This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: INSN_UID same for two insns?

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: N V Krishna <nvk at cs dot purdue dot edu>
Cc: gcc at gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 11:18:47 -0700
Subject: Re: INSN_UID same for two insns?
References: <20021023171024.GF17719@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210231234210.11489-100000@puma.cs.purdue.edu>

On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 12:58:02PM -0500, N V Krishna wrote:
> Just curious, why is it that the memory is free'd pretty late in the
> process? Why is it not free'd immediately? Why the function
> free_basic_block_vars is called after final?

No reason other than that's where a lot of other cleanup happens.


r~

References:
- Re: INSN_UID same for two insns?
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: INSN_UID same for two insns?
  - From: N V Krishna

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]