This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: gcc 3.2.1 schedule?
- From: prj at po dot cwru dot edu (Paul Jarc)
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 17:17:01 -0500
- Subject: Re: gcc 3.2.1 schedule?
- Organization: What did you have in mind? A short, blunt, human pyramid?
- References: <200210312207.XAA10368@faui11.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Ulrich Weigand <weigand@immd1.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> wrote:
> Paul Jarc wrote:
>>> Does the bootstrap work when stage 1 is built with
>>> -fno-strict-aliasing?
>>
>> Yes: I used an existing 3.2 build and added -fno-strict-aliasing to
>> STAGE1_CFLAGS for a 2.95.3 build, and there were no errors this time.
>
> That's good to know, thanks.
So, IIUC, this means 3.2 produced "wrong" code, just as is usually the
case for a bootstrap comparison failure, but only because the 2.95.3
source was buggy. And 2.95.3 was itself more tolerant of that bug and
so produced "right" code when compiling the same buggy source. Do I
have that right?
paul