This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
- From: Mike Stump <mstump at apple dot com>
- To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>, neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 17:03:55 -0800
- Subject: Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
On Thursday, January 30, 2003, at 03:41 PM, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
Or not fix it. Which seems to be what is happening.
Well, we hope to find a better way to fix it (the preferred method), or
failing that, we'll do some research and try and improve the number.
The patch will be submitted, if the FSF doesn't want it, we'll, lets
just say, that it will become just another local change. :-( We
already have two of them 100%/8MB (instead of the 30%/4MB) now, so
changing them to be 100%/16MB or 100%/32MB isn't that bad.
In addition to this, we hope to track down the actual regression that
led us to wanting to change the numbers...