This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Fwd: GCC2C compiler/converter]
- From: Alexey Starovoytov <starlex at eng dot sun dot com>
- To: Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>
- Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>, <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 15:27:04 -0700 (PDT)
- Subject: Re: [Fwd: GCC2C compiler/converter]
- Reply-to: Alexey Starovoytov <stork at sun dot com>
On 17 Jul 2002, Geoff Keating wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> writes:
>
> > I assume it's the same one Alexey posted to this list in April,
> > roughly. It was shot down by the usual response to generating C code -
> > because people did not want the FSF to appear to endorse the technique
> > that Sun is using here, compiling code with GCC and again with Forte.
> >
> > I personally think that argument holds no water now that someone is
> > (quite legally) distributing the patched version.
>
> I don't see why we would want to endorse the technique just because
> someone is doing it. If anything, we would want to condemn it even
> more strongly, in the hope that they stop doing it.
Although GCC2C is not an official part of GCC, it's free and can be
distributed under GPL. It may never be included in GCC, but, I believe,
many users will find it very useful counting on performance it delivers.
Don't need to argue that peak Sun Forte performance is way better than GCC
on UltraSPARCs.
Best regards,
Alexey.
PS
I didn't mean to post anything here, knowing your 'condemning' position.