This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: What's happening to SPEC's 164.gzip/176.gcc/254.gap??
- From: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
- To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at unitus dot it>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org,Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>, Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
- Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 16:54:56 +0100
- Subject: Re: What's happening to SPEC's 164.gzip/176.gcc/254.gap??
- References: <3DD63B94.3030506@unitus.it> <20021116155243.GA19681@tornado.toronto.redhat.com>
> On Sat, 16 Nov 2002, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > the performance regression, for at least the first two, is very
> > impressive :-(
> >
> For the b-i-b tester, 176.gcc hasn't built in a while. However,
> gzip and gap seem fine.
I've just fixed the problem that broke gcc so hope it will build
tomorrow.
I have no idea what is causing the regressions. THe patch from day they
happent does not show anything interesting, so it may be just setup
change, but that looks unlikely too.
Honza
>
>
> Diego.