This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
config.sub (was: (ti)c4x maintainer)
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
- To: "Svein E. Seldal" <Svein dot Seldal at solidas dot com>
- Cc: gcc <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 14:31:42 +0100 (CET)
- Subject: config.sub (was: (ti)c4x maintainer)
- References: <200211261518.KAA24716@makai.watson.ibm.com><xwuhee4f4q8.fsf@tonopah.toronto.redhat.com> <3DE40459.9040100@solidas.com><Pine.BSF.4.50.0212051303150.63645-100000@naos.dbai.tuwien.ac.at><3DEF537E.2090005@solidas.com>
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Svein E. Seldal wrote:
> Now, down to business... One of the (two) approved files are
> 'config.sub'. In context with the binutils patch, I did make sure that
> the file was updated in the central/master configuation repository
> (subversions.gnu.org:/cvsroot/config) because binutils synchs from this
> source. I am under the impression that gcc does the same - and according
> to the changelog this seems true. This patch is already imported into
> the central configuraton repository, so all I need to do is an import.
Yup; http://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html describes how to deal
with upstream packages.
> Therefore I'm asking for permission to import the config.sub from the
> master repository (with all those sideeffect that may have). Or better:
> someone else with greater authority could do this task for me... ;)
I believe, but I'm not completely sure, that config.sub can be imported
with explicit approval -- DJ?
Gerald
--
Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.pfeifer.com/gerald/