This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
I think so; we intentionally fixed the alignment of certain tiny classes,While working on C++ compatibility tests I broke up g++.dg/init/empty1.C into this set of source files. This test passes when everything is built with either GCC 3.2 or with the mainline but fails when empty1_x.C is compiled with GCC 3.2 and the rest is built with the mainline. The original test is for a PR that was fixed in 3.0.2. The failure is due to a change in alignment. Is this expected?
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |