This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: libgcc_s, Linux, and PT_GNU_EH_FRAME, and binutils

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, "Martin v. Loewis" <martin at v dot loewis dot de>, Richard Henderson <rth at twiddle dot net>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2002 08:45:12 -0700
Subject: Re: libgcc_s, Linux, and PT_GNU_EH_FRAME, and binutils

--On Tuesday, August 06, 2002 07:00:42 AM +0200 Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> wrote:

Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:

The whole point of 3.2 is for all the distributors to have a chance to
get to a common ABI.  I'd assume they will be able to get together and
agree on the right set of configure options.  I have no objection to
automating that more -- in fact I'd like it if we did -- but I don't
see this as a showstopper.  (At least not yet.)

Can we put up some webpage that defines this common ABI and what
versions of tools (binutils,glibc) and what configure flags need to
get used?  That way it is documented and we can point people to it,

It's a good idea.  I'll bet that Gerald will be happy to let you create
the web page...

--
Mark Mitchell                mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC            http://www.codesourcery.com

References:
- Re: libgcc_s, Linux, and PT_GNU_EH_FRAME, and binutils
  - From: Andreas Jaeger

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]