This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] Use of build_binary_op


Op do 26-09-2002, om 12:31 schreef Jason Merrill:
> On 26 Sep 2002 12:23:47 +0200, Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl> wrote:
> 
> > Op do 26-09-2002, om 11:28 schreef Jason Merrill:
> >> On Thu, 26 Sep 2002 10:40:51 +0200, Pop Sébastian <pop@gauvain.u-strasbg.fr> wrote:
> >> > I think that we have to define an interface on both lowered and
> >> > non lowered GIMPLE.
> >> 
> >> Why would they need to be different?
> >
> > Because it allows you to share the lowering pass among the front ends.
> 
> Why would having separate interfaces change that?  The bnw-simple lowering
> pass is already language-independent.

Ah, okeydokey, great! As this isn't the case in the tree-ssa branch,I
assumed it also isn't in the bnw-branch.

Greetz
Steven



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]