This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch] Re: ARM: testsuite gcc.c-torture/execute/20020307-2.c failure
- From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>
- To: jeroen dobbelaere <jeroen dot dobbelaere at acunia dot com>
- Cc: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com, David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 16:43:10 +0000
- Subject: Re: [patch] Re: ARM: testsuite gcc.c-torture/execute/20020307-2.c failure
- Organization: ARM Ltd.
- Reply-to: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com
> jeroen dobbelaere wrote:
> [...]
>
> > I have implemented this (similar to ia64) and I'm doing a regression
> > test right
> > now (c only). First indication is that 20020307-2.c does not fail any
> > more...
> >
> > 2002-11-13 Jeroen Dobbelaere <jeroen.dobbelaere@acunia.com>
> >
> > * config/arm/arm.h (EXPAND_BUILTIN_VA_ARG,
> > FUNCTION_ARG_PASS_BY_REFERENCE): Add.
> > * config/arm/arm.c (arm_va_arg,
> > arm_function_arg_pass_by_reference): Add.
> > * config/arm/arm-protos.h: Add prototypes.
> >
>
> no regressions seen (checked gcc, g++, objc, f77), 8 failures gone...
Which configuration have you tested?
It's quite important for a change like this that some checks with
libraries built with older compilers are run to ensure we haven't changed
the ABI in some unexpected manner.
R.