This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC 3.2 Branch Closure
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 01:56:37PM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:
>
>
> --On Friday, November 08, 2002 01:49:12 PM -0800 Joe Buck
> <jbuck@synopsys.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >> I believe that HJ's patch for x86 clears up the last of the significant
> >> silent code generation problems, and Joe is right that we have fixed a
> >> ton of regressions in GCC 3.2.1; we should get that compiler out there
> >> in the wild, and start focusing on GCC 3.3, and GCC 3.2.2 if necessary.
> >
> > No, there's still 5351/7951.
> >
> > HJ has two different patches; the one that fixes 8146 has been applied,
> > but the other one, that fixes 5351 and 7951, has not been. I think that
^^^^^^ It is 7591.
> > the other one, in
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-08/msg01170.html
>
> Thank you both for your testing, and for following up. I had not been
> able to keep all the patches separate in my brain.
>
> This patchs looks sound to me. Based on your testing, I agree; HJ,
> please apply this patch to the branch as well, and to the mainline
> if it is not already there.
>
I checked it into 3.2 branch. Although I belive my patch does the right
thing on mainline, I was told the bug was fixed on the mainline with a
different patch. Are you sure you want my patch on the mainline? Also
should my other patch be applied to the mainline also?
H.J.