This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: testsuite cleanup?
- From: Nathanael Nerode <neroden at doctormoo dot dyndns dot org>
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 15:47:24 -0400
- Subject: Re: testsuite cleanup?
- References: <E17xusi-0004eY-00@nerodeguest>
> uOn Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 08:43:16PM +0100, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> >
> > > Looking at the testsuite, it's rather confusing. Some directories are
> > > documented in READMEs; many aren't. There are multiple organizational
> > > systems. There are multiple drivers, many of which seem very similar;
> > > one suspects redundancy.
> >
> > The documentation is properly in gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi. But some
> > directories are undocumented, and other documentation in READMEs hasn't
> > yet been moved into the manual.
> Actually, most directories are undocumented.
>
> For a first question: Would it be reasonable to transition gcc.c-torture
> tests over to the gcc.dg framework? If not, why not?
>
> Would it be reasonable to make a new subdirectory in gcc.dg? If not, why
> not?
>
> --Nathanael