This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: binutils bug-tracker [was Re: coff-h8300 ld segfault]
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- To: Max Bowsher <maxb at ukf dot net>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com,gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 20:00:34 -0500
- Subject: Re: binutils bug-tracker [was Re: coff-h8300 ld segfault]
- References: <003d01c29a3f$5ee72920$78d96f83@pomello> <20021202222817.GJ27956@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <023901c29b0d$811ac2d0$78d96f83@pomello> <20021203231634.GY27956@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <003601c29b28$fc3b5860$78d96f83@pomello> <20021204004110.GA27956@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au>
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:11:10AM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 12:06:25AM -0000, Max Bowsher wrote:
> > I'm happy with the workaround, but is there anything I should do to prevent
> > this bug from being forgotten?
>
> Agitate for a binutils bug-tracking system, perhaps. :)
>
> It would be really, really, nice if someone with the requisite skills
> could set one up. Hmm, perhaps binutils could even use gcc's existing
> bug-tracker. About all you'd need to do is add a "binutils" category.
Sure could; all it would take would be asking overseers@, probably.
GDB already uses GNATS.
Of course there will someday be a bugzilla transition...
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer