64 simulator and board description?

Scott Robert Ladd

• 2003-02-03 22:03 RE: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
• 2003-02-03 22:16 RE: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
• 2003-02-04 01:13 RE: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
• 2003-02-04 01:21 RE: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
• 2003-02-07 23:39 RE: [Gomp-discuss] Re: Implementing OpenMP pragmas for the C front end
• 2003-02-08 13:08 RE: [Gomp-discuss] Re: Implementing OpenMP pragmas for the C front end
• 2003-02-08 13:54 RE: [Gomp-discuss] Re: Implementing OpenMP pragmas for the Cfront end
• 2003-02-10 12:34 RE: [Gomp-discuss] Re: Implementing OpenMP pragmas for the C front end
• 2003-02-10 12:59 OpenMP, HPC, and the future of GCC
• 2003-02-10 13:55 RE: OpenMP
• 2003-02-10 16:08 RE: OpenMP, HPC, and the future of GCC
• 2003-02-10 20:43 --enable-__cxa_atexit
• 2003-02-10 21:57 RE: --enable-__cxa_atexit
• 2003-02-10 22:16 RE: --enable-__cxa_atexit
• 2003-02-10 22:50 RE: --enable-__cxa_atexit
• 2003-02-11 19:10 RE: --enable-__cxa_atexit
• 2003-02-12 17:11 RE: [Gomp-discuss] Re: Working on branches while copyright paperwork being processed?
• 2003-02-12 19:08 RE: Working on branches while copyright paperwork being processed?

Segher Boessenkool

• 2003-02-02 05:20 Re: Ephemeral garbage [Was: GCC 3.2.1 -> GCC 3.3 compile speedregression]
• 2003-02-14 01:19 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-16 02:49 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
• 2003-02-18 04:38 Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics

Sherzod Ruzmetov

• 2003-02-01 08:37 Can't get GCC installed. HELP! (RPM related)
• 2003-02-01 12:50 RE: Can't get GCC installed. HELP! (RPM related)

snyder

• 2003-02-20 01:53 Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
• 2003-02-28 21:56 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2

Spundun Bhatt

• 2003-02-06 19:12 alpha nobwx movqi/hi question
• 2003-02-10 18:49 quick question
• 2003-02-11 22:35 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-12 18:02 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-13 01:14 gcc internals question
• 2003-02-14 01:25 Re: gcc internals question

Stan Shebs

• 2003-02-06 22:08 Re: #import, #pragma once to be removed in 3.4
• 2003-02-06 22:32 Re: #import, #pragma once to be removed in 3.4
• 2003-02-07 22:43 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - THE GRAPH

Stephane Carrez

• 2003-02-20 21:18 Re: what binutils for m68hc11-elf and gcc 3.3-branch

Steve Ellcey

• 2003-02-12 21:41 STARTFILE*PREFIX*SPEC question
• 2003-02-19 16:34 Re: Gcc-3.2.2 on HPUX-IA64

Steve Snyder

• 2003-02-22 14:33 Difference between "-march=k6-3" and "-march=k6-2"?

