This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: DWARF question/inlining/local classes
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 10:50:15 -0800
- Subject: Re: DWARF question/inlining/local classes
- References: <200210310010.g9V0AsU17674@gandalf.codesourcery.com>
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 04:10:54PM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> What has me worried is the comment; is it true that the debugging
> machinery will be unhappy if we emit Local::f but do not emit an
> out-of-line definition of h?
Well, dwarf2 wants to build the tree:
h - ...
+ Local - ...
+ f
You might be able to get this placed under the abstract instance
of H, which I think is emitted any time the inline declaration is
seen.
Not sure what an out-of-line definition has to do with this.
r~