This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC 3.2 Prerelease

From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
To: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot com>
Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>,"B. Kosnik" <bkoz at nabi dot net>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 11:56:20 -0700
Subject: Re: GCC 3.2 Prerelease
References: <34330000.1028658001@warlock.codesourcery.com> <200208061842.LAA06224@atrus.synopsys.com>

On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 11:42:51AM -0700, Joe Buck wrote:
> 
> > > 1. gcc 3.3 using libstdc++ from gcc 3.2. Additional failures:
> > >
> > > +FAIL: backward/strstream_members.cc execution test
> > > +FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c,  -O1
> > > +FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
> > 
> > Here, you are claiming that changing the C++ library broke the C
> > compiler.  Are you sure about that?
> 
> Which test suite is being used, and which results are being diff'd
> against?  If he's comparing against 3.2 results, he may be detecting
> a regression in 3.3 vs 3.2 for the C compiler.

I tested gcc 3.3 in gcc 3.3 test suite and 3.2 in 3.2 test suite.


H.J.

References:
- Re: GCC 3.2 Prerelease
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: GCC 3.2 Prerelease
  - From: Joe Buck

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]