This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: HPUX C++ ABI


>>>>> Fergus Henderson writes:

Fergus> The extent to which such ABI-related patches would be accepted is directly
Fergus> proportional to the size and complexity of those patches.
Fergus> Small, simple patches are OK.  Big or complex patches are not.

	Says who?

Fergus> It would provide a
Fergus> useful feature in FSF GCC (compatibility with HPUX C++), it would save HP
Fergus> a lot of work, it would save GCC developers and users on HP a lot of work,
Fergus> and the cost would be low.

	Why is this a useful feature in FSF GCC?  Why is promoting one
proprietary compiler over others appropriate for GCC?

	This is exactly my point: if GCC is going to help users on HP in
this way, it needs to be willing to help users on all platforms.  I am not
fundamentally opposed to the patch, but if this patch is accepted then it
is inappropriate to design criteria which makes this patch okay and
rejects other patches.

David


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]