This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: xfail gcc.dg test

From: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>, Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 11:43:30 +0930
Subject: Re: xfail gcc.dg test
References: <200210041827.g94IRQO07760@desire.geoffk.org> <200210041833.OAA28636@makai.watson.ibm.com> <20021004204046.GC16411@redhat.com>

On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 01:40:46PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 02:33:09PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> > "..foo" and "_.foo" seem to be the simplest choices.  Either is reasonable.
> 
> Indeed.  Personally, I think I favour "_.foo", but I don't
> have any reason for it -- I just think it looks better.  ;-)

Before we make any change, I'd like to try renaming the .text section
symbol to ..text or something like that in gas and ld.  That, and
changing the names of a few symbols emitted by gcc may just work
around the name clashes.

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre

Follow-Ups:
- Re: xfail gcc.dg test
  - From: David Edelsohn

References:
- Re: xfail gcc.dg test
  - From: Geoff Keating
- Re: xfail gcc.dg test
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: xfail gcc.dg test
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]