Steven Bosscher

• 2003-02-04 00:31 RE: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
• 2003-02-06 12:24 [tree-ssa] Can't build because libmudflap needs C++
• 2003-02-07 22:11 Implementing OpenMP pragmas for the C front end
• 2003-02-07 23:12 Re: Implementing OpenMP pragmas for the C front end
• 2003-02-07 23:39 Re: Implementing OpenMP pragmas for the C front end
• 2003-02-08 13:21 RE: [Gomp-discuss] Re: Implementing OpenMP pragmas for the Cfront end
• 2003-02-08 18:18 RE: [Gomp-discuss] Re: Implementing OpenMP pragmas for the Cfront end
• 2003-02-10 07:37 Re: [Gomp-discuss] Re: Implementing OpenMP pragmas for the Cfrontend
• 2003-02-10 17:27 Re: OpenMP, HPC, and the future of GCC
• 2003-02-10 18:16 Re: OpenMP, HPC, and the future of GCC
• 2003-02-10 19:57 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-10 23:20 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-12 06:54 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-12 07:03 Re: vrp?
• 2003-02-12 11:14 Re: Working on branches while copyright paperwork being processed?
• 2003-02-12 12:08 [wwwdocs] Where is the new_register_allocator anchor?
• 2003-02-12 18:00 Re: Working on branches while copyright paperwork being processed?
• 2003-02-12 18:30 Compile time and effectiveness of optimizers
• 2003-02-18 16:47 Re: 3.3 target date?
• 2003-02-18 22:43 Re: Bootstrap failure in toplev.c
• 2003-02-19 16:06 Re: fixed PRs
• 2003-02-20 13:22 Re: Breaking up enormous source files
• 2003-02-21 12:20 Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up
• 2003-02-21 18:02 Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up
• 2003-02-21 18:31 Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up
• 2003-02-22 01:17 Pending patches for PRs 3782 and 8828
• 2003-02-24 06:54 Re: _Complex and _Imaginary datatypes
• 2003-02-24 17:01 Re: patch that caused regression PR opt/9357
• 2003-02-24 20:11 Re: internal error in cp-lang.c
• 2003-02-24 23:23 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-25 06:45 Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)
• 2003-02-25 07:07 Re: internal error in cp-lang.c
• 2003-02-25 10:48 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-25 18:14 Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up
• 2003-02-25 19:58 Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up
• 2003-02-26 20:37 Re: Please test bugzilla web interface
• 2003-02-27 11:47 Re: compile server design document
• 2003-02-27 17:34 tree-ssa status (was: Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer)
• 2003-02-27 20:31 Re: tree-ssa status (was: Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer)
• 2003-02-27 20:36 Re: [tree-ssa] Inlining vs gimple vs compound expressions
• 2003-02-27 21:36 Re: tree-ssa status

Steven M. Christensen

• 2003-02-16 00:41 Re: successful build gcc-3.2.2 solaris x86

Stuart Hastings

• 2003-02-25 22:01 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria

Svein E. Seldal

• 2003-02-19 15:07 Re: 3.3 target date?

Svetlana

• 2003-02-26 21:38 My way to the fine art nude photography...
• 2003-02-27 16:32 My way to the fine art nude photography...

Ta-Cheng Lin

• 2003-02-13 16:43 fstream attach for g++3.2.1
• 2003-02-19 02:54 ext/stdio_fielbuf.h

Takis Psarogiannakopoulos

• 2003-02-28 06:29 Question on libgcc_eh

Thomas Frayne

• 2003-02-03 23:36 Broken link on web page

Tim Hollebeek

• 2003-02-04 00:05 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4

Tim Josling

• 2003-02-03 19:50 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
• 2003-02-04 20:07 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
• 2003-02-04 20:17 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
• 2003-02-06 19:26 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
• 2003-02-08 05:53 GC impact (was Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4)
• 2003-02-08 07:46 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - THE GRAPH
• 2003-02-13 08:59 e: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-13 09:16 Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3
• 2003-02-13 19:33 Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3
• 2003-02-15 00:20 Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3
• 2003-02-25 19:32 Breaking up the 'parse' time into 'parse/bison' and 'parse/other'
• 2003-02-26 09:39 Re: Breaking up the 'parse' time into 'parse/bison' and 'parse/other'

Timothy J. Wood

• 2003-02-01 08:09 Ephemeral garbage [Was: GCC 3.2.1 -> GCC 3.3 compile speed regression]
• 2003-02-25 20:59 Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)
• 2003-02-27 06:16 Re: compile server design document

tm_gccmail

• 2003-02-11 19:21 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-11 19:26 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-11 20:46 Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment
• 2003-02-12 00:37 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-12 01:26 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-12 08:41 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-12 17:33 Re: Working on branches while copyright paperwork being processed?
• 2003-02-12 17:47 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-12 19:03 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-13 03:24 new-ra code sizes on Hitachi H8
• 2003-02-13 19:22 Re: new-ra code sizes on Hitachi H8
• 2003-02-13 19:46 Re: new-ra code sizes on Hitachi H8
• 2003-02-13 20:41 Re: new-ra code sizes on Hitachi H8
• 2003-02-25 19:25 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-25 21:48 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-02-27 00:47 Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer
• 2003-02-27 02:27 Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer
• 2003-02-27 03:44 Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer

