This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Status of SSE builtins

From: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Cc: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, Joern Rennecke <joern dot rennecke at superh dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, bernds at redhat dot com, aj at suse dot de
Date: 31 Oct 2002 10:54:47 -0800
Subject: Re: Status of SSE builtins
References: <3DC04D9A.2D379818@superh.com><20021030214140.GA22590@kam.mff.cuni.cz><20021031165228.GC4764@redhat.com><20021031165439.GH3632@kam.mff.cuni.cz><20021031165658.GE4764@redhat.com>

>>>>> "Richard" == Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> writes:

Oh yeah, I'll probably tackle this next week.  I'm just a bit busy
with my try/finally and CLASS_CANNOT_CHANGE_MODE patches which are
both 98% finished ;-).

 > On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 05:54:39PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
 >> What names would you propose?
 >> Perhaps extract_vec_fieldM/set_vec_fieldM?

 > No idea.  I was hoping that Aldy would invent something.  ;-)

I was thinking more along the lines of aldyvec_fieldM :).

I think a combination of the vec_select and vec_merge patterns which
we already have (but don't emit), could be used for most
architectures.  I'll look into it.

AldyVec

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Status of SSE builtins
  - From: Jan Hubicka

References:
- Status of SSE builtins
  - From: Joern Rennecke
- Re: Status of SSE builtins
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: Status of SSE builtins
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Status of SSE builtins
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: Status of SSE builtins
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]