Re: 2 new regression on darwin6.1

[Andreas Tobler <toa at pop dot agri dot ch>]

Aldy Hernandez wrote:

> This might be a dejagnu bug.  It may also be some silly OS bug when
> spawning lots of processes.  It gets confused, and you end up getting
> bogus errors.  I don't know if this is fixed in Jaguar, but I know
> that in previous versions you'd have to do "make check" a few times
> and report the union of the runs :).
>
> Perhaps Jim Ingham can elaborate on this.  He had explained the bug to
> me in more eloquent words.
>
> ...and perhaps, it's an actual regression failure..

Hm, I guess the latter since I run a Shebs tweaked gcc which has the 
-fslow switch integrated. My results so far are like this:

                === gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes            20186
# of unexpected failures        21
# of expected failures          62
# of unresolved testcases       3
# of unsupported tests          139

Andreas