Tolga Dalman

• 2003-02-09 23:49 Re: gmake questions
• 2003-02-25 03:20 Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)
• 2003-02-25 03:26 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-25 19:41 Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)
• 2003-02-27 04:24 Re: compile server design document

Tom Lord

• 2003-02-06 23:35 "ways of accomplishing ... the basic goal"
• 2003-02-07 01:07 Re: "ways of accomplishing ... the basic goal"
• 2003-02-07 09:08 Re: "ways of accomplishing ... the basic goal"
• 2003-02-07 23:43 possible red flag for new C++ parser
• 2003-02-08 05:57 Re: possible red flag for new C++ parser
• 2003-02-08 06:25 Re: possible red flag for new C++ parser
• 2003-02-26 02:42 hmm

Tom Tromey

• 2003-02-03 20:44 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
• 2003-02-03 22:34 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
• 2003-02-11 20:50 Re: Successfull build of gcc 3.2.2 under IRIX6.5
• 2003-02-12 18:47 Re: Working on branches while copyright paperwork being processed?
• 2003-02-12 18:55 Re: Missing file? libjava/gnu/java/nio/natSelectorImpl.h
• 2003-02-20 17:26 Re: gcj + jakarta-tomcat-4
• 2003-02-21 15:30 Build failure on x86

Toon Moene

• 2003-02-06 19:16 Re: [tree-ssa] Can't build because libmudflap needs C++
• 2003-02-07 21:56 [Fwd: failure notice]
• 2003-02-08 13:10 Re: acknowledge
• 2003-02-10 21:59 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-14 21:05 Re: [tree-ssa] Build Failure
• 2003-02-14 21:32 [Fwd: Fixing PR optimization/9258 and PR fortran/7681 on 3.3 branch.]
• 2003-02-17 20:43 PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
• 2003-02-18 08:55 Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
• 2003-02-18 21:54 Re: [Fwd: Fixing PR optimization/9258 and PR fortran/7681 on 3.3branch.]
• 2003-02-18 22:04 Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
• 2003-02-18 22:55 Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
• 2003-02-19 06:54 Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
• 2003-02-19 09:59 Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
• 2003-02-19 20:29 Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
• 2003-02-19 21:07 Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
• 2003-02-19 21:12 Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
• 2003-02-20 06:49 Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
• 2003-02-20 21:15 Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
• 2003-02-21 20:17 Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up
• 2003-02-24 23:15 Re: ISO Aliasing rules question
• 2003-02-28 19:53 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2
• 2003-02-28 19:54 Re: tree-ssa status

Tupshin Harper

• 2003-02-23 12:06 disable subregs?
• 2003-02-23 19:47 Re: disable subregs?
• 2003-02-27 06:13 help: real_convert aborts when targetting new cpu
• 2003-02-28 03:15 unrecognizable insn help

Ulrich Weigand

• 2003-02-01 17:23 Re: failed bootstrap

Uwe Reimann

• 2003-02-10 19:21 Building a c4x-cross-compiler
• 2003-02-10 23:53 Building a crosscompiler
• 2003-02-11 00:05 Re: Building a crosscompiler

Vidacs Laszlo

• 2003-02-27 14:25 ARM - register liveness problem

Vladimir Makarov

• 2003-02-04 19:53 Re: instruction scheduler and passing arguments in registers
• 2003-02-27 16:23 Re: gcc in IA64

Vladimir Merzliakov

• 2003-02-20 08:50 Re: Turning off C++ casting??
• 2003-02-20 12:04 Re: Turning off C++ casting?

