This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFC: Named warnings

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk>
Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: 24 Jan 2003 12:58:23 -0700
Subject: Re: RFC: Named warnings
References: <58640000.1043428355@warlock.codesourcery.com><87wukucu77.fsf@student.uni-tuebingen.de><20030124194948.GB26102@daikokuya.co.uk>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Neil" == Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.co.uk> writes:

Neil> You're not complaining that someone might have to change their
Neil> #pragma's from what worked on a experimental branch off an
Neil> experimental development compiler, surely?

Not all branches are experimental -- at least one vendor ships a
compiler off a gcc branch.  While GCC could officially ignore the
various forks out there, I think it would be preferable to recognize
that they happen, and plan for it accordingly.

Tom

References:
- Re: RFC: Named warnings
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: RFC: Named warnings
  - From: Falk Hueffner
- Re: RFC: Named warnings
  - From: Neil Booth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]