This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] Merging with bnw-simple

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Cc: Steven Bosscher <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>, Paul Brook <paul at nowt dot org>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche at redhat dot com>
Date: 24 Sep 2002 14:41:08 -0400
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Merging with bnw-simple
References: <20020924140250.GA25658@tornado.toronto.redhat.com><1032883162.1574.19.camel@steven> <wvly99rnxsl.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com>

On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 12:43, Jason Merrill wrote:

> >> 2- Create a new temporary branch, fix everything there and merge
> >>    the changes into tree-ssa.
> >
> > Yet another branch, for what? There's no reason to do any work on
> > the tree-ssa branch during this fixing period, it would only make
> > the merge more complicated.
> >
Agreed.

> > It has already been decided to abandon SIMPLE. Better do it soon
> > then, so development can go on with the new IL.
> 
Abandon SIMPLE?  We are not abandoning SIMPLE, we are merely changing
some of the nodes of the underlying IR.  The SIMPLE grammar is still,
largely, the same.


> > BTW does Jason's IL have a name?
> 
> The name GIMPLE has been bandied about.  :)
> 
I kind of like it.


Diego.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tree-ssa] Merging with bnw-simple
  - From: Daniel Berlin

References:
- [tree-ssa] Merging with bnw-simple
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [tree-ssa] Merging with bnw-simple
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: [tree-ssa] Merging with bnw-simple
  - From: Jason Merrill

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]