Volker Reichelt

• 2003-02-04 20:03 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (third iteration)
• 2003-02-06 09:46 Info-files missing in gcc 3.2.2
• 2003-02-06 20:24 Re: Info-files missing in gcc 3.2.2
• 2003-02-07 14:29 Successfull build of gcc 3.2.2 under IRIX6.5

Wesley W. Terpstra

• 2003-02-03 13:13 Warnings for unhandled c++ exceptions?
• 2003-02-03 16:45 Re: Warnings for unhandled c++ exceptions?
• 2003-02-03 19:14 Re: Warnings for unhandled c++ exceptions?
• 2003-02-03 19:16 Re: Warnings for unhandled c++ exceptions?
• 2003-02-03 19:24 Re: Warnings for unhandled c++ exceptions?
• 2003-02-03 19:37 Re: Warnings for unhandled c++ exceptions?
• 2003-02-03 19:47 Re: Warnings for unhandled c++ exceptions?

william

• 2003-02-26 03:13 4-in-1 Multiple-Function digital camera offer

Wolfgang Bangerth

• 2003-02-08 00:14 Re: possible red flag for new C++ parser
• 2003-02-08 17:02 Re: possible red flag for new C++ parser
• 2003-02-21 16:08 Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up
• 2003-02-27 16:17 Re: Please test bugzilla web interface

Yajima, Yoshiko

• 2003-02-20 16:21 gcj + jakarta-tomcat-4

Zack Weinberg

• 2003-02-04 02:26 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
• 2003-02-06 18:33 PPC E500 chip -- what are the -m switches supposed to be?
• 2003-02-06 20:49 #import, #pragma once to be removed in 3.4
• 2003-02-06 21:58 Re: #import, #pragma once to be removed in 3.4
• 2003-02-06 21:59 Re: #import, #pragma once to be removed in 3.4
• 2003-02-06 22:04 Re: #import, #pragma once to be removed in 3.4
• 2003-02-07 03:36 Re: New semicolon handling in specs uncovered questionable errortext
• 2003-02-11 16:37 Re: Implementing OpenMP pragmas for the C front end
• 2003-02-12 00:24 Re: Splitting adalib out into its own directory?
• 2003-02-12 02:48 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
• 2003-02-14 00:11 c99status.html - split up per release?
• 2003-02-14 02:41 Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3
• 2003-02-14 07:19 Re: c99status.html - split up per release?
• 2003-02-17 19:57 Re: rfc: auto-casted vector types
• 2003-02-18 18:13 Re: optimizations
• 2003-02-20 00:24 Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
• 2003-02-20 23:33 Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3
• 2003-02-21 23:50 Re: SC gives Global Write Privileges to Zack Weinberg
• 2003-02-22 08:56 Re: Target-specific bugs
• 2003-02-23 23:44 Re: gcc3.3 30% speedup in the past 2 weeks (MICO compilation)
• 2003-02-23 23:59 Re: gcc3.3 30% speedup in the past 2 weeks (MICO compilation)
• 2003-02-24 05:47 Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-24 17:15 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-24 17:18 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-24 17:20 Re: arc-*-* was Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-24 17:46 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-24 18:10 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-24 18:37 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-24 18:57 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-24 21:00 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-24 21:41 Re: HAVE_probe macro
• 2003-02-24 23:17 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-25 02:34 Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c
• 2003-02-25 18:22 Re: Bugzilla
• 2003-02-25 19:13 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-25 20:22 Re: Target deprecation, round three
• 2003-02-26 19:45 Re: autoconf issues
• 2003-02-26 23:23 Re: 'malloc' attribute?
• 2003-02-27 20:57 Re: tree-ssa status
• 2003-02-27 22:27 Re: tree-ssa status

Zdenek Dvorak

• 2003-02-02 17:04 Weird comment in flow.c
• 2003-02-06 13:59 libcall problem during new unroller merge
• 2003-02-07 15:06 Re: libcall problem during new unroller merge
• 2003-02-07 21:14 Re: libcall problem during new unroller merge
• 2003-02-27 00:23 Dropping of old loop optimizer
• 2003-02-27 01:04 Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer
• 2003-02-27 10:51 Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer
• 2003-02-27 16:39 Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer

Ziemowit Laski

• 2003-02-04 01:14 Re: GC overhead (Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4)
• 2003-02-07 20:51 GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - THE GRAPH
• 2003-02-07 22:22 Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - THE GRAPH
• 2003-02-13 20:53 GCC Compile-Time Regressions
• 2003-02-13 21:18 Re: GCC Compile-Time Regressions

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)