This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Variable-sized types vs. templates
- From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- To: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com
- Cc: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk>, nathan at cs dot bris dot ac dot uk,Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org,nathan at codesourcery dot com, gdr at codesourcery dot com
- Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2002 14:17:53 +0100
- Subject: Re: Variable-sized types vs. templates
- References: <200210081303.g98D3aS25721@pc960.cambridge.arm.com>
On Tue, 08 Oct 2002 14:03:36 +0100, Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com> wrote:
> Except, of course, that c99 says that only an "ordinary indentifier" may
> be a VLA.
I don't see that. It says that only an ordinary identifier can have a VM
type, but seems to specifically avoid saying the same thing about VLAs.
